Normalized values of elements obtained from spectral analysis of ferrite 3F3, corresponding to Spectrum 1–6, 5000× magnification.
This study starts with the ZnO nanostructured materials used for improve the efficiency of polycrystalline solar cells operation under low solar radiation conditions. The ZnO nanowires were prepared using the hydrothermal method of deposition on the seed layer by a new and complex process, with controllable morphological and optical properties. The analysis of the XRD patterns, scanning electron microscopy images (SEM) of the ZnO nanowires and a lot of tests made Pasan Meyer Burger HighLight 3 solar simulator, confirm the advantages of using the ZnO nanowires in solar cells applications for antireflection coatings. Then, piezoelectric structures based on new modified PZT zirconate titanate designed for energy harvesting applications is presented. Based on their piezoelectric characteristics, modified PZT zirconate titanate ceramics made of Pb(Zr0.53Ti0.47)0.99Nb0.01O3 ceramic have efficient applications in energy harvesting devices. A piezoelectric transducer, consisting of a thin plate of this piezoceramic material, with dimensions (34 mm × 14 mm × 1 mm), is illustrated. A multiphysics numerical simulation further illustrates such piezoelectric transducer operation. Finally, the miniature planar transformer with circular spiral winding and hybrid core—ferrite and magnetic nanofluid, designed for new energy harvesting systems is presented. We purpose now that the magnetic nanofluid be used both as a coolant and as part of the hybrid magnetic core.
- ZnO nanostructured materials
- antireflection coatings
- piezoelectric devices
- energy harvesting
- electric micro-transformer
- planar coils
- magnetic nanofluid
1. Using the ZnO nanostructured materials in order to improve the efficiency of polycrystalline solar cells operation under low solar radiation conditions
1.1. Current state regarding obtaining of the ZnO nanoparticles
ZnO is a II–VI semiconductor with direct banned band of 3.37 eV. Nanostructured ZnO is used to obtain LED’s (light-emitting diode – electroluminescent diode), in the manufacture of gas sensors and photovoltaic cells, both because of its electron transport properties and anti-reflective coatings. In recent years, a number of articles have been reported to present the results obtained from studies to obtain ZnO nanoparticles. The use of the hydrothermal method for obtaining these nanostructures using water as solvent and the Zn(NO3)2 – HMTA system, at low temperatures (below 100°C), is among the processes that have begun to be used in recent years. ZnO nanoparticles are relatively easy to synthesize due to the hexagonal columnar structure of the unit cell. Once with getting the nanobelts of ZnO in 2001 , the research of ZnO nanostructures with different morphologies has seen rapid growth. The different methods of synthesizing these nanoparticles have been developed in recent years; they include vapor–liquid–solid techniques [2, 3], chemical vapor deposition , thermal evaporation  and hydrothermal method [6, 7]. The hydrothermal method does not involve the use of catalysts and facilitates the growth of nanoparticles on large surfaces. The increase in the gaseous phase can be achieved using one of the following methods: chemical deposition of metal–organic vapors (MOCVD) [8, 9], chemical transport from vapor [10, 11] and deposition by laser ablation . With these methods, high-quality nanoparticles of micron size [13, 14] can be obtained. The process presents a number of disadvantages: it requires a temperature of 450–900°C, a series of limitations related to the substrate are imposed like morphology and its area . In contrast, growth from the solution is a process that takes place at temperatures below 100°C, [16, 17], and the advantage of this process is to obtain nanoparticles with optical and electrical properties necessary for their use in the field of photovoltaic cells (antireflection coatings, electrode transparent, etc.).
1.2. Preparation of antireflective coating based on ZnO nanoparticles for application on the substrate
Anti-reflection technology plays an important role in the fabrication of high-efficiency solar cells by increasing light coupling into the active region of devices. A complex process is used for obtaining ZnO nanostructures for antireflective coatings. The process is suitable to silicone solar cells and can be used in order to increase their efficiency under low solar radiation, allowing the control of the morphological and optical properties of ZnO nanostructures deposited on glass through ZnO seed layer deposition process. The ZnO nanowires were prepared using the hydrothermal method of deposition on the seed layer by a new and complex process, . To obtain the ZnO nanoparticles, two steps are required: obtaining the ZnO seed layer (on which ZnO nanoparticles are formed) and a second stage consisting of the actual growth of ZnO nanoparticles. ZnO seeded layers were prepared using a solution of zinc acetate dissolved in 1-propanol. Zinc decomposition or hydrolysis to obtain ZnO nanocrystals are a method often used [19–21]. Subsequent decomposition of zinc acetate at temperatures between 100°C − 280°C leads to the formation of Zn4O(CH3CO2)6, which eventually breaks down into ZnO. During the process of obtaining a ZnO by this method a series of gaseous products are released: water (H2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), acetone ((CH3)2CO) and acetic acid (CH3COOH). These products are eliminated around the temperature of 270°C ((1)–(4)). As the temperature increases, ZnO nanoparticles are formed following chemical reactions:
Thus, thermal dehydration of zinc acetate can be considered a process of dehydration, vaporization/decomposition and ZnO formation . Synthesis of ZnO nanowires by the hydrothermal method on the deposited substrate by the dehydratated zinc acetate process, involves the reactions:
HMTA hydrolyzes readily in water to form formic aldehyde (HCHO) and ammonia (NH3), releasing energy, which is associated with its molecular structure, as can be seen in reactions (5) and (7). This stage is critical in the process of increasing ZnO nanowires. If HMTA hydrolyses very quickly, it produces a very large amount of OH− ions—in a very short time, Zn2+ ions from the solution would precipitate quickly due to the basic pH, and this would lead to rapid consumption of precursors and to an inhibition of the growth of ZnO nanoparticles . From reactions (8) and (9), NH3 which originates from hydrolysis HMTA has two essential roles. Firstly it produces the basic medium required for the formation of Zn(OH)2. Secondly, it coordinates the Zn2+ ions and thus stabilizes the aqueous solution. Zn(OH)2 is dehydrated when heated by ultrasonication or even under the sunlight. All five reactions (5), (6), (7), (8) and (9) are in equilibrium and can be controlled by adjusting the reaction parameters: precursor concentration, temperature and growth time, which may have a positive or negative influence on the balance of reactions. Thus, precursor concentration determines the nanoparticle density, temperature and growth time controls. It also controls the morphology and nanoparticle size ratio. In reaction (5) it can be seen that seven moles of reactants produce ten moles of reaction products, which means an increase in entropy during the reaction, resulting an increase of the temperature, and finally the result is the shift of equilibrium to the reaction products. The rate of hydrolysis of HMTA increases with the increase of the basicity of the environment and vice versa. Also, the five reactions continue at room temperature but at a very low speed. For example, the solution with a precursor concentration of less than 10 mmol/L remains transparent and clear at room temperature for several months. If microwaves are used as a source of heating, the reactions take place at a very high speed, with a nanofire growth rate of up to 100 nm/min .
1.3. The analysis of ZnO seed layer and ZnO nanowires growth by the hydrothermal method
The X-ray diffraction analysis was performed for the ZnO seed layer as well as for the ZnO nanowires growth by the hydrothermal method as shown within Figures 1 and 2 respectively. The structural analysis of the ZnO nanoparticles was performed, by grazing incident X-ray diffraction using an X-ray diffractometer (Bruker AXS D8 Discover) with Cu and Kα irradiation, 40 kV/40 mA, 20–60°, 2 Theta domain, 2 seconds/step scan speed and 0.04° step. In the case of the ZnO seed layer, there were identified