Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Highlights on Anopheles nili and Anopheles moucheti, Malaria Vectors in Africa

By Christophe Antonio-Nkondjio and Frédéric Simard

Submitted: March 27th 2012Reviewed: November 20th 2012Published: July 24th 2013

DOI: 10.5772/55153

Downloaded: 2589

1. Introduction

Anopheles niliTheobald 1904 and An. mouchetiEvans 1925 are major human malaria vectors in forested and humid savannah areas of West and Central Africa [1]. Yet, they remain critically understudied and basic knowledge on their biology, ecology and genetics is crucially lacking [2]. To date, most studies of African malaria vectors have focused on An. gambiae, An. arabiensis, and An. funestus, in part, because molecular and cytogenetic tools for characterizing population structure, ecological adaptation, and taxonomic status of other species have been lacking until recently. Further, no laboratory colony is available for experimental work involving these neglected species. This gap in knowledge needs to be addressed for successful implementation of global strategies for malaria elimination and eradication in the Afrotropical region [3].

Recent studies of the ecological niche profile of major African malaria vectors demonstrated that the habitats of An. gambiae, An. arabiensis, and An. funestushave more overlap with each other than with the habitat of An. niliand An. moucheti[4-7]. This results in an unusual geographic distribution of An. niliand An. moucheti(Figure 1), revealing their crucial role in malaria transmission in forested and degraded forest areas of equatorial Africa [8-13]. Unique aspects of ecological adaptation and behaviour can, in part, explain the increased vectorial capacity of the species in these environments and might protect them from conventional vector control tools targeting highly endophilic and endophagic mosquito species [3, 14]. Moreover, the recent findings of circulation of Plasmodium falciparumalong with other Plasmodiumspecies in great apes and monkeys [15-17] raise concerns about pathogen transfer between humans and primates and further highlight the need to improve our knowledge of forest malaria vectors.

In this chapter, we review knowledge gained so far on mosquitoes from An. mouchetiand closely related species, as well as the An. nilicomplex. We highlight specific bionomical, ecological and genetic attributes that distinguish these species from the most well-known major African malaria vectors, providing opportunities for further research on neglected aspects of vector biology and control.


2. Anopheles mouchetiand closely related species

Anopheles mouchetibelongs to the series Myzomyia and closely resembles Anopheles marshalliiTheobald of the Marshallii complex. This close morphological similarity resulted in An. mouchetibeing initially considered a variety of An. marshalliibefore it was raised to the rank of full species on the basis of morphological and bionomic differences [18]. However the taxonomic status of An. mouchetihas been subject to several interpretations during the past decades. Based on morphological similarities between An. bervoetsiand An. moucheti nigeriensis,Anopheles mouchetiwas later considered by Brunhes et al.[19] as a group consisting of three morphological forms, namely An. mouchetimoucheti(referred to as the type form), An. mouchetibervoetsiand An. moucheti nigeriensisdistinguishable by slight morphological characters present at the adult and/or at the larval stages [2, 19, 20]. In their classification, Brunhes et al. [19] referred to An. bervoetsias a subspecies of An. mouchetiwhile they suggested to put in synonymy An. m. nigeriensisand the type form. Genetic analysis conducted subsequently provided evidences against any taxonomic value for this morphological classification [21-23]. Recent classification by Harbach [24] recognizes An. mouchetiand An. bervoetsias formal species while An. m. nigeriensisis considered as a morphological variant within An. moucheti.

Anopheles mouchetiis widely distributed across West and Central Africa (Figure 2) whereas the two other taxa have only been reported so far from their type locality in Nigeria near Lagos (06°27’N; 03°24’E) for An. moucheti nigeriensisand in Tsakalakuku (06°34’S; 17°35’E) in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) for An. bervoetsi[18].

Figure 1.

