InTech uses cookies to offer you the best online experience. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Medicine » Infectious Diseases » "Anopheles mosquitoes - New insights into malaria vectors", book edited by Sylvie Manguin, ISBN 978-953-51-1188-7, Published: July 24, 2013 under CC BY 3.0 license. © The Author(s).

Chapter 18

Bacterial Biodiversity in Midguts of Anopheles Mosquitoes, Malaria Vectors in Southeast Asia

By Sylvie Manguin, Chung Thuy Ngo, Krajana Tainchum, Waraporn Juntarajumnong, Theeraphap Chareonviriyaphap, Anne-Laure Michon and Estelle Jumas-Bilak
DOI: 10.5772/55610

Article top


Map of Southeast Asia showing the locations of three provinces in Thailand (blue dots) and the province in Vietnam (red dot) where the mosquito collections were implemented.
Figure 1. Map of Southeast Asia showing the locations of three provinces in Thailand (blue dots) and the province in Vietnam (red dot) where the mosquito collections were implemented.
Representative TTGE analysis of V3 16S rRNA gene PCR products amplified from midgut samples of Anopheles mosquitoes from Thailand. Each lane corresponded to a specimen microbiota.
Figure 2. Representative TTGE analysis of V3 16S rRNA gene PCR products amplified from midgut samples of Anopheles mosquitoes from Thailand. Each lane corresponded to a specimen microbiota.
Distribution of the Anopheles mosquito populations from Thailand and Vietnam according to their refined diversity index
Figure 3. Distribution of the Anopheles mosquito populations from Thailand and Vietnam according to their refined diversity index
Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic tree of the genus Acinetobacter. Lineages of strains detected in the microbiota of Anopheles mosquitoes are in color, blue for Thailand, red for Vietnam. Bootstrap percentages (>50 %) after 100 resamplings are shown. Bar: 0.5 % sequence divergence.
Figure 4. Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic tree of the genus Acinetobacter. Lineages of strains detected in the microbiota of Anopheles mosquitoes are in color, blue for Thailand, red for Vietnam. Bootstrap percentages (>50 %) after 100 resamplings are shown. Bar: 0.5 % sequence divergence.
Repartition in genera of OTU assigned bands obtained by PCR-TTGE from 175 specimens of Anopheles mosquitoes from Thailand (A) and from Vietnam (B).
Figure 5. Repartition in genera of OTU assigned bands obtained by PCR-TTGE from 175 specimens of Anopheles mosquitoes from Thailand (A) and from Vietnam (B).
Repartition in significative high-level bacterial taxa of OTU from 175 specimens of Anopheles mosquitoes from Thailand (A) and from Vietnam (B). GP for Gammaproteobacteria.
Figure 6. Repartition in significative high-level bacterial taxa of OTU from 175 specimens of Anopheles mosquitoes from Thailand (A) and from Vietnam (B). GP for Gammaproteobacteria.
Comparison of the microbiota of An. maculatus caught in Thailand (n=11) (A) and in Vietnam (n=28) (B).
Figure 7. Comparison of the microbiota of An. maculatus caught in Thailand (n=11) (A) and in Vietnam (n=28) (B).

Bacterial Biodiversity in Midguts of Anopheles Mosquitoes, Malaria Vectors in Southeast Asia

Sylvie Manguin1, Chung Thuy Ngo1, 2, Krajana Tainchum3, Waraporn Juntarajumnong3, Theeraphap Chareonviriyaphap3, Anne-Laure Michon4 and Estelle Jumas-Bilak4

1. Introduction

Factors allowing the development of a pathogen to reach the infecting stage in a mosquito are poorly known. On the 528 species of mosquitoes recorded within the Anopheles genus [1], only 70 to 60 are able to transmit parasites responsible for malaria and filariasis [2, 3]. In vector-parasite interactions, the mosquito gut represents the first point of contact between parasites ingested and the vector epithelial surfaces. In the midgut, the parasites will have the opportunity to undergo their life cycle, but of the tens of thousands of Plasmodium gametocytes ingested by mosquitoes, less than five oocysts might be produced [4]. The factors responsible for this drastic reduction are still poorly understood. Recent studies showed that one of these factors concerns the primordial role played by the bacteria naturally present in mosquito midgut. Then, there is a growing interest on bacterial biodiversity in Anopheles mosquitoes and particularly those based on the identification of bacteria to be used for malaria transmission blocking based on bacterial genetic changes to deliver antiparasite molecules or paratransgenic approach [5-13]. Recent studies reported the presence of symbiotic bacteria, such as Pantoea agglomerans or Asaia in midgut lumen with anti-Plasmodium effector proteins that render host mosquitoes refractory to malaria infection [6, 10, 13]. Engineered P. agglomerans strains were able to inhibit Plasmodium falciparum development by 98% [13]. Other studies showed that insects with an important microbiota seem more resistant to infections and certain bacteria, such as Enterobacter sp. (Esp Z) inhibit partially or totally ookinete, oocyst and sporozoite formation [14-16]. In Anopheles albimanus, co-infections with the bacteria, Serratia marcescens, and Plasmodium vivax resulted in only 1% of mosquitoes being infected with oocysts, compared with 71% infection for control mosquitoes without bacteria [17]. A recent meta-taxogenomic study provides an in-depth description of the microbial communities in the midgut of Anopheles gambiae exposed to P. falciparum infection and the links between microbiota and parasitic status by comparing midgut microbiota in P. falciparum-positive and P. falciparum-negative individuals. Authors found significant correlation between the high enterobacterial content and malaria infection. Despite conflicting results on the role of enterobacteria, it has now clearly been established that bacteria present in Anopheles populations have a great influence on parasite transmission [18].

In Thailand and Vietnam, malaria is a public health priority with a strong prevalence of this disease in forested regions, in particular along the international borders with Myanmar and Cambodia respectively. In these malaria endemic areas, another parasitic disease occurs, Bancroftian lymphatic filariasis (BLF) for which only limited data are available [2]. Malaria and BLF are mosquito-borne diseases with Plasmodium species, especially P. falciparum, P. vivax, and rural strains of Wuchereria bancrofti sharing the same Anopheles vector species. In Southeast Asia, Anopheles vectors belong to species complexes with different involvement in the transmission of pathogens [19]. Few sibling species of the Dirus and Minimus Complexes and the Maculatus Group are involved in malaria and BLF, but specific role of each sibling species and factors influencing this role have never been studied due to the lack of reliable methods for species identification, now available [20-22]. As mosquito microbiota is one of the factors influencing pathogen transmission, this chapter is presenting the biodiversity of bacteria in the midgut of field-collected adults of 10 Anopheles species, topic less studied compared to the large number of studies presenting bacteria in the defense against parasites in laboratory conditions.

1.1. Midgut microbiome of mosquitoes

Many insects contain large communities of diverse microorganisms that probably exceed the number of cells in the insect itself [23]. More specifically, complex microbiotae have been described in mosquito midgut reporting the presence of numerous Gram-negative rods, including Serratia marcescens, Klebsiella ozaenae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Enterobacter spp. [14]. Recently, three metagenomic studies provided a more comprehensive picture of the diversity of midgut microbiota in Anopheles gambiae, the main malaria vector in Africa [18, 24, 25]. In wild caught adults of Anopheles species, the microbiota showed the common presence of Pseudomonas and Aeromonas species reported from at least five species among which malaria vectors (Table 1). The following five genera, Asaia, Bacillus, Chryseobacterium, Klebsiella, and Pantoea have been reported from four field collected Anopheles species, while Serratia and Stenotrophomonas were identified in three species (Table 1). At least three mosquito-specific bacterial species, isolated from the midgut of main malaria vectors of the Gambiae Complex, have been described, such as Thorsellia anophelis [26], Janibacter anophelis [27] and Elizabethkingia anophelis [28]. The first of the three species represents a new genus and species found predominant in the midgut of Anopheles arabiensis [29], the same Anopheles species in which J. anophelis was isolated. The third newly described species is closely related to Elizabethkingia meningoseptica as they share 98.6% similarity, and both species have been found in the midgut of Anopheles gambiae [11, 28]. The latter species, E. meningoseptica, was also isolated from diseased birds, frogs, turtles, cats, being most likely an agent of zoonotic infections, as well as a human meningitis especially in newborn infants [30]. Bacteria of the genus Asaia have also been associated with Anopheles species, in particular field-collected An. gambiae, An. funestus, An. coustani and An. maculipennis (Table 1), as well as a colony of An. stephensi in which Asaia bacteria was dominant and stably associated [9]. The presence of Asaia species in Anopheles could serve as candidate for malaria control based on the production of antiparasite molecules in mosquitoes for use in paratransgenic control of malaria [6, 9, 31]. Other bacterial species have been defined as antimalarial agents, especially those producing prodigiosin, a pigment produced by various bacteria, including S. marcescens [14].

