1. Introduction
Living on the same planet, plants means a lot to us. No matter being taken, as our food or treated with great commercial significance, plants are so indispensable that we have to learn how to protect, make use of, and most important of all, get on well with them. In the first place, what we all understand is: plants are distinguished from us or other animals by being unable to escape from the surrounding circumstances. Thus, when they are confronted with living-threaten pressures, their only choice is to try their best to adjust to them.
The second is "But how?" Plants have developed plenty of physical and biochemical strategies to face up to adverse conditions. Fortunately, thanks to so many excellent researchers' efforts in this field, we have been making so many progresses in identifying and characterizing the mechanisms on how plants perceive outside stress and response to it. Unfortunately, that's far from enough. In this chapter, we will mainly discuss abiotic stress and endeavor to elucidate the mechanism of various reactions plants take at the molecular level.
Before we start our discussion, we probably need to know what abiotic stress is all about. Basically, it includes all the non-living environmental factors that can negatively or even harmfully affect the growth and productivity of plants. Commonly, we choose to put drought, flooding or submergence, salinity, extreme temperatures on our daily researching agenda due to their key roles in producing yield loss of agricultural or industrial crops worldwide. But other kind of abiotic stress is entitled to be paid more attention, such as high light, deficits of inorganic nutrients (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium et al.), and for sure, they are of definite importance for plants' growth and development. Moreover, one factor we can not set aside is human behavior, which in a large sense put considerable pressure on plants. Residuals of chemicals brought by agricultural practice to improve yield may generate stress, and the inceased modification of the atmosphere by human activities is gaining weight. And what we should really stress on is the compounding damaging effects by multiple stress factors acting simultaneously. Thus for plants exposed in diverse stress conditions, struggling for surviving, they organically adapt a complicated interplay of signaling cascade to percepting stress signal, then amplifying, transmitting, and finally triggering stress responses. Furthermore, there do exist overlap between different kinds of stress responses, which truly explains the cross-tolerance phenomenon, a measure taken by plants facing with combining stresses. Here, we are going to introduce signal transduction mechanisms in plants under stressful circumstances, hoping to give readers a general idea about how plants survive in different stressful situations.
2. Signal transduction
In general, for plant cells, signal transduction starts from the receptor activation, then the generation of second messengers translating the primary external signal to intracellular signals. These intracellular messengers will be further interpreted by their co-workers resulting in the inspiration of downstream pathways. During the whole process, reversible protein phosphorylation frequently happens; this can activate various transcription factors inducing the expression of stress responsive genes. Moreover, other components are also essential for the pathway to process. They have always been mentioned as signaling partners, mainly working in recruiting and assembling signal complexes, targeting signaling molecules, as well as controlling their lifespan.
Simply saying, the signal transduction pathway is a delicate cooperating process conducted by each single participator including receptors/sensors, second messengers, phosphoprotein cascades, transcription factors, and stress-responsive genes. Eventually the precise and optimal response will be triggered to protect plants from damages in a large sense. As far as we know, signal transduction is indispensable for many cellular activities and their coordination, and most of its steps are complicated occurring in a time and space-dependent manner. In the following part, we are going to explore every single step of signal transduction in order to understand how plants cope with various stress in their lifespan.
2.1. Sensors
2.1.1. Complexity in researching on sensors
Sensors act as the molecules pioneering in perceiving stress stimulus and relaying the signal to downstream molecules to initiate the signal transduction pathway. As the first participator in the pathway, they must be of great researching meaning. However, they are also the mainly intricate role for us to recognize.
Firstly, most of the abiotic stress signals themselves are complicated which probably comprise several physical or chemical signals. Taken the cold stress as an example, it can induce both osmotic stress and mechanistic stress. Similarly, drought may be accompanied by osmotic stress, ionic stress, a mechanistic signal, and heat stress in some cases. Based on these facts, it is natural for us to deduce that for plants there probably exists inequality in treating each single stimulus in accordance with the plant status or the stress severity. That is to say, a simple stimulus may diversely deliver complicated information to the plants, that's exactly why it is very likely for plants to have multiple cellular sensors to perceive each stress signal or one attribute of that signal. Secondly, the redundancy of signal perception make it even harder to identify and confirm each sensor relating to each stress stimulus, since knocking out one receptor may not significantly affect stress signaling outputs. Thirdly, even if we find a putative sensor, how to prove our hypothesis could also become a headache. Because different sensors probably vary in molecular identities, signal-perceiving modes, outputs, and also subcellular localizations, no wonder not much is known about plant abiotic stress sensors.
2.1.2. Putative sensors for perceiving stress signal
First of all, how can an external signal turn out to be internal? Where are the receptors/sensors and transporters? These will be the first bunch of questions we are going to ask. Imaging if we are plant cells, what will be the first weapon we use to maintain inner homeostasis when suffering from the outside disturbances? The answer will probably be "plasma membrane". So far, many researchers have demonstrated that the plasma membrane (PM) is responsible for perceiving and transmitting external stress signals, as well as responding to them. For example, when plants are under salinity stress, salt reaches the PM first, which makes the membrane lipids and transport proteins start to regulate permeability of this membrane triggering primary responses (Cooke and Burden, 1991). In many plants, changes in PM lipids, such as sterols and fatty acids, have been observed responding to salt stress and may contribute to the control of membrane fluidity and permeability, as a primary stress-responsive reaction (Elkahoui et al., 2004). Therefore, it is suggested that physical properties of membranes (lipid composition, fatty acid composition) may lead us to find potential sensors perceiving stress signals.
Secondly, let's stress a little bit more on the most common stress signals, cold, drought, and salinity. All of these three stresses have been detected to induce transient Ca2+ influx into the cell cytoplasm (Sanders D et al., 1999; Knight, 2000). Thus we can hypothesis channels responsible for this Ca2+ influx possibly acting as a sensor for these stress signals. Based on what we have discussed above, signaling reception may involve changes in membrane fluidity and cytoskeleton reorganization, which are also confirmed in early cold signaling (Sangwan et al., 2001; Wang and Nick, 2001). Coincidentally, cold-induced Ca2+ influx in plants occurs only after the occurrence of a rapid temperature drop (Plieth et al., 1999). Taken together, physical alterations in cellular structures may activate certain Ca2+ channels under cold stress, which indirectly suggests that Ca2+ channels might be a putative sensor.
Except the ion channel as a whole, other types of functional proteins can hardly be ignored on the list of sensors. So far, studies on plants and other systems have also identified several kinds of sensors. And in order to find sensors effectively in plant abiotic pathways, we need to borrow the experience and results of researches on other species. It is known that for plants, cold, drought, and salt stresses will all induce the accumulation of compatible osmolytes and antioxidants (Hasegawa et al., 2000). In yeast and in animals, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways are responsible for producing osmolytes and antioxidants, which are activated by receptors/sensors such as protein tyrosine kinases, G-protein coupled receptors, and two-component histidine kinases. For plants, only histidine kinases may have been explored and clarified in a deeper sense compared with others.
Retrospecting the history of histidine kinase, one important discovery is the cyanobacterium histidine kinase Hik33 (Suzuki et al., 2000) and the
Thirdly, in plants, the receptor-like kinases and G-protein are worthy to be mentioned in the searching for stress signal sensors. Why? The stress hormone abscisic acid (ABA) makes us study on them who may contain putative stress sensors. It is well-known that the ABA is of great significance in stress signaling, thus, to understand how ABA is perceived certainly will contribute to revealing the hidden sensing-processes of stress signals. Generally, the researches on ABA perception mechanisms always relate to putative receptor-linked components or those putative receptor molecules regulated by stress or ABA.
Here we are going to mention a different way of osmolyte production that involves the pathways triggering the activation of late embryogenesis-abundant (
On the other hand,
With the proceeding of the pathway, we can see that abiotic stresses also give birth to second signaling molecules (discussed below). Therefore, in the next part, we are going to pay attention to the second messengers and their performance in signal transduction pathways.
2.2. Second messengers
Several second messengers are active participators in stress signal transduction. Mainly they are groups of small intracellular signaling molecules or ions, normally locating in the cytoplasm of a cell and responding to a signal received by a cell-surface sensor, which activates various kinases to regulate other enzymes' activities. What we mention frequently as second messengers are reactive oxygen species, lipid phosphates-derived signals, and cyclic nucleotides-related signals. Besides, some plant hormones also work as secondary signal molecules under stress conditions.
2.2.1. Reactive oxygen species (ROS)
ROS are species of oxygen which are in a more reactive state than molecular oxygen, resulting from excitation or incomplete reduction of molecular oxygen. Generally, ROS contains both free radical (O2•−, RO•, HO2•, OH•), and non-radical forms (H2O2, 1O2). For plants, they tend to be a two-edged weapon. On one hand, they are highly reactive and toxic, always taken as unwelcome harmful by-products of normal cellular metabolism, and causes damage to proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, DNA which ultimately results in cell death in plants. On the other hand, it has also been proved that ROS can affect genes' expression and signal transduction pathways, which mean that cells may use it as biological stimuli and signals to activate and regulate various genetic stress-response processes (Foyer and Noctor 2009).
Since it means a lot to plants' life, where and how it can be produced? In photosynthetic tissues, the chloroplast is the prime source of ROS. But for the non-photosynthetic tissues, mitochondria are the leader in production. In chloroplasts, photosystem I and II (PSI and PSII) are the major sites for the production of 1O2 and O2•−. In mitochondria, complex I, ubiquinone and complex III of electron transport chain (ETC) are the major sites for the generation of O2•−. In addition to the mitochondria and NADPH oxidases, additional cellular sources of ROS production include a host of other intracellular enzymes such as xanthine oxidase, cyclo-oxygenases, cytochrome p450 enzymes, and lip-oxygenases for which oxidants act as part of their normal enzymatic function.
Consequently, when plant cells are under stresses, the rate of ROS production usually goes up, inspiring the activities of antioxidants and scavenging enzymes to keep plants live a healthy life. Fortunately, plant cells possess very efficient enzymatic (superoxide dismutase, SOD; catalase, CAT; ascorbate peroxidase, APX; glutathione reductase, GR; monodehydroascorbate reductase, MDHAR; dehydroascorbate reductase, DHAR; glutathione peroxidase, GPX; guaicol peroxidase, GOPX and glutathione-S- transferase, GST) and non-enzymatic (ascorbic acid, ASH; praline; glutathione, GSH; phenolic compounds, alkaloids, non-protein amino acids and a-tocopherols) antioxidant defense systems cooperatively working on controlling the cascades of uncontrolled oxidation and protecting plant cells from oxidative damage by scavenging of ROS. Eventually, the equilibrium has maintained between ROS production and antioxidant defense systems.
However, this balance will always be perturbed by various biotic and abiotic stress factors such as salinity, UV radiation, drought, heavy metals, temperature extremes, nutrient deficiency, air pollution, herbicides and pathogen attacks. Once it has been challenged, various signals pathways start to be proceeded to mediate the disturbances to protect cells from harm brought by extra ROS. For example, when osmotic stress comes, various plant species show an obviously reduced assimilation rate due to stomatal closure (Huchzermeyer and Koyro 2005). This result can be owed to an excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) who are highly destructive to lipids, nucleic acids, and proteins (Kant et al. 2006 ; Türkan and Demiral 2009 ; Geissler et al. 2010).
First and foremost, having been identified as second messengers how does ROS affect stress signal transduction? Several enzymes which are involved in cell signaling mechanisms are also potential targets of ROS. These include guanylyl cyclase (E. Vranova, S. Atichartpongkul, 2002), phospholipase C (C.H. Foyer, G. Noctor, 2003), phospholipase A2 (I.M. Moller, 2001) and phospholipase D (A.G. Rasmusson, K.L. Soole, 2004). Ion channels may be targets as well (G. Noctor, R.D. Paepe, 2006), among which calcium channels was mentioned (D.M. Rhoads, A.L. Umbach, 2006). Since calcium has ubiquitous functions in plant stress signal transduction pathway, we are interested in the relationship between ROS and calcium. Before dive into calcium, let's back to NADPH oxidases that are an important ROS-generating system. RBOHs shorting for respiratory burst oxidase homologs is always an eye-catching topic. Recent evidence points out RBOHs relate to heavy-metal induced accumulation of ROS (Pourrut et al. 2008) and early response to salt stress (Leshem et al. 2007). Subsequently, ROS produced by Rbohs are thought to activate Ca2+ channels leading to further increases in cytosolic Ca2+ (Foreman et al. 2003) and downstream signaling. In general, it has been suggested that ROS took part in the regeneration of Ca2+ signals by activating Ca2+ channels. Then additional signal transduction was triggered through Ca2+-mediated pathways (reviewed in Mori, I.C. and Schroeder, J.I. 2004).
