Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Saponin-Based, Biological-Active Surfactants from Plants

Written By

Dorota Kregiel, Joanna Berlowska, Izabela Witonska, Hubert Antolak, Charalampos Proestos, Mirko Babic, Ljiljana Babic and Bolin Zhang

Submitted: 14 October 2016 Reviewed: 22 February 2017 Published: 05 July 2017

DOI: 10.5772/68062

From the Edited Volume

Application and Characterization of Surfactants

Edited by Reza Najjar

Chapter metrics overview

8,004 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Plants have the ability to synthesize almost unlimited number of substances. In many cases, these chemicals serve in plant defense mechanisms against microorganisms, insects, and herbivores. Generally, any part of the plant may contain the various active ingredients. Among the plant, active compounds are saponins, which are traditionally used as natural detergents. The name ‘saponin’ comes from the Latin word ‘sapo,’ which means ‘soap’ as saponins show the unique properties of foaming and emulsifying agents. Steroidal and triterpenoid saponins can be used in many industrial applications, from the preparation of steroid hormones in the pharmaceutical industry to utilization as food additives that exploit their non‐ionic surfactant properties. Saponins also exhibit different biological activities. This chapter has been prepared by participants of the Marie Sklodowska‐Curie Action—Research and Innovation Staff Exchange (RISE) in the framework of the proposal ‘ECOSAPONIN.’ Interactions between the participants, including chemists, physicists, technologists, microbiologists and botanists from four countries, will contribute to the development of collaborative ties and further promote research and development in the area of saponins in Europe and China. Although this chapter cannot provide a comprehensive account of the state of knowledge regarding plant saponins, we hope that it will help make saponins the focus of ongoing international cooperation.

Keywords

  • plants
  • saponins
  • surfactants
  • emulsifiers
  • biological activity

1. Introduction

An increasing trend in the food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic industry is the utilization of natural plant extracts or plant‐derived compounds, as an alternative to the application of chemical or synthetic antimicrobials to combat spoilage microflora and pathogens [1, 2]. Furthermore, the nontoxic nature of chemicals in plants, positive healthy properties, consumer perception and acceptance of their use has been well demonstrated [3, 4].

There are estimated 250,000–500,000 species of plants on Earth. A relatively small percentage (1–10%) of these is consumed as food by both humans and animal species. It is possible that a greater number are used for medicinal purposes. People on all continents have long applied poultices and imbibed infusions of hundreds, if not thousands, of indigenous plants. Currently, antimicrobial plant extracts are of especial interest to chemists and microbiologists due to growing public awareness of the negative effects of the over‐use of antibiotics and disinfectants [5].

Plants have the ability to synthesize an almost limitless array of substances. In many cases, these chemicals serve as plant‐defense mechanisms against predation by microorganisms, insects, and herbivores. Some, such as terpenoids, give plants their flavors; others—quinones and tannins are responsible for plant pigmentation. Any part of the plant may contain active components. For instance, roots of ginseng plants contain active saponins and essential oils, while eucalyptus leaves are harvested for their essential oils and tannins. Some trees contain useful substances in their bark, leaves, and shoots [6]. Some of the same herbs and spices used by humans to season food can yield useful medicinal compounds. Among different compounds derived from plants, saponins deserve a special mention. These chemicals may be considered as a part of plants’ defense systems. They have been included in a large group of protective molecules found in plants named ‘phytoanticipins’ or ‘phytoprotectants’ [7].

The physiochemical and biological properties of saponins have led to a number of traditional and industrial applications. They have traditionally been used as natural detergents. The combination of a hydrophobic aglycone backbone and hydrophilic sugar molecules confers foaming and emulsifying properties of saponins [8]. The name ‘saponin’ is derived from the Latin word ‘sapo,’ meaning soap, as a soapy lather forms when plants containing saponins are agitated in water. They also exhibit a variety of biological activities. Plant‐derived triterpenoid and steroidal saponins have been used in the production of steroid hormones in the pharmaceutical industry, as food additives, fire extinguishers and in other industrial applications. Other interesting biological applications include their use in anti‐inflammatory, hypocholesterolemic and immune‐stimulating remedies [9, 10].

Advertisement

2. Molecular characteristics

Saponins are a class of substances with a rigid skeleton of at least four hydrocarbon rings to which sugars in groups of one or two are attached (usually not more than 10 units). Traditionally, they are subdivided into triterpenoid and steroid glycosides. Steroidal saponins are mainly compounds containing 27 carbon atoms forming the core structures: spirostan (16β,22:22α,26‐diepoxy‐cholestan) and furostan (16β,22‐epoxycholestan) [1113] (Figures 1 and 2).

Figure 1.

Structures of (A) triterpenoid and (B) steroidal saponins [8].

Figure 2.

Structures of (A) spirostanol and (B) furostanol saponins [14].

There are 11 main classes of saponins: dammaranes, tirucallanes, lupanes, hopanes, oleananes, taraxasteranes, ursanes, cycloartanes, lanostanes, cucurbitanes, and steroids. The oleanane skeleton is the most common, present in most orders of the Plant Kingdom [15, 16].

Saponins with the carbohydrate or oligosaccharide groups attached at the C‐3 position are monodesmosidic, while saponins with carbohydrates attached at both the C‐3 and C‐26 or C‐28 positions are bidesmosidic. The variety of a glycones, carbohydrates, and different attachment positions result in numerous types of saponins. The carbohydrate chains of saponins usually include: D‐glucose, D‐galactose, L‐rhamnose, L‐arabinose, D‐xylose, D‐apiose, D‐fucose, and D‐glucuronic acid. The steroidal saponins usually show furostanol or spirostanol form. Additionally, both steroidal and triterpene saponins may contain other functional groups: –OH, –COOH, –CH3 that give them additional diversity [17].

The chemical structure of saponins may be transformed during storage or processing. The linkages between the sugar chain and the aglycones as well as between the sugar residues can undergo hydrolysis during acid or base treatment, hydrothermolysis or enzymatic/microbial transformations, resulting in the formation of aglycones, prosapogenins (partially hydrolyzed saponins), and sugar residues [17]. Therefore, the selection of methods appropriate to storage of plant material is a key part of each efficient technology [1820].

Advertisement

3. Plant sources

The presence of saponins has been reported in more than 100 families of plants and in a few marine sources such as star fish and sea cucumber. Triterpene saponins are present in many taxonomic plant groups. In particular, they can be found in parts of dicotyledonous plants (Dicotyledones) such as the seeds of Hippocastani, roots and flowers of Primulae, leaves of Hedrae, roots of Ginseng, bark of Quillaja, roots of Glycyrrbizae, roots of Senegae, leaves of Polygalae Amarae, roots of Saponariae, seeds of Glycine max and leaves of Herniariae. Legumes such as soybeans, beans and peas are rich sources of triterpenoid saponins. Steroidal saponins are typically found in members of the Agavaceae, Alliaceae, Asparagaceae, Dioscoreaceae, Liliaceae, Amaryllidaceae, Bromeliaceae, Palmae and Scrophulariaceae families and accumulate in abundance in crop plants such as yams, alliums, asparagus, fenugreek, yucca and ginseng. Diosgenin, the steroidal aglycone obtained by hydrolysis of dioscin, a saponin abundant in the tubers of Dioscorea villosa (wild yam), is the precursor for commercial synthesis of steroids such as cortisone, progesterone and pregnenolone. Steroidal glycoalkaloids are commonly found in members of the Solanaceae family including tomato, potato, aubergines and capsicum [8]. Cereals and grasses are generally deficient in saponins, with some notable exceptions, such as the Avena species (oats) which accumulates both triterpenoid and steroidal saponins. The phylogenetic tree with plant subclasses from which saponins have been isolated and characterized is presented in Figure 3.