The number of bacteria not only varied between individuals but also changed markedly during development, depending on both the stage of development and the blood-feeding status of the mosquitoes [31]. The normal midgut microbiota of Anopheles mosquitoes need to be further identified [5] as only few studies have reported the microbiota of wild caught malaria vectors (Table 1) [5-7, 9, 11, 12, 17, 24, 26-29, 31-35]. Further investigations of gut microbiota, especially of wild-caught insect vectors, might contribute to understanding the annual and regional variations recorded for vector transmitted diseases [17] and yield novel vector-control strategies [14].

1.2. Exploring bacterial communities by 16S PCR-TTGE

Bacterial communities are classically assessed through culture-dependent methods based on colony isolation on solid medium, sometimes after enrichment by growth in liquid medium. But, it is now obvious that the microbial diversity is poorly represented by the cultured fraction, and culture have been shown to explore less than 1% of the whole bacterial diversity in environment samples [36]. Thanks to sophisticated biotechnological and computational tools of the metagenomics, molecular ecology offers the potential of determining microbial diversity in an ecosystem by assessing the genetic diversity. The complete metagenomic approach will give the total gene content of a community, thus providing data about biodiversity but also function and interactions [37]. For the purpose of biodiversity studies, metagenomics can focus on one common gene shared by all members of the community. The most commonly used culture-independent method relies on amplification and analysis of the 16S rRNA genes in a microbiota [38].

The 16S rRNA genes are widely used for documentation of the evolutionary history and taxon assignment of individual organisms because they have highly conserved regions for construction of universal primers and highly variable regions for identification of individual species [39]. The notion developed by Woese that rRNA genes could identify living organisms by reconstructing phylogenies resulted in the adoption of 16S rRNA gene in microbiology [39]. Its universality and the huge number of sequences stored in databases have established 16S rRNA gene as the “gold standard” not only in microbial phylogeny, systematics, and identification but also microbial ecology [40].

Anopheles Total Anopheles species
Bacteria genera (species) albimanus arabiensis coustani darlingi dureni funestus gambiae maculipennis stephensi
Achromobacter (A. xylosoxidans)[31][5, 34]2
Acidovorax (A. temperans) [12]1
Acinetobacter sp. (A. hemolyticus, A. radioresistens)[24][34]2
Aeromonas sp. (A. hydrophila)[24]*[35][24][12, 24][5]5
Anaplasma (A. ovis)[12]1
Asaia spp. (A. bogorensis, A. siamensis)[24][24][9, 24][9]4
Bacillus spp. (B. cereus, B. coagulans, B. megaterium, B. mucoides, B. silvestris, B. simplex, B. thuringensis)[12][31][31][34]4
Brevundiumonas (B. diminuta)[31]1
Cedecea (C. davisae)[31][31]2
Chryseobacterium (C. indologenes)[24][24][24][34]4
Citrobacter (C. freundii)[34]1
Enterobacter spp. (E. amnigenus, E. cloacae, E. sakazaki)[17][34]2
Erwinia (E. ananas, E. chrysanthenum)[31][31]2
Escherichia (E. coli, E. senegalensis)[12][31]2
Elizabethkingia (E. anophelis, E. meningoseptica)[11, 28]1
Flavobacterium (F. resinovorum)[31]1
Gluconobacter (G. cerinus)[31]1
Janibacter (J. anophelis, J. limosus)[12, 27]1
Klebsiella spp. (K. pneumoniae)[33][31][31][32]4
Kluyvera (K. cryocrescens)[31]1
Leuconostoc (L. citreum)[34]1
Leminorella (L. grimontii)[34]1
Morganella (M. morgani)[31]1
Mycoplasma (M. wenyonii)[12]1
Nocardia (N. corynebacterioides)[12]1
Paenibacillus sp.[12]1
Pantoea (P. agglomerans, P. stewartii)[35][31][11, 31][7]4
Pseudomonas spp. (P. aeruginosa, P. mendosina, P. pseudoflava, P. putida, P. stutzeri, P. synxantha, P. testosteroni)[35][33][29, 31][12, 31][5, 34]5
Salmonella spp. (S. choleraesuis, S. enteritidis)[31][31]2
Serratia (S. marcescens, S. nematodiphila, S. odorifera, S. proteamaculans)[17][12][32, 34]3
Sphingobacterium (S. multivorum)[11]1
Spiroplasma sp.[12]1
Stenotrophomonas (S. maltophilia)[12][31][11, 12]3
Thorsellia (T. anophelis)[26, 29]1
Vibrio (V. metschnikovii)[12]1
Xenorhabdus (X. nematophila)[34]1

Table 1.

Bacterial genera isolated from the midgut of wild-caught adults of 9 Anopheles species linked to the associated reference numbers.

[i] - °, An. gambiae s.l. or s.s.; *, For Osei-Poku et al (2012) [24], genera with low frequency were not considered in this table.

The complete 16S rRNA gene (1500 bp) gives the accurate affiliation to a species in most cases. In metagenomics, the amplified fragments are shorter, ranging from 200 to 400 bp, but contain nine hypervariable regions (V1-V9) [41], which compensate the lack of information due to the small sequence size by a high rate of mutation. In most studies, the V3 region located in the 5’ part of the gene is chosen [42]. However, the phylogenetic information is sometimes insufficient to achieve species identification. Depending on the bacterium, sequences provide identification to the genus or family level only. Consequently, the diversity of the community is not described by a list of bacterial species but by a list of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) corresponding to the lower taxonomic level being accurately identified. The 16S rRNA gene, in spite of some recognized pitfalls [43], remains today the most popular marker for studying the specific diversity in a bacterial community. Alternative markers can also be proposed such as rpoB [40] but universal rpoB PCR primers allowing the exploration of the whole bacterial diversity cannot be designed (Jumas-Bilak E, personal data) and the databases remain poor in rpo sequences.

Molecular approaches for assessing biodiversity avoid the bias of cultivability but displayed several pitfalls that should be evaluated and considered for a sound interpretation of the data. Particularly, DNA should be recovered and amplified from all the genotypes in the community, i.e. extraction and PCR should be as universal as possible. Special attention should be given to Firmicutes and Actinobacteria because they display thick and resistant cell wall. The extraction efficiency should be tested on a wide panel of bacteria to scan a large range of bacterial types. Extraction is generally improved by the use of large-spectrum lytic enzymes and/or by a mechanical grinding [44, 45]. The PCR itself is another cause of limitations in the molecular approaches. It often praises for its detection sensitivity but this sensitivity can fail when complex samples are analyzed. For example, detection thresholds of 103-104 CFU (colony forming units)/mL are currently described for universal PCR and migration in denaturing gels [44-46]. The detection limit cannot be easily assessed as it depends on both CFU/g count of each OTU and the relative representation of OTUs in the community. Minor populations of less than 1% of total population are generally undetectable for denaturing-gel-based methods used in microbial ecology [45, 47, 48].

In biodiversity studies, the different 16S rRNA genes representative of the community are amplified by PCR and then separated and identified either by cloning and Sanger sequencing or by direct pyro-sequencing [38]. Tools for sequence-specific separation after bulk PCR amplification, such as T-RFLP (Terminal-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism) [49], D-HPLC (Denaturing High Performance Liquid Chromatography) [50], CDCE (Constant Denaturing Capillary Electrophoresis) [51], SSCP (Single Stranded Conformation Polymorphism) [52], DGGE (Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis) [53], TGGE (Temperature Gradient Gel Electrophoresis), [48] and TTGE (Temporal Temperature Gradient Gel Electrophoresis) [47], can also be used. Methods based upon separation in denaturing electrophoresis allow the comparison of microbiotae with low or medium diversity [54]. They easily provide a “fingerprint” of the community diversity and therefore they are suitable for the follow-up of large collection of samples.