Except the interaction with calcium, another route for ROS to work is that ROS themselves can directly modify signaling molecules through redox regulation. Redox status inside a cell is essential to the correct functioning of many enzymes, which can be used to alter enzyme activity; thus alteration of the redox status could be treated as a signaling mechanism (Gamaley and Klyubin, 1999). One of the most important and well-known redox-sensitive molecules in this respect is glutathione (GSH), which can form the GSH/GSSG couple. The balance between the GSH and GSSG takes the central position to maintain cellular redox state (C.H. Foyer, G. Noctor, 2005). But ROS like H2O2 can affect the process of lowering the cells' GSH content to alter the redox status. Meanwhile, it also has been suggested that enzymes such as ribonucleotide reductase and thioredoxin reductase, as well as transcription factors, might be among the targets for altered redox status. In detail, cysteine residues of molecules may be key active sites as targets for redox regulation. And these molecules can act as potential sensors for ROS (Xiong, L. and Zhu, J.K. 2002).
Secondly, ROS are very likely to play a significant role in the activation of stress-responsive genes, especially those who encode enzymes responsible for antioxidants biosynthesis or enzymes directly detoxify reactive oxidative radicals. For example, H2O2 production is thought to be raised under various abiotic stresses, which can enhance gene expression of active oxygen scavenging (AOS) enzymes. NO, produced under salt stress, could serve as a second messenger for the induction of PM H-ATPase genes' expression, which promote PM H-ATPase activity (Liqun Zhao, Feng Zhang et al., 2004).
Thirdly, we are going to stress a little more on H2O2 and NO. In maize, H2O2 production grows up induced by chilling stress, and exogenously applied H2O2 lifted up chilling tolerance (T.K. Prasad, M.D. Anderson, 1994). Increased H2O2 production has been detected occurring gradually responding to salt stress in rice plants (N.M. Fadzilla, R.P. Finch, 1997). Moreover, H2O2 was also reported to induce small heat shock proteins (HSP26) in tomato and rice (J. Liu, M. Shono, 1999; B.H. Lee, S.H. Won, H.S. Lee, 2000). However, it was recently shown that H2O2 produced by apoplastic polyamine oxidase can influence the salinity stress signaling in tobacco and can play a role in balancing the plant response between stress tolerance and cell death (Moschou et al. 2008). NO has also been suggested to act as a signal molecular mediating responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. Under salt stress, NO could serve as a second messenger for the induction of PM H-ATPase expression, which may account for the enhanced PM H-ATPase activity. Thus, ion homeostasis is reestablished so as to adapt to salt stress (Liqun Zhao, Feng Zhang et al., 2004).
Furthermore, researches on ABA give us much more information on H2O2 and NO in signal transduction. So let's take a look at how they work in ABA signaling and other signal transduction pathways. The process of stomata closure regulated by ABA in a large sense require the generation of H2O2. Moreover, H2O2 production may be a prerequisite for ABA-induced stomatal closure (Zhang, X., Zhang, L. et al. 2001). Experiments have found out mutations in genes encoding catalytic subunits of NADPH oxidase, known as the major source for H2O2 production, will impair ABA-induced ROS production, as well as the activation of guard cell Ca2+ channels and stomata closure (Kwak J.M., Mori, I.C. et al. 2003). In plants, both nitrate reductases and NO synthases (NOS) can contribute to NO generation. Loss-of-function mutations in Arabidopsis NOS, AtNOS1, impair ABA-induced NO production and stomata closure (Guo, F.Q., Okamoto, M. and Crawford, N.M., 2003).
On the other hand, accumulated evidence indicate ROS seem to play a central role in regulating Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK or MPK) cascades (discussed later in detail). However, only the functions of MPK4, MPK3 and MPK6, out of the 20 Arabidopsis MAPKs, have been thoroughly characterized. What really counts is they can all be activated by ROS and abiotic stress. In addition, activities of MPK1 and MPK2 have been shown to be provoked by H2O2 and ABA (Ortiz-Masia et al. 2007). Also MPK7 was found to be activated by H2O2 under specific circumstances (Dόczi et al. 2007). Furthermore, the authors found that H2O2 may probably have a generally stabilizing impact on MAPKKs (MAP kinase kinases). In the future, we still have lots of work to elucidate how ROS regulate MAPK signaling in abiotic stress field.
All in all, even if we are holding a lot of evidence about the functions of ROS in abiotic stress, we still have to face up to those obscure steps relating to different mechanisms, not to mention hundreds of stress responsive genes involved in.
2.2.2. Lipid-derived signal messengers
It is well-known that cellular membranes contains a wide range of different lipids, including sphingo-, neutral-, glyco-, and phospholipids, all with unique biophysical properties. Beyond the structural role, some of them are equipped with direct signal-transducing properties. What we discussed in the sensors part is that membrane lipids can directly response to abiotic stress stimuli by modulating membrane fluidity or its other physiochemical properties, but in this part we will take another angle to demonstrate its significant function in the process of generating intracellular signaling molecules. Moreover lipids and their biogenesis and degradation enzymes play many direct or indirect roles to regulate or affect signaling and stress tolerance. In signal transduction, signaling lipids are distinguished for their low abundance and rapid turnover. They are rapidly formed responding to diverse stimuli through lipid kinases or phospholipases' activation. Thanks to the lipid-binding domains, these lipid signals can activate enzymes or recruit proteins to membranes leading to the activation of downstream signaling pathways resulting in specific cellular events and physiological responses. Studies on them find out, for plants, lipid signaling form a complex regulatory network responding to abiotic stress.
Basically, in eukaryotes, typical signaling lipids includes phosphatidylinositol lipids (polyphosphoinositides; PPIs), certain lyso-phospholipids, diacylglycerol (DAG), and phosphatidic acid (PA) (Munnik and Testerink, 2009; Xue et al.,2009; Munnik and Vermeer, 2010). Among them, PA is of great importance as a lipid second messenger in plants involved in various biotic and abiotic stress conditions. Based on thousands of researches, it is easy to detect almost every environmental cue can trigger a rapid PA response (Testerink and Munnik, 2005; Arisz et al., 2009; Li et al., 2009; Mishkind et al., 2009). How can PA be produced? Two ways in brief. Directly PA is generated through activation of phospholipase D (PLD), and indirectly a phospholipase C/diacylglycerol kinase (PLC/DGK) pathway regulated by two types of PLC enzyme named as the PI-PLCs (phosphoinositide-PLCs) and NPCs (non-specific PLCs). After the rapidly bounce up under stress, PA level will go back to normal when stimuli disappear. (Christa Testerink et al. 2011).
In most of the osmotic stress cases, both PLC/DGK and PLD pathways are activated leading to fast and transient PA accumulation, but exceptions also exist (Zonia and Munnik, 2004; Darwish et al., 2009; Hong et al., 2010). Besides responding to osmotic stress, we also see the PLDα1 enzyme participating in cold, frost, and wound stress signaling (Bargmann et al., 2009; Hong et al., 2010) and probably by promoting responses to ABA, especially in stomata (Mishra et al., 2006). On the other side, PLC/DGK pathways also get activated by salinity (Arisz, 2010). Earlier we knew that AtPLC1, one of the PI-PLCs, was shown to be induced by salinity and drought (Hirayama et al., 1995), which is necessary for ABA-induced inhibition of germination and gene expression (Sanchez and Chua, 2001). Recently, NPC4 (a NPC isoform) was found to modulate responses to ABA and bring enhanced salt and drought tolerance (Peters et al., 2010). In addition, several ABA signaling proteins have been identified as potential PA targets (Mishra et al., 2006), which has further suggested PA could mediate ABA responses. Meanwhile, cooperation between the NADPH oxidase isoforms RbohD, RbohF and PA brings more information for us to understand PA's function in ABA-induced ROS generation and stomatal closure (Zhang et al., 2009). Furthermore, PA also targets other protein kinases like SnRK2 protein kinase (Testerink et al., 2004), MAPK isoform MPK6 (Yu et al., 2010), sphingosine kinase (SPHK) (Liang Guo, XueminWang, 2012) to influence diverse signaling transduction pathways.
Other two important second messenger molecules - inositol phosphates Ins(1,4,5)P3 and DAG (diacylglycerol) are worthy to be mentioned here. Firstly, InsP3 was shown to release Ca2+ from an intracellular store in the early 90s, but recently evidences pops up suggesting that InsP6 was shown to release Ca2+ at a 10-fold lower concentration than InsP3 (Lemtiri-Chlieh et al., 2003; Teun Munnik, 2009), who can be generated by phosphorylating InsP3. By the way data can be found demonstrating that whole-plant IP3 level goes up significantly within 1 min after stimuli occur, and keep the tendency for more than 30 min under stress. Under osmotic stress, in Arabidopsis, phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PtdIns(4,5)P2) is hydrolyzed to IP3. And IP3 accumulation occurs coincidently in a time frame similar to stress-induced calcium mobilization (Daryll B. DeWald et al., 2001). In conclusion, what we can say is under different stress, to identify the most critical second messenger molecules depends on the research on the network consisting of multiple polyphosphoinositides.
Secondly, diacyglycerol (DAG) is an important class of cellular lipid messengers, but for its function in plants, data is not sufficiently provided. In
At last, we'd love to say more about other types of phospholipases like secreted phospholipase A2 and patatin-related phospholipase A (pPLA) who were shown to have functions in auxin signal transduction by cooperating with auxin receptors ABP1 or TIR1. (Günther F. E. Scherer et al., 2012 ). And this fact helps us to further confirm the significance of phytohormones in signaling transduction which will be discussed below.
2.2.3. Phytohormones
When it comes to phytohormones, strictly speaking, we can not conclude them as second messengers, but the first and foremost idea needs to be posted here is "The most powerful players in intercellular regulation are plant hormones." (Wolfgang Busch, Philip N. Benfey, 2010). Owing to the broad and diverse functions, many of phytohormones were discovered before the dawn of molecular genetics (Sachs and Thimann, 1967; Thimann and Skoog, 1933). In generation, they are a large bunch of trace amount growth regulators, the best-known group comprises auxin (IAA), cytokinin (CK), gibberellic acid (GA), abscisic acid (ABA), jasmonic acid (JA), ethylene (ET), salicylic acid (SA), but the name list is growing by time. Here we add brassinosteroids (BR), nitric oxide (NO), polyamines, and strigolactone (SL). Indubitably phytohormones have various functions in growth and development. Indeed, they play central roles in nutrient allocation, and source/sink transitions. However based on former description relating to sensors and second messengers, we have to focus on here is that these low-molecular-weight compounds are indispensable for coordinating various signal transduction pathways during responses to various abiotic stresses.
Firstly, they function as systemic signals that can transmit information over large distances. Like ABA, it can be transported and play physiological roles at sites far away from where it is synthesized (Sauter, A. et al., 2001). And different types of cells have their own understanding even for the same hormones signal. And information from diverse hormones always triggers coherent responses of cells. This is signal perception at cellular level. Lucky for us, modern transcriptome profiling technologies have provided a global view of hormones' effects at the molecular level and identified hundreds to thousands of genes, the expression levels of which are modified by individual hormones (Goda et al., 2008). A large number of data have proved that treating plants with exogenous hormones will rapidly and transiently alter genome-wide transcript profiles (Chapman and Estelle 2009).
Secondly, complex networks of gene regulation by phytohormones under abiotic stresses involve various
Thirdly, the ability of plants to a wide range of environmental stresses is also finely balanced through the interaction of hormonal plant growth regulators and the redox signaling hub. Plant hormones produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) as second messengers in signaling cascades that convey information concerning changes in hormone concentrations and/or sensitivity to mediate a whole range of adaptive responses (Carlos G. Bartoli et al., 2012). For example, Brassinosteroids (BRs) can induce plant tolerance to diverse abiotic stresses by triggering H2O2 generation in cucumber leaves (Cui et al., 2011). In the following part we will simply introduce how phytohormones work in signal transduction, and how they talk with each other when they exchange information.
Let's start from ABA, whose synthesis is one of the fastest responses to abiotic stress for plants. Under water stress, ABA synthesis triggers ABA-inducible gene expression leading to stomatal closure, thereby reducing water loss through transpiration, and consequently, a reduced growth rate (Schroeder, J.I. et al., 2001). ABA also plays a vital role in adapting to cold temperatures. Cold stress induces the synthesis of ABA and the exogenous application of ABA enhances the cold tolerance of plants. A large number of genes associated with ABA biosynthesis and ABA receptors-encoding genes and downstream signal relays have been characterized in Arabidopsis thaliana (reviewed by Cutler SR et al., 2010). ABA activates the expression of many stress-responsive genes independently or synergistically with stresses, which makes it become the most studied stress-responsive hormone.
Other hormones, in particular CK, SA, ET, and JA, also have substantial direct or indirect performances in abiotic stress responses. CK is an antagonist to ABA, and under water shortage situation, CK levels usually decrease. But transgenic tomato rootstocks expressing IPT (isopentenyl transferase, a gene encoding a key step in CK biosynthesis) had improved root CK synthesis shown raised salinity stress tolerance (Ghanem ME et al., 2011). Meanwhile, by checking public microarray expression data for A. Thaliana, numerous genes encoding proteins associated with CK signaling pathways have been found affected by various abiotic stresses (Argueso CT et al., 2009). Although auxins, GAs, and CKs have been implicated primarily in developmental processes in plants, they regulate responses to stress or coordinate growth under stress conditions (Günther F. E. Scherer et al., 2012; F. Eyidogan et al., 2012). Auxins taking part in drought tolerance was postulated by researchers (ZhangS-W et al., 2009). What's more, BR was reported (mainly researches on exogenous application of BR) to induce stress-related genes' expression, which results in the maintenance of photosynthesis activity, the activation of antioxidant enzymes, the accumulation of osmoprotectants, and the induction of other hormone responses (Divi UK et al., 2009). In conclusion, there do exist a complex network for phytohormones to contribute to stress-induced reactions for plants. And due to the overlap between hormone-regulated gene suites in the adaptive responses, we have to discuss cross-talk between the different hormone signaling pathways as a extensive part of that complex network.
