Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Antimicrobial Resistance

By Muhammad Usman Qamar, Muhammad Hidayat Rasool, Shah Jahan, Muhammad Shafique and Bilal Aslam

Submitted: February 26th 2018Reviewed: October 29th 2018Published: April 3rd 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.82303

Downloaded: 635


Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) pose an emerging threat to public health sector worldwide. They are one of the potent nosocomial pathogens and cause variety of infections including pneumonia, septicaemia, wound infections, urinary tract infections and catheter-associated infections. From the last two decades, these pathogens are becoming more powerful due to the acquisition of resistomes on different types of plasmids and transposons. There are four main mechanisms of antibacterial resistance such as efflux pump, target alteration, membrane permeability and notably enzymes hydrolysis. K. pneumoniae produce different types of enzymes but most importantly extended spectrum-β-lactamase (ESBL), carbapenemase and metallo-β-lactamase (MBL). K. pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPCs) and New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM) producing isolates displayed resistance not only against the β-lactam drugs (penicillins, cephalosporins and carbapenems) but also to other classes of antibiotics (aminoglycosides and quinolones). Therapeutic options available to treat serious infections caused by these extensively drug-resistant pathogens are limited to colistin, tigecycline and fosfomycin. Hence, combination therapy has also been recommended to treat such bacteria with clinical side effects, therefore, new treatment regime must be required. Moreover, we are relying on conventional diagnostic tools, however, novel techniques must be required for robust identification of multi-drug-resistant bacteria.


  • Klebsiella pneumoniae
  • antimicrobial resistant mechanisms
  • mortality and morbidity
  • economic burden

1. Introduction

Klebsiella pneumoniaeis one of the notorious pathogens with increase number of severe infections and shortage of effective treatment regimes. They are extremely resilient pathogens because their success seems to follow the model of “the best defence for a pathogen is a good defence” rather than “the best defence for a pathogen is a good offense”. K. pneumoniaeis a Gram negative, non-motile, capsulated and an imperative member of Enterobacteriaceaefamily. They were firstly identified in late nineteenth century and given the name Friedlander’s bacterium [1]. They are hermaphrodite and cause both community acquired infections (soil, surface water) and significantly hospital acquire infections (medical devices, catheters). Importantly, they can reside on different body mucosal surfaces of oropharynx and gastrointestinal tract and cause variety of infections including pneumonia, bacteraemia, septicaemia, gastritis, wound infections, urinary tract infections, and soft tissue surgical infections [2]. From the last 2 decades, K. pneumoniaestrains acquired extra genetic traits and become more virulent and antibiotic resistant [3]. They develop resistance against a wide range of antibiotics including carbapenems. Therefore, they produce (or synthesise) extended spectrum-β-lactamases (ESBL), carbapenemases, metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs), New Delhi metallo-β-lactamases (NDM) and have many other resistant mechanisms such as efflux pump and membranous target alteration.


2. Antimicrobial resistance

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) defined when a bacterial strain shows resistance against antibiotics that normally inhibit or stop their growth and allow them to withstand against drugs. Last 2 decades, there are various AMR pathogens have been emerged around the globe such an ESBL producing pathogens, multi-drug resistant and extensively drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis(MDR, XDR-MTB), MBL producing bacteria, methicillin resistance Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA) and the advent of NDM producing bacteria. These isolates are almost impossible to treat with the existent treatment regime [4]. AMR emerged even since the discovery of first antibiotic “penicillin” in 1940 due the natural process of bacteria. Certainly, the genes that confer resistance upon some strains of bacteria precede antibiotics by millions of years [5]. Currently, AMR is becoming a big health issue around the world due to the irrational, overused and misuse of antibiotics which can lead to extra financial burden, prolong hospital stay and even fatal consequences. Unfortunately, currently we deficiency of the novel effective antimicrobial compounds, peptides and pipelines antibiotics to combat with emerging superbugs which result us facing growing enemy with largely depleted armoury [6].