PCR-TTGE is a PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis that allows separation of DNA fragments in a temporal gradient of temperature [47, 55]. PCR amplicons of the same size but with different sequences are separated in the gel. In a denaturing acrylamide gel, DNA denatures in discrete regions called melting domains, each of them displaying a sequence specific melting temperature. When the melting temperature (Tm) of the whole amplicon is reached, the DNA is denatured creating branched molecules. This branching reduces DNA mobility in the gel. Therefore, amplicons of the same size but with different nucleotide compositions can be separated based on differences in the behavior of their melting domains. When DNA is extracted and amplified from a complex community, TTGE leads to the separation of the different amplicons and produces a banding pattern characteristic of the community. Counting bands on the TTGE profile provides a diversity score that roughly corresponds to the number of molecular species in the sample. The banding profile can be further analyzed by measuring distance migration of bands and comparing with patterns from known species. This comparison allows the affiliation of band to some representative species. Affiliation of all bands can be achieved by cutting bands from the gel, extracting DNA from bands and sequencing. A method associating migration distances measurement and sequencing of selected bands has shown its efficiency in describing bacterial communities of low complexity such as the gut microbiota of neonates [45]. Such an approach is simple enough and cost-effective to survey bacterial communities on a wide range of samples [56].

This chapter presents the bacterial biodiversity in the midguts of malaria vectors from Thailand and Vietnam based on the amplification of the V3 region of the 16S rRNA gene, separation of amplicon by TTGE and sequencing. The bacterial biodiversity among specimens and species in relation to the collection site are discussed.

2. Material and methods

2.1. Mosquito collections and species identification

In Thailand, populations of Anopheles mosquitoes were collected from three different sites located in malaria endemic area along the Thai-Myanmar border (Figure 1). One study site is in Pu Teuy, a village located in Sai Yok District, Kanchanaburi Province, western Thailand (14° 17’N, 99° 01’E). The rural site is located in mountainous terrain mostly surrounded by forest. The main water body near the collection site is a narrow, slow running stream, bordered with native vegetation [57]. This stream represents the main larval habitat for An. minimus s.l. [58]. A total of 1,330 malaria cases were reported in 2011 in the Sai Yok District with a prevalence of 389 cases of P. falciparum (44.7%) and 481 cases of P. vivax (55.3%) with a mortality rate per 100,000 inhabitants of 0.71 [59]. The second site located in Mae Sod District, Tak Province, is in the northern part of Thailand (16° 67’N, 98° 68’E). This is a forested area associated to agricultural fields and small streams. In 2011, 1,876 malaria cases were reported in this district with 187 cases of P. falciparum (28.3%) and 473 cases of P. vivax (71.7%). The mortality rate per 100,000 was of 0.56 [59]. The third site in Sop Moei District is the most southern district of Mae Hong Son Province (17° 86’N, 97° 96’E). This mountainous province is located north of Tak Province with a high malaria transmission occurring from June to August, during the rainy season [60]. In 2011, 1,643 malaria cases were found in this district due to P. falciparum with 419 cases (45.0%) and P. vivax with 511 cases (55.0%) and a mortality rate per 100,000 of 0.41 [59].

The specimens from Vietnam were collected from six sites located in Dak Ngo Commune, Tuy Duc District, Dak Nong Province (11°59’N, 107°42’E - central Highlands) where 848 malaria cases were reported in 2011, of which, 322 cases (54.9%) were caused by P. falciparum, 209 cases (35.6%) by P. vivax and 56 cases (9.5%) were mixed infections [61]. This province was named in 2004 after integrating parts from northern area of Binh Phuoc Province and southern area of Dak Lak Province. The average temperature in this province is around 24° C with the rainy season ranging from May to October and the dry season from November to April. The climate is favorable for agriculture, especially coffee, pepper and rubber plantations. Crops of coffee, pepper or cashew nuts were normally cultivated around houses. Villages were surrounded by cassava, corn and rice fields and located in the fringe forest. Every year, during harvest period, workers from neighbourhood come to work in the field, which generate high population movements in this area.

Anopheles mosquitoes were morphologically sorted by taxon before using specific AS-PCR assays for species identification within the complex or the group [20-22]. Each individual was split in two pieces, head-thorax for species identification and abdomen for midgut bacteria analysis.


Figure 1.

Map of Southeast Asia showing the locations of three provinces in Thailand (blue dots) and the province in Vietnam (red dot) where the mosquito collections were implemented.

2.2. DNA extraction

Mosquitoes stored at -20°C were surface rinsed twice in purified water prepared for injectable solution, and abdomen was thoroughly disrupted using a tissue crusher device in 150 µl of TE buffer. DNA was extracted using the Master Pure Gram Positive DNA purification kit as recommended by the supplier (Epicentre Biotechnologics, Madison, USA).

2.3. PCR

The V2–V3 region of the 16S rRNA gene of bacteria in the samples was amplified using the primers HDA1/HDA2 [45]; HDA1: 5’-ACTC CTA CGG GAG GCA GCA GT-3’, HDA2: 5’-GTA TTA CCG CGG CTG CTG GCA-3’. A 40-bp clamp, named GC (5’-CGC CCG GGG CGC GCC CCG GGC GGG GCG GGG GCA CGG GGG G-3’) flanked the 5’ extremity of HDA1 [47] in order to form HDA1-GC. PCR was performed using an Eppendorf thermal cycler® (Eppendorf, Le Pecq, France) and 0.5 ml tubes. The reaction mixture (50 µl) contained 2.5 units of Taq DNA Polymerase (FastStart High fidelity PCR system, Roche, Meylan, France), 0.2 mM of each primer and 1 μl of DNA in the appropriate reaction buffer. Amplification was 95°C for 2 min, 35 cycles of 95°C for 1 min, 62°C for 30 s, 72°C for 1 min and 7 min at 72°C for final extension. To avoid contamination, solutions were prepared with sterile DNA-free water and preparation of the mastermix, addition of template DNA and gel electrophoresis of PCR products were carried out in separate rooms. PCR amplification was checked by DNA electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gels containing ethidium bromide and visualized under ultraviolet light.

2.4. TTGE migration

TTGE was performed using the DCode universal mutation detection system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Marne-la-Coquette, France) in gels that were 16 cm × 16 cm by 1 mm. The gels (40 ml) were composed of 8% (wt/vol) bisacrylamide (37.5:1), 7 M urea, 40 μl of N,N,N’,N’-tetramethylethylenediamine (TEMED), and 40 mg ammonium persulfate (APS). Gels were run with 1X Tris–acetate–EDTA buffer at pH 8.4. The 5 µl of DNA was loaded on gel with 5 μl of in-house dye marker (saccharose 50%, Bromophenol Blue 0.1%) using capillary tips. Denaturing electrophoresis was performed at 46 V with a temperature ramp from 63°C to 70°C during 16 h (0.4°C/h) after a pre-migration of 15 min at 20 V and 63°C. Gels were stained with ethidium bromide solution (5 µg/ml) for 20 minutes, washed with de-ionized water, viewed using a UV transillumination system (Vilbert-Lourmat, France) and photographed.

2.5. TTGE band sequencing and OTU affiliation

TTGE bands were excised and the DNA was eluted with 50 µl of elution buffer (EB) of the Qiaquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Courtabeuf, France) overnight at 37°C before PCR amplification with HDA1/HDA2 used without GC clamp. The reaction conditions were identical to those described above. PCR products were sequenced on an ABI 3730xl sequencer (Cogenics, Meylan, France). Each sequencing chromatograph was visually inspected and corrected. The sequences were analyzed by comparison with Genbank ( and RDPII databases ( using Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) and Seqmatch programs, respectively. The reference sequence with the highest percentage was used for OTU affiliation. A sequence was affiliated to a species-level OTU when the percent of sequence similarity was above 99.0%, as previously proposed [62]. This value is over the recognized cut-off value for the delineation of species [63], but warrants high stringency for species-level OTU affiliation. Below 99.0%, the sequence is affiliated to the genus of the reference sequence with the highest percentage. When several species reference sequences match equally, affiliation was done to the genus level. For example, sequence with 99.5% in similarity to the species Aeromonas caviae and Aeromonas hydrophila was only assigned to the genus Aeromonas. Low cut-off is not defined for the genus delineation since affiliation to a higher taxonomic rank such as family or order will be done considering the taxonomic frame of the clade using Greengenes database [64]. On each TTGE gel, about 50% of the bands were sequenced, the others being affiliated to an OTU by comparison of their migration distance with that of sequenced bands.