Figure 3.

The phylogenetic tree with plant subclasses [16].

Some studies have suggested that variations in saponin distribution and composition in plants may be a reflection of varying needs for plant protection. In some plants, for example, Phytolacca dodecandra (gopo berry) and Dioscorea pseudojaponica (yam), maximal saponin accumulation has been noted during fruit and tuber development and has been suggested to protect reproductive organs. However, it was documented that in several plant species, the production of saponins is induced in response to biotic (herbivory and pathogen attack) and abiotic (humidity, nutrient starvation, light, temperature) stresses [8].

The main sources of saponins in human diet are legumes, mainly broad beans, kidney beans and lentils. Saponins are also present in Allium species (onion, garlic), asparagus, oats, spinach, sugarbeet, tea and yam. Nevertheless, the main plant sources of saponins used in medicine and industrial applications are soap bark tree (Quillaja saponaria), Mojave yucca (Yucca schidigera), licorice (Glycyrrhiza species), ginseng (Panax species), fenugreek (Trigonellafoenum‐graceum), alfalfa (Medicago sativa), horse chestnut (Aesculus hippocastanum), soapwort (Saponaria officinaux), gypsophila genus (Gypsophila paniculata) and sarsaparilla (Smilax species).

Some of the better‐known botanicals rich in saponins are presented in Table 1.

Plant Saponin content [%]
Latin name Common name
Aesculis hipocastanum Horse‐chestnut 3
Avena sativa Oat 0.1–0.13
Beta vulgaris Sugar beet (leaves) 5.8
Chenopodium quinoa Quinoa 0.14–2.3
Cicer arietinum Chickpea 0.23
Crocus savitus Saffron crocus 1.2–3.4
Glycine max Soybean 0.22–0.49
Glycyrrhiza glabbra Licorice (root) 22.2–32.3
Hedera helix Ivy 5
Medicago sativa Alfalfa 0.14–1.71
Panax ginseng Chinese ginseng 2–3
Panax quinquefolius American ginseng 1.42–5.58
Pisum sativum Green pea 0.18–4.2
Polygala spp. Milkwort 8–10
Primula spp. Primula 5–10
Quillaja saponaria Quillaja bark 9–10
Saponaria officinalis Soapwort 2–5
Smilax officinalis Sarsaparilla 1.8–2.4
Trigonellafoenum‐graecum Fenugreek 4–6
Yucca schidigera Yucca 10

Table 1.

The better‐known plants—sources of saponins [21, 22].

In Northern Europe, the main sources of saponins are: Saponaria officinalis, Calendula officinalis, Salvia, Digitalis, Verbascum, Solanum species, sugar beet, oats, etc.

Calendula officinalis (Asteraceae) is well‐known medicinal plant in Poland. It is also popular in gardens as a decorative annual species. Traditionally, it has been used topically for many eruptive skin diseases and abrasions, as well as for gastric and menstrual discomfort, as a plant with antiseptic, mild diaphoretic and antispasmodic properties. Calendula contains significant amounts of oleananesaponins, which form two distinct series of related compounds, called ‘glucosides’ and ‘glucuronides’ according to the structure of the respective precursor. Extracts from marigold flowers are still used in ointments, cosmetic creams and hair‐shampoos [15].

In sugar beet leaves, saponins have been reported at level of 5%, and in roots 0.1–0.3%. However, during raw beet processing, these saponins are mostly concentrated in the waste products. For example, the concentration of saponins in sugar beet pulp water reaches 1.2% [23]. Similar concentrations of saponins have been detected in the filtration residues and molasses. In Polish research laboratories, several triterpene‐based saponin structures have been isolated and characterized [24]. Given the scale of worldwide sugar production from sugar beet, this plant can be considered as an industrial source of saponins [25]. Sugar beet as a high economic value crop will have a prosperous perspective of application in the food, bioenergy, and pharmacy industries [26].

In Southern Europe, the region around the Mediterranean Sea is rich in grapes. Saponin glycosides in red wine are known as heart protective, due to their LDL cholesterol‐lowering and HDL cholesterol‐increasing effects. The saponins in red wine also help prevent clumping of red blood cells. Many of plant species rich in saponins are used traditionally in Greece for making herbal teas, as flavorings and seasonings and have been tested for various pharmacological activities [27]. Mediterranean thyme (Thymus capitatus) is a common plant in the Mediterranean region, growing in arid rocky places and flowering between May and August. It is commonly used as a medicinal and culinary herb, owing to its strong and agreeable odor, mainly attributed to its essential oil. Other constituents include saponins and organic acids. Thyme has several medicinal uses including antiseptic, expectorant, antispasmodic and anthelminthic properties. Greek agave plants contain saponins and fructans. Many other representative species of the Mediterranean flora including Melissa officinalis (balm), Origanum vulgare (wild marjoram), Origanum dictamnus (dittany of Crete or hop marjoram), Hyssopus officinalis (hyssop), Dioscorea villosa (wild yam), Viola tricolor (wild violet, wild pansy, heartsease, Johnny jump‐ups), Salvia officinalis (sage), S. officinalis (common soapwort), Tribulus terrestris (tribulus) contain saponins with antioxidant and anti‐inflammatory properties and can boost the human immune system [28, 29]. The genus Ruscus (Asparagaceae family) is native to the Mediterranean, Southern and Western Europe. The underground parts of Ruscus plants are a source of steroidal saponins. Ruscus extracts were extensively used, especially in Germany and France, for the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency, varicose veins, hemorrhoids, and orthostatic hypotension [30].

China is rich in various plant sources of saponins, which are often unknown in Europe. Mussaenda pubescens (Rubiaceae), Bupleurum chinense, Clinopodium chinense var. parviflorum and Clematis chinensis Osbeck (Ranunculaceae) and Yucca elephantipes are Chinese folk medicine plants used as diuretics, antiphlogistics, diaphoretics and antipyretic agents and have also been used to detoxify mushroom poisons and terminate early pregnancy. Yucca (Agavaceae) plants are native to China. The leaf extract of Y. elephantipes with saponins has been reported to have antiviral activity against tobacco mosaic virus and to exhibit antifungal activity against the pathogenic yeasts Candida albicans and Cryptococcus neoformans [31].

The interesting plant in China is Caragana, also known as peashrub, a member of Fabaceae. More than 80 Caragana species were recorded, and several of them have a long history of use in traditional Chinese medicine, for example, in the treatment of cervical and breast cancer. Seeds of this legume represented an interesting source of triterpenoid saponins of the soyasaponin B type [32].

The Glycyrrhiza genus (Leguminosaefamily) consists of about 30 species and is widely distributed all over the world. In China, three species G. uralensis, G. glabra and G. inflata are officially used as licorice and recorded in Chinese Pharmacopoeia. Biological studies showed that licorice has a variety of biological effects, such as antioxidant, antiviral, anti‐cancer, antidepressant, anti‐inflammatory, anti‐carcinogenesis, hepatoprotective and neuroprotective bioactivities [33, 34].

The important source of natural medicines is Panax genus. Three valuable Panax species P. ginseng, P. quinquefolius, and P. notoginseng are of great interest to medicine and food industry, and they are widely used in healthcare products, foods and food additives. To the end of 2012, at least 289 saponins were reported from eleven different Panax species [35]. Most of them are glycosides of triterpenoid aglycones [36]. Ginseng has been used as a herbal medicine in China for thousands of years due to its wide pharmacological properties, such as anticancer, antidiabetic, antifatigue, anti‐ageing, hepatoprotective and neuroprotective [37]. It was also documented that P. notoginseng saponins suppress radiation‐induced osteoporosis by regulating bone formation and resorption [38].