3. Mortality, morbidity and economic burden due to antimicrobial resistant bacteria

AMR pathogens are one of the main cause of morbidity and mortality in both developed and developing countries. According to a published data, around 700,000 people die due to infections caused by AMR pathogens every year worldwide and most of the data is still underreported because of poor reporting and surveillance studies [7]. On the other hand, as per The Centre of Disease and Control (CDC), above 2 million people get infected due to AMR bacteria with a mortality rate of 23,000 each year [8]. Similarly, an Indian study revealed that around 60,000 neonates die due to AMR infections per year [9]. Likewise, a study conducted in Pakistan in 2009 was also documented that 40% neonates die due to MDR and XDR pathogens (Escherichia coli, K. pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae) isolated from blood samples [10]. Another study from Pakistan testified that 37 out of 78 new-borns died due to infections caused by MDR-Acinetobacter spp.,[11]. Qamar et al., conducted a study in Islamabad, Pakistan also reported 4/9 children died due to NDM positive isolates mainly of E. coliand K. pneumoniae[12]. Recently, Khan et al., from Karachi, Pakistan also reported that 22 with <1 month of age and 10 were elderly patients died due to bacteraemia and septicaemia which was mainly caused by NDM positive K. pneumoniae[13]. Highest mortality rate is mainly reported in developing countries as compare to developed countries largely in immunocompromised persons. Major risk factors in public sectors hospitals of developing countries are, poor hygienic practices of health care workers, irrational use of antibiotics, poor sanitation and hygienic facilities, nosocomial pathogens, hospital and wards are overcrowded with patients and attended and lack of health care workers, floors and rooms are spilled with sputum and operation theatres are in deliberated condition and are poorly equipped, contaminated drinking water, more than one patients on single bed, presence of insects and flies and most importantly low health care budget by the Government [14].

Every year, millions of dollars are spent to tackle the burden of AMR bacterial infections around the globe. European Union invested around €1.5 billion annually to tackle the infections caused by AMR pathogens which are responsible for around 23,000 mortalities only in Europe [15]. However, United States of America also expenditures above $20 billion to treat the 20 million patients who get infected with AMR infection each year [16].

4. Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance

Since 1990s, bacteria have been becoming gradually more lethal, due to acquisition of resistomes and develop resistance to different sets of antibiotics. Now a day, many bacterial pathogens notably K. pneumoniaeare intrinsically resistant to various antibiotics or they acquire or encoded antimicrobial resistant genes mainly on plasmids as well on chromosomes [17]. There are different mechanisms such as conjugation, transformation and transduction in which susceptible strains can acquire resistance genes with transposons that eventually support different resistance genes to incorporate with host chromosome or plasmids. Presently, there are four fundamental mechanisms of bacterial drug resistance (1) target alteration (2) modification in membrane permeability (3) efflux pump and (4) antibiotic degradation by enzymes as shows in Figure 1 [18]. In K. pneumoniaeboth the efflux pump and enzymatic degradation of different antibiotics are more efficient as compare to other two mechanisms.

Figure 1.

Mechanism of antimicrobial resistance.

4.1 Target alteration of the antibiotics

In general, many antibiotics bind to different bacterial target sites with high affinity. So, most of the bacteria including K. pneumoniaealter the target sites and structure to block or inhibit the efficient binding sites [19]. In K. pneumoniae, antibiotic resistance occurs due to target modification in lipopolysaccharides (LPS), which is interceded by the activation of PmrA/PmrB two component regulatory system (TCRS). Moreover, another TCRS, PhoP/PhoQ contributes to produce polymyxin resistance by indirectly activating the PmrA/PmrB TCRS via PmrD linker protein. Similarly, inactivation of the PhoQ/PhoP negative regulator encoded by mgrBgene has also been identified to play a prominent role in polymyxin resistance in K. pneumoniae[20]. There are various pathogens that cause different infections and develop resistance even against single point mutation of resistant genes that encode an antibiotic target. These resistant strains then further produce numerous copies of bacteria [21].