2.6. Phylogeny

The sequences for phylogenetic analysis were selected in the GenBank database using BLAST program and taxonomy browser ( The sequences were then quality checked using SEQMATCH program in the 16S rDNA-specialized database, RDPII ( Sequences were aligned using the ClustalX program [65], and the alignment was manually corrected to exclude gaps and ambiguously aligned regions. Maximum-likelihood (ML) phylogenetic analysis was performed using PhyML v2.4.6 [66], the model being General Time Reversible plus gamma distribution plus invariable site. ML bootstrap support was computed on 100 reiterations using PhyML.

3. Results

3.1. Anopheles species

Among the 175 specimens of Anopheles collected in Thailand and Vietnam, a total of 10 species were identified including six species per country of which two, An. maculatus and An. dirus, were common to both countries (Table 2). Eight species out of 10 belong to a group or a complex of which the sibling species were identified using the appropriate PCR assay (see Material and Methods). The Maculatus Group was represented by two species, An. maculatus and An. sawadwongporni, the latter collected in Thailand only. Within the Dirus Complex, three species were identified, An. dirus, An. baimaii and An. scanloni, the latter two were also collected in Thailand, as well as two species of the Minimus Complex, An. minimus and An. harrisoni. Three additional species were collected in Vietnam, An. gigas belonging to the Gigas Complex, An. barbumbrosus, and An. crawfordi. Among the 10 collected species, the former seven species of the Maculatus Group, Dirus and Minimus Complexes are defined as important malaria vectors and the latter three species have not been reported as being involved in malaria transmission [19, 67].

3.2. PCR-TTGE profiles and diversity index in midgut bacterial communities of Anopheles

The midgut microbiota of 175 specimens of Anopheles mosquitoes was investigated by 16S rRNA gene PCR-TTGE anchored in the V3 hypervariable region. A representative gel is given in Figure 2. TTGE profiles were obtained for 144 samples, 31 samples (17.7%) giving no amplification in PCR or a faint PCR signals leading to non-detectable TTGE profiles. Negative results suggested a low bacterial inoculum rather than a total absence of bacteria in the corresponding samples. Most negative samples came from Vietnam mosquitoes (n=26), compared to Thailand (n=5), and seemed to be unrelated to the Anopheles species. Finally, V3 16S PCR-TTGE approach led to the description of a microbial community for about 80% of the specimens analyzed and therefore appeared as an efficient tool to investigate midgut bacterial diversity in a large population of mosquitoes.

Figure 2.

Representative TTGE analysis of V3 16S rRNA gene PCR products amplified from midgut samples of Anopheles mosquitoes from Thailand. Each lane corresponded to a specimen microbiota.

A raw diversity index that globally reflects the bacterial diversity in a sample is classically evaluated by counting the bands in TTGE profiles. At a first glance, the number of bands on TTGE profiles (Figure 2) ranged from 1 to 10 suggesting that the bacterial diversity per specimen ranged from 1 to 10 OTUs. However, sequencing showed that bands with different distance of migration could belong to the same OTU. This atypical phenomenon was observed for bacteria displaying sequence heterogeneity among their 16S rRNA gene copies. For instance, members of the genus Acinetobacter as well as most members of the genera affiliated to the family Enterobacteriaceae displayed a high level of 16S rRNA gene heterogeneity leading to complex banding patterns in V3 16S PCR-TTGE. Considering that Acinetobacter and Enterobacteriaceae were prevalent in our samples, the raw diversity index drastically overestimated the bacterial diversity. Therefore, a refined diversity index was calculated after affiliation of each band to an OTU by sequencing or by comparative approach (see Material and Methods).

The refined diversity index showed a low bacterial diversity per specimen with an average of 1.5 OTU per specimen. Most positive samples displayed a diversity index of 1 or 2 (Figure 3). Five OTUs is the maximal biodiversity per specimen observed in our population of Anopheles mosquitoes. Figure 3 showed that the number of OTUs per specimen differed slightly between populations from different origin, with an average of 1.7 and 1.3 OTU per specimen in Thailand and Vietnam, respectively. Considering mosquito species, the average diversity varied between 0 for An. sawadwongporni and 3 for An. harrisoni (Table 2).

Maculatus Minimus Dirus
Thailand (n=75) Vietnam (n=100) An. maculatus (n=28) An. maculatus (n=11) An. sawadwongporni (n=1) An. minimus (n= 37) An. harrisoni (n=13) An. baimaii (n=4) An. scanloni (n=3) An. dirus (n=6) An. dirus (n=23) An. gigas (n=24) An. barbumbrosus (n=13) An. crawfordi (n=12)
Acinetobacter 14101011111835
Aeromonas 8
Asaia 24
Bacillus 111
Cellvibrio* 1
Chromobacterium* 1
Chryseobacterium 111
Citrobacter 1
Corynebacterium* 1
Cronobacter* 5
Diaphorobacter* 1
Diplorickettsia* 11
Elizabethkingia 41
Enhydrobacter* 1
Enterobacter 111112
Escherichia 1
Gluconacetobacter* 2
Kluyvera 3
Microbacterium* 1
Moraxella* 112
Nitrincola* 3
Pantoea 1
Pseudomonas 818112
Psychrobacter* 1
Raoultella* 292
Riemerella* 1
Serratia 86123
Shewanella* 1
Sphingomonas* 2016811
Staphylococcus* 11
Stenotrophomonas 2
Diversity Index1.

Table 2.

Bacterial genera detected in midgut of Anopheles species caught in Thailand (blue) and Vietnam (red) with the number of specimens carrying each genus. Diversity index links to Anopheles species and origin is given at the bottom of the table. Genera described for the first time in Anopheles are marked with asterisk. Vertical lines delineated, from left to right, both countries with their respective number of Anopheles specimens, and groupings of Anopheles species, such as the Maculatus Group, the Minimus and Dirus Complexes, and the non-vector species including the Gigas Complex and 2 additional species.

Figure 3.

Distribution of the Anopheles mosquito populations from Thailand and Vietnam according to their refined diversity index

3.3. Bacterial diversity in the whole population of Anopheles mosquitoes

16S rRNA gene PCR-TTGE is focused on hypervariable region V3 produced sequences of about 200 bp, which are generally not informative enough for species affiliation. Consequently, we presented here the bacterial diversity to the genus level. However, probable species affiliation will be proposed for several genera when the phylogenetic signal of the V3 region was significant.

Contrasting with the low diversity per specimen, OTU diversity in the whole population was high with the detection of 31 different bacterial genera (Table 2) distributed in four phyla, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes/Chlorobi, Firmicutes and Actinobacteria. Proteobacteria largely dominated the midgut microbiota of Anopheles mosquitoes with 232 OTUs in the population studied. Their diversity encompassed Alpha, Beta- and Gamma superclasses of Proteobacteria.

The gamma-proteobacterial genera Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, Enterobacter, Serratia and Raoultella were widely detected in our populations. A total of 40% of specimens and 70% of Anopheles species were colonized by members of the genus Acinetobacter, which therefore could be considered as a ‘core genus’ of the midgut microbiota of Anopheles. The sequences affiliated to the genus Acinetobacter were identified to the species level by a phylogenetic approach (Figure 4). The Anopheles midgut microbiota included 6 main species, Acinetobacter baumannii, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, Acinetobacter johnsonii, Acinetobacter soli, Acinetobacter guillouiae and Acinetobacter junii, the two latter being more represented. The genus Acinetobacter belongs to the order Pseudomonadales in gamma-proteobacteria together with Pseudomonas (Pseudomonas fluorescens and Pseudomonas alcaligenes), Moraxella, Enhydrobacter, Psychrobacter and Cellvibrio. Enterobacteriales was the second main order of gamma-proteobacteria represented in the midgut microbiota of Anopheles. In enterobacteria, the species affiliation could not be achieved since genera are very close together in 16S rRNA gene phylogeny, particularly for Enterobacter and its relatives Cronobacter and Pantoea. Members of gamma-proteobacteria of the orders Legionellales (Diplorickettsia), Oceanospirillales (Nitrincola), Alteromonadales (Shewanella), Xanthomonadales (Stenotrophomonas) and Aeromonadales (Aeromonas) were also detected showing the very wide diversity of gamma-proteobacteria in the midgut microbiota of Anopheles.