Calamus leptospadix grows as a non‐climbing palm in the Sub‐Himalayan region. Extract of C. leptospadix was characterized by Borah and co‐workers, and they documented presence of a triterpenoid saponin with antimicrobial properties against both Escherichia coli and Candida albicans [39].

Stauntonia brachyanthera is an evergreen shrub belonging to the family of Lardizabalaceae, mainly distributed in the southwest of China. This plant is traditionally used to treat various diseases. Its fruit, zhuyaozi, is very popular in the southwest of China because of its fresh taste and abundant nutrients. The chemical study on this fruit resulted in the isolation of triterpenoid saponins. This research provided useful clues for the fruit of S. brachyanthera as a new resource of food for hepatoprotection [40].

Camellia oleifera, originated in China, is an important source of edible oil obtained from its seeds. This plant has been used as a natural detergent, and its extract rich in saponins is commercially utilized as a foam‐stabilizing and emulsifying agent. The percentage of crude saponins extract that was obtained from the defatted seed meal of C. oleifera was 8.34% [41].

Plant saponins show region‐specific character. It was found that variety of soybean from China is richer in saponins than those from Japan, Canada or United States [42]. Tribulus terrestris samples collected in Bulgaria, Greece, Serbia, Macedonia, Turkey, Georgia, Iran, Vietnam and India were analyzed by LC‐ESI/MS/MS, and the results revealed distinct differences in the saponin profiles depending on region of sample collection, plant part studied and stage of plant development. The samples from Bulgaria, Turkey, Greece, Serbia, Macedonia, Georgia and Iran exhibited similar features but the Vietnamese and Indian samples exhibit totally different chemical profile. The obtained results suggested the existence of one chemotype common to the East South European and West Asian regions [43]. Studies conducted by Montero and co‐workers showed that several licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra) samples collected at different locations were characterized by specific metabolite profiles. Therefore, it was concluded that obtained 2D‐chromatograms from the different licorice samples can be used as typical patterns that could potentially be related to geographical location and authentication of plant source [44].

To obtain saponins from plant material different extraction methods may be used, using solvents as water, methanol, ethanol or hydroalcoholic mixtures in Soxhlet extractors or in orbital shakers. In addition, other solvents such as glycerol and aqueous or alcoholic surfactants solutions were also reported. Novel procedures use lower amounts of solvent but additional physical/chemical treatment: multi‐stage extraction, pressure, microwaves, ultrasounds or supercritical fluid extraction. These methods can led to an increase in the process efficiency. However, it should be considered that under harsher conditions (higher temperature and pressure), saponins can be hydrolyzed and degraded, so rather mild processes should be used [4549].

Advertisement

4. Natural surfactants and emulsifiers

Saponins, due to the presence of a lipid‐soluble aglycone and water‐soluble sugar chain, show amphiphilic nature. In this way, foam formation (with liquid‐gaseous phases), an emulgator effect (with liquid‐liquid phases) and dispersion abilities (with liquid‐solid phases) are achieved. Saponins with one sugar chain have the best foaming characteristics. The compounds with two or three sugar chains show decreasing of foaming ability. Some saponins without foaming character have also been observed [17].

In aqueous solution, saponin molecules align themselves vertically on the surface with their hydrophobic ends oriented away from the water. This has the effect of reducing the surface tension of the water, causing it to foam. In aqueous solutions, surfactants form micelles above a critical concentration called critical micelle concentration (CMC). Below this concentration, molecules remain unassociated. Micelles have a lipophilic center, and this creation of a fat‐loving compartment explains why detergents can dissolve grease and oils (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Micelle formation [50].

The size and structure of micelles are dependent on the type of saponin. For example, saponins from S. officinalis and soya bean form small micelles consisting of only two molecules, while the aggregates of Quillaya saponaria saponin consist of 50 molecules. It was documented that the properties and the aggregation number (number of monomers) of micelles forming by Quillaya saponins are affected by temperature, salt concentration, and pH level. For saponins from Q. saponaria, CMC is equal from 0.5 to 0.8 g/l at temperature 25°C and decreases with increasing salt dose [17]. The micelle shapes depend on the saponin molecule. For example, micelles formed by Saponaria and Quillaya saponins are elongated or even filamentous, while those formed by saponins of G. max are rather circular. Probably, the reason for these differences is the chemical structure of aglycone.

The presence of carboxylic acid in the saponin molecule may strongly influence the surface activity. Additionally, the location of this acid in the molecule is particularly important. For example, G. max saponin contains ‐COOH group in its hydrophilic part. The carboxylic group dissociates in aqua phase and forms free carboxyl anion, responsible for increasing the solubility of saponin in water environment. In contrast, saponins of Sapindus mukorossi (Chinese washnut) also contain the carboxylic groups but they attach to the hydrophobic aglycone. In consequence of this mechanism, the dissociation level of –COOH groups is very low. Saponins can also form mixed ‘sandwich‐like’ or ‘pile of coins‐like’ micelles with bile acids. These are much larger than the micelles of saponins alone, and they differ depending on the structure of the aglycone. In the presence of bile acids, saponins from S. officinalis and Q. saponaria form filamentous structures, while G. max saponins have an open structure. The ability of saponins to form large stable micelles with bile acids gives important implications for dietary mechanisms. Saponins in food and feed increase fecal excretion of bile acids. Additionally, the incorporation of cholesterol into saponin micelles increases their size, CMC, viscosity, and the aggregation level resulting in the solubility enhancement of cholesterol. The micelles formed are too large for the digestive tract to absorb. This mechanism leads to decreasing of the plasma cholesterol concentration. SaponinQ. saponaria was found to solubilize cholesterol significantly better than linear hydrocarbon chain surfactants [51].

Interactions between saponin and membrane‐bound cholesterol lead pore formation and increasing of membrane permeabilizing properties. This specific effect of saponins depends on the combination of various factors: the membrane composition, the type of saponin, and—especially—the nature of aglycone [52].

Saponins also affect the permeability of intestinal cells by forming complexes with sterols in mucosal cell membranes. This leads to increase in intestinal mucosal cells permeability. Thus, this facilitates the uptake of substances to which the gut would normally be impermeable, for example, milk alergen α‐lactoglobulin [17].

Quillaja saponins also had a solubilizing effect on some toxic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, which increases linearly with saponin concentration at values higher than CMC. A similar linear correlation has been observed between the concentration of the saponins from Sapindus mukorossi and aqueous solubility of hexachlorobenzene and naphthalene [21]. Saponins also enhance solubility of Yellow OB, and progesterone [8] Purified saponins and saponin mixtures resulted in both enhancements and reductions in water solubility of quercetin, digitoxin, rutin and aesculin [53].

Emulsifiers play two key roles in the creation of successful emulsion‐based products. They: (i) facilitate the initial formation of fine lipid droplets during homogenization and (ii) enhance the stability of the lipid droplets once they have been formed. Oil‐in‐water emulsions may be formed using either high‐ or low‐energy approaches. High‐energy approaches utilize mechanical devices (homogenizers): high shear mixers, colloid mills, high‐pressure valve homogenizers, microfluidizers, and sonicators. Low‐energy homogenization relies on the spontaneous formation of emulsions when the composition or environment of certain emulsifier‐oil‐water mixtures is changed in a particular way. Quillaja saponin is a natural effective emulsifier to form and stabilize oil/water emulsions with very small oil beads (d < 200 nm). They are stable in wide range of environmental parameters (pH, ionic strength, temperature). This fact makes saponins of Q. saponaria suitable for wide application in food products [54].