Earlier, it was reported that ABA can inhibit the biosynthesis of ethylene and may also potentially reduce the sensitivity of plants to ethylene (Sharp, R.E., 2002). Recently the expression of many other genes associated with auxin synthesis, perception, and action has been shown to be regulated by ethylene (Stepanova AN, Alonso JM, 2009). And it is not surprising that auxin has been found involved in ethylene biosynthesis very early. Meanwhile, CK was shown to be a positive regulator of auxin biosynthesis (Jones B et al., 2010).
Furthermore, GA and BR regulate many common physiological processes like the growth and development in rice seedlings (Wang L et al., 2009). Except BR, GA has another partner - SA. Transgenic A. thaliana plants constitutively overexpressing a GA-responsive gene became more tolerant under abiotic stress and this stronger tolerance was correlated with increased endogenous levels of SA (Alonso-Ramirez A et al., 2009).
Discussed above, ABA can regulate stomatal actions under stress conditions; however, it is not alone in that process. CK, ET, BR, JA, SA, and NO also affect stomatal function (reviewed by Acharya B, Assmann S, 2009). In detail, ABA, BR, SA, JA, and NO induce stomatal closure, CK and IAA promote stomatal opening. And we mentioned before, NO acts as a key intermediate in the ABA-mediated signaling network in stomatal closure. Moreover BR-mediated signaling was regulated by ABA, and in turn, ABA was also shown to inhibit BR-induced responses under abiotic stress (Divi U et al., 2010). And it is not hard to deduce that there are other tricky relationships between different hormone-involved pathways. Cross-talk between the phytohormones results in synergetic or antagonist interactions, which is crucial for plants in abiotic stress responses. To characterize the molecular mechanisms regulating hormone synthesis, signaling, and action means a lot to modificate hormone biosynthetic pathways to develop transgenic crop plants with promoted tolerance to abiotic stress.
2.3. Ca2+ as an intermediate signal molecule
So far, we have already touched some grounds related to Calcium (Ca2+) functioning in signal transduction. Among all ions in eukaryotic organisms, it is likely to be the most versatile one who almost links to all aspects of plant development, not to mention many regulatory processes. The reason why it is so powerful may root in its flexibility in exhibiting different coordination numbers and complex geometries, and this ability makes it easily form complexes with proteins, membranes, and organic acids. However we won't detect high cytosolic or organelle Ca2+ concentrations resulting from the tight management of various Ca2+ pumps and transporters. The reason why the concentration needs to be controlled is that higher Ca2+ concentrations can chelate negatively charged molecules in the cell leading to cytotoxicity. Interestingly, all the secondary signaling molecules we mentioned above may activate transient increases in cytosolic Ca2+, and transient elevations in cytosolic Ca2+ concentration have been documented to have relationship with a multitude of physiological processes linking to abiotic stress responses. So we may wonder concentration control probably will help us tell the story of another famous second messenger--- Ca2+ in signal transduction for plants under abiotic stress.
Earlier in 1982, research on the green algae Chara told us the cytosolic Ca2+ concentration change predicted Ca2+ might work as a second messenger in plants (Williamson and Ashley, 1982). Based on later reports, it has been found various stimuli will spur their own special Ca2+ responses differing in where and how changes happen (Johnson et al., 1995; Tracy et al., 2008), which exactly supports the former concept of Ca2+ signature. For plants, to maintain Ca2+ homeostasis, they need the help from Ca2+ channels, pumps, and exchangers (carriers) to make specific adaptation to every kind of stimulus (Kudla et al., 2010). Later, cellular Ca2+ signals are decoded and transmitted by Ca2+-binding proteins that relay this information into downstream responses. Major Ca2+ signal transduction routes contain Ca2+-regulated kinases mediating phosphorylation events and regulation of gene expression via Ca2+-regulated transcription factors and Ca2+-responsive promoter elements.
Generally speaking, Ca2+ signaling comprises three phases: generation of a Ca2+ signature, sensing the signature and transduction of the signal (Reddy and Reddy, 2004). Having discussed above, we are informed that the concentration change are always triggered by cellular second messengers, such as NAADP, IP3, IP6, Sphingosine-1-Phospate, and cADPR (Allen and Sanders, 1995; Navazio et al., 2000; Lemtiri-Chlieh et al., 2003). Then a specific cellular Ca2+ signature is sensed by Ca2+-binding proteins, the Ca2+ sensors (Dodd et al., 2010; Reddy and Reddy, 2004). The sensors themselves may become active to transduce the signal by themselves, or choose to bind to their interacting proteins and affect their partners’ activity to transduce the signal. In detail, there are three major classes of Ca2+ sensors identified in plants. The first one is calmodulins (CaMs) and calmodulin-related proteins (CMLs). CaMs is a group of small acidic protein, highly conserved in eukaryotes (Snedden and Fromm, 2001), and contains four EF hands (one major Ca2+ binding motif) where bind Ca2+. Moreover this binding action induces a conformational change of CaM, leading to exposure of hydrophobic surfaces and further triggering electrostatic interactions with target proteins - CaM-binding proteins (CBPs) (Hoeflich and Ikura, 2002). CBPs have been found to take part in regulating transcription, metabolism, ion transport, protein folding, cytoskeleton-associated functions, protein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation, as well as phospholipid metabolism (Yang and Poovaiah, 2003; Reddy and Reddy, 2004). Furthermore, different CaM proteins exhibit differential expression and are likely to show differential affinity to Ca2+ and to their target proteins (McCormack et al., 2005; Popescu et al., 2007), which makes CaM be equipped with multiple capabilities in Ca2+ signal transduction. With many similarities to CaMs, CMLs are mostly composed of four EF-hands and lack other known functional domains. Like CaMs, they relay the signal by binding to other proteins resulting in activation or inactivation of interacting proteins. Over 300 proteins that interact with CaMs and CMLs have been identified in plants (Popescu et al., 2007). The second class of Ca2+ sensor is represented by the calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs/CPKs) who are serine/threonine protein kinases contain a catalytic kinase domain and EF-hand motifs (Cheng et al., 2002). The third typical sensor type is the EF-hand-containing Ca2+-modulated protein named SCaBP (SOS3 (Salt-Overly-Sensitive 3)-like Ca2+-biniding proteins)/Calcineurin B-like (CBL) proteins, which is plant-specific (Luan et al., 2002). CBLs interact with a family of protein kinases called CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) (Luan et al., 2009; Weinl and Kudla, 2009; Batistic et al., 2010). In addition to EF-hand-containing Ca2+ binding proteins, there are other proteins without that motif acting as sensors who also can bind Ca2+, like PLD (introduced in 2.2.2), annexins and C2 domain–containing proteins (Clark and Roux, 1995; Reddy and Reddy, 2004; Laohavisit and Davies, 2011), however their functions in abiotic stress responses haven't been deeply explored, and only some reports suggest PLD and annexin be relevant to stress signal transduction (White et al., 2002; reviewed by Laohavisit and Davies, 2011).
However here we will mainly stress on the EF-hand-containing sensors due to their considerable significance in signal transduction pathways. Based on their functional styles, these sensors are assigned into two camps termed as sensor relays and sensor responders (Kudla et al., 2010). The sensor relays do not have any known enzymatic or other functional domains except the EF hands. They interact with other proteins and regulate their activities, just like CaMs/CMLs, and CBLs (with one exception, CaM7) (McCormack et al., 2005; Luan, 2009; DeFalco et al., 2010). The members of another camp are characterized by an additional a catalytic or functional domain, except EF hands, whose activity is regulated by Ca2+ binding to EF-hand motifs. So definitely CDPKs belong to this camp, and other members are Ca2+-and Ca2+/CaM-dependent protein kinases (CCaMKs), some DNA or lipid binding proteins, and a few enzymes (Day et al., 2002; Yang and Poovaiah, 2003; Harper and Harmon, 2005). Many calcium sensors are coded by multiple genes, and expression of many of these is induced by stresses (DeFalco et al., 2010).
Then, let's take a look at what will be the next move of those Ca2+-activated sensors. Firstly, they can directly bind to
Meanwhile, what performance they will give in each specific abiotic stress condition needs to be simply introduced here. For drought stress, cellular Ca2+ transmits drought signals to regulate the physiological responses induced by drought stress (Dai et al., 2007). It has been found that Ca2+ treatment increased protection against membrane lipid peroxidation and stability of membranes and therefore resulted in the increase of drought resistance of rice seedlings. It is also reported that in wheat Ca2+ may reduce the adverse stress effects by elevating the content of proline and glycine betaine, thus improving the water status and growth of seedlings and minimizing the injury to membranes (Geisler et al., 2000; Munns et al., 2006; Goldgur et al., 2007). Additionally, Ca2+/CaM means a lot to the process of ABA-induced drought signal transferring under PEG stress. And ABA synthesis correlates with cytoplasmic Ca2+ concentrations ([Ca2+]cyt) (Rabbani et al., 2003; Noctor, 2006). We know how important ABA is to the stomatal status, and now more studies have established a close relationship between [Ca2+]cyt oscillation and stomatal status. In addition, in Arabidopisis genome, 9 SOS3 homologs (SCaBP/CBL) and 22 SOS2 homologs (SOS2-like protein kinases -PKS/CBL-interacting protein kinases-CIPK) were identified. By the way, SOS2 is a serine/threonine protein kinase with an SNF1/AMPK–like catalytic domain and a unique regulatory domain (Liu et al., 2000). Individual SCaBP/CBL interacts with PKS/CIPK with different specificities (Gong et al., 2004; Luan et al., 2002). And it is indicatied that the interaction between SCaBP5 and PKS3 may interpret Ca2+ signatures resulting from ABA or drought stress signals. On the other hand, SOS3 interact with and activate the SOS2, whose mutation also confers salt sensitivity. Then the activated SOS2 phosphorylates and regulates ion transporters such as the Na+/H+ antiporter SOS1 controlling long-distance Na+ transport from the root to shoot, which eventually leads to the restoration of ion homeostasis in the cytoplasm under salt stress (Zhu, J.K., 2003).
In light of salt stress, like other stresses, it is perceived at cell membrane and then trigger intracellular-signaling cascade including the generation of secondary messenger molecules like Ca2+ and protons. For instance, it was found that in barley roots, under NaCl stress, Ca2+-CaM system may work in activating tonoplast H+-ATPase and regulating Na+ and K+ uptake with involvement of SOS signal transduction pathway (Brini et al., 2007). In Arabidopsis, experiments to overexpress AtCaMBP25 (a CaM binding protein) who may be a a negative regulator of osmotic stress tolerance find the transgenic Arabidopsis plants show higher sensitivity to osmotic stress, while the antisense plants gain more tolerance under salt stress (Perruc, E. et al., 2004).
Furthermore, when it comes to uncomfortable temperature, is there any position for Ca2+? For sure. The Ca2+ channels have shown their power for the growth of root hairs and the low temperature acclimation of chilling-resistant plants. That's why we find data indicating that the activity and stability of Ca2+-ATPase under 2 °C low temperature are the key factors in the development of cold resistance of winter wheat (Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, 2006). Moreover the studies on Arabidopsis mutants displaying reduced tonoplast Ca2+/H+ antiport (CAX1) activity indicate that CAX1 participates in the development of the cold acclimation response (Lecourieux et al., 2006). On the other field of temperature acclimation, there exists data showing in Arabidopsis, Ca2+/CaM have gotten involved in heat shock response (Zhang et al., 2009). And we also find some researches on overexpression of a CDPK in rice which brings increased tolerance to cold and salt stress (Saijo, Y. et al., 2000).
Taken together, depending on the type of signal or the type of cell, internal and/or external Ca2+ stores could be involved in raising [Ca2+]cyt (Dodd et al., 2010; Kudla et al., 2010). Both types of Ca2+ transporters, namely, Ca2+-ATPases and CAXs involve in plant responses by regulating [Ca2+]cyt. Based on that, regulating cellular and intercellular Ca2+ signaling networks brings improving resistances or tolerances. And seeing from the regulation networks of stress responses to drought, salt and cold stress, we find Ca2+ and its interacting proteins may be the cross-talks among ABA-dependent, MAPK and other stress signaling pathways. Anyway, we can see the core of Ca2+ actions in relaying abiotic stress signaling depends on how to translate Ca2+ signatures to specific protein phosphorylation cascades,which we have mentioned above, so in the following part, we are going to trace the performance of phosphoproteins in signal transduction.