Figure 4.

Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic tree of the genus Acinetobacter. Lineages of strains detected in the microbiota of Anopheles mosquitoes are in color, blue for Thailand, red for Vietnam. Bootstrap percentages (>50 %) after 100 resamplings are shown. Bar: 0.5 % sequence divergence.

The diversity was lower in alpha- and beta-proteobacteria. However, the genus Sphingomonas that belonged to Alphaproteobacteria, was the second main genus detected in this study (26% of the Anopheles species colonized) mostly represented by sequences affiliated or related to the species Sphingomonas aromaticivorans and Sphingomonas glacialis. Acetic-acid bacteria (Asaia and Gluconacetobacter) belonged to Alphaproteobacteria and were sporadically represented as well as Chromobacterium and Diaphorobacter, the two members of Betaproteobacteria.

Beside Proteobacteria, the phyla Bacteroidetes/Chlorobi, Actinobacteria and Firmicutes were represented by only few genera: 15, 9 and 5 respectively. Chryseobacterium, Elizabethkingia and Riemerella, which colonized only 8 mosquitoes, belonged to Bacteroidetes/Chlorobi and class Flavobacteriia. Sequences affiliated to the genus Elizabethkingia could not be related with certainty to Elizabethkingia anophelis, because the V3 region did not discriminate between this Anopheles-specific species and the human pathogen Elizabethkingia meningoseptica. Bacillus and Staphylococcus (Firmicutes), Corynebacterium and Microbacterium (Actinobacteria) were the sole Gram-positive genera found in the population of Anopheles mosquitoes. The most related species were Bacillus cereus, Corynebacterium freiburgense and Microbacterium trichothecenolyticum. The Staphylococcus sequences found in two mosquitoes were identical to those of a strain isolated in the midgut of the ladybug Harmonia axyridis and were linked to the species Staphylococcus sciuri.

3.4. Bacterial associations and relationship

Acinetobacter spp. was present in all mosquito specimens except in An. maculatus and An. dirus from Thailand. Specimens of these two Anopheles species were mainly colonized by Pseudomonas and Serratia (Table 2). When the microbiota of each specimen is considered (data not shown), the pair Pseudomonas / Serratia never co-habited with Acinetobacter in the same midgut. Pseudomonas strains associated with Serratia were related to the species P. fluorescens whereas P. alcaligenes was never associated with Serratia and inhabited midguts colonized with Acinetobacter. These results suggested that the association P. fluorescens / Serratia might specifically inhibit the colonization of Anopheles midgut by Acinetobacter.

Negative relationships between Sphingomonas and enterobacteria were also suggested in Table 2 for mosquitoes from Vietnam. Considering each specimen, we always observed the absence of enterobacteria when Sphingomonas colonized the midgut (data not shown).

3.5. Comparison of bacterial diversity in the midgut of Anopheles from Thailand and Vietnam

Table 2 and Figure 5 showed the differential distribution of bacterial genera according to the geographic origin of mosquitoes. Eight genera were shared between specimens from Thailand and Vietnam and corresponded to genera with high prevalence such as Enterobacter, Serratia, Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter. In Thailand, each of these four genera colonized more than 10% of specimens, each of the genera Raoultella, Cronobacter, Aeromonas, Elizabethkingia and Asaia colonized 3 to 10% of the specimens, and 10 other genera colonized 2% or less of the specimens (Figure 5A).

Except for the core genus Acinetobacter, main genera found in Thailand were not prevalent in specimens from Vietnam, Enterobacter, Serratia, Pseudomonas, Raoultella, and Asaia colonizing each 2% or less of the Vietnam specimens (Figure 5B). Cronobacter, Aeromonas and Elizabethkingia were not detected in Anopheles mosquitoes from Vietnam. Except for the genus Acinetobacter again (40%), the more prevalent genera in specimens from Vietnam appeared origin-specific. Indeed, Sphingomonas and Moraxella present in Anopheles from Vietnam at 36% and 3% respectively, were not detected in mosquitoes from Thailand (Figure 5B). When the species forming the genus Acinetobacter were considered, we observed again an origin-specific distribution with A. junii and A. johnsonii dominating the microbiota of mosquitoes from Vietnam but absent from the Thailand samples. Gut microbiota of mosquitoes from Thailand displayed a wider Acinetobacter diversity with four species represented, A. baumannii, A. calcoaceticus, A. soli and A. guillouiae (Figure 4). In the same phylogenetic clade of Acinetobacter, bacterial lineages from Thailand mosquitoes differed from bacterial lineages of Vietnam mosquitoes. For instance, the lineages A. baumannii and A. junii belonged to the same clade in the 16S rRNA gene tree but inside this clade, each lineage was origin-specific (Figure 4).

Figure 5.

Repartition in genera of OTU assigned bands obtained by PCR-TTGE from 175 specimens of Anopheles mosquitoes from Thailand (A) and from Vietnam (B).

Considering bacterial taxa higher than the genus, the microbiotae of Anopheles from Thailand and Vietnam were both dominated by Pseudomonadales (Figure 6) due to the general high prevalence of Acinetobacter. Enterobacteriaceae largely dominated the microbiota of Anopheles from Thailand but contributed little to bacterial diversity in Anopheles from Vietnam.

Figure 6.

Repartition in significative high-level bacterial taxa of OTU from 175 specimens of Anopheles mosquitoes from Thailand (A) and from Vietnam (B). GP for Gammaproteobacteria.

This low prevalence of enterobacteria in the midgut of Anopheles from Vietnam was particularly noteworthy (Fig. 6B). In opposite, Sphingomonadales was the major high-level taxon in Vietnam specimens but absent from Thailand specimens. Therefore, the ratio Enterobacteriaceae / Sphingomonadales appeared as a signature differentiating Thailand and Vietnam Anopheles specimens. Other signatures, which should be confirmed with more specimens, were Betaproteobacteria and Actinobacteria in specimens from Thailand and Vietnam, respectively.

3.6. Links between microbiota composition and Anopheles species or species complexes

Table 2 showed the distribution of bacterial genera according to the species of Anopheles. To evaluate the link between bacteria and host species, we first compared the microbiotae of the same mosquito species but from different origins. Specimens of An. maculatus gave a good model for this comparison because it was enough represented in both geographic sites (Figure 7). The two groups of microbiotae differed clearly, in particular considering the origin-specific signature, i.e. the ratio Enterobacteriaceae / Sphingomonadales (Figure 7). Therefore, the case of An. maculatus indicated that the microbiota composition was influenced by sampling geographic sites rather than Anopheles species. Comparison of the microbiotae between An. dirus from Thailand and Vietnam resulted in the same conclusion (Table 2).

Figure 7.

Comparison of the microbiota of An. maculatus caught in Thailand (n=11) (A) and in Vietnam (n=28) (B).

Sibling species within a group or a complex have been linked to the microbial content of the midgut. As previously observed for the species An. maculatus, the corresponding complex displayed a non-specific microbiota but its bacterial colonization is influenced by the geographic origin. Similar situation was observed in the Dirus Complex for which the shared bacterial genera were Acinetobacter and Enterobacter, as well as for An. gigas of the Gigas Complex with shared bacteria belonging to the dominating genera Acinetobacter and Enterobacter.

In the Minimus Complex, An. minimus and An. harrisoni were colonized by 18 different bacterial genera but only three were shared by both species. Two shared genera corresponded to bacteria widely represented in the whole population, Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas, while the third one, Raoultella, seemed to be more specific, represented in two and nine specimens of An. minimus and An. harrisoni respectively, showing its higher association to the latter species.