Quillaja saponins currently find commercial scale in food industry as emulsifiers with milk and egg proteins, for example, β‐lactoglobulin, β‐casein or egg lysozyme by electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions as well as by specific sugar binding sites [55].

Advertisement

5. Biological activity

Due to their amphiphilic nature, saponins show a wide range of biological activities. Various crude isolates, extracts, and saponin containing plants were utilized in the investigation of biological activity in the earlier studies; however, progress in the isolation/purification and characterization techniques has enabled the investigation of the bioactivity of well characterized [56, 57]. Saponins have been shown to swell and rupture erythrocytes causing a release of hemoglobin. The effect of saponin on erythrocyte death or hemolysis may limit the therapeutic use of the substances. On the other hand, saponins have been proposed for the treatment of a variety of diseases, including diabetes, obesity and osteoporosis [58]. Pharmacological effects of saponins include stimulation of immune responses. Their efficacy against cancer has been attributed to their ability to inhibit cell proliferation, to counteract angiogenesis and to stimulate apoptosis [5961].

The toxicity of saponins to insects (insecticidal activity), parasite worms (anthelmintic activity), molluscs (molluscicidal), and fish (piscidal activity), and their antifungal, antiviral, and antibacterial activity is well documented. Toxicity of saponins to warm blooded animals is dependent on the source, composition, and concentration of these compounds. The results of in vivo studies with rats, mice, and rabbits implied that saponins are not absorbed in the alimentary channel but hydrolyzed enzymatically to sapogenins [21].

The action of saponins, by enhancing the immune response to antigens, has been documented since 1940s. Quillaja saponins are exclusively used in the production of saponin adjuvants, and this immune function was also reported for soya, quinoa, gypsophila and Saponaria saponins [62]. Due to the structural complexity and toxicity of plant saponins, their use in human vaccines is limited, but the progress in new processing and purification techniques with maintaining of immunological adjuvant activity is important to create saponins as new generation vaccines [63].

Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain the hypocholesterolaemic activity of saponins. Possible mechanisms may involve the capacity of saponins to: (i) form insoluble complexes with cholesterol, (ii) affect micelle formation, (iii) interfere with bile acid metabolism, (iv) inhibit lipase activity, or (v) regulate cholesterol homeostasis via monitoring the expression of the key regulatory genes of proteins or enzymes related to cholesterol metabolism [58, 64]. Cholesterol‐lowering activity of saponins has been demonstrated in both animal and human trials. Animal diet containing purified saponins or concentrated saponin extracts containing, for example, digitonin (saponin from Digitalis purpurea), saikosaponin (saponins from Bupleurumfalcatum and related plants) and saponins from Saponaria, soya, chick pea, Yucca, alfalfa, fenugreek, Quillaja, Gypsohila, and garlic resulted in reductions of cholesterol concentrations [21].

Anticancer activity has been reported for soya saponins, ginsenosides, saikosaponin, diosgenin and glycyrrhizic acid. In particular, the potential of soybean saponins as anticarcinogens has been studied in recent years. Anticancer activities of saponin containing plants such as ginseng and licorice were also investigated [65].

The study of the relationship between chemical structure of aglycones and colon anticancer activity of soybean saponins revealed that the soya sapogenols were more bioactive than the glycosidic saponins. Other aglycones with anticancer activity include dammaranesapogenins from ginseng, betulinic acid, and oleanolic acid. These two last compounds were also reported to possess anti‐viral, anti‐inflammatory, hepatoprotective, anti‐ulcer, antibacterial, hypoglycaemic, anti‐fertility, and anticariogenic activities. However, the conversion of saponins to their aglycones may also result in the loss of activity. For example, the hydrolysis of saponins by ruminal bacteria results in the loss of antiprotozoal activity. Similarly, the deacylation of Quillaja saponins decreases their adjuvant activity [66].

Advertisement

6. Antimicrobial activity

The antimicrobial effects of saponins extracted from plants have been studied in Solanum, oats, seeds of Capsicum annuum, alfalfa, garlic, Yucca, Quillaja, etc. The saponin extracts were tested against numerous Gram‐positive and Gram‐negative bacteria, yeasts and molds. However, the results were varied due to the high diversity of plant saponins [67]. For example, saponins from Yucca exhibit antimicrobial activity against Gram‐positive cells but do not act on Gram negative bacteria. However, S. officinalis extracts showed antibacterial action against Gram negative, avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) strains [68, 69]. In general, the antibacterial activity of saponins is often weak, whereas significant antifungal activity has been observed. The primary mode of action of saponins toward fungi involves pore formation and loss of membrane integrity. The mechanism of action is an analogous to hemolytic activity of saponins. It was proposed a model of action for avenacin—triterpene saponin of oats. The first step involves the insertion of the aglycone fragments into the membrane and then their binding to sterols [70]. The following stage conducts to the interaction of sugar residues and formation of sterol‐saponin complexes. This phenomenon leads to the rearrangement of membrane lipids, formation of pores and‐finally—lysis of cells [71, 72]. Yeast studies on Quillaja saponins conducted in Poland found that saponin treatment lead to increased cell membrane permeability in different yeast strains, and therefore, it was concluded that Quillaja saponins facilitate the process of obtaining yeast salt‐free lysates [73]. It is interesting that Yucca and Quillaja saponins increased growth of bacterial Escherichia coli cells up to a certain concentration, and thereafter decreased growth [74]. Arabski and co‐workers demonstrated that saponin Q. saponaria at dose of 12 μg/mL enhanced the six E. coli strains growth [75]. Naturally, cholesterol‐free Gram‐negative bacteria cell‐wall outer membranes are around 90% covered with lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Therefore, it was concluded that saponin may interact with the lipid A part of LPS and thereby increase the permeability of the bacterial cell wall. Sublethally injured or weakened cells may become more susceptible to the action of conventional disinfectants, even at reduced concentrations. It was suggested that lipid A‐saponin complexes could promote antibiotic (colistin, ampicillin) or disinfectant action toward inherently resistant microbial cells [75]. The similar results were obtained by Alberice and co‐workers [76]. They documented that application of saponin extract in the food industry would be economically viable and sustainable. The results indicated that saponin alone can be used by the industry as a bactericide to reduce the risk of juice spoilage by Gram‐positive cells Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris.

Advertisement

7. Commercial applications

Y. schidigera and Q. saponaria are the two major commercial sources of saponins added to cosmetics as well as food products as emulsifiers and long‐lasting foaming agents [17].

Y. schidigera is a native plant from southwestern United States and Mexico. Native Americans used it to make soap. The trunk of the plant is mechanically shredded, and yucca juice is produced by mechanical squeezing in a press. The obtained juice is concentrated by evaporation. Y. schidigerasyrup (concentrated juice; Yucca extract), and dried and finely powdered logs (Yucca powder) are of particular interest to cosmetic, pharmaceutical and beverage industries as well as animal nutrition [77]. These products possess foaming features that are of particular interest in cosmetic, soft drinks (root beer), food and feed industries [78].