2.4. Role of phosphoproteins in stress signaling
By controlling the phosphorylation status of other proteins, protein kinases and phosphatases play a fundamental role in coordinating the activity of many known signal transduction pathways. For many signal pathways not only in abiotic stress field, protein reversible phosphorylation is the major player in relaying signals. And during this significant process, we highlight the functions of protein kinases and protein phosphatases who are enzymes to catalyze these reversible phosphorylation processes. And they are divided into several categories according to their structure or functional characteristics. And in the following part, we will give a general idea to the readers about their central role in signal transduction in abiotic stress aspect.
2.4.1. MAPK
Obviously, we have seen MAPK many times in formal description in this chapter. Even if it is not found in plants, the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades are known to be involved in plant abiotic stress responses acting as intracellular signal modules that mediate signal transduction from the cell surface to the nucleus. The reason to mention it here is that phosphorylation plays a central role in the progression of the signal through the MAPK cascade. Moreover MAPK cascades, the conserved signaling modules found in all eukaryotes, are fundamental in transducing environmental and developmental cues into intracellular responses bringing changes in cellular organization or gene expression. The simplest constitution of a MAPK cascade contains MAP kinase kinase kinases (MAP3Ks/MAPKKKs/MEKKs), MAP kinase kinases (MAP2Ks/MAPKKs/MEKs/MKKs) and MAP kinases (MAPKs/MPKs) (Mishra NS et al., 2006). And when under stress, stimulated plasma membrane will activate MAP3Ks or MAP kinase kinase kinase kinases (MAP4Ks), who may be the adapters to link upstream signaling steps to the core MAPK cascades (Dan I et al., 2001). Following that, MAP3Ks will phosphorylate two amino acids in the S/T-X3-5-S/T motif of the MAP2K activation loop. Then MAP2Ks phosphorylate MAPKs on threonine and tyrosine residues at a conserved T-X-Y motif at the active site. When signals come to MAPKs, further phosphorylation will tag on a wide range of substrates involving other kinases, cytoskeleton-associated proteins, and/or transcription factors. As for formation and integrity of a specific MAPK cascade, scaffold proteins take control over it (Whitmarsh AJ et al., 1998). And after signaling completed, MKPs (MAPK phosphatases) take the responsibility to shut the pathway down. Generally, the whole cascade is regulated by various mechanisms, including not only transcriptional and translational regulation but through post-transcriptional regulation such as protein-protein interactions (Rodriguez MC et al., 2010).
Thanks to traditional genetic and biochemical methods and lots of excellent research efforts, we can conclude that MAP3K/MAP2K/MAPK signaling modules show overlapping roles in controlling diverse cellular functions by forming complex interconnected networks within cells. These include cell division, development, hormone signaling and synthesis, and response to abiotic stress (high and low temperature, drought and high and low osmolarity, wounding, high salinity, UV radiation, ozone, ROS, heavy metals), as well as biotic stress reactions (Jonak C et al., 2002; Xiong L et al., 2003; Raman, M. et al., 2007; Gohar Taj et al., 2010; Alok Krishna Sinha et al., 2011).
According to the researches on MAPK pathways, we can see that regulated expression of MAPK components shows effects on stress sensitivity. Here are some examples. Expression of an active form of a tobacco MAP3K, NPK1, increases freezing tolerance of transgenic tobacco or maize plants (Kovtun, Y et al., 2000; Shou, H et al., 2004). Meanwhile, MAP2K1 shows transcriptional induction under salt stress, drought and cold, as well as activated by wounding and drought stress. And MAP2K1 can phosphorylate MAPK4. An unsurprised fact is that MAPK4 and MAPK6 are found to be activated by cold, salt and drought (Ichimura K et al., 2000). Indeed, a MAPK module composed of MAP3K1-MAP2K1/MAP2K2-MAPK4/MAPK6 has been confirmed in cold and salt stress by yeast two hybrid analyses and yeast complementation (Teige M et al., 2004). So we can say different MAPKs are activated at different times after the onset of stress and the activities of these MAPKs are activated within different time periods. By the way, during osmolarity signaling MAPKs module seems to be widely involved (reviewed by Gohar Taj et al., 2010).
Due to the interlink between osmotic stress and oxidative stress, we are informed of the relationship between ROS, hormone signaling and MAPKs. ROS like H2O2 is closely associated to MAPKs' activities. In Arabidopsis, H2O2 activates AtMPK6 and the related AtMPK3 via the MAP3K ANP1(Desikan R et al., 1999), and AtMPK6 are involved in cold stress as we knew before. Additionally, in tobacco, under H2O2 and ozone treatment, the ortholog of AtMPK, SIPK1 will be activated as well (Samuel MA et al., 2000). These findings imply that multiple MAPK modules mediate oxidative stress responses and that MAPK cascades are not only induced by ROS but may also regulate ROS levels. Meanwhile, activating SIPK1 (salicylic acid-induced protein kinase), who is an NO-activated protein kinase in tobacco, can not process without SA, which brings a suggestion for the existence of cross-talk between ROS, hormone signaling and MAPKs. Here is some other evidence coming from studies on stomatal movement (Eckardt NA., 2009). In guard cells of Vicia faba, MAP2K is believed to regulate stomatal movement through mediating H2O2 generation induced by ABA (Song XG et al., 2008). Later, in guard cells studies, MAPK9 and MAPK12 have been proved to serve as positive regulators acting downstream of reactive oxygen species and calcium signaling in ABA signaling. In 2.2.4, we talk about ABA- and Ca2+-induced stomatal closure, so we can't help wonder is there any link between MAPK and ABA- and Ca2+-induced pathways? Yes, it has been found that ABA and Ca2+ signals cannot activate anion channels in mpk9/12 mutants, thus indicating that these two MAPKs act between the ABA and Ca2+ signals and the anion channels. (Jammes F et al., 2009).
Even if the role of MAPK in ABA signaling has not yet been directly confirmed, the attempts to clarify the relationship between hormone and MAPKs never stop. Not just for ABA, the role of MAPK signaling cascades in auxin signaling and ethylene biosynthesis has been documented in numerous studies (Dai Y et al., 2006; Xu J et al., 2008). Eventually, the genes in hormone biosynthesis (ethylene) and responses (auxin) are altered, it is of great significance to distinguish the direct targets of MAPK cascade from those that are regulated by altered hormonal and oxidative stress responses. On the other hand, recently in heavy metal stress studies, we find data supporting that MAPK3 and MAPK6 are activated responding to cadmium through ROS accumulation produced by oxidative stress in Arabidopsis (Liu XM et al., 2010), which further demonstrate the close relevance between ROS and MAPKs.
Meanwhile, by searching for the linkage between MAPKs and its various substrates involving other kinases and transcription factors, we gain much more information about MAPK cascades. Over-expression of MAP2K2 affects genes for several transcription factors (such as RAV1, STZ, ZAT10, ERF6, WRKY, and CBF2), disease resistance proteins, cell wall related proteins, enzymes involved in some secondary metabolisms and an 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase (ACS). In the case of ACS, the rate-limiting enzyme of ethylene biosynthesis, the phosphorylation by MAPKs and by CDPKs affects protein stability and turnover, which again shows us the complicated cross-talk network (Bernhard Wurzinger et al., 2011). So it is a big challenge to identifying the targets of MAPK cascades, but the researches on other protein kinases leave us useful clue to find the answer.
2.4.2. Other protein kinases
Whether at the transcript level or activity level, protein kinases are induced by a variety of abiotic stress, which indicates their powerful participation in signaling process. Moreover no matter suppressing or overexpressing these kinases, there both exists data showing that in transgenic plants, stress responses has changed. So far, we know several protein kinases involved in stress tolerance are stimulated by ABA, such as most of SNF1-related kinases (SnRKs) like SnRK2, SnRK3 (CIPK), CDPK and MAPK families. But others like Glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) ( Jonak and Hirt, 2002; Koh et al., 2007), S6 kinase (S6K) (Mahfouz et al., 2006), SERK (Marcelo O. Santos et al., 2009) also attract a lot of attention.
Now let's start from SnRKs. The SnRK2 family members are plant-specific kinases relating to abiotic stresses responses and abscisic acid (ABA)-dependent plant development. They have been classed into three groups; members of group 1 are not activated by ABA, and group 2 also will not be activated or weekly activated, while group 3 is strongly activated by ABA. In
As follows, we take a brief look at other kinases. CDKs (Cyclin dependent protein kinases) are a large family of serine/threonine protein kinases and mainly function in ensuring that cells progress in order over the different cell division stages. But their roles in abiotic stress responses turn out to be more eye-catching, which can be reflected in heat, cold, drought and salt stimuli researches (reviewed by Georgios Kitsios, 2011). Other findings like Somatic Embryogenesis Receptor Kinase (SERK) relating to somatic embryogenesis and apomixis (Marcelo O. Santos et al., 2009), AtNEK6, a member of the NIMA (never in mitosis A)-related kinases (NEKs) (Lee SJ et al., 2010), bring us a large amount of information to explore the functional importance of various kinases in abiotic stress.
2.4.3. Protein phosphatases
During phosphorylation process, the job for protein phosphatases is to remove the phosphate added by protein kinases. Based on their substrate specificity, protein phosphatases can be classified, at least three families, as PPP family and PPM family composed by serine/threonine phosphatases, PTP family comprising tyrosine phosphatases, and dual specificity phosphatases (dsPTPs/dsPPase). As the largest group of phosphatases in plants, serine/threonine phosphatases can be further divided into PP1, PP2A, PP2B, and PP2C. For stress signal transduction, involvement of PP2C, PP2A, PTP, dsPPase have been reported in ABA or stress signal transduction, but the best-known example is the PP2C. On the other hand, many experiments have found that the relationship between MAPKs and phosphatases both exists in animals and plants. It has been shown that tyrosine-specific phosphorylation is associated with plant MAPKs, which again demonstrate the essential position phosphatases take in signaling pathways.
For the biggest branch of protein phosphatases in plants, in Arabidopsis alone, 76 PP2C genes have been identified early (Kerk et al. 2002). Further researches say ABA and other abiotic stress stimuli can induce A-type PP2C expression. Furthermore the A-type PP2C phosphatases, ABI1, ABI2, HAB1 (P2CHA) and PP2CA (AHG3) have been proved to directly interact with PYR/RCAR ABA receptors, however they always act as negative regulators at different layers of ABA signaling. (Merlot et al., 2001; Umezawa et al., 2009; Nishimura et al., 2010).
Working on other phosphatases like PP1, we find data in
Finally, we can see that the biggest challenge for abiotic stress signal research is to elaborate the network of kinases and phosphatases, and their relationship with a wide range of substrates, as well as understand the phosphorylation states and how phosphorylation-dependent activity culminates in the process of coping with a particular environmental stress.
2.5. The role of TFs and genes in certain abiotic stress situations
By the end of signaling, the biggest assignment is to temporally and spatially regulate stress-induced genes expression, and it is almost done at transcriptional level(Rushton and Somssich 1998). Obviously the most contributing workers are transcription factors (TFs) who modulate genes expression by binding to specific DNA sequences in the promoters of target genes (Chaves and Oliveira 2004). Thanks to coordination between TFs and genes, new transcripts are synthesized and stress adaptations have been realized within just a few hours. Consequently, that is why TFs are such a group of powerful targets being so popular in genetic engineering field aiming at improving stress resistance in crop plants. But, who are they? While, most of them belong to several big families, naming AP2/ERF (ethylene responsive element binding factor), Zn finger, basic leucine zipper (bZIP), basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH), WRKY, MYB, and NAC. Indeed we frequently mentioned them in formal description. So let's start to wander in their complicated regulatory network designed for the also complex stress situations.
2.5.1. Drought
Based on recent data, the rate of land area experiencing drought is uprising and probably goes up to 30% by the end of this century (Yi et al. 2010). And that is a big threaten for plants lives, for drought is very likely to give rise to arrest of photosynthesis, disturbance of metabolism and finally plant death (Jaleel et al. 2008). But plants will react efficiently. With a few second of water loss, phosphorylation status of a protein will be triggered and later when the suffering time reached hours or days long, gene expression and plant morphology occur (Verslues and Bray, 2006). By researching on Arabidopsis plants under water-deficit stress, more than 800 induced genes have been identified (Bray, 2004), who play key roles in signal transduction, transcriptional regulation, cellular metabolism and transport, as well as cellular structures protection. Meanwhile, when water deficit comes two major transcriptional regulatory pathways of gene expression show up. One group is TFs called dehydration response element binding protein (DREB) coming from AP2/ERF family and another is NAC, AREB/ABF, WRKY and MYB group. The former work in the ABA-independent pathway, latter known to be as the most responsive to ABA signaling under drought.
The DREB proteins contain an ERF/AP2 DNA-binding domain that is quite conserved. The TFs containing it are widely found in many plants, including Arabidopsis (Okamuro et al. 1997 ), tomato (Zhou et al. 1997 ), tobacco (Ohme-Takagi and Shinshi 1995 ), rice (Weigel 1995 ) and maize (Moose and Sisco 1996 ). And a conserved Ser/Thr-rich region next to ERF/AP2 domain is considered to be responsible for DREB proteins phosphorylation (Liu et al., 1998). Latter, Agarwal et al. found high sequence similarity exists in different DREB proteins by amino acid alignment analysis (Agarwal et al., 2006).