4. Discussion

To our knowledge, this study describes the midgut microbiotae of the largest population of field-collected Anopheles species with 10 species (Table 2) when the literature shows 9 analyzed species, An. gambiae being the most studied species of all (Table 1). Thereby, 16S rRNA gene PCR-TTGE focused on hypervariable region V3 proves its efficiency to study microbiota of Anopheles mosquitoes. This method, that presents a relative low resolution, is efficient to follow bacterial communities with low to moderate diversities. This limit is due to the number of bands that can be separated within the length of the gel. Optimization of TTGE conditions allows separation of bands by a minimum of 0.1 mm over all the gel length. Therefore, TTGE would be difficult to interpret if the diversity exceeds 25 to 30 OTUs [45]. Microbiotae of Anopheles displays TTGE profiles that do not exceed 10 bands but the profiles have been interpreted with difficulties due to heterogeneities in rRNA genes for most bacteria in the mosquito midgut ecosystem. At the genomic level, rRNA genes are generally organized in multigene families [68] in which sequences show low variability within species, subspecies or genome [69]. However, intra-genomic heterogeneity in the form of nucleotide differences between 16S rRNA gene copies are described in relation to fine-tuning of the ribosome function to optimize bacterial niche fitness [70]. In PCR-TTGE, heterogeneities lead to multiple bands for a single OTU and then to an overestimation of OTU diversity. This pitfall has been avoided here by band sequencing that led to the definition of a refined diversity index drastically lowered in comparison with the raw diversity index. The level of ribosomal heterogeneity in bacteria genome from midgut of mosquitoes suggested adaptation processes in a rather instable niche.

With the development of high-output sequencing, twenty-one century metagenomics consider fingerprint approaches as obsolete. However, these methods remain of great interest to give a snapshot of microbiota in large populations of hosts. Thereby, we described herein the midgut microbiotae of 175 specimens of 10 Anopheles species with a sequencing effort of less than 150 reads compared to 5 millions of reads estimated for the same study by pyrosequencing. A pyrosequencing study of the midgut microbiota of An. gambiae (30 laboratory breed and two field-collected mosquitoes) has been recently published [18]. Authors described bacteria belonging to 26 phyla, among which, five represented more than 99% of the total microbiota: Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, and Fusobacteria. Except the latter, four phyla corresponded to those described in this study, suggesting that PCR-TTGE explored the majority of bacterial populations in the microbiota. Among 147 OTUs detected by pyrosequencing, only 28 genera had an abundance of >1% in at least one mosquito midgut [18]. This is in accordance with our results describing 31 bacterial genera in the microbiota of field-collected Anopheles. Fourteen of the 31 genera have been previously detected in diverse studies on field-collected Anopheles (Table 1). Then, we would like to highlight the fact that 17 bacterial genera were described herein for the first time (Table 2), 6 (32%) and 12 (60%) from the populations of Thailand and Vietnam respectively, suggesting that the bacterial diversity associated to midgut of Anopheles remains underestimated. It is noteworthy that twice as many new genera were found in specimens from Vietnam compared to Thailand. Newly described genera were scarcely represented in few specimens except for Sphingomonas found in 46 specimens belonging to five species from Vietnam and Raoultella found in 13 specimens belonging to 3 species from Thailand and Vietnam. Of note the genus Sphingomonas has been detected by pyrosequencing in the midgut of a population of An. gambiae maintained in standard insectary conditions [18].

The gut microbiota of mosquitoes presented a large inter-specimen variability but was dominated by few genera, Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, Enterobacter, Serratia, Raoultella and Sphingomonas. Among them, Acinetobacter was considered as a mosquito midgut core genus because it was detected in most specimens. Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas and Sphingomonas also belong to the An. gambiae midgut core microbiota defined by Boissière et al. [18]. Asaia was found in all samples by pyrosequencing but its relative abundance showed great variations ranging from 0.04 to 98.95% according the An. gambiae specimen [18]. We detected Asaia in only 6 specimens of An. maculatus and An. harrisoni. Again, our result compared to pyrosequencing data suggested that PCR-TTGE failed to detect minority and/or low loaded populations. This low resolution is certainly a limit but we also see it as a benefit because the majority taxa detected by TTGE probably corresponds to true colonizers of the midgut and not to transient or contaminant bacteria.

Anopheles-associated bacterial species recently described were not detected or identified with confidence in this study. Members of the genus Elizabethkingia detected in Anopheles from Thailand could not be identified as E. anophelis owing to its relatedness in 16S rRNA gene sequence with E. meningosepticum. Of note, Thorsellia anophelis has been detected in mosquitoes used in the optimization step of this study but not in mosquitoes included in the study population.

In spite of the large inter-specimen variability, sub-populations from different geographic origins exhibit drastically different midgut microbiotae. High prevalence of Enterobacteriacea and absence of Sphingomonas spp. characterize microbiotae of Anopheles caught in Thailand whereas Anopheles in Vietnam displayed high prevalence of Sphingomonas and low rate of enterobacteria. Similar differences in enterobacteria prevalence have been described in An. gambiae originating from two sampling sites in Cameroon [18]. Composition of the midgut microbiota seems unrelated to Anopheles species, except for Raoultella and An. harrisoni but their relationship needs to be confirmed on additional specimens. Some positive and negative associations of bacteria suggested complex interactions in the microbiota. The most striking result was the pair P. fluorescens / Serratia which never co-habited with Acinetobacter. Pseudomonas fluorescens is well known as a great anti-microbial and bacteriocin-like substances producer [71] exhibiting negative effect on diverse Gram-negative bacteria and biofilm formation [72]. The bacteriocins are narrow-spectrum toxins that typically kill bacteria related to the producing strain as is the case for P. fluorescens and Acinetobacter, which both belong to the order Pseudomonadales. Moreover, bacteriocins can play an important role in the fitness of a strain by killing or inhibiting bacterial co-inhabitants that compete for the limited resources probably found in the midgut environment [71]. Similar antagonism was observed between Sphingomonas and enterobacteria in mosquitoes from Vietnam. Sphingomonas is a sparsely known genus but antimicrobial activities against Candida have been described recently [73]. Culture of the natural isolates of P. fluorescens, Serratia, Acinetobacter and Sphingomonas should confirm these potential antagonisms and give insights about their mechanism.

Antagonism against enterobacteria is of particular interest because it has been suggested that mosquitoes harboring Enterobacteriacae are more likely to be infected by P. falciparum [18]. In our collection, An. minimus specimen KAN-27 from Pu Teuy, Kanchanaburi was infected by P. falciparum and displayed a microbiota containing exclusively enterobacteria that belonged to four genera, Pantoea, Enterobacter, Cronobacter and Escherichia. This specimen displayed the highest enterobacterial diversity of the Anopheles collection and the core genus Acinetobacter was not detected. Identification of the Enterobacter species in our samples will be the next step with the search for Enterobacter (Esp_Z), which was reported to inhibit P. falciparum development in An. gambiae [15]. As the microbiota might have an impact on pathogen development in Anopheles mosquitoes and disease transmission, more studies need to be done for better understanding the role of some specific bacteria in wild mosquito populations before developing potential method of control.

5. Conclusion

Based on the analysis of the midgut microbiota of 10 field-caught Anopheles species from Thailand and Vietnam, we described 17 bacterial genera for the first time in Anopheles mosquitoes, suggesting that the bacterial diversity associated to midgut of Anopheles remains underestimated. Low bacterial diversity ranging from one to three per specimen was found which contrasted with a high OTU diversity in the whole Anopheles population that presented 31 different bacterial genera distributed in four phyla, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes/Chlorobi, Firmicutes, and Acinetobacteria. More specifically, the association of Pseudomonas and Serratia never co-habited with Acinetobacter in the same mosquito midgut. The same presence/absence was observed between Sphingomonas and enterobacteria. Midgut microbiota was drastically different for the Anopheles from Thailand compared to those from Vietnam showing the importance of the geographic origin. The ratio Enterobacteriaceae / Sphingomonadales appeared as a signature differentiating the Anopheles specimens from Thailand and Vietnam.


We are thankful to Naritsara Malaithong and Wanapa Ritthison, students of the Department of Entomology (Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand) for their involvement in the optimization step of this study. This study was funded by the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs in the framework of the “Partenariat Hubert Curien” - PHC Thai project 20627SD.