In the United States, Yucca is listed in The Code of Federal Regulation [79]. In Japan, Yucca extract (extract of whole plant of Yucca arborescens or Y. schidigera) is listed in the List of Existing Food Additives [80]. Because steroidal saponins in Yucca exhibit antifungal activities, Yucca extract has been added to food as a ‘shelf life extender’ in the Japanese market. Yucca powder water extracts can be successfully used in confectionery/food industries for improving both product quality and shelf stability. Sucharzewska and co‐workers documented that Yucca extract contains two groups of beneficial substances. One group is formed by steroidal saponins, which may improve product quality (porosity, density, and hardness), and the second one is created by antioxidants that are able to reduce fat oxidation and extend food quality during shelf‐life time [81]. It is also worth to note that Yucca extracts may be used as natural, non‐toxic deodorizers. The studies conducted in Poland show that combined treatment with microbial preparations and Yucca extract can significantly reduce the concentration of odorants in poultry manure [82]. Natural saponin extracts, namely those that may be obtained by steam treating the pulp of Yucca with water, in combination with proteins exhibit a synergistic effect, eliminating odors from the breath and oral cavity of humans, as well as from other environments [83].

Tenon and co‐workers used HPLC/ELSD technique for Yucca steroidal saponin quantification. This method is effective for routine industrial analyses for saponin fingerprints and capable of distinguishing saponin profiles from taxonomically distant species [78].

The second saponin source of commercial value is Q. saponaria. The term ‘quillaia’ refers to the dried inner bark of the tree, which is a large evergreen with shiny, leathery leaves and a thick bark, native to China and several South American countries, principally Bolivia, Chile, and Peru [84, 85]. The bark of this tree was used as shampoo in for hundreds of years. Quillaja extracts contain over 100 triterpenoid saponins. The basic structure of them is the hydrophobic triterpenoid quillaic acid known as sapogenin, and the hydrophilic sugar moieties are attached at two positions: di‐ or trisaccharide at C3 and oligosaccharide at C28 [85]. Young plants usually exhibit less heterogeneous saponins profiles than those obtained from mature extracts [87].

A large amount of Quillaja saponin is mainly utilized as a surfactant. It is also used in beverages, food ingredients, shampoos, liquid detergents, toothpastes and extinguishers as an emulsifier and long‐lasting foaming agent. Additionally, a saponin mixture possessing immune‐adjuvant properties was given a pharmaceutical application, as a suspension stabilizer [88].

The beneficial effects of extracts from Yucca and Quillaja are well documented. The extracts from these plants may influence microbial fermentation. Inhibition of gut microbes, particularly Streptococcus bovis, Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens, Escherichia coli and rumen protozoa has been reported [74]. Extracts of Y. schidigera and Q. saponaria have been used as ‘food grade’ saponins. This term is widely used by manufacturers, and it is defined as any grade or preparation of saponin which is approved for use in food and beverages under the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

According to the Codex Alimentarius Commission, extracts from Q. saponaria may be used as a foaming agent in ‘water‐based flavored drinks’, including ‘sport’ or ‘electrolyte’ drinks and particulate drinks (GSFA category 14.1.4, 500 mg/kg maximum use level). In soft drinks, unpurified Quillaja extracts are used at dose up to 200 mg/kg. However, in syrups intended for dispensable frozen beverages (FCBs) or frozen lemonades, Quillaja extracts may be up to 500 mg/kg on dry solid basis [87].

Although Quillaja and Yucca saponins are not considered Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) by FDA, they have been assigned as GRAS by Flavor and Extract Manufacturers’ Association of the United States (FEMA) with FEMA number 2973 [21, 87].

Quillaja extracts are classified as type 1 and type 2 based on their saponin content, 20–26% and 75–90%. Quillaja extract, type 2, is used in Japan as an emulsifier for preparations containing lipophilic colors or flavors that are added to soft drinks, fermented vegetables, and dressing [87]. Other saponins used food additives include enzymatically modified soybean saponin, Pfaffia and Yucca extracts, and tea seed saponins [80].

In the European Union, Quillaja extract is classified as the foaming agent for use in water‐based, flavored non‐alcoholic drinks and labeled as E999 (200 mg/l calculated as anhydrous extract) [87].

The physiochemical properties of saponins can also be utilized in food processing applications, thus, while complex formation of saponins with cholesterol has been used for the removal of cholesterol from dairy products such as butter oil [8991]. It was documented that the natural food‐grade surfactant isolated from the bark of the Q. saponaria Q‐Naturale® may be able to replace synthetic surfactants in food and beverages [92]. The interaction of saponins with cell membranes has been considered for the selective precipitation of fat globule membranes from cheese whey. In this application, saponins are used to increase the hydrophobicity of the fat membrane to facilitate flocculation and precipitation of the formed complexes.

As a natural surfactant, Q saponaria saponins demonstrated good performance in manufacturing orange oil nanoemulsions. This fact may permit the manufacture of good quality orange oil‐based nanoemulsions in beverage and alcohol‐free mouthwash applications [93, 94]. Quillaja saponins show a high surface activity and functionality to solubilize a lutein ester extract for its incorporation in food matrices [86]. Additionally, it was documented that the mixtures containing Quillaja saponins and lecithins were rather unaffected upon heating from 25 to 75°C. Therefore, these results provide important insights into selecting surfactants to be used in specific food applications, for example, whether the food will be heat treated or not. This type of structure modulation through different environmental conditions and heating may also be useful for structure design in pharmaceutical applications [95].

Dried roots of licorice represent an important agricultural product. The name ‘glycyrrhiza’ originates from the Greek words ‘glykosrhiza,’ which mean ‘sweet root.’ Licorice is used as a sweetener and a flavor enhancer for foods in China and other countries. It is approved by Food and Drug Administration USA as a food additive, regarded with the ‘GRAS’ label and registered as CFR 184.1408 [33].

Saponins can be used to enhance both the effectiveness of cleaning/disinfection processes. They are considered natural detergents and are used as additives in washing powders, and additives for liquid/powder cleaning. The addition of a small amount of a saponin to an aqueous environment provides a product that is an effective water clarifier and solid surface cleanser. These compositions may be used to clean metals, metal‐plated surfaces, ceramics, wood, glass, etc. The use of natural plant products as detergents could provide cheaper, safer and more consumer‐acceptable alternatives to synthetic compounds.

Advertisement

8. Conclusion

Saponins are diverse compounds traditionally used as natural detergents. Their physicochemical and biological properties are wide exploited in food, cosmetics and pharmaceuticals. Information on the composition (qualitative and quantitative), properties of the saponins present in the raw material, and the effects of processing on their composition and properties are key elements of successful process design.