Generally, The DREB TFs could be divided into DREB1 and DREB2, and they participate in signal transduction pathways under low temperature and dehydration respectively. They belong to plants-distinctive ERF family. ERF proteins share a conserved domain binding to the C-repeat CRT/dehydration responsive element (DRE) motif engaged in the expression of cold and dehydration responsive genes (Agarwal et al., 2006). The expression of DREB2A and its homolog DREB2B are induced by dehydration and high salt stress (Liu et al., 1998; Nakashima et al., 2000 ). Furthermore, the expression of DREB genes is induced by abiotic stresses at different time periods (Liu et al. 1998; Dubouzet et al. 2003). But for the character of tissue-specific expression, the data is still in short.
For the ABA-dependent gene induction under water-deficit condition, we want to stress on another group of TFs. Firsly, MYB, MYC, homeodomain TFs and a family of transcriptional repressors (Cys2/His2-type zinc-finger proteins) are involved in the ABA response to water deficit. The promoter region of Responsive to Dehydration 22 (RD22), who is induced by ABA, contains MYC and MYB
2.5.2. Flooding stress
Flooding and submergence are two stresses lead to anoxic conditions in the root system. Under this stress condition, both anoxia and hypoxia are defined by O2 shortage. But diverse plants have their own way to adjust to it. Some lowland rice cultivars, such as FR13A, can survive submergence by suppressing shoot elongation. At the molecular level, Submergence-1 (Sub1), which is derived from FR13A, is a major quantitative trait locus contributing to great submergence tolerance (Xu et al. 2006). And three sequentially arrayed genes (designated
In plants, different cell types exhibit a conserved response to low oxygen levels at the molecular level (Mustroph et al. 2010). This response includes the induction of genes after 30 min under hypoxia, whose expression is maintained for several hours (Klok et al. 2002; van Dongen et al. 2009). The increased transcript levels of these genes are further accompanied by active combination between mRNAs and polysomes reflecting promoted translation process (Branco-Price et al. 2008). Unfortunately, in plants the mechanism by which oxygen is perceived has not been clarified. But researches on hypoxia-responsive TFs can help us a lot to investigate the regulation of the hypoxic response. Usually these TFs are detected in families like MYB, NACs [Arabidopsis Transcription Activation Factor (ATAF) and Cup-shaped Cotyledons (CUC)], Plant Homeodomain (PHD) and ERF families (Hoeren et al. 1998; Christianson et al. 2009; Licausi et al. 2010b). And on the other hand, Microarray data in Arabidopsis and rice research find us several transcription factors whose expression increases induced by oxygen deprivation, such as heat shock factors, MADS-box proteins, and WRKY factors (Lasanthi-Kudahettige et al., 2007). Recently Licausi et al. (2010a) have identified TFs that are differentially expressed under hypoxic conditions. The results indicate members of the AP2 ⁄ ERF-type family are the most common upregulated TFs, followed by Zinc-finger and basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH-type) TFs. TFs belonging to the bHLH family also appear in the downregulated part, together with members from the bZIP and MYB families.
On the other hand, by
2.5.3. Salinity
Plants growing in high salt concentrations, as we know, will suffer from osmotic stress and take actions like closing stomata and reducing cell expansion in young leaves and root tips. Subsequently, accumulation of ions, especially sodium (Na+), in the photosynthetic tissues, will hit photosynthetic components such as enzymes, chlorophylls, and carotenoids (Davenport et al. 2005), followed by secondary stresses (oxidative stress and nutritional disorders) (Hasegawa et al. 2000; Chinnusamy et al. 2006).
One of the main strategies taken to improve plant salt tolerance is to re-establish ion homeostasis by counteracting the osmotic component of the stress to avoid toxic concentrations within the cytoplasm (Munns and Tester 2008). Recently, in Arabidopsis it has been confirmed that the effective establishing and maintaining ion homeostasis is mediated mainly by a Salt Overly Sensitive (SOS) signal pathway, which we refer to in Ca2+ part. Recently, SOS4 and SOS5 have also been characterized (Mahajan et al. 2008). Similar to
Meanwhile, what do TFs do in salt stress signaling? Based on researches on Cor/Lea salinity stress responsive genes, whose expression is mediated Ca2+and ABA in salt stress signaling, it has been indicated that various upstream TFs will activate DRE/CRT, ABREs, MYC recognition sequence (MYCRS) and MYB recognition sequence (MYBRS)
2.5.4. Extremes of temperature
Signals of extreme temperature, from freezing to scorching, is perceived by membrane and transduced by different transduction components results in transcription of several genes. Cold stress directly inhibit metabolic reactions and indirectly produce harm through cold-induced osmotic prevents the expression of full genetic potential of plants owing to its direct inhibition of metabolic reactions and, indirectly, through cold-induced osmotic, oxidative and other stresses such as water uptake barriers caused by chilling and cellular dehydration induced by freeze. Cold stress, based on temperature range, are defined as chilling (<20°C) and/or freezing (<0°C) temperatures, both of which hurt plants in different ways. The former leads to slow biochemical reactions related to enzymes and membrane transport activities, while the latter forming ice crystal can cause membrane system disruption (Chinnusamy et al. 2007).
Numerous TFs in cold stress circumstances have been identified in Arabidopsis, homologs of which have been reported in other plants also. Significant progress has been made in the past decade in elucidating the transcriptional networks regulating cold acclimation. Firstly, AP2/ERF family TFs, CBFs play essential role in controlling genes in phosphoinositide metabolism, osmolyte biosynthesis, ROS detoxification, hormone metabolism and signalling (Lee et al. 2005). They can bind to
Moreover for many studies, emphasize has been laid on the ICE-CBF-COR transcriptional cascade. In Arabidopsis, ICE1 (Inducer of CBF Expression1), a MYC-type bHLH TF, can bind to MYC recognition elements in the
3. Conclusion
Thanks to so much efforts made by researchers in various fields, we have a pretty clear idea about how to develop our researching methods in abiotic stress field. That is exactly what we should concentrate on in the future. For plants’ reactions to different kinds of stress, we must make more efforts in taking measures in focusing on systematic studies which so far can be taken as the best way to figure out what plants will do under certain circumstances.
As we all know, it is of incredibly great importance to understand more about abiotic stress which impacts a lot on plants, which will not only change our understanding of current environment we live, but also bring a plenty of benefits for improving human beings living standards. That is why at this part we hope we can get everyone’s attention to how to explore plants kingdom and develop researches in a systematic way.
References
- 1.
Cooke D. T Munkonge F. M Burden R. S James C. S Fluidity and lipid composition of oat and rye shoot plasma membrane: effect of sterol perturbation by xenobiotics. Biochim Biophys Acta,1991 156 EOF 62 EOF - 2.
Elkahoui S Smaoui A Zarrouk M Ghrir R Limam F Salt-induced lipid changes in Catharanthus roseus cultured cell suspensions. 2004 1911 EOF 7 EOF - 3.
Bewell M. A Maathuis F. J Allen G. J Sanders D Calcium-induced calcium release mediated by a voltage-activated cation channel in vacuolar vesicles from red beet 1999 41 EOF 44 EOF - 4.
Knight B. W Omurtag A Sirovich L The approach of a neuron population firing rate to a new equilibrium: An Exact Theoretical Result. 2000 1045 EOF 55 EOF - 5.
Sangwan V Foulds I Singh J Dhindsa R. S Cold-activation of Brassica napus BN1 The Plant Journal,1 EOF 12 EOF promoter is mediated by structural changes in membranes and cytoskeleton, and requires Ca2+ influx.2001 - 6.
Wang Q. Y Nick P Cold acclimation can induce microtubular cold stability in a manner distinct from abscisic acid Plant Cell Physiology,2001 999 EOF 1005 EOF - 7.
Plieth C Temperature sensing by plants: calcium-permeable channels as primary sensors-A Model. 1999 121 EOF 7 EOF - 8.
Hasegawa P. M Bressan R. A Zhu J-K Bohnert H. J Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity 2000 463 EOF 500 EOF - 9.
Suzuki I Los D. A Kanesaki Y Mikami K Murata N The pathway for perception and transduction of low-temperature signals in Synechocystis. 2000 1327 EOF 34 EOF - 10.
Aguilar P. S Hernandez-arriaga A. M Molecular basis of thermosensing: a two-component signal transduction thermometer in Bacillus subtilis. 2001 1681 EOF 91 EOF - 11.
Two-component systems in plant signal transduction. Trends in Plant Science,Urao T Yamaguchi-shinozaki K Shinozaki K 2000 - 12.
Maeda T Wurgler-murphy S. M Saito H A two-component system that regulates an osmosensing MAP kinase cascade in yeast. 1994 242 EOF 5 EOF - 13.
Urao T Yakubov B Satoh R Yamaguchi-shinozaki K A transmembrane hybrid-type histidine kinase in Arabidopsis functions as an osmosensor. 1999 1743 EOF 54 EOF - 14.
Plant salt tolerance. Trends in Plant Science,Zhu J-K 2001 - 15.
Xiong L Zhu J-K Molecular and genetic aspects of plant responses to osmotic stress Cell & Environment,2002 131 EOF 139 EOF - 16.
Ullah H Chen J-G Young J. C Im K-H Modulation of cell proliferation by heterotrimeric G protein in Arabidopsis. Science,2001 2066 EOF 9 EOF - 17.
Wang X-Q Ullah H Jones A. M Assmann S. M G protein regulation of ion channels and abscisic acid signaling in Arabidopsis guard cells. Science,2001 2070 EOF 2 EOF - 18.
Ma Y Szostkiewicz I Korte A Regulators of Science,2C phosphatase activity function as abscisic acid sensors.2009 - 19.
Park S-Y Fung P Nishimura N Abscisic acid inhibits type 2C protein phosphatases via the PYR/PYL family of START proteins. Science,2009 1068 EOF 71 EOF - 20.
Ascorbate and glutathione: the heart of the redox hub. Plant Physiology, andFoyer C. H Noctor G 2011 - 21.
Salt and drought stress effects on photosynthesis. Handbook of Photosynthesis (2nd edition).,Huchzermeyer B Koyro H. W 2005 - 22.
Kant S Kant P Raveh E Barak S Evidence that differential gene expression between the halophyte, Thellungiella halophila, and Arabidopsis thaliana is responsible for higher levels of the compatible osmolyte proline and tight control of Na+ uptake in T. Halophila. Ce ll & Environment,2006 1220 EOF 1234 EOF - 23.
Türkan I Demiral T Recent developments in understanding salinity tolerance 2 EOF 9 EOF 2009 - 24.
Satchell KJF.Geissler B Tungekar R Identification of a conserved membrane localization domain within numerous large bacterial protein toxins Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.,2010 - 25.
Vranova E Atichartpongkul S Comprehensive analysis of gene expression in Nicotiana tabacum leaves acclimated to oxidative stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.,2002 - 26.
Foyer C. H Noctor G Redox sensing and signalling associated with reactive oxygen in chloroplasts, peroxisomes and mitochondria 2003 355 EOF 364 EOF - 27.
Moller I. M Plant mitochondria and oxidative stress: electron transport, NADPH turnover, and metabolism of reactive oxygen species 2001 561 EOF 591 EOF - 28.
Alternative NAD (P) H dehydrogenases of plant mitochondria. Annual Review of Plant Biology,Rasmusson A. G Soole K. L Elthon T. E 2004 - 29.
Noctor G Metabolic signalling in defence and stress: the central roles of soluble redox couples Cell & Environment,2006 409 EOF 425 EOF - 30.
Rhoads D. M Umbach A. L Subbaiah C. C Siedow J. N Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species. Contribution to oxidative stress and interorganellar signaling Plant Physiology,2006 - 31.
Pourrut B Perchet G Silvestre J Cecchi M Guiresse M Pinelli E Potential role of NADPH-oxidase in early steps of lead-induced oxidative burst in Vicia faba roots 2008 571 EOF 579 EOF - 32.
Leshem Y Seri L Levine A Induction of phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase-mediated endocytosis by salt stress leads to intracellular production of reactive oxygen species and salt tolerance2007 - 33.
Foreman J Demidchik V Bothwell J. H Mylona P Reactive oxygen species produced by NADPH oxidase regulate plant cell growth. 2003 442 EOF 6 EOF - 34.
Mori I. C Schroeder J. I Reactive Oxygen Species Activation of Plant Ca2+ Channels. A Signaling Mechanism in Polar Growth, Hormone Transduction, Stress Signaling, and Hypothetically Mechanotransduction. Plant Physiology,2004 - 35.
Gamaley I. A Klyubin I. V Roles of reactive oxygen species: signaling and regulation of cellular functions. 1999 203 EOF 55 EOF - 36.
Foyer C. H Noctor G Redox homeostasis and antioxidant signaling: a metabolic interface between stress perception and physiological responses The Plant Cell,2005 - 37.