Habitat suitability maps for the five major malaria vectors in Cameroon. A/Anopheles gambiae,An. arabiensis,An. funestus,,An. nili,An. moucheti. Different colors identify four classes of habitat quality including optimal (red), suitable (orange), marginal (yellow) and unsuitable habitat (white). Figure drawn from Ayalaet al., 2009 [4].

Anopheles mouchetiis among the most important human malaria vectors in the equatorial forest region of Africa, particularly in villages situated along slow moving rivers or streams where its larvae develop in and around floating vegetation and debris (Figure 3) [4, 5]. Larval collections to assess ecological factors influencing An. mouchetidistribution across river networks in south Cameroun showed that An. mouchetilarvae are frequently associated with lentic rivers, low temperatures and the abundance of aquatic vegetation at the edge of the river (Figure 4) [5]. Increased urbanization and deforestation as well as lower-scale landscape modification such as river banks cleaning for gardening and/or recreational purposes were shown to be highly detrimental to the species, fostering changes in the malaria vector system composition with a higher prevalence of An. gambiae, taking the lead over An. moucheti[9]. Insecticide susceptibility tests conducted on several populations from South Cameroon in 2007 indicated that An. mouchetiis fully susceptible to DDT, permethrin and deltamethrin (Etang et al., unpublished data).

Figure 2.

Map of the predicted probability of occurrence ofAnopheles mouchetiin Africa (redrawn from [25]). Black dots represent 69 records of occurrence forAn. mouchetias described in Hay et al. [26].

Figure 3.

A typical breeding site forAnopheles mouchetilarvae along river Nyong in southern Cameroon.

Figure 4.

Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) diagram showing the ordination of anopheline species along the first two axes and their correlation with environmental variables. The first axis is horizontal, second vertical. Direction and length of arrows shows the degree of correlation between mosquito larvae and the variables. Figure drawn from Antonio-Nkondjioet al.[5].

In rural villages situated in deep forest areas, An. mouchetiusually is the major vector of Plasmodium, and quite often the only one maintaining a high level of malaria endemicity in humans. Natural infection rates in the range 1–3% are commonly reported in wild females, sustaining annual entomological inoculation rates (EIR) reaching up to 300 infective bites/human/year [27, 28]. As such, the species has been incriminated in malaria transmission in a number of countries in Central Africa, including Nigeria [29], Cameroon[28, 30], Gabon [31, 32], Equatorial Guinea [10, 11], Congo [18], the DRC [18] and Uganda [18]. In these settings, An. mouchetifrequently bites indoors and high densities of blood-fed females can be collected resting indoors, over 95% of which had taken their blood meal on humans demonstrating strong anthropophily. However, high mosquito densities might also be collected far from any human settlements, indicating a probable zoophilic behaviour in some forest populations [33, 34].

Anopheles bervoetsihas only been reported so far from its type locality and surrounding villages in the DRC. Larvae are found in small rivers sheltered by forest galleries that wind through the valleys in a hilly landscape. Adults are highly anthropophilic and preferentially bite outdoors. However, it can be collected biting and resting indoors when abundance is high at the end of the rainy season (Antonio-Nkondjio et al. unpublished data). Biting occurs at night with a peak of activity usually recorded in the second part of the night. A recent study reported three specimens found infected by Plasmodium falciparumout of 237 tested by ELISA, confirming its role in malaria parasites transmission [35].

Anopheles m. nigeriensisis considered as a synonym to An. moucheti, due to the absence of reliable morphological differences at the adult and larval stages between the two morphs [19, 24]. Nothing is known of the species bionomics. The only report of its implication in malaria parasites transmission is from Baber and Olinger in 1931 ([18], loc. cit.) who reported 1 in 87 mosquitoes infected with sporozoites. Collections conducted in its type locality in 2005 reported few specimens (<10, Antonio-Nkondjio and Simard, unpublished data), probably reflecting habitat deterioration due to the expansion of the urban domain around Lagos.