1 - Harbach RE. Anopheles classification. Mosquito Taxonomic Inventory,, accessed on 8 November 2012.
2 - Manguin S, Bangs MJ, Pothikasikorn J, Chareonviriyaphap T. Review on global co-transmission of human Plasmodium species and Wuchereria bancrofti by Anopheles mosquitoes. Infection, Genetics and Evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases 2010;10:159-177.
3 - Manguin S, Carnevale P, Mouchet J, Coosemans M, Julvez J, Richard-Lenoble D, et al. Biodiversity of malaria in the world. Paris, France: John Libbey Eurotext; 2008.
4 - Al-Olayan EM, Williams GT, Hurd H. Apoptosis in the malaria protozoan, Plasmodium berghei: a possible mechanism for limiting intensity of infection in the mosquito. International Journal for Parasitology 2002;32:1133-1143.
5 - Chavshin AR, Oshaghi MA, Vatandoost H, Pourmand MR, Raeisi A, Enayati AA, et al. Identification of bacterial microflora in the midgut of the larvae and adult of wild caught Anopheles stephensi: a step toward finding suitable paratransgenesis candidates. Acta Tropica 2012;121:129-134.
6 - Damiani C, Ricci I, Crotti E, Rossi P, Rizzi A, Scuppa P, et al. Mosquito-bacteria symbiosis: the case of Anopheles gambiae and Asaia. Microbial Ecology 2010;60:644-654.
7 - Dinparast Djadid N, Jazayeri H, Raz A, Favia G, Ricci I, Zakeri S. Identification of the midgut microbiota of An. stephensi and An. maculipennis for their application as a paratransgenic tool against malaria. PloS One 2011;6:e28484.
8 - Dong Y, Das S, Cirimotich C, Souza-Neto JA, McLean KJ, Dimopoulos G. Engineered Anopheles immunity to Plasmodium infection. PLoS Pathogens 2011;7:e1002458.
9 - Favia G, Ricci I, Damiani C, Raddadi N, Crotti E, Marzorati M, et al. Bacteria of the genus Asaia stably associate with Anopheles stephensi, an Asian malarial mosquito vector. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2007;104:9047-9051.
10 - Favia G, Ricci I, Marzorati M, Negri I, Alma A, Sacchi L, et al. Bacteria of the genus Asaia: a potential paratransgenic weapon against malaria. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 2008;627:49-59.
11 - Lindh JM, Borg-Karlson AK, Faye I. Transstadial and horizontal transfer of bacteria within a colony of Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae) and oviposition response to bacteria-containing water. Acta Tropica 2008;107:242-250.
12 - Lindh JM, Terenius O, Faye I. 16S rRNA gene-based identification of midgut bacteria from field-caught Anopheles gambiae sensu lato and A. funestus mosquitoes reveals new species related to known insect symbionts. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2005;71:7217-7223.
13 - Wang S, Ghosh AK, Bongio N, Stebbings KA, Lampe DJ, Jacobs-Lorena M. Fighting malaria with engineered symbiotic bacteria from vector mosquitoes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2012;109:12734-12739.
14 - Azambuja P, Garcia ES, Ratcliffe NA. Gut microbiota and parasite transmission by insect vectors. Trends in Parasitology 2005;21:568-572.
15 - Cirimotich CM, Dong Y, Clayton AM, Sandiford SL, Souza-Neto JA, Mulenga M, et al. Natural microbe-mediated refractoriness to Plasmodium infection in Anopheles gambiae. Science 2011;332:855-858.
16 - Dong Y, Manfredini F, Dimopoulos G. Implication of the mosquito midgut microbiota in the defense against malaria parasites. PLoS Pathogens 2009;5:e1000423.
17 - Gonzalez-Ceron L, Santillan F, Rodriguez MH, Mendez D, Hernandez-Avila JE. Bacteria in midguts of field-collected Anopheles albimanus block Plasmodium vivax sporogonic development. Journal of Medical Entomology 2003;40:371-374.
18 - Boissiere A, Tchioffo MT, Bachar D, Abate L, Marie A, Nsango SE, et al. Midgut microbiota of the malaria mosquito vector Anopheles gambiae and interactions with Plasmodium falciparum infection. PLoS Pathogens 2012;8:e1002742.
19 - Manguin S, Garros C, Dusfour I, Harbach RE, Coosemans M. Bionomics, taxonomy, and distribution of the major malaria vector taxa of Anopheles subgenus Cellia in Southeast Asia: An updated review. Infection, Genetics and Evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases 2008;8:489-503.
20 - Garros C, Koekemoer LL, Coetzee M, Coosemans M, Manguin S. A single multiplex assay to identify major malaria vectors within the African Anopheles funestus and the Oriental An. minimus groups. American Journal of Tropical Medicine & Hygiene 2004;70:583-590.
21 - Walton C, Handley JM, Kuvangkadilok C, Collins FH, Harbach RE, Baimai V, et al. Identification of five species of the Anopheles dirus complex from Thailand, using allele-specific polymerase chain reaction. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 1999;13:24-32.
22 - Walton, C, Somboon, P, O'Loughlin, S. M, Zhang, S, Harbach, R. E, Linton, Y. M, et al. Genetic diversity and molecular identification of mosquito species in the Anopheles maculatus group using the ITS2 region of rDNA. Infection, Genetics and Evolution: journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases (2007); 7, 93-102.
23 - Dillon RJ, Dillon VM. The gut bacteria of insects: nonpathogenic interactions. Annual Review of Entomology 2004;49:71-92.
24 - Osei-Poku J, Mbogo CM, Palmer WJ, Jiggins FM. Deep sequencing reveals extensive variation in the gut microbiota of wild mosquitoes from Kenya. Molecular Ecology 2012;21:5138-5150.
25 - Wang Y, Gilbreath TM, 3rd, Kukutla P, Yan G, Xu J. Dynamic gut microbiome across life history of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae in Kenya. PloS One 2011;6:e24767.
26 - Kampfer P, Lindh JM, Terenius O, Haghdoost S, Falsen E, Busse HJ, et al. Thorsellia anophelis gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the Gammaproteobacteria. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 2006;56:335-338.
27 - Kampfer P, Terenius O, Lindh JM, Faye I. Janibacter anophelis sp. nov., isolated from the midgut of Anopheles arabiensis. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 2006;56:389-392.
28 - Kampfer P, Matthews H, Glaeser SP, Martin K, Lodders N, Faye I. Elizabethkingia anophelis sp. nov., isolated from the midgut of the mosquito Anopheles gambiae. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 2011;61:2670-2675.
29 - Briones AM, Shililu J, Githure J, Novak R, Raskin L. Thorsellia anophelis is the dominant bacterium in a Kenyan population of adult Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes. The ISME Journal 2008;2:74-82.
30 - Bernardet JF, Vancanneyt M, Matte-Tailliez O, Grisez L, Tailliez P, Bizet C, et al. Polyphasic study of Chryseobacterium strains isolated from diseased aquatic animals. Systematic and Applied Microbiology 2005;28:640-660.
31 - Straif SC, Mbogo CN, Toure AM, Walker ED, Kaufman M, Toure YT, et al. Midgut bacteria in Anopheles gambiae and An. funestus (Diptera: Culicidae) from Kenya and Mali. Journal of Medical Entomology 1998;35:222-226.
32 - Jadin J. [Role of bacteria in the digestive tube of insects, vectors of plasmodidae and trypanosomidae]. Annales des Sociétés Belges de Médecine Tropicale, de Parasitologie, et de Mycologie 1967;47:331-342.
33 - Jadin J, Vincke IH, Dunjic A, Delville JP, Wery M, Bafort J, et al. [Role of Pseudomonas in the sporogenesis of the hematozoon of malaria in the mosquito]. Bulletin de la Société de Pathologie Exotique et de ses filiales 1966;59:514-525.
34 - Rani A, Sharma A, Rajagopal R, Adak T, Bhatnagar RK. Bacterial diversity analysis of larvae and adult midgut microflora using culture-dependent and culture-independent methods in lab-reared and field-collected Anopheles stephensi-an Asian malarial vector. BMC Microbiology 2009;9:96.
35 - Terenius O, de Oliveira CD, Pinheiro WD, Tadei WP, James AA, Marinotti O. 16S rRNA gene sequences from bacteria associated with adult Anopheles darlingi (Diptera: Culicidae) mosquitoes. Journal of Medical Entomology 2008;45:172-175.