Zhao L Zhang F Guo J Yang Y Li B Zhang L Nitric oxide functions as a signal in salt resistance in the calluses from two ecotypes of reed. 2004 849 EOF 57 EOF - 38.
Prasad T. K Anderson M. D Martin B. A Evidence for chilling-induced oxidative stress in maize seedlings and a regulatory role for hydrogen peroxide. The Plant Cell,1994 - 39.
Fadzilla N. M Finch R. P Burdon R. H Salinity, oxidative stress and antioxidant responses in shoot cultures of rice 1997 325 EOF 332 EOF - 40.
Lui J Shono M Characterization of mitochondria-located small heat shock protein from tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) Plant Cell Physiology,1999 1297 EOF 1304 EOF - 41.
Lee B. H Won S. H Lee H. S Miyao M Chung W. I Kim I. J Expression of the chloroplast-localized small heat shock protein by oxidative stress in rice 2000 283 EOF 290 EOF - 42.
Moschou P. N Paschalidis K. A Delis I. D Spermidine exodus and oxidation in the apoplast induced by abiotic stress is responsible for H2O2 signatures that direct tolerance responses in tobacco. The 2008 1708 EOF 1724 EOF - 43.
Zhang X Zhang L Dong F Gao J Galbraith D. W Hydrogen peroxide is involved in abscisic acid-induced stomatal closure in Vicia faba. 2001 1438 EOF 48 EOF - 44.
Kwak J. M Mori I. C Pei Z. M Leonhardt N Torres M. A NADPH oxidase AtrbohD and AtrbohF genes function in ROS-dependent ABA signaling in Arabidopsis 2003 2623 EOF 2633 EOF - 45.
Guo F. Q Okamoto M Crawford N. M Identification of a plant nitric oxide synthase gene involved in hormonal signaling. Science,2003 100 EOF 3 EOF - 46.
Ortiz-masia D Perez-amador M. A Carbonell J Diverse stress signals activate the C1 subgroup MAP kinases of Arabidopsis 2007 1834 EOF 1840 EOF - 47.
Dóczi R Brader G Pettkó-szandtner A The Arabidopsis mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase MKK3 is upstream of group C mitogen-activated protein kinases and participates in pathogen signaling. 2007 3266 EOF 79 EOF - 48.
Munnik T Testerink C Plant phospholipid signaling: “in a nutshell”. 2009 - 49.
Xue H. W Chen X Mei Y Function and regulation of phospholipid signalling in plants Biochemical Journal,2009 - 50.
Vermeer JEM.Munnik T Osmotic stress-induced phosphoinositide and inositol phosphate signalling in plants. Cell & Environment,2010 655 EOF 69 EOF - 51.
Phosphatidic acid: a multifunctional stress signaling lipid in plants.Trends in Plant Science,Testerink C Munnik T 2005 - 52.
Arisz S. A Testerink C Munnik T Plant PA signaling via diacylglycerol kinase. BBA)- Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids,2009 869 EOF 75 EOF - 53.
and phosphatidic acid-mediated signaling in plants. BBA)- Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids,Li M Hong Y Wang X Phospholipase D 2009 927 EOF 35 EOF - 54.
Vermeer JEM, Darwish E.Mishkind M Heat stress activates phospholipase D and triggers PIP2 accumulation at the plasma membrane and nucleus. 2009 10 EOF 21 EOF - 55.
Testerink C Munnik T Molecular, cellular, and physiological responses to phosphatidic acid formation in plants. 2011 2349 EOF 61 EOF - 56.
Zonia L Munnik T Osmotically induced cell swelling versus cell shrinking elicits specific changes in phospholipid signals in tobacco pollen tubes. 2004 813 EOF 23 EOF - 57.
Darwish E Testerink C Khalil M Phospholipid signaling responses in salt-stressed rice leaves Plant Cell Physiology,2009 986 EOF 997 EOF - 58.
and phosphatidic acid signalling in plant response to drought and salinity. Cell & Environment,Hong Y Zhang W Wang X Phospholipase D 2010 627 EOF 635 EOF - 59.
Bargmann BOR Laxalt AM, Riet B.Multiple PLDs required for high salinity and water deficit tolerance in plants Plant Cell Physiology,2009 - 60.
Mishra G Zhang W Deng F Zhao J A bifurcating pathway directs abscisic acid effects on stomatal closure and opening in Arabidopsis. Science,2006 264 EOF 6 EOF - 61.
Diacylglycerol kinase. Lipid Signaling in Plants,Arisz S Munnik T 2010 - 62.
Hirayama T Ohto C Mizoguchi T A gene encoding a phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C is induced by dehydration and salt stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.,1995 3903 EOF 7 EOF - 63.
Sanchez J. P Chua N. H Arabidopsis PLC1 is required for secondary responses to abscisic acid signals The Plant Cell,2001 - 64.
Popescu S. C Popescu G. V Bachan S Zhang Z Seay M Gerstein M Snyder M Dinesh-kumar S. P Differential binding of calmodulin-related proteins to their targets revealed through high-density Arabidopsis protein microarrays. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.,2007 4730 EOF 5 EOF - 65.
Peters C Li M Narasimhan R Roth M Nonspecific phospholipase C NPC4 promotes responses to abscisic acid and tolerance to hyperosmotic stress in Arabidopsis The2010 2642 EOF 2659 EOF - 66.
Testerink C Dekker H. L Lim Z. Y Johns M. K Isolation and identification of phosphatidic acid targets from plants 2004 527 EOF 536 EOF - 67.
Yu L Nie J Cao C Jin Y Yan M Wang F Liu J Phosphatidic acid mediates salt stress response by regulation of MPK6 in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytologist,2010 762 EOF 73 EOF - 68.
Guo L Wang X Crosstalk between Phospholipase D and Sphingosine Kinase in Plant Stress Signaling. 2012 51 EOF - 69.
MacRobbie EAC.Lemtiri-chlieh F Inositol hexakisphosphate mobilizes an endomembrane store of calcium in guard cells Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.,2003 - 70.
Dewald D. B Torabinejad J Jones C. A Rapid accumulation of phosphatidylinositol 4, 5-bisphosphate and inositol Plant Physiology,1 4 5 trisphosphate correlates with calcium mobilization in salt-stressed Arabidopsis.2001 - 71.
Peters C Li M Narasimhan R Roth M Nonspecific phospholipase C NPC4 promotes responses to abscisic acid and tolerance to hyperosmotic stress in Arabidopsis The2010 2642 EOF 2659 EOF - 72.
Scherer GFE Labusch C, Effendi Y. Frontiers:Phospholipases and the Network of Auxin Signal Transduction with ABP1 and TIR1 as Two Receptors: A Comprehensive and Provocative Model. Frontiers in Plant Physiology,2012 56 EOF - 73.
Busch W Benfey P. N Information processing without brains-the power of intercellular regulators in plants. 2010 1215 EOF 1226 EOF - 74.
Sachs T Thimann K. V The role of auxins and cytokinins in the release of buds from dominance 1967 136 EOF - 75.
Thimann K. V Skoog F Studies on the growth hormone of plants: III. The inhibiting action of the growth substance on bud development Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.,1933 - 76.
The long‐distance abscisic acid signal in the droughted plant: the fate of the hormone on its way from root to shoot. Journal of Experimental Botany,Sauter A Davies W. J Hartung W 2001 - 77.
The AtGenExpress hormone and chemical treatment data set: experimental design, data evaluation, model data analysis and data access.Goda H Sasaki E Akiyama K 2008 526 EOF 542 EOF - 78.
Chapman E. J Estelle M Mechanism of auxin-regulated gene expression in plants. 2009 265 EOF 85 EOF - 79.
The ubiquitin‐proteasome system regulates plant hormone signaling. The Plant Journal,Santner A Estelle M 2010 - 80.
. Interactions between hormone and redox signalling pathways in the control of growth and cross tolerance to stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2012, 52(3): 139-47. ,Bartoli CG , Simontacchi MCasalongué CA - 81.
Role of nitric oxide in hydrogen peroxide‐dependent induction of abiotic stress tolerance by brassinosteroids in cucumber. Plant, Cell & Environment,Cui J Zhou Y Ding J. G 2011 - 82.
Schroeder J. I Kwak J. M Allen G. J Guard cell abscisic acid signalling and engineering drought hardiness in plants. 2001 327 EOF 30 EOF - 83.
Abscisic acid: emergence of a core signaling network.Cutler S. R Rodriguez P. L Finkelstein R. R Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2010 - 84.
Ghanem M. E Hichri I Smigocki A. C Albacete A Root-targeted biotechnology to mediate hormonal signalling and improve crop stress tolerance 2011 807 EOF 823 EOF - 85.
Argueso C. T Ferreir F. J Environmental perception avenues: the interaction of cytokinin and environmental response pathways. Cell & Environment,2009 1147 EOF 60 EOF - 86.
Signal Transduction ofEyidogan F Oz M. T Yucel M Oktem H. A Phytohormones Under Abiotic Stresses. Phytohormones and Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants,2012 - 87.
Zhang S. W Li C. H Cao J Zhang Y. C Zhang S. Q Altered architecture and enhanced drought tolerance in rice via the down-regulation of indole- Plant Physiology,3 acetic acid by TLD1/OsGH3.13 activation2009 - 88.
Divi U. K Krishna P Brassinosteroid: a biotechnological target for enhancing crop yield and stress tolerance. 2009 131 EOF 6 EOF - 89.
Sharp R. E Interaction with ethylene: changing views on the role of abscisic acid in root and shoot growth responses to water stress cell & environment,2002 211 EOF 222 EOF - 90.
Stepanova A. N Alonso J. M Ethylene signaling and response: where different regulatory modules meet. 2009 548 EOF 55 EOF - 91.
Cytokinin regulation of auxin synthesis in Arabidopsis involves a homeostatic feedback loop regulated via auxin and cytokinin signal transduction.The Plant Cell,Jones B Gunneras S. A Petersson S. V 2010 - 92.
Wang L Wang Z Xu Y Joo S. H Kim S. K OsGSR1 is involved in crosstalk between gibberellins and brassinosteroids in rice 2009 498 EOF 510 EOF - 93.
Alonso-ramirez A Rodriguez D Reyes D Evidence for a role of gibberellins in salicylic acid-modulated early plant responses to abiotic stress in Arabidopsis seeds 2009 1335 EOF 1344 EOF - 94.
Acharya B. R Assmann S. M Hormone interactions in stomatal function 2009 451 EOF 462 EOF - 95.
Divi U. K Rahman T Krishna P Brassinosteroid-mediated stress tolerance in Arabidopsis shows interactions with abscisic acid, ethylene and salicylic acid pathways BMC plant biology,2010 - 96.
Williamson R. E Ashley C. C Free Ca2++ and cytoplasmic streaming in the alga Chara 1982 647 EOF 50 EOF - 97.
Masson. P Circadian oscillations of cytosolic and chloroplastic free calcium in plants. Science,Johnson C. H Knight M. R Kondo T 1995 - 98.
Tracy F. E Gilliham M Dodd A. N NaCl-induced changes in cytosolic free Ca2+ in Arabidopsis thaliana are heterogeneous and modified by external ionic composition. Cell & Environment,2008 1063 EOF 73 EOF - 99.
Kudla J Batistic O Hashimoto K Calcium signals: the lead currency of plant information processing The Plant Cell,2010 - 100.
Reddy ASN. Crystal structure of kinesin regulated by Ca2+-calmodulin. The Journal of Biological Chemistry,Vinogradova M. V Reddy V. S 2004 - 101.
Allen G. J Sanders D Calcineurin, a type 2B protein phosphatase, modulates the Ca2+-permeable slow vacuolar ion channel of stomatal guard cells. The Plant Cell,1995 - 102.
The language of calcium signaling.Dodd A. N Kudla J Sanders D Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2010 - 103.
Calmodulin as a versatile calcium signal transducer in plants.Snedden W. A Fromm H 2001 35 EOF 66 EOF - 104.
Hoeflich K. P Ikura M Calmodulin in action: diversity in target recognition and activation mechanism s.2002 739 EOF 742 EOF - 105.
Yang T Poovaiah B. W Calcium/calmodulin-mediated signal network in plants 2003 505 EOF 512 EOF - 106.
. Handling calcium signaling: Arabidopsis CaMs and CMLs. Trends in Plant Scienc, ,McCormack E ,Tsai YC Braam J 2005 , 10(8):383-9. - 107.
Popescu S. C Popescu G. V Bachan S Zhang Z Seay M Gerstein M Snyder M Dinesh-kumar S. P Differential binding of calmodulin-related proteins to their targets revealed through high-density Arabidopsis protein microarrays. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.,2007 4730 EOF 5 EOF - 108.
Cheng S. H Willmann M. R Chen H. C Sheen J Calcium signaling through protein kinases. The Arabidopsis calcium-dependent protein kinase gene family. Plant Physiology,2002 - 109.
Luan S Kudla J Rodriguez-concepcion M Yalovsky S Gruissem W Calmodulins and calcineurin B-like proteins: calcium sensors for specific signal response coupling in plants. Plant Cell,2002 Suppl:S389 400 - 110.