From morphological analysis (Figure 5), it appears that the type form could display high morphological variation with variants similar to An. m. nigeriensisand An. bervoetsi. However, genetic investigations and the follow-up of morphological diversity in the progeny of field collected gravid females demonstrated that a single taxon was represented, at least in Cameroon [21]. Population genetic investigations using a set of ten microsatellite markers [36] further strengthened this view, revealing genetic homogeneity between natural populations ofAn. mouchetiin South Cameroon and throughout Central Africa, including Uganda and the DRC [36, 37]. Studies comparing sequence variations in nuclear (rDNA Internal Transcribed Spacer 1, ITS2 and the D3 domain of the 28S ribosomal subunit) and mitochondrial (cytochrome b) DNA regions were also concordant, depicting a low level of genetic diversity and differentiation between specimens from Cameroon, Uganda and the DRC and confirming the high genetic homogeneity of An. mouchetipopulations throughout Central Africa [23]. However, when mosquito samples collected from the type localities of An. bervoetsiand An. m. nigeriensiswere included in the analyses, sequence differences were detected between the three taxa, similar in degree to the differences found previously between sibling species within other anopheline groups or complexes [23]. An allele specific PCR assay based on sequence differences in the rDNA ITS1 region was developed to allow rapid identification of each of these three genetic lineages (Figure 6) [23]. Microsatellite analysis further demonstrated significant genetic differentiation between An. bervoetsipopulations form the DRC and An. mouchetipopulations from Cameroon, suggesting that they represent two different species [35]. In light of accumulating evidences (morphological, behavioral and genetic differences) this taxa was raised to the rank of full species and named An. bervoetsi[35] [24]. Yet the issue of the taxonomic status of An. m. nigeriensisremains unresolved. It might still be considered as a variant of An. mouchetito be further studied.

Figure 5.

Morphological variations on the wing ofAn. moucheti.

Figure 6.

An agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide revealing size differences in the PCR amplification products discriminatingAn. mouchetiand closely related species:An. bervoetsi(lanes 1 and 2),An. moucheti(lanes 3 and 4) andAn. m. nigeriensis(lanes 5 and 6). Figure from Kengneet al., 2007 [23]

3. Anopheles nili complex

Important morphological, ecological and behavioral differences among natural populations of Anopheles nilifrom sub-Saharan Africa suggested the existence of several taxonomic units and resulted in the description of four formal species, namely: Anopheles nilisensu stricto, An. somalicus, An. carnevaleiand An. ovengensis[20, 21]. Morphologically, these four species are very close from one another, differing only through subtle morphological characters present at the adult and/or at the larval stages (Figure 7) [18, 38, 39]. Apart from An. somalicus, which is zoophilic and was never incriminated in human malaria transmission, the three other members of the complex are highly anthropophilic and are vectors of malaria.

Figure 7.

Morphological differences between members of theAn. nilicomplex. A: wing ofAn. niliandAn. somalicus,B: wing ofAn. carnevalei,C: wing ofAn. ovengensis.

Anopheles nili among the most important malaria vectors in sub-Saharan Africa. It has a wide geographic distribution range spreading across most of West, Central and East Africa mainly populating humid savannas and degraded rainforest areas (Figure 8) [1, 4, 20, 40]. Larvae thrive at the sunny edge of fast running streams and rivers, where floating vegetation and debris provide suitable shelters (Figure 9) [32]. Forest populations are usually highly anthropophilic and feed regularly indoors whereas savanna populations are more exophilic and exophagic [12, 28]. Despite feeding preferentially on humans, this mosquito can be, at times highly zoophilic [41]. Anopheles niliis usually responsible for a high nuisance to humans in villages along rivers, and abundance rapidly decreases within a few kilometers from the breeding sites [42]. It is also present at the periphery of urban areas.