4.2 Modification in membrane permeability

Outer membrane of the bacteria is first line barrier to protect the microorganisms against unfavourable environment including chemical and biological materials. In comparison, majority of the Gram-negative rods (GNR) are intrinsically less permeable to various antibiotics because of outer membrane barrier than Gram positive bacteria [22]. In the cell wall of Enterobacteriaceaefamily including K. pneumoniaecontains various outer membrane proteins (Omps) such as OmpA, OmpF and OmpC and the hydrophilic antibiotics can cross through these Omps by diffusion. These proteins are involved in adhesion to other cell surfaces, maintenance of cell structure and regulation of transport of bactericidal agents and nutrition. OmpF expression is regulated at the posttranscriptional level via the micF RNA, and many different environmental stresses impact the OmpC/OmpF ratio via changes in micF levels. The expression of micF is increased along with that of OmpF at high OmpR-P concentrations. The expression of micF is also induced by toxic agents, such as paraquat and weak acids, by the SoxS, MarA, and Rob transcription factors, which bind to the same sequence element in the micF promoter and they down regulate the synthesis of OmpF at transcriptional level (Figure 2) [23]. Therefore, the bacteria showed resistance by limiting the antibiotics entry in to the cell by the down regulation or replacement of porins with more selective channels. However, recent data showed that the loss of porins expression play a significant role to produce resistance to new drugs (cephalosporins and carbapenems), to which resistance is manly mediated by the enzyme degradation [24]. OmpA is one of the major protein of K. pneumoniaethat prevent the activation of airway epithelial and loss of this protein make the bacteria susceptible. There are two important Omps in K. pneumoniae; OmpK35 and OmpK36 that allow the hydrophilic molecules such as nutrients and carbapenems to diffuse into bacteria. Moreover, K. pneumoniaealso contain two alternative proteins; KpnO and OmpK26. Any mutation in OmpK36, OmpK26 and KpnO leads to increased resistance to cephalosporin and carbapenems [25].

Figure 2.

Down regulation mechanism of outer membrane proteins (OMPs) in gram negative bacteria.

4.3 Increased efflux pumps

Efflux pumps are the active transport mechanisms that expel out antibiotics from bacterial cell and play a vital role to develop intrinsic resistance against broad range of antibiotics in GNR [18]. Currently, there are several MDR efflux pumps are present in bacteria including FuaABC in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, MedeA in Streptococcus mutansand AcrAB, KexD and more recently OqxAB efflux pumps in K. pneumoniae[26, 27]. In K. pneumoniae, most efficient antimicrobial resistant efflux pump is AcrAB, which is not only expel out the β-lactam, quinolones and chloramphenicol but also the host derived antimicrobial agents such as human antimicrobial peptides and human bronchoalveolar lavage fluid [25]. Recently, newly emerging OqxAB efflux pump has been recognised in different parts of the world that conferring resistance to quinolones and chloramphenicol [27].

4.4 Enzymatic hydrolysis of the antibiotics

In K. pneumoniae, the most potent and significant antimicrobial resistant mechanism is enzymatic hydrolysis of wide range of antibiotics including β-lactam, quinolones, aminoglycosides and macrolides [18]. β-lactamases are the enzymes that hydrolyze the effect of β-lactam drugs by attacking on their β-lactam ring. Currently, a total of 4037 β-lactam enzymes have been identified and mong these 1327 are class A, class B (n = 581), class C (n = 1359) and 660 belong to class D [28]. K. pneumoniaeencode for many β-lactamases such as ESBLs, carbapenemases and MBLs. ESBLs and carbapenemases contain important subclasses of β-lactamase enzymes such as imipenemase (IMP), Verona integron encoded metallo-β-lactamase (VIM), K. pneumoniaecarbapenemases (KPC), oxacillinase (OXA) and recently NDM [29].

4.4.1 Classification of β-lactamases

These enzymes are broadly classified into two main scheme one is Ambler Molecular classification scheme which is based on amino acid sequence and is widely acceptable and secondly, Bush Jacoby classification scheme which is based on biochemical properties [30]. Ambler class is further divided in to four major sub-classes A, B, C, and D based on conserved and distinguished amino acid motifs. Among these, class A, C, and D are the serine carbapenemases that hydrolyzed their substrate through active site by forming acyl groups and require serine as a cofactor for their activity. However, class B enzymes are the MBLs that utilised at least one zinc ion at their active site to hydrolyze the β-lactam antibiotics. MBLs are further classified into three super families B1, B2 and B3 [31]. However, Bush-Jacoby-Medeiros classification scheme is divided into three major groups; class C (Group 1 cephalosporinases), class A and D (Group 2 Serine β-lactamases) and class B (Group 3 MBLs). These are further divided in to several different subgroups as shows in Table 1 [30].