Chul Lee S.Luan S Lan W Potassium nutrition, sodium toxicity, and calcium signaling: connections through the CBL-CIPK network. 2009 339 EOF 46 EOF - 111.
The CBL-CIPK Ca2+-decoding signaling network: function and perspectives. New Phytology,Weinl S Kudla J 2009 - 112.
Batistic O Waadt R Steinhorst L Held K Kudla J CBL-mediated targeting of CIPKs facilitates the decoding of calcium signals emanating from distinct cellular stores. Plant Journal,2010 211 EOF 22 EOF - 113.
Clark G. B Roux S. J Annexins of plant cells. Plant Physiology,1995 - 114.
Annexins. New Phytology,Laohavisit A Davies J. M 2011 - 115.
White P. J Bowen H. C Demidchik V Nichols C Davies J. M Genes for calcium-permeable channels in the plasma membrane of plant root cells Biochim Biophys Acta,2002 299 EOF 309 EOF - 116.
. Handling calcium signaling: Arabidopsis CaMs and CMLs. Trends in Plant Scienc, ,McCormack E ,Tsai YC Braam J 2005 , 10(8):383-9. - 117.
Defalco T. A Chiasson D Munro K Kaiser B. N Snedden W. A Characterization of GmCaMK1, a member of a soybean calmodulin-binding receptor-like kinase family 2010 4717 EOF 4724 EOF - 118.
Reddy ASN.Day I. S Reddy V. S Ali G. S Analysis of EF-hand-containing proteins in Arabidopsis. 2002 research0056.1 0056 - 119.
Harper J. F Harmon A Plants, symbiosis and parasites: a calcium signalling connection. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol.,2005 555 EOF 66 EOF - 120.
Reddy A. S Reddy V. S Golovkin M A calmodulin binding protein from Arabidopsis is induced by ethylene and contains a DNA-binding motif Biochem Biophys Res Commun.,2000 762 EOF 769 EOF - 121.
Park C. Y Lee J. H Yoo J. H Moon B. C Choi M. S Kang Y. H Lee S. M Kim H. S Kang K. Y Chung W. S Lim C. O Cho M. J WRKY group IId transcription factors interact with calmodulin 2005 1545 EOF 1550 EOF - 122.
Szymanski D. B Liao B Zielinski R. E Calmodulin isoforms differentially enhance the binding of cauliflower nuclear proteins and recombinant TGA3 to a region derived from the Arabidopsis Cam-3 promoter Plant Cell,1996 1069 EOF - 123.
Galon Y Finkler A Fromm H Calcium-regulated transcription in plants. 2010 653 EOF 69 EOF - 124.
ASN Reddy.B. W Poovaiah Calcium and signal transduction in plants. 1993 185 EOF 211 EOF - 125.
Zhang Y Xu S Ding P Wang D Cheng Y. T He J Gao M Xu F Li Y Zhu Z Li X Zhang Y Control of salicylic acid synthesis and systemic acquired resistance by two members of a plant-specific family of transcription factors Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.,2010 18220 EOF 18225 EOF - 126.
Kim S. G Kim S. Y Park C. M A membrane-associated NAC transcription factor regulates salt-responsive flowering via FLOWERING LOCUS T in Arabidopsis 2007 647 EOF 654 EOF - 127.
Yoon H. K Kim S. G Kim S. Y Park C. M Regulation of leaf senescence by NTL 9 mediated osmotic stress signaling in Arabidopsis2008 - 128.
Kim Y. S Kim S. G Park J. E Park H. Y Lim M. H Chua N. H Park C. M A membrane-bound NAC transcription factor regulates cell division in Arabidopsis. 2006 3132 EOF 44 EOF - 129.
Kushwaha R Singh A Chattopadhyay S Calmodulin7 plays an important role as transcriptional regulator in Arabidopsis seedling development The2008 1747 EOF 1759 EOF - 130.
Dai X Xu Y Ma Q Xu W Wang T Xue Y Chong K Overexpression of an R1R2R3 MYB gene, OsMYB3R-2, increases tolerance to freezing, drought, and salt stress in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Phy siology,2007 - 131.
Molecular aspects of higher plant P-type Ca2+-ATPases. Biochim Biophys Acta,Geisler M Axelsen K. B Harper J. F Palmgren M. G 2000 - 132.
Munns R James R. A Läuchli A Approaches to increasing the salt tolerance of wheat and other cereals 2006 1025 EOF 1043 EOF - 133.
Goldgur Y Rom S Ghirlando R Shkolnik D Shadrin N Konrad Z Bar-zvi D Desiccation and zinc binding induce transition of tomato abscisic acid stress ripening 1, a water stress- and salt stress-regulated plant-specific protein, from unfolded to folded state. Plant Physiology,2007 - 134.
Rabbani M. A Maruyama K Abe H Khan M. A Katsura K Ito Y Yoshiwara K Seki M Shinozaki K Yamaguchi-shinozaki K Monitoring expression profiles of rice genes under cold, drought, and high-salinity stresses and abscisic acid application using cDNA microarray and RNA gel-blot analyses. Pl ant Physiology,2003 - 135.
Liu J Ishitani M Halfter U Kim C. S Zhu J. K The Arabidopsis thaliana SOS2 gene encodes a protein kinase that is required for salt tolerance Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.,2000 - 136.
Gong D Guo Y Schumaker K. S Zhu J. K The SOS3 family of calcium sensors and SOS2 family of protein kinases in Arabidopsis. 2004 919 EOF 26 EOF - 137.
Zhu J. K Regulation of ion homeostasis under salt stress 2003 441 EOF 445 EOF - 138.
Overexpression of wheat Na+/H+ antiporter TNHX1 and H+-pyrophosphatase TVP1 improve salt- and drought-stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana plants. Journal of Experimental Botany,Brini F Hanin M Mezghani I Berkowitz G. A Masmoudi K 2007 - 139.
Perruc E Charpenteau M Ramirez B. C Jauneau A Galaud J. P Ranjeva R Ranty B A novel calmodulin-binding protein functions as a negative regulator of osmotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings Plant Journal,2004 410 EOF 420 EOF - 140.
Yamaguchi-shinozaki K Shinozaki K Transcriptional regulatory networks in cellular responses and tolerance to dehydration and cold stresses. 2006 781 EOF 803 EOF - 141.
. Calcium in plant defence-signalling pathways. New Phytologist, ,Lecourieux D ,Ranjeva R Pugin A 2006 , 171(2):249 EOF 269 EOF -69. - 142.
Over-expression of a single Ca2+-dependent protein kinase confers both cold and salt/drought tolerance on rice plants. Plant Journal,Saijo Y Hata S Kyozuka J Shimamoto K Izui K 2000 - 143.
Mishra N. S Tuteja R Tuteja N Signaling through MAP kinase networks in plants Arch Biochem Biophys.,2006 55 EOF 68 EOF - 144.
Dan I Watanabe N. M Kusumi A The Ste20 group kinases as regulators of MAP kinase cascades Trends Cell Biol.,2001 220 EOF 230 EOF - 145.
Whitmarsh A. J Cavanagh J Tournier C Yasuda J Davis R. J A mammalian scaffold complex that selectively mediates MAP kinase activation. Science,1998 1671 EOF 4 EOF - 146.
Rodriguez M. C Petersen M Mundy J Mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling in plants. 2010 621 EOF 49 EOF - 147.
Jonak C Okrész L Bögre L Hirt H Complexity, cross talk and integration of plant MAP kinase signalling 2002 415 EOF 424 EOF - 148.
Xiong L Yang Y Disease resistance and abiotic stress tolerance in rice are inversely modulated by an abscisic acid-inducible mitogen-activated protein kinase. Plant Cell,2003 745 EOF 59 EOF - 149.
Raman M Chen W Cobb M. H Differential regulation and properties of MAPKs. 2007 3100 EOF 12 EOF - 150.
Taj G Agarwal P Grant M Kumar A MAPK machinery in plants: recognition and response to different stresses through multiple signal transduction pathways Plant Signal Behav.,2010 - 151.
Sinha A. K Jaggi M Raghuram B Tuteja N Mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling in plants under abiotic stress Plant Signal Behav.,2011 196 EOF 203 EOF - 152.
Kovtun Y Chiu W. L Tena G Sheen J Functional analysis of oxidative stress-activated mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.,2000 2940 EOF 5 EOF - 153.
Shou H Bordallo P Wang K Expression of the Nicotiana protein kinase (NPK1) enhanced drought tolerance in transgenic maize J Exp Bot.,2004 1013 EOF 1019 EOF - 154.
Ichimura K Mizoguchi T Yoshida R Yuasa T Shinozaki K Various abiotic stresses rapidly activate Arabidopsis MAP kinases ATMPK4 and ATMPK6. Plant Journal,2000 655 EOF 65 EOF - 155.
Teige M Scheikl E Eulgem T Dóczi R Ichimura K Shinozaki K Dangl J. L Hirt H The MKK2 pathway mediates cold and salt stress signaling in Arabidopsis 2004 141 EOF 152 EOF - 156.
Desikan R Clarke A Atherfold P Hancock J. T Neill S. J Harpin induces mitogen-activated protein kinase activity during defence responses in Arabidopsis thaliana suspension cultures. 1999 97 EOF 103 EOF - 157.
Samuel M. A Miles G. P Ellis B. E Ozone treatment rapidly activates MAP kinase signalling in plants. Plant Journal,2000 367 EOF 76 EOF - 158.
Eckardt N. A Negative regulation of stress-activated MAPK signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell,2009 2545 EOF - 159.
MAPK Kinase and CDP Kinase Modulate Hydrogen Peroxide Levels during dark-induced Stomatal Closure in Guard Cells of Vicia faba. Botanical Studies,X. G Song X. P She L. Y Guo Z. N Meng A. X Huang 2008 - 160.
Jammes F Song C Shin D Munemasa S Takeda K Gu D Cho D Lee S Giordo R Sritubtim S Leonhardt N Ellis B. E Murata Y Kwak J. M MAP kinases MPK9 and MPK12 are preferentially expressed in guard cells and positively regulate ROS-mediated ABA signaling Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.,2009 20520 EOF 20525 EOF - 161.
Dai Y Wang H Li B Huang J Liu X Zhou Y Mou Z Li J Increased expression of MAP KINASE KINASE7 causes deficiency in polar auxin transport and leads to plant architectural abnormality in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell,2006 308 EOF 20 EOF - 162.
Xu J Li Y Wang Y Liu H Lei L Yang H Liu G Ren D Activation of MAPK kinase 9 induces ethylene and camalexin biosynthesis and enhances sensitivity to salt stress in Arabidopsis J Biol Chem.,2008 26996 EOF 27006 EOF - 163.
Liu X. M Kim K. E Kim K. C Nguyen X. C Han H. J Jung M. S Kim H. S Kim S. H Park H. C Yun D. J Chung W. S Cadmium activates Arabidopsis MPK3 and MPK6 via accumulation of reactive oxygen species 2010 614 EOF 618 EOF - 164.
Wurzinger B Mair A Pfister B Teige M Cross-talk of calcium-dependent protein kinase and MAP kinase signaling Plant Signal Behav.,2011 - 165.
Jonak C Hirt H Glycogen synthase kinase 3/SHAGGY-like kinases in plants: an emerging family with novel functions Trends Plant Sci.,2002 457 EOF 461 EOF - 166.
Koh S. H Kim Y Kim H. Y Hwang S Lee C. H Kim S. H Inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3 suppresses the onset of symptoms and disease progression of G93A-SOD1 mouse model of ALS Exp Neurol.,2007 336 EOF 346 EOF - 167.
Mahfouz M. M Kim S Delauney A. J Verma D. P Arabidopsis TARGET OF RAPAMYCIN interacts with RAPTOR, which regulates the activity of S6 kinase in response to osmotic stress signals Plant Cell,2006 - 168.
Santos M. O Aragao F. J Role of SERK genes in plant environmental response Plant Signal Behav.,2009 - 169.
Boudsocq M Barbier-brygoo H Lauriere C Identification of nine sucrose nonfermenting J Biol Chem.,1 related protein kinases 2 activated by hyperosmotic and saline stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana.2004 - 170.
Umezawa T Nakashima K Miyakawa T Kuromori T Tanokura M Shinozaki K Yamaguchi-shinozaki K Molecular basis of the core regulatory network in ABA responses: sensing, signaling and transport Plant Cell Physiology,2010 - 171.
2 protein kinases--key regulators of plant response to abiotic stresses. OMICS., 2011, 15(12):859-72. ,Kulik A ,Wawer I ,Krzywińska E ,Bucholc M .Dobrowolska G Sn RK - 172.
Shen Q Gomez-cadenas A Zhang P Walker-simmons M. K Sheen J Ho T. H Dissection of abscisic acid signal transduction pathways in barley aleurone layers Plant Mol Biology,2001 437 EOF 448 EOF - 173.