References

  1. 1. Killeen GF, Madigan CA, Connolly CR, Walsh GA, Clark C, Hynes MJ, Timmins BF, James P, Headon DR, Power RF. Antimicrobial saponins of Yucca schidigera and the implications of their in vitro properties for their in vitro impact. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 1998;46:3178-3186. doi:10.1021/jf970928j
  2. 2. Selim SA, Adam ME, Hassan SM,AlbalawiAR. Chemical composition, antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity of the essential oil and methanol extract of the Mediterranean cypress (CupressussempervirensL.). BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2014;14:179. doi:10.1186/1472‐6882‐14‐179
  3. 3. Proestos C, Rashed K, Roidaki A, Sinanoglou VJ. Antioxidant capacity and antimicrobial activity of selected aromatic Egyptian plants. Promising raw materials for “superfoods” and dietary supplements. Agro Food Industry HI‐TECH. 2016;27(4):35-38.
  4. 4. RoidakiA, Kollia E, Panagopoulou E, Chiou A, VarzakasT, MarkakiP, Proestos C. Super foods and super herbs: antioxidant and antifungal activity. Current Research in Nutrition and Food Science. 2016;4(SI.2):138-145. doi:10.12944/crnfsj.4.special‐issue‐october.19
  5. 5. Goud MJP, Komraiah A, Rao KN, Ragan A, Raju VS, Charya MAS. Antibacterial activity of some folklore medicinal plants from South India. African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines. 2008;5(4):421-426. doi:10.4314/ajtcam.v5i4.446
  6. 6. Cowan MM. Plant products as antimicrobial agents. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 1999;12(4):564-582.
  7. 7. Francis G, Kerem Z, Makkar HPS, Becker K. The biological action of saponins in animal systems: a review. British Journal of Nutrition. 2002;88:587-605. doi:10.1079/BJN2002725
  8. 8. Moses T, Papadopoulou KK, Osbourn A. Metabolic and functional diversity of saponins, biosynthetic intermediates and semi‐synthetic derivatives. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2014;49(6):439-462. doi:10.3109/10409238.2014.95362
  9. 9. Cheeke PR, Piacente S, Oleszek W. Anti‐inflammatory and anti‐arthritic effects of Yucca schidigera: a review. Journal of Inflammation. 2006;3:6 doi:10.1186/1476‐9255‐3‐6
  10. 10. Liu J, Li Y, Shi H, Wang T, Wu X, Sun X, Yu L. Components characterization of total tetraploid jiaogulan (Gynostemma pentaphyllum) saponin and its cholesterol‐lowering properties. Journal of Functional Foods. 2016;23:542-555. doi:10.1016/j.jff.2016.03.013
  11. 11. Sparg SG, Light ME, van Staden J. Biological activities and distribution of plant saponins. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2004;94:219-243. doi:10.1016/j.jep.2004.05.016
  12. 12. Thakur M, Melzig MF, Fuchs H, Weng A. Chemistry and pharmacology of saponins: Special focus on cytotoxic properties. Botanics Targets Therapy. 2011;1:19-29. doi:10.2147/BTAT.S17261
  13. 13. Saxena M, Saxena J, Nema R, Singh D, Gupta A. Phytochemistry of medicinal plants. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2013;1(6):168-182.
  14. 14. Challinor VL,De Voss JJ. Open‐chain steroidal glycosides, a diverse class of plant saponins. Natural Product Reports.2013;30(3):429-454. doi:10.1039/c3np20105h
  15. 15. Szakiel A, Ruszkowski D, Janiszowska W. Saponins in Calendula officinalis L.—structure, biosynthesis, transport and biological activity. Phytochemistry Reviews. 2005;4:151-158. doi:10.1007/s11101‐005‐4053‐9
  16. 16. Vincken JP,Heng L,de Groot A,Gruppen H. Saponins, classification and occurrence in the plant kingdom. Phytochemistry. 2007;68(3):275-297. doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.10.008
  17. 17. Oleszek W, Hamed A. Saponin‐based surfactants. In: Kjellin M, Johansson I editors. Surfactants from Renewable Sources Resources. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Chichester, UK; 2010. pp. 239-249. doi:10.1002/9780470686607.ch12
  18. 18. Mitrevski V, Lutovska M, Mijakovski V, Pavkov I, Babić M, Radojčin M. Adsorption isotherms of pear at several temperatures. Thermal Science. 2015;19(3):1119-1129. doi:10.2298/TSCI140519082M
  19. 19. Pavkov I, Babić L, Babić M, Radojčin M, Stamenković Z. Mathematical modelling of convective drying nectarine halves (Pyrus persica L.). Savremena Poljoprivredna Tehnika. 2013;39(2):103-112.
  20. 20. Hossain MB, Brunton NP, Rai DK. Effect of drying methods on the steroidal alkaloid content of potato peels, shoots and berries. Molecules. 2016;21(4):403. doi:10.3390/molecules21040403
  21. 21. Güçlü‐Ustündağ O, Mazza G. Saponins: properties, applications and processing. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2007;47(3):231-258. doi:10.1080/10408390600698197
  22. 22. Mir MA, Parihar K, Tabasum U, Kumari E. Estimation of alkaloid, saponin and flavonoid content in various extracts of Crocus sativa. Journal of Medicinal Plants Studies. 2016;4(5):171-174.
  23. 23. Brezhneva TA, Nikolaevskii VA, Selemenev VF, Slivkin AI, Muad AA, Khind T, Safonova EF. Isolation of saponins from sugar beet roots and preliminary characterization of their adaptogen properties. Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal. 2001;35(3):159-161. doi:10.1023/A:1010462013789
  24. 24. Mikołajczyk‐Bator K, Błaszczyk A, Czyżniejewski M, Kachlicki P. Identification of saponins from sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) by low and high‐resolution HPLC‐MS/MS. Journal of Chromatography B. 2016;1029-1030:36-47. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2016.06.038
  25. 25. Binczarski M, Witonska I, Berlowska J, Dziugan P, Piotrowski J. Sweetening juices by beet juice. Agro Przemysł. 2013;1:66-69 (In Polish)
  26. 26. Zhang Y, Nan J, Yu B. OMICS technologies and applications in sugar beet. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2016;7:900. doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.00900
  27. 27. Couladis M, Tzakou O, Verykokidou E, Harvala C. Screening of some Greek aromatic plants for antioxidant activity. Phytotherapy Research. 2003;17:194-195. doi:10.1002/ptr.1261
  28. 28. Kwak WJ, Han CK, Chang HW, Kim HP, Kang SS, Son KH. Loniceroside C, an antiinflammatory saponin from Lonicera japonica. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin (Tokyo). 2003;51(3):333-335. doi:10.1248/cpb.51.333
  29. 29. Skotti E, Anastasaki E, Kanellou G, Polissiou M, Tarantilis PA. Total phenolic content, antioxidant activity and toxicity of aqueous extracts from selected Greek medicinal and aromatic plants. Industrial Crops and Products. 2014;53:46-54. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.12.013
  30. 30. Masullo M, Pizza C, Piacente S. Ruscus genus: a rich source of bioactive steroidal saponins. Planta Medica. 2016;82:1513-1524. doi:10.1055/s‐0042‐119728
  31. 31. Zhang Y, Zhang YJ, Jacob MR, Li XC,Yang CR. Steroidal saponins from the stem of Yucca elephantipes. Phytochemistry.2008;69(1):264-270. doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2007.06.015
  32. 32. Taylor WG, Sutherland DH, Richards KW, Zhang H. Oleanane triterpenoid saponins of Caraganaarborescens and their quantitative determination. Industrial Crops and Products. 2015;77:74-80. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.08.034
  33. 33. Tao W, Duan J, Zhao R, Li X, Yan H, Li J, Guo S, Yang N, Tang Y. Comparison of three officinal Chinese pharmacopoeia species of Glycyrrhiza based on separation and quantification of triterpene saponins and chemometrics analysis. Food Chemistry. 2013;141(3):1681-1689. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.05.073