Molecular class (subclass)Bush Jacoby groupsMain substrateDefining characteristic(s)RepresentativeBacteria
A2aPenicillinsIncreased hydrolysis of benzylpenicillinPC1
A2bPenicillins and early CephalosporinsHydrolysis of the penicillins and cephalosporinsTEM and SHVEnterobacteriaceae(K. pneumoniae, E. coli, E. cloacae)
A2beExtended spectrum-β- lactam drugs, monobactamHydrolysis of extended spectrum-β- lactam drugsTEM, SHV and CTX-MEnterobacteriaceae(K. pneumoniae, E. coli, E. cloacae)
A2brPenicillinsResistant to β-lactam inhibitorTEM and SHVEnterobacteriaceae(K. pneumoniae, E. coli, E. cloacae)
A2cCarbenicillinHydrolysis of carbenicillinCARBEnterobacteriaceae(K. pneumoniae, E. coli, E. cloacae)
A2ceCarbenicillin and CefepimeHydrolysis of carbenicillin and cefepimeRTG
B (B1)3aCarbapenemsCarbapenems but not aztreonamIMP, VIM and NDMEnterobacteriaceae(K. pneumoniae, E. coli), non-fermenters (P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii)
B (B2)3bCarbapenemsPrefer to hydrolyze carbapenemsCphA and Sfh
C1CephalosporinsMore hydrolyze the cephalosporinsAmpC,
C1eCephalosporinsHighly hydrolyzed the ceftazidimeGC1, CMY-37
D2dOxacillinHydrolysis of oxacillinOXA-1, OXA-10A. baumannii
D2deExtended spectrum-β- lactam drugsHydrolysis of extended spectrum-β- lactam drugsOXA-11, OXA-50A. baumannii
D2dfCarbapenemsHydrolysis of oxacillin and carbapenemsOXA-23 and OXA-48A. baumannii

Table 1.

Classification of the β-lactamases.

4.4.2 Extended spectrum-β-lactamase producing K. pneumoniae

ESBL are the enzymes that hydrolyze the extended spectrum drugs mainly cephalosporins. ESBL producing Enterobacteriaceaemainly the K. pneumoniaeand E. coliis becoming one of the serious threat to the public health sectors. According to World Health Organisation (WHO), around 50% of ESBL producing K. pneumoniaebecomes the endemic in many parts of the world and it causes 30% resistance rate in the community [32]. In 1965, first β-lactamase enzyme Temoneria (TEM-1) and sulphydryl variable (SHV-1) has been identified. In 1983, first case SHV-2 and TEM-3 has been documented in Germany and France respectively. Similarly, in 1989, USA also reported ESBL producing K. pneumoniaeand E. coli. Since then, incidence of these enzymes markedly sporadic from one region to another [33]. ESBL producing K. pneumoniaedisplayed resistance to clinically effective extended spectrum cephalosporins and monobactam and left limited treatment options. Moreover, ESBL producing K. pneumoniaehas become major ESBL carrying bacteria associated with nosocomial infections and outbreak during 1990 to 2000. Later, these pathogens acquired variants of ESBL such as CTX-M, TEM and SHV. There are various types of ESBLs have been identified throughout the world. Up till now, TEM (n = 227) are the most predominant type of ESBLs followed by CTX-M (n = 207), SHV (n = 203), VEB (n = 19) and PER (n = 9) [28]. Majority of these ESBLs have been reported in Enterobacteriaceaenotably K. pneumoniaeand E. coli. ESBLs producing K. pneumoniaehave also become an important hospital acquired pathogen. In China, around 50% of the hospital acquired infections are caused by CTX-M-14 and CTX-M-15 ESBL producing K. pneumoniae[34]. Recently, these ESBL producing K. pneumoniaewere also reported from community such as water, soil and veterinary settings [35]. In Asia, SHV is the predominant genotype of ESBL and early SHV-5 and SHV-12 enzymes were documented in Korea and Japan. However, in Europe and south east Asia (India and Pakistan), CTX-M-2, CTXM-3, CTX-M-14 and CTX-M-15 producing Enterobacteriaceaeat its rise. However, in Japan, SHV-12 and CTX-M-3 and CTXM-14 have been predominantly reported in K. pneumoniaeand E. coli. In Indo-Pakistan region, most of the clinical isolates of K. pneumoniaeencoded for TEM, CTX-M and SHV. Two highly populated countries in the world (China and India) represents the largest reservoir of CTX-M in the world [36].