The prevalence of Plasmodiuminfections in wild females typically ranges between 1 and 3%and transmission rate reaching 200 infective bites/human/year have been reported in the literature for An. nili[12, 13, 28, 43]. Reports on its epidemiological role in East Africa however, are scarce, dating back to the 1970s [18, 44]. There is no published record available for insecticide susceptibility in An. nilipopulations, although unpublished results from South Cameroon suggest full susceptibility to DDT and pyrethroids (permethrin and deltamethrin) using the diagnostic doses recommended for assessing An. gambiaepopulations (Etang et al., unpublished data). The analysis of key ecological factors associated with the distribution of An. nili larvae across 24 hydrographic networks in Cameroon showed that An. nilidistribution conforms to that of a generalist species which is adapted in exploiting a variety of environmental conditions (Figure 4).

Anopheles carnevaleiand An. ovengensisare mainly distributed in deep forest areas where they take over An. nili this environment [4, 41]. Anopheles carnevaleihas been reported so far only from Côte d’Ivoire, Cameroon and Equatorial Guinea [10, 11, 38]. It is rarely collected resting indoors and bites more frequently outdoors [12]. This mosquito is mostly zoophilic although it regularly feeds on humans in villages situated close to its breeding sites. Interestingly, although biting activity can be detected all night long, man-biting activity peaks early in the evening, between 6-7 PM, when inhabitants traditionally meet at the river for domestic and body care activities [12]. Studies conducted in Cameroon and Equatorial Guinea reported infection rates circa1% in Cameroon [12, 28], raising up to 24% when using PCR-based protocols for parasite detection in specimens from Equatorial Guinea [10].

Figure 8.

Map of the predicted probability of occurrence ofAnopheles nilicomplex in Africa [25]. Black dots represent 105 records of occurrence forAn. nilicomplex as described in Hay et al. [26].

Figure 9.

A typical breeding site forAn. nilialong the river Sanaga in South Cameroon.

Figure 10.

A typical breeding site forAn. ovengensisalong river Njoh in South Cameroon (Photo: P Bousses, IRD/MIVEGEC).

Anopheles ovengensis, the most recently described species of the An. nilicomplex, is highly anthropophilic, and bites and rests frequently outdoors [39]. However, studies conducted in Equatorial Guinea reported high densities collected by window exit traps indicating some degree of endophagic and endophilic behavior [11]. Anopheles ovengensisusually displays high biting rates for humans, ranging from 50 to 300 bites/man/night along rivers where its larvae develop (Figure 10). Infection rates by P. falciparumranges between 0.4 to 4.4% in specimens from Cameroon [39] and in Equatorial Guinea [11]. Larvae are often found in sympatry with those of An. mouchetiwith whom it shares most of its distribution area. The distribution range of the species probably extends further East, throughout the Congolese forest basin but this has not been investigated yet.

Anopheles somalicusis strictly zoophilic. At the adult stage, An. somalicusclosely resembles An. nilifrom which it can be morphologically separated at the larval stage only [18]. Adults are rarely recorded in villages although larvae are always found in sympatry with those of An. nili[5]. Nothing is known of its bionomics. According to Gillies and De Meillon [18] its distribution range includes Sierra Leone, Guinea, Burkina Faso, Ivory Coast, Cameroon, Somalia and Tanzania.

Genetic studies conducted on the An. nilicomplex using various molecular markers confirmed the high genetic heterogeneity among its members [2]. Multilocus enzyme analysis of the genetic variability detected species-specific alleles and large differences in shared allele frequencies among species of the complex collected in South Cameroon [45]. Analysis of sequence polymorphism in the rDNA ITS2 region estimated genetic distances in the range of 0.11-0.25 between the four species [46]. This heterogeneity in ITS2 DNA sequences was further used to develop a PCR-based protocol for molecular identification of the different species within the complex (Figure 11) [46]. These data provided support for the recent taxonomic classification within theAn. nilicomplex [24].

Figure 11.

An agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide revealing size differences in the PCR amplification products discriminating between members of theAn. nilicomplex:An. nili(lanes 1 to 4),An. somalicus(lanes 5 and 6),An. ovengensis(lanes 7 and 8) andAn. carnevalei(lanes 9 and 10). Figure from Kengneet al., 2003 [46].

Microsatellite loci were developed in 2003 to allow for more in-depth population genetics investigations [47]. A first comprehensive study explored the level of genetic variability and differentiation between nine populations of An. nilidistributed in West and central Africa, including samples from Senegal, Ivory Coast, Burkina Faso, Nigeria, Cameroon and the DRC using a set of 11 microsatellite markers and sequence variation in four genes within the nuclear rDNA subunit (ITS2 and D3) and mtDNA (COII and ND4). High genetic homogeneity was revealed among An. nilipopulations distributed from Senegal to Cameroon, suggesting shallow population substructure throughout the humid savannas of West Africa, in agreement with a weak effect of geographic distance [48]. However, the population sampled in DRC was highly significantly differentiated from the core of West African populations (FST>0.118, P<0.001), and all individuals segregated into a single genetic cluster separated from all other West African populations in Bayesian cluster analysis (Figure 12). Sequence variation in mtDNA genes matched these results, whereas low polymorphism in rDNA genes prevented detection of any population substructure at this geographical scale in savannah populations [48]. Extensive allele sharing between populations and homogeneity across microsatellite loci in the level of genetic differentiation suggested that enhanced genetic drift in the DRC population, rather than selection was responsible for the observed pattern.

Figure 12.

Bayesian genetic cluster analysis of microsatellite allele frequencies inAn. nili s.l.populations. Genetic homogeneity within savannah populations ofAn. nili s.s.from West/Central Africa and high genetic drift in the DRC population.

In Cameroon, the pattern of genetic differentiation was explored among species within the An. nilicomplex and between populations of An. nilicollected in different ecological settings including the deep evergreen forest, deforested areas and savannah areas. The average observed heterozygosity varied from 0.359 for An. ovengensisto 0.661 for An. nili s.s. and mean pairwise FSTover all loci varied from 0.281 (between An. niliand An. carnevalei) to 0.416 (betweenAn. somalicusand An. ovengensis) and were highly significant (P<0.0001) [45]. The limited number of loci which could readily amplify and the high proportion of loci departing from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in samples collected from the deep forest region suggested the presence of new taxonomic units in this area. Up to seven clusters could be identified in An. niliafter processing Bayesian cluster analysis (Figure 13). Two of these clusters were specific for An. nilipopulations collected in the East Cameroon forest area, suggesting that An. nilifrom East Cameroon may consist of four new taxa. Data obtained from microsatellites analysis were consistent with the high genetic distance measured with rDNA and mtDNA genes [49].

Figure 13.

Bayesian genetic cluster analysis of microsatellite allele frequencies inAn. nili s.l.populations. Genetic heterogeneity between forest populations ofAn. nili South Cameroon showing genetic clustering ofAn. carnevalei(yellow),An. ovengensis(green),An. somalicus(dark blue) and the four genetic clusters suggesting further taxonomic subdivision withinAn. nili this area.

Recently, cytogenetic analysis depicted a physical chromosome map for An. niliupon which nine microsatellite markers could be mapped (Figure 14) [50, 51]. Chromosomal arm homology with An. gambiaewas assessed by fluorescent in situhybridization of DNA probes which established that chromosomes X, 2R and 3R are homologous between the two species, while the 2L arm of An. gambiaecorresponds to the 3L arm of An. nili, and vice versa [50]. Preliminary analysis of chromosomal polymorphism in natural An. nilipopulations from Burkina Faso and Cameroon demonstrated that two polymorphic inversions, named 2Rband 2Rc, are often present simultaneously on the right arm of chromosome 2 [50, 51].

Figure 14.