36 - Riesenfeld CS, Schloss PD, Handelsman J. Metagenomics: genomic analysis of microbial communities. Annual Review of Genetics 2004;38:525-552.
37 - Tyson GW, Chapman J, Hugenholtz P, Allen EE, Ram RJ, Richardson PM, et al. Community structure and metabolism through reconstruction of microbial genomes from the environment. Nature 2004;428:37-43.
38 - Nossa CW, Oberdorf WE, Yang L, Aas JA, Paster BJ, Desantis TZ, et al. Design of 16S rRNA gene primers for 454 pyrosequencing of the human foregut microbiome. World Journal of Gastroenterology : WJG 2010;16:4135-4144.
39 - Woese CR. Bacterial evolution. Microbiological Reviews 1987;51:221-271.
40 - Case RJ, Boucher Y, Dahllof I, Holmstrom C, Doolittle WF, Kjelleberg S. Use of 16S rRNA and rpoB genes as molecular markers for microbial ecology studies. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2007;73:278-288.
41 - Van de Peer Y, Chapelle S, De Wachter R. A quantitative map of nucleotide substitution rates in bacterial rRNA. Nucleic Acids Research 1996;24:3381-3391.
42 - Jany JL, Barbier G. Culture-independent methods for identifying microbial communities in cheese. Food Microbiology 2008;25:839-848.
43 - von Wintzingerode F, Gobel UB, Stackebrandt E. Determination of microbial diversity in environmental samples: pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysis. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 1997;21:213-229.
44 - Le Bourhis AG, Dore J, Carlier JP, Chamba JF, Popoff MR, Tholozan JL. Contribution of C. beijerinckii and C. sporogenes in association with C. tyrobutyricum to the butyric fermentation in Emmental type cheese. International Journal of Food Microbiology 2007;113:154-163.
45 - Roudiere L, Jacquot A, Marchandin H, Aujoulat F, Devine R, Zorgniotti I, et al. Optimized PCR-Temporal Temperature Gel Electrophoresis compared to cultivation to assess diversity of gut microbiota in neonates. Journal of Microbiological Methods 2009;79:156-165.
46 - Temmerman R, Masco L, Vanhoutte T, Huys G, Swings J. Development and validation of a nested-PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis method for taxonomic characterization of bifidobacterial communities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2003;69:6380-6385.
47 - Ogier JC, Son O, Gruss A, Tailliez P, Delacroix-Buchet A. Identification of the bacterial microflora in dairy products by temporal temperature gradient gel electrophoresis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2002;68:3691-3701.
48 - Zoetendal EG, Akkermans AD, De Vos WM. Temperature gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of 16S rRNA from human fecal samples reveals stable and host-specific communities of active bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1998;64:3854-3859.
49 - Kitts CL. Terminal restriction fragment patterns: a tool for comparing microbial communities and assessing community dynamics. Current Issues in Intestinal Microbiology 2001;2:17-25.
50 - Penny C, Nadalig T, Alioua M, Gruffaz C, Vuilleumier S, Bringel F. Coupling of denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism with precise fragment sizing for microbial community profiling and characterization. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2010;76:648-651.
51 - Thompson JR, Randa MA, Marcelino LA, Tomita-Mitchell A, Lim E, Polz MF. Diversity and dynamics of a north atlantic coastal Vibrio community. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2004;70:4103-4110.
52 - Ege MJ, Mayer M, Normand AC, Genuneit J, Cookson WO, Braun-Fahrlander C, et al. Exposure to environmental microorganisms and childhood asthma. The New England Journal of Medicine 2011;364:701-709.
53 - Muyzer G, de Waal EC, Uitterlinden AG. Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1993;59:695-700.
54 - Roudiere L, Lorto S, Tallagrand E, Marchandin H, Jeannot JL, Jumas-Bilak E. [Molecular fingerprint of bacterial communities and 16S rDNA intra-species heterogeneity: a pitfall that should be considered]. Pathologie-Biologie 2007;55:434-440.
55 - Yoshino K, Nishigaki K, Husimi Y. Temperature sweep gel electrophoresis: a simple method to detect point mutations. Nucleic Acids Research 1991;19:3153.
56 - Jacquot A, Neveu D, Aujoulat F, Mercier G, Marchandin H, Jumas-Bilak E, et al. Dynamics and clinical evolution of bacterial gut microflora in extremely premature patients. The Journal of Pediatrics 2011;158:390-396.
57 - Chareonviriyaphap T, Prabaripai A, Bangs MJ, Aum-Aung B. Seasonal abundance and blood feeding activity of Anopheles minimus Theobald (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand. Journal of Medical Entomology 2003;40:876-881.
58 - Kengluecha A, Singhasivanon P, Tiensuwan M, Jones JW, Sithiprasasna R. Water quality and breeding habitats of anopheline mosquito in northwestern Thailand. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine & Public Health 2005;36:46-53.
59 - MoPH. Report of Vector Borne Disease. In: Department DC, editor: Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand; 2011.
60 - Thimasarn K, Jatapadma S, Vijaykadga S, Sirichaisinthop J, Wongsrichanalai C. Epidemiology of Malaria in Thailand. Journal of Travel Medicine 1995;2:59-65.
61 - IMPEQN. Malaria cases reported in 2011 - The Central and Highland provinces. Institute of Malaria, Parasite and Entomology sub., Quy Nhon; 2012.
62 - Drancourt M, Bollet C, Carlioz A, Martelin R, Gayral JP, Raoult D. 16S ribosomal DNA sequence analysis of a large collection of environmental and clinical unidentifiable bacterial isolates. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2000;38:3623-3630.
63 - Stackebrandt E, Goebel BM. Taxonomic note: a place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriolgy 1994;44:846-849.
64 - McDonald D, Price MN, Goodrich J, Nawrocki EP, DeSantis TZ, Probst A, et al. An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea. The ISME Journal 2012;6:610-618.
65 - Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG. Multiple sequence alignment using ClustalW and ClustalX. Current protocols in bioinformatics / editoral board, Andreas D Baxevanis [et al] 2002;Chapter 2:Unit 2 3.
66 - Guindon S, Delsuc F, Dufayard JF, Gascuel O. Estimating maximum likelihood phylogenies with PhyML. Methods of Molecular Biology 2009;537:113-137.
67 - Sinka ME, Bangs MJ, Manguin S, Chareonviriyaphap T, Patil AP, Temperley WH, et al. The dominant Anopheles vectors of human malaria in the Asia-Pacific region: occurrence data, distribution maps and bionomic précis. Parasites & Vectors 2011;4:89.
68 - Acinas SG, Marcelino LA, Klepac-Ceraj V, Polz MF. Divergence and redundancy of 16S rRNA sequences in genomes with multiple rrn operons. Journal of Bacteriology 2004;186:2629-2635.
69 - Liao D. Gene conversion drives within genic sequences: concerted evolution of ribosomal RNA genes in bacteria and archaea. Journal of Molecular Evolution 2000;51:305-317.
70 - Roger F, Lamy B, Jumas-Bilak E, Kodjo A, Marchandin H. Ribosomal Multi-Operon Diversity: An Original Perspective on the Genus Aeromonas. PloS One 2012;7:e46268.
71 - Loper JE, Hassan KA, Mavrodi DV, Davis EW, 2nd, Lim CK, Shaffer BT, et al. Comparative genomics of plant-associated Pseudomonas spp.: insights into diversity and inheritance of traits involved in multitrophic interactions. PLoS Genetics 2012;8:e1002784.
72 - Guerrieri E, Bondi M, Sabia C, de Niederhausern S, Borella P, Messi P. Effect of bacterial interference on biofilm development by Legionella pneumophila. Current Microbiology 2008;57:532-536.
73 - Lee LH, Cheah YK, Nurul Syakima AM, Shiran MS, Tang YL, Lin HP, et al. Analysis of Antarctic proteobacteria by PCR fingerprinting and screening for antimicrobial secondary metabolites. Genetics and Molecular Research, 2012;11:1627-1641.