4.4.3 AmpC producing K. pneumoniae

AmpC are the β-lactam enzymes that belong to the ambler class C of β-lactam. These enzymes hydrolyze cephalosporins antibiotics and produce resistance against penicillin, second and third generation cephalosporins and cephamycin. Moreover, these enzymes can also convey resistance to combination of these antibiotics along with β-lactam inhibitors. The versatility of the K. pneumoniaeis to encode various β-lactam resistant genes on their transferable plasmids that able them to spread AmpC like resistomes in to other species [30]. Plasmid mediated AmpC gene was firstly identify during 1980s in K. pneumoniae. The most common genes of AmpC families that have been reported in K. pneumoniaeare DHA, FOX, CMY and MOX types in different parts of the world. Although they are plasmid mediated however, first case of chromosomal mediated AmpC blaCMY-2 containing K. pneumoniaewas reported in 2009. AmpC producing K. pneumoniaealong with porin loss and increase efflux pump display increase resistance against β-lactam drugs which can lead to the carbapenem resistance in future [37].

4.4.4 Class A carbapenemases producing K. pneumoniae

Since the sporadic spread of ESBL producing K. pneumoniaein different regions, carbapenems which is considering last resort to treat infections caused by such pathogens have widely used. The extensive usage of carbapenems have led the emergence of plasmid mediated carbapenemase genes such as IMP, VIM, KPC and NDM. Carbapenemases are the potent enzymes that hydrolyzed the carbapenem drugs and left no treatment option available [32]. There are various chromosomal mediated (SME, SFC and NMC-A) and plasmid mediated carbapenemases (KPC, GES, IMI) have been identified. It has determined that a carbapenemase has variants extending from KPC-1 to KPC-33 till now [28]. KPC gene is mainly located on different types of transmissible plasmids such as IncF, IncX, IncA/C, IncR and IncI2 which lead to the horizontal transfer of antimicrobial resistomes. These plasmids also acquired resistant genes of other antibiotics such as aminoglycosides, tetracycline and quinolones. Most of the KPC genes are associated with Tn4401transposons which jumped from one plasmid to other [38]. the endemic of KPC producing K. pneumoniaeidentified in different parts of the world including USA, UK, Japan, China, Greece, India, Spain, Germany and Italy. Moreover, out breaks of the KPC also documented in different countries like USA, France (travelling history from the endemic area), Spain, Netherlands, UK, Finland and Sweden [39].

4.4.5 Class B carbapenemase producing K. pneumoniae

Class B are the MBLs that require Zn+ as a cofactor for their activity. There are many types of MBLs have been identified such as IMP, VIM, and NDM in Enterobacteriaceae. These enzymes cause resistance to various antibiotics including carbapenems and left no treatment option [40]. NDM is one the potent enzyme of MBL that newly emerged in clinically isolates of K. pneumoniaeand E. colifrom a Swedish patient who had been hospitalised in New Delhi, India in 2008. NDM producing bacteria displayed resistance not only against β-lactam drugs but also to other 14 classes of antibiotics. NDM producing bacteria notable K. pneumoniaeand E. coliare major cause of morbidity and mortality in developing countries. Qamar et al. reported 4/9 children died due to NDM producing bacteria [12]. Similarly, another study from Karachi, Pakistan also documented 57% mortality in neonates due to NDM producing bacteria mainly K. pneumoniae[13]. Up till now there are 19 (NDM-1 to NDM-19) variants have been identified in different parts of the world [41]. Among these NDM-1, NDM-5 and NDM-7 are most prevalent variants with a hyper variable region. NDM are mainly plasmid mediated as compared to chromosome and located on different size and number of plasmids such as IncF, IncX, IncA/C. NDM producing K. pneumoniaeare belong to various sequence types such as ST11, ST147, ST258, ST340, ST15 and ST16. More than 50% of the NDM producing K. pneumoniaehave been identified from ST11 and ST147. NDM genes are mainly associated with ISAba125transposons in Enterobacteriaceaefamily which hypothesised originated from the Tn125of A. baumannii[42]. Since the discovery of the NDM in Asia it is widely spread in different parts of the world including USA, UK, Middle East, Europe, Africa and Australia. Main reservoir for NDM are the Asian countries like India, Pakistan and China and the Balkan States [39].