Physical chromosome map ofAn. nilishowing the cytological location of the nine microsatellite markers mapped on polytene chromosomes (arrows). Two chromosomal inversions are indicated by brackets. Figure from Peeryet al., 2011 [51].

Frequencies of inverted and standard 2Rbvariants were almost equal in the savannah areas of Burkina Faso, albeit with strong deficit in heterozygotes (Fis=+0.603, P<0.0001). In forest areas of Cameroon, only the standard arrangement was found. It is postulated that this inversion may be involved in local ecological or behavioral adaptation in An. nili[50]. Inversion 2Rcoccurred at high frequency in Burkina Faso (83%) while its frequency was only 0.6% in samples from Cameroon, suggesting its involvement in ecogeographic cline from dry to more humid environments. Because An. niliis a forest-savannah transition species, polymorphic inversions could provide genetic plasticity that allowed its expansion into dry savannah and deforested areas of central Africa, where most of the human population is present. High frequencies of these inversions in savannah areas make them useful markers for studying ecological adaptations of this important vector.

4. Conclusion

Most of the work on malaria vectors has been conducted in the savannah environment, whereas principal vectors and their roles in malaria transmission in the immense African rainforest have barely been explored. Therefore, data are crucially lacking for a large part of Africa where malaria transmission is both intense and permanent throughout the year. Recent results demonstrated high levels of differentiation between populations/species of An. mouchetiand the An. nilicomplex over short geographic distances within the forest block but not in the savannah. These data suggest that, unlike other major vectors, these mosquitoes originated and speciated in the equatorial forest. Because malaria elimination in forested areas is most difficult, detailed understanding of the genetic structure, gene flow, and species diversity of malaria vectors is important. Original information gained on the genetic structure of An. mouchetiand An. nilican further be used to investigate genes for a signature of selection to uncover the genetic mechanisms of ecological adaptations, speciation, and susceptibility to Plasmodium, within a comparative framework that will use information available for other major human malaria vectors. Furthermore, because some species/populations within An. mouchetiand the An. nilicomplex are highly exophagic/exophilic and can bite man as well as other vertebrates in remote areas, they are likely candidates for acting as bridge vectors, providing opportunities for wildlife pathogens to cause zoonosis in humans. These findings raise a concern in the light of recent reports confirming the circulation of various Plasmodiumspecies, including strains of P. falciparum, in chimpanzees, gorillas, and guenons in the equatorial forest region [52].


Part of the work reported in this manuscript was supported by grants no. A00942, A20727, A60347 from the UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR) to C.A.N, a Wellcome Trust Intermediate Fellowship in Public Health and Tropical Medecine (WTO86423MA) to CAN, the NIH grant R21 AI079350, the Pal+ programme from the French Ministry of Research and the French Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD/MIVEGEC).

© 2013 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite and reference

Link to this chapter Copy to clipboard

Cite this chapter Copy to clipboard

Christophe Antonio-Nkondjio and Frédéric Simard (July 24th 2013). Highlights on Anopheles nili and Anopheles moucheti, Malaria Vectors in Africa, Anopheles mosquitoes - New insights into malaria vectors, Sylvie Manguin, IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/55153. Available from:

chapter statistics

2589total chapter downloads

More statistics for editors and authors

Login to your personal dashboard for more detailed statistics on your publications.

Access personal reporting

Related Content

This Book

Next chapter

The Dominant Mosquito Vectors of Human Malaria in India

By Vas Dev and Vinod P. Sharma

Related Book

First chapter

Malaria Elimination: Challenges and Opportunities

By Umberto D’Alessandro

We are IntechOpen, the world's leading publisher of Open Access books. Built by scientists, for scientists. Our readership spans scientists, professors, researchers, librarians, and students, as well as business professionals. We share our knowledge and peer-reveiwed research papers with libraries, scientific and engineering societies, and also work with corporate R&D departments and government entities.

More About Us