  34. 34. Quirós‐Sauceda AE, Ovando‐Martínez M, Velderrain‐Rodríguez GR, González‐Aguilar GA, Ayala‐Zavala JF. Licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra Linn.) oils. In: Preedy V. editor. Essential Oils in Food Preservation, Flavor and Safety. Elsevier Inc. Amsterdam, Netherlands; 2016. pp. 523-530. doi:10.1016/B978‐0‐12‐416641‐7.00060‐2
  35. 35. Yang W, Hu Y, Wu W, Ye M, Guo D. Saponins in the genus Panax L. (Araliaceae): a systematic review of their chemical diversity. Phytochemistry. 2014;106:7-24.doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2014.07.012
  36. 36. Shin B‐K, Kwon SW, Park JH. Chemical diversity of ginseng saponins from Panax ginseng. Journal of Ginseng Research. 2015;39(4):287-298. doi:10.1016/j.jgr.2014.12.005
  37. 37. Li K‐K, Gong X‐J. A review on the medicinal potential of Panax ginseng saponins in diabetes mellitus. RSC Advances. 2015;5:47353-47366. doi:10.1039/c5ra05864c
  38. 38. Wenxi D, Shufang D, Xiaoling Y, Liming Y. Panaxnoto ginseng saponins suppress radiation‐induced osteoporosis by regulating bone formation and resorption. Phytomedicine.2015:22(9):813-819. doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2015.05.056
  39. 39. Borah B,Phukon P, Hazarika MP, Ahmed R, Sarmah DK, Wann SB, Das A, Bhau BS. Calamus leptospadix Griff. a high saponin yielding plant with antimicrobial property. Industrial Crops and Products. 2016;82:127-132. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.11.075
  40. 40. Meng D‐L, Xu L‐H, Chen C, Yan D, Fang Z‐Z, Cao Y‐F. A new resource of hepatic protectant, nor‐oleanane triterpenoid saponins from the fruit of Stauntonia brachyanthera. Journal of Functional Foods. 2015;16:28-39. doi:10.1016/j.jff.2015.04.003
  41. 41. Chen Y‐F, Yang C‐S, Chang M‐S, Ciou Y‐P, Huang Y‐C. Foam properties and detergent abilities of the saponins from Camellia oleifera. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2010;11:4417-4425. doi:10.3390/ijms11114417
  42. 42. Yoshiki Y, Kudou S, Okubo K Relationship between chemical structures and biological activities of triterpenoid saponins from soybean. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry. 1998;62(12): 2291-2299. doi:10.1271/bbb.62.2291
  43. 43. Dinchev D, Janda B, Evstatieva L, Oleszek W, Aslani MR, Kostova I. Distribution of steroidal saponins in Tribulus terrestris from different geographical regions. Phytochemistry. 2008;69:176-186. doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2007.07.003
  44. 44. Montero L, Ibáñez E, Russo M, di Sanzo R, Rastrelli L, Piccinelli AL, Celano R, Cifuentes A, Herrero M. Metabolite profiling of licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra) from different locations using comprehensive two‐dimensional liquid chromatography coupled to diode array and tandem mass spectrometry detection. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2016;913:145-159. doi:10.1016/j.aca.2016.01.040
  45. 45. Doughari JH. Phytochemicals: extraction methods, basic structures and mode of action as potential chemotherapeutic agents. In: Rao V editor. Phytochemicals—A Global Perspective of Their Role in Nutrition and Health. InTech. Rijeka, Croatia; 2012. pp. 1-32. doi:10.5772/1387
  46. 46. Ribeiro BD, Alviano DS, Barreto DW, Coelho MA. Functional properties of saponins from sisal (Agave sisalana) and juá (Ziziphusjoazeiro): Critical micellar concentration, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2013;436:736-743. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.08.007
  47. 47. Bitencourt RG, Queiroga CL, Junior IM, Cabral FA. Fractionated extraction of saponins from Brazilian ginseng by sequential process using supercritical CO2, ethanol and water. Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2014;92:272-281. doi:10.1016/j.supflu.2014.06.009
  48. 48. Cheok CY, Salman HAK, Sulaiman R. Extraction and quantification of saponins: A review. Food Research International. 2014;59:16-40. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2014.01.057
  49. 49. Moghimipour E, Handali S. Saponin: Properties, methods of evaluation and applications. Annual Research & Review in Biology. 2015;5(3):207-220. doi:10.9734/ARRB/2015/11674
  50. 50. Zana R. Dynamics of Surfactant Self‐Assemblies: Micelles, Microemulsions, Vesicles and Lyotropic Phases. CRC Press. London, UK; 2005. 515 p. doi:10.1081/DIS‐200067928
  51. 51. Mitra S, Duncan SR. Cholesterol solubilization in aqueous micellar solutions of Quillaja saponin, bile salts, or nonionic surfactants. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2001;49(1):384-394. doi:10.1021/jf000568r
  52. 52. Bachran C, Bachran S, Sutherland M, Bachran D, Fuchs H. Preclinical studies of saponins for tumor therapy. In: Rahman A, Choudhar MI, Perry G, editors. Recent Advances in Medicinal Chemistry. Vol. 1. Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. Amsterdam, Netherlands; 2014. pp. 272-302. doi:10.1016/B978‐0‐12‐803961‐8.50009‐9
  53. 53. Walthelm U, Dittrich K, Gelbrich G, Schöpke T. Effects of saponins on the water solubility of different model compounds. Planta Medica. 2001;67(1):49-54. doi:10.1055/s‐2001‐10876
  54. 54. McClements DJ, Gumus CE. Natural emulsifiers—Biosurfactants, phospholipids, biopolymers, and colloidal particles: Molecular and physicochemical basis of functional performance. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science. 2016;234:3-26. doi:10.1016/j.cis.2016.03.002
  55. 55. Kezwon A, Wojciechowski K. Interaction of Quillaja bark saponins with food‐relevant proteins. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science. 2014;209:185-195. doi:10.1016/j.cis.2014.04.005
  56. 56. Oda K, Matsuda H, Murakami T, Katayama S, Ohgitani T, Yoshikawa M. Adjuvant and haemolytic activities of 47 saponins derived from medicinal and food plants. Biological Chemistry. 2000;381(1):67-74. doi:10.1515/BC.2000.009
  57. 57. Gurfinkel DM, Rao AV. Soya saponins: the relationship between chemical structure and colon anticarcinogenic activity. Nutrition and Cancer. 2003;47(1):24-33. doi:10.1207/s15327914nc4701_3
  58. 58. Marrelli M, Conforti F, Araniti F, Statti GA. Effects of saponins on lipid metabolism: A review of potential health benefits in the treatment of obesity. Molecules. 2016;21:1404. doi:10.3390/molecules21101404
  59. 59. Bissinger R, Modicano P, Alzoubi K, Honisch S, Faggio C, Abed M, Lang F. Effect of saponin on erythrocytes. International Journal of Hematology. 2014;100(1):51-59. doi:10.1007/s12185‐014‐1605
  60. 60. Du J‐R, Long F‐Y, Chen C. Research progress on natural triterpenoid saponins in the chemoprevention and chemotherapy of cancer. In: Bathaie SZ, Tamanoi F editors. The Enzymes, Vol 36. Natural Products and Cancer Signaling: Isoprenoids, Polyphenols and Flavonoids. 2014; Elsevier Inc. London, UK; pp. 95-130. doi:10.1016/B978‐0‐12‐802215‐3.00006‐9
  61. 61. Elekofehinti OO. Saponins: Anti‐diabetic principles from medicinal plants—A review. Pathophysiology. 2015;22:95-103. doi:10.1016/j.pathophys.2015.02.001
  62. 62. Vinay TN, Park CS, Kim HY, Jung SJ. Toxicity and dose determination of Quillaja saponin, aluminum hydroxide and squalene in olive flounder (Paralichthysolivaceus). Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology. 2014;158:73-85. doi:10.1016/j.vetimm.2013.03.007
  63. 63. Netala VR, Ghosh SB, Bobbu P, Anitha D, Tartte V. Triterpenoid saponins: a review on biosynthesis, applications and mechanism of their action. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2015;7(1):24-28.
  64. 64. Zhao D. Challenges associated with elucidating the mechanisms of the hypocholesterolaemic activity of saponins. Journal of Functional Foods.2016;23:52-65. doi:10.1016/j.jff.2016.02.023