4.4.6 Class D carbapenemases producing K. pneumoniae

These carbapenemase enzymes swiftly hydrolyzed the isoxazolylpenicillins drugs such as oxacillin, cloxacillins and dicloxacillin than benzylpenicillin. There are more than 574 variants have been identified around the globe but few of them have the carbapenemase activity. Therefore, class D are reclassified in to 12 main groups; Oxacillinase (OXA)-23, OXA-24, OXA-48, OXA-51, OXA-58, OXA-143, OXA134, OXA-211, OXA-213, OXA-214, OXA-229, OXA-235 [43]. Among these most potent variants is OXA-48 which was firstly identified in K. pneumoniaein Turkey in 2003. Later, this gene spread in different parts of the world such as Libya, Egypt, India, Spain Switzerland, France, Germany, Argentine, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Japan. The highest percentage of OXA-48 has been reported in France, Spain and Saudi Arabia (78%) followed by 88% in Lebanon and 56% in Pennsylvania [39]. Co-existence of OXA-48 like K. pneumoniaehas been reported from different countries like Switzerland (OXA-48/NDM-1), Turkey (OXA-48/NDM-1) and India (OXA-181/VIM-5). OX-48 like genes are mainly present on transferable and conjugative group of plasmids (IncL/M and IncL) [39, 44].

5. Tacking of antibiotic resistance

AMR is becoming a menace to global health. According to United Nation (UN), in 2050, if we do not tackle the AMR now, more than 10 million people will die each year and the global income cost would be $100 trillion. So, in 2050, one person will die after every 3 seconds [7]. Firstly, it is need of the hour to give a public awareness through paper and electronic media to stop the irrational use of antibiotics. Secondly, people should improve their hygiene practices which will reduce the 60% antibiotics burden to reduce the diarrhoea. Thirdly, more than 70% world’s antibiotics are being utilised in agriculture and live stocks, so overuse of antibiotics must be avoided in these settings. Fourthly, Global surveillance of AMR should be conducted and maintained throughout the world. Fifthly, there are many countries which do not have the rapid and effective diagnostics facilities of microbiology which allow the physician to prescribe the broad-spectrum empirical therapy. Sixthly, there is an urgent need to develop an alternative method to treat the AMR such as vaccines, phage therapy, probiotics, antibodies and lysins. Seventhly, there are shortages of microbiologists, infectious diseases specialists, infections control specialists, vegetarians, pharmacists and epidemiologists. Eighthly, A global funding must be required to support and encourage the less commercially attractive. Ninthly, the world gives better incentive to pharmaceutical companies to develop new and existing antibiotics. Finally, world leading organisations such as WHO, G20, UN must work together with coordination.

© 2019 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite and reference

Link to this chapter Copy to clipboard

Cite this chapter Copy to clipboard

Muhammad Usman Qamar, Muhammad Hidayat Rasool, Shah Jahan, Muhammad Shafique and Bilal Aslam (April 3rd 2019). Antimicrobial Resistance, Antimicrobials, Antibiotic Resistance, Antibiofilm Strategies and Activity Methods, Sahra Kırmusaoğlu, IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.82303. Available from:

chapter statistics

635total chapter downloads

More statistics for editors and authors

Login to your personal dashboard for more detailed statistics on your publications.

Access personal reporting

Related Content

This Book

Next chapter

Alternative Approaches to Combat Medicinally Important Biofilm-Forming Pathogens

By Mansab Ali Saleemi, Navindra Kumari Palanisamy and Eng Hwa Wong

Related Book

First chapter

Are Herbal Products an Alternative to Antibiotics?

By Mihaela Ileana Ionescu

We are IntechOpen, the world's leading publisher of Open Access books. Built by scientists, for scientists. Our readership spans scientists, professors, researchers, librarians, and students, as well as business professionals. We share our knowledge and peer-reveiwed research papers with libraries, scientific and engineering societies, and also work with corporate R&D departments and government entities.

More About Us