Kobayashi Y Murata M Minami H Yamamoto S Kagaya Y Hobo T Yamamoto A Hattori T Abscisic acid-activated SnRK2 protein kinases function in the gene-regulation pathway of ABA signal transduction by phosphorylating ABA response element-binding factors Plant Journal,2005 939 EOF 949 EOF - 174.
Huai J Wang M He J Zheng J Dong Z Lv H Zhao J Wang G Cloning and characterization of the SnRK2 gene family from Zea mays 2008 1861 EOF 1868 EOF - 175.
Kudla J Batistic O Hashimoto K Calcium signals: the lead currency of plant information processing The Plant Cell,2010 - 176.
Geiger D Scherzer S Mumm P Marten I Ache P Matschi S Liese A Wellmann C Al-rasheid K. A Grill E Romeis T Hedrich R Guard cell anion channel SLAC1 is regulated by CDPK protein kinases with distinct Ca2+ affinities Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.,2010 - 177.
Lee S. J Cho D. I Kang J. Y Kim M. D Kim S. Y AtNEK6 interacts with ARIA and is involved in ABA response during seed germination. 2010 559 EOF 66 EOF - 178.
Kerk D Bulgrien J Smith D. W Barsam B Veretnik S Gribskov M The complement of protein phosphatase catalytic subunits encoded in the genome of Arabidopsis. 2002 908 EOF 25 EOF - 179.
Merlot S Gosti F Guerrier D Vavasseur A Giraudat J The ABI1 and ABI2 protein phosphatases 2C act in a negative feedback regulatory loop of the abscisic acid signalling pathway. The Plant Journal,2001 295 EOF 303 EOF - 180.
Umezawa T Sugiyama N Mizoguchi M Hayashi S Myouga F Yamaguchi-shinozaki K Ishihama Y Hirayama T Shinozaki K Type 2C protein phosphatases directly regulate abscisic acid-activated protein kinases in Arabidopsis Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.,2009 17588 EOF 17593 EOF - 181.
Hubbard K. E Nishimura N Hitomi K Getzoff E. D Schroeder J. I Early abscisic acid signal transduction mechanisms: newly discovered components and newly emerging questions Genes & Development,2010 - 182.
Takemiya A Kinoshita T Asanuma M Shimazaki K Protein phosphatase 1 positively regulates stomatal opening in response to blue light in Vicia faba Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.,2006 - 183.
Yu R. M Zhou Y Xu Z. F Chye M. L Kong R. Y Two genes encoding protein phosphatase 2A catalytic subunits are differentially expressed in rice. 2003 295 EOF 311 EOF - 184.
Yu R. M Wong M. M Jack R. W Kong R. Y Structure, evolution and expression of a second subfamily of protein phosphatase 2A catalytic subunit genes in the rice plant (Oryza sativa L.) 2005 757 EOF 768 EOF - 185.
Protein phosphatases in plants.Luan S Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2003 - 186.
Fordham-skelton A. P Chilley P Lumbreras V Reignoux S Fenton T. R Dahm C. C Pages M Gatehouse J. A A novel higher plant protein tyrosine phosphatase interacts with SNF 1 related protein kinases via a KIS (kinase interaction sequence) domain2002 - 187.
Kerk D Conley T. R Rodriguez F. A Tran H. T Nimick M Muench D. G Moorhead G. B A chloroplast-localized dual-specificity protein phosphatase in Arabidopsis contains a phylogenetically dispersed and ancient carbohydrate-binding domain, which binds the polysaccharide starch 2006 400 EOF 413 EOF - 188.
Rushton P. J Somssich I. E Transcriptional control of plant genes responsive to pathogens 1998 311 EOF 315 EOF - 189.
Chaves M. M Oliveira M. M Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects for water-saving agriculture 2004 2365 EOF 2384 EOF - 190.
Yi N Kim Y. S Jeong M. H Oh S. J Jeong J. S Park S. H Jung H Choi Y. D Kim J. K Functional analysis of six drought-inducible promoters in transgenic rice plants throughout all stages of plant growth. 2010 743 EOF 54 EOF - 191.
Jaleel C. A Gopi R Sankar B Gomathinayagam M Panneerselvam R Differential responses in water use efficiency in two varieties of Catharanthus roseus under drought stress 2008 42 EOF 47 EOF - 192.
Verslues P. E Bray E. A Role of abscisic acid (ABA) and Arabidopsis thaliana ABA-insensitive loci in low water potential-induced ABA and proline accumulation 2006 201 EOF 212 EOF - 193.
Bray E. A Genes commonly regulated by water-deficit stress in Arabidopsis thaliana 2004 2331 EOF 2341 EOF - 194.
domain of APETALA2 defines a large new family of DNA binding proteins in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.,Okamuro J. K Caster B Villarroel R Van Montagu M Jofuku K. D The A. P 1997 - 195.
Zhou J Tang X Martin G. B The Pto kinase conferring resistance to tomato bacterial speck disease interacts with proteins that bind a cis-element of pathogenesis-related genes. EMBO Journal,1997 3207 EOF 18 EOF - 196.
Ethylene-inducible DNA binding proteins that interact with an ethylene-responsive element. The Plant Cell,Ohme-takagi M Shinshi H 1995 - 197.
The APETALA2 domain is related to a novel type of DNA binding domain. The Plant Cell,Weigel D 1995 - 198.
Glossy15, an APETALAMoose S. P Sisco P. H 2 like gene from maize that regulates leaf epidermal cell identity. Genes & Development,1996 - 199.
Two transcription factors, DREB1 and DREB2, with an EREBP/AP2 DNA binding domain separate two cellular signal transduction pathways in drought- and low-temperature-responsive gene expression, respectively, in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell,Liu Q Kasuga M Sakuma Y Abe H Miura S Yamaguchi-shinozaki K Shinozaki K 1998 - 200.
Role of DREB transcription factors in abiotic and biotic stress tolerance in plants. Plant Cell Reports,Agarwal P. K Agarwal P Reddy M. K Sopory S. K 2006 - 201.
OsDREB genes in rice, Oryza sativa L., encode transcription activators that function in drought-, high-salt- and cold-responsive gene expression. The Plant Journal,Dubouzet J. G Sakuma Y Ito Y Kasuga M Dubouzet E. G Miura S Seki M Shinozaki K Yamaguchi-shinozaki K 2003 - 202.
Arabidopsis AtMYC2 (bHLH) and AtMYB2 (MYB) function as transcriptional activators in abscisic acid signaling. The Plant Cell,Abe H Urao T Ito T Seki M Shinozaki K Yamaguchi-shinozaki K 2003 - 203.
AtMYB61, an R2RLiang Y. K Dubos C Dodd I. C Holroyd G. H Hetherington A. M Campbell M. M 3 MYB transcription factor controlling stomatal aperture in Arabidopsis thaliana. Current Biology,2005 - 204.
WRKY transcription factors: key components in abscisic acid signalling. Plant Biotechnology Journal,Rushton D. L Tripathi P Rabara R. C Lin J Ringler P Boken A. K Langum T. J Smidt L Boomsma D. D Emme N. J Chen X Finer J. J Shen Q. J Rushton P. J 2012 - 205.
Overexpressing a NAM, ATAF, and CUC (NAC) transcription factor enhances drought resistance and salt tolerance in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.,Hu H Dai M Yao J Xiao B Li X Zhang Q Xiong L 2006 - 206.
Sub1A is an ethylene-response-factor-like gene that confers submergence tolerance to rice. Nature,Xu K Xu X Fukao T Canlas P Maghirang-rodriguez R Heuer S Ismail A. M Bailey-serres J Ronald P. C Mackill D. J 2006 - 207.
Flooding stress: acclimations and genetic diversity. Annual Review of Plant Biology,Bailey-serres J Voesenek L. A 2008 - 208.
Cross-kingdom comparison of transcriptomic adjustments to low-oxygen stress highlights conserved and plant-specific responses. Plant Physiology,Mustroph A Lee S. C Oosumi T Zanetti M. E Yang H Ma K Yaghoubi-masihi A Fukao T Bailey-serres J 2010 - 209.
Expression profile analysis of the low-oxygen response in Arabidopsis root cultures. The Plant Cell,Klok E. J Wilson I. W Wilson D Chapman S. C Ewing R. M Somerville S. C Peacock W. J Dolferus R Dennis E. S 2002 - 210.
Transcript and metabolite profiling of the adaptive response to mild decreases in oxygen concentration in the roots of arabidopsis plants. Annals of Botany,Van Dongen J. T Frohlich A Ramírez-aguilar S. J Schauer N Fernie A. R Erban A Kopka J Clark J Langer A Geigenberger P 2009 - 211.
Selective mRNA translation coordinates energetic and metabolic adjustments to cellular oxygen deprivation and reoxygenation in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal,Branco-price C Kaiser K. A Jang C. J Larive C. K Bailey-serres J 2008 - 212.
Evidence for a role for AtMYB2 in the induction of the Arabidopsis alcohol dehydrogenase gene (ADH1) by low oxygen. Genetics,Hoeren F. U Dolferus R Wu Y Peacock W. J Dennis E. S 1998 - 213.
The low-oxygen-induced NAC domain transcription factor ANAC102 affects viability of Arabidopsis seeds following low-oxygen treatment. Plant Physiology,Christianson J. A Wilson I. W Llewellyn D. J Dennis E. S 2009 - 214.
HRE1 and HRE2, two hypoxia-inducible ethylene response factors, affect anaerobic responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal,Licausi F Van Dongen J. T Giuntoli B Novi G Santaniello A Geigenberger P Perata P 2010 - 215.
Transcript profiling of the anoxic rice coleoptile. Plant Physiology,Lasanthi-kudahettige R Magneschi L Loreti E Gonzali S Licausi F Novi G Beretta O Vitulli F Alpi A Perata P 2007 - 216.
When defense pathways collide. The response of Arabidopsis to a combination of drought and heat stress. Plant Physiology,Rizhsky L Liang H Shuman J Shulaev V Davletova S Mittler R 2004 - 217.
Genome-wide analysis of transcript abundance and translation in Arabidopsis seedlings subjected to oxygen deprivation. Annals of Botany,Branco-price C Kawaguchi R Ferreira R. B Bailey-serres J 2005 - 218.
Control of sodium transport in durum wheat. Plant Physiology,Davenport R James R. A Zakrisson-plogander A Tester M Munns R 2005 - 219.
Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol.,Hasegawa P. M Bressan R. A Zhu J. K Bohnert H. J 2000 - 220.
Gene regulation during cold stress acclimation in plants. Methods in Molecular Biology,Chinnusamy V Zhu J. K Sunkar R 2010 - 221.
Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology,Munns R Tester M 2008 - 222.
Calcium- and salt-stress signaling in plants: shedding light on SOS pathway. Arch Biochem Biophys.,Mahajan S Pandey G. K Tuteja N 2008 - 223.
Drought- and salt-tolerant plants result from overexpression of the AVP1 H+-pump. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.,Gaxiola R. A Li J Undurraga S Dang L. M Allen G. J Alper S. L Fink G. R 2001 - 224.
Transgenic salt-tolerant tomato plants accumulate salt in foliage but not in fruit. Nature Biotechnology,Zhang H. X Blumwald E 2001 - 225.
Expression of a Late Embryogenesis Abundant Protein Gene, HVA1, from Barley Confers Tolerance to Water Deficit and Salt Stress in Transgenic Rice. Plant Physiology,Xu D Duan X Wang B Hong B Ho T Wu R 1996 - 226.
Overexpression of wheat dehydrin DHN-5 enhances tolerance to salt and osmotic stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Reports,Brini F Hanin M Lumbreras V Amara I Khoudi H Hassairi A Pages M Masmoudi K 2007 - 227.
Plant tolerance to drought and salinity: stress regulating transcription factors and their functional significance in the cellular transcriptional network. Plant Cell Reports,Golldack D Lüking I Yang O 2011 - 228.
Cold stress regulation of gene expression in plants. Trends Plant Sci.,Chinnusamy V Zhu J Zhu J. K 2007 - 229.
The Arabidopsis cold-responsive transcriptome and its regulation by ICE1. The Plant Cell,Lee B. H Henderson D. A Zhu J. K 2005 - 230.
An Arabidopsis gene family encoding DRE/CRT binding proteins involved in low-temperature-responsive gene expression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun.,Shinwari Z. K Nakashima K Miura S Kasuga M Seki M Yamaguchi-shinozaki K Shinozaki K 1998 - 231.
The Arabidopsis CBF gene family is composed of three genes encoding AP2 domain-containing proteins whose expression Is regulated by low temperature but not by abscisic acid or dehydration. Plant Physiology,Medina J Bargues M Terol J Pérez-alonso M Salinas J 1999 - 232.
Natural genetic variation of freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology,Hannah M. A Wiese D Freund S Fiehn O Heyer A. G Hincha D. K 2006 - 233.
ICE1: a regulator of cold-induced transcriptome and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Genes & Development,Chinnusamy V Ohta M Kanrar S Lee B. H Hong X Agarwal M Zhu J. K 2003 - 234.
Consensus by democracy. Using meta-analyses of microarray and genomic data to model the cold acclimation signaling pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology,Benedict C Geisler M Trygg J Huner N Hurry V 2006