  65. 65. Nasri H, Baradaran A, Shirzad H, Rafieian‐Kopaei M. New concepts in nutraceuticals as alternative for pharmaceuticals. International Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2014;5(12):1487-1499.
  66. 66. Marciani DJ, Ptak RG, Voss TG, Reynolds RC, Pathak AK, Chamblin TL, Scholl DR, May RD. Degradation of Quillaja saponaria Molina saponins: loss of the protective effects of a herpes simplex virus 1 subunit vaccine. International Immunopharmacology. 2002;2(12):1703-11. doi:10.1016/S1567‐5769(02)00192‐3
  67. 67. Lanzotti V, Barile E, Antignani V, Bonanomi G, Scala F. Antifungal saponins from bulbs of garlic, Allium sativum L. var. Voghiera. Phytochemistry. 2012;78:126-134. doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2012.03.009
  68. 68. Guil‐Guerrero JL, Ramos L, Moreno C, Zúñiga‐Paredes JC, Carlosama‐Yepez M, Ruales P. Antimicrobial activity of plant‐food by‐products: A review focusing on the tropics. Livestock Science. 2016;189:32-49.
  69. 69. Nabinejad A. Antibacterial effects of Saponaria officinalis extracts against avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC). African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2013;8(18):2068-2071. doi:10.5897/AJAR11.1390
  70. 70. Korchowiec B, Gorczyca M, Wojszko K, Janikowska M, Henry M, Rogalska E. Impact of two different saponins on the organization of model lipid membranes. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Biomembranes. 2015;1848:1963-1973. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2015.06.007
  71. 71. Lacaille‐Dubois MA, Wagner H. A review of the biological and pharmacological activities of saponins. Phytomedicine. 1996;2(4):363-386. doi:10.1016/S0944‐7113(96)80081‐X
  72. 72. Coleman JJ, Okoli I, Tegos GP, Holson EB, Wagner FF, Hamblin MR, Mylonakis E. Characterization of plant‐derived saponin natural products against Candida albicans. ACS Chemical Biology. 2010;5(3):321-332.doi:10.1021/cb900243b
  73. 73. Berlowska J, Dudkiewicz M, Kregiel D, Czyzowska A, Witonska I. Cell lysis induced by membrane‐damaging detergent saponins from Quillaja saponaria. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 2015;75-76:44-48. doi:10.1016/j.enzmictec.2015.04.007
  74. 74. Sen S, Makkar HPS, Muetzel S, Becker K. Effect of Quillaja saponaria saponins and Yucca schidigera plant extract on growth of Escherichia coli. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 1998;27:35-38.
  75. 75. Arabski M, Węgierek‐Ciuk A, Czerwonka G, Lankoff A, Kaca W. Effects of saponins against clinical E. coli strains and eukaryotic cell line. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology. 2012; Article ID 286216, doi:10.1155/2012/286216
  76. 76. Alberice JV, Funes‐Huacca ME, Guterres SB, Carrilho E. Inactivation of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris in orange juice by saponin extracts combined with heat‐treatment. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2012;159:130-135. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.08.004
  77. 77. Piacente S, Pizza C, Oleszek W. Saponins and phenolics of Yucca schidigera Roezl: Chemistry and bioactivity. Phytochemistry Reviews. 2005;4:177-190. doi:10.1007/s11101‐005‐1234‐5
  78. 78. Tenon M, Feuillère N, Roller M, Birtic S. Rapid, cost‐effective and accurate quantification of Yucca schidigera Roezl. steroidal saponins using HPLC‐ELSD method. Food Chemistry. 2017;221:1245-1252. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.11.033
  79. 79. U.S. FDA Code of Federal Regulation, 21, part 172, subpart F—Flavoring Agents and Related Substances, §172.510 [Internet]. 2016. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=172.510 [Accessed: 2017‐01‐17]
  80. 80. JETRO Specifications and Standards for Foods, Food Additives (Abstract) 2010 [Internet] 2011. Available from: https://www.jetro.go.jp/ext_images/en/reports/regulations/pdf/foodext2010e.pdf [Accessed: 2017‐01‐17]
  81. 81. Sucharzewska D, Stochmal A, Oleszek W. The effect of Yucca schidigera extract on the physical structure and on the oxidative stability of sugar‐candy foam products. Lebensmittel‐Wissenschaft&Technologie. 2003;36:347-351. doi:10.1016/S0023‐6438(03)00016‐1
  82. 82. Matusiak K, Oleksy M, Borowski S, Nowak A, Korczyński M, Dobrzański Z, Gutarowska B. The use of Yucca schidigera and microbial preparation for poultry manure deodorization and hygienization. J Environ Manage. 2016;170:50-59. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.01.007
  83. 83. Böttger S, Hofmann K, Melzig MF. Saponins can perturb biologic membranes and reduce the surface tension of aqueous solutions: a correlation? Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry. 2012;20(9): 2822-2828. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2012.03.032
  84. 84. Guo S, Kenne L, Lundgren LN, Rönnberg B, Sundquist BG. Triterpenoid saponins from Quillaja saponaria. Phytochemistry.1998;48(1):175-180.
  85. 85. WHO Food Additives Series: 48 Safety Evaluation of CertainFood Additives and Contaminants [Internet]. 2002 http://www.inchem.org/documents/jecfa/jecmono/v48je01.htm [Accessed: 2017‐01‐17]
  86. 86. Tippel J, Lehmann M, von Klitzing R, Drusch S. Interfacial properties of Quillaja saponins and its use for micellisation of lutein esters. Food Chemistry. 2016;212:35-42. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.05.130
  87. 87. FAO. 61st JECFA. Quillaia extracts [Internet]. 2004 http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agns/pdf/jecfa/cta/61/QUILLAIA.pdf [Accessed 2017‐01‐17]
  88. 88. Patent US8808692B2 Compositions comprising immunoreactive reagents and saponins, and methods of use thereof [Internet] 2014. Available from: https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pdfs/US8808692.pdf [Accessed 2017‐01‐17]
  89. 89. Patent US 5326579 A Process to remove cholesterol from dairy products [Internet]. 1994. Available from: https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pdfs/US5326579.pdf [Accessed 2017‐01‐17]
  90. 90. Patent US 5370890 A Aqueous process to remove cholesterol from food products [Internet] Available from: https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pdfs/US5370890.pdf [Accessed 2017‐01‐17]
  91. 91. Chang EJ, Oh HI, Kwak HS. Optimization of cholesterol removal conditions from homogenized milk by treatment with saponin. Asian‐Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2001;14(6):844-849. doi:10.5713/ajas.2001.844
  92. 92. Yang Y, Leser ME, Sher AA, McClements DJ. Formation and stability of emulsions using a natural small molecule surfactant: Quillaja saponin (Q‐Naturale®). Food Hydrocolloids. 2013;30:589-596. doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2012.08.008
  93. 93. Zhang J, Bing L, Reineccius GA. Formation, optical property and stability of orange oil nanoemulsions stabilized by Quallijasaponins. LWT—Food Science and Technology. 2015;64:1063-1070. doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2015.07.034
  94. 94. Zhang J,Bing L,Reineccius GA. Comparison of modified starch and Quillaja saponins in the formation and stabilization of flavor nanoemulsions. Food Chemistry. 2016;192:53-59. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.06.078
  95. 95. Reichert CL, Salminen H, Leuenberger BH, Weiss J. Influence of heat on miscibility of Quillaja saponins in mixtures with a co‐surfactant. Food Research International. 2016;88:16-23. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2016.03.034

Written By

Dorota Kregiel, Joanna Berlowska, Izabela Witonska, Hubert Antolak, Charalampos Proestos, Mirko Babic, Ljiljana Babic and Bolin Zhang

Submitted: 14 October 2016 Reviewed: 22 February 2017 Published: 05 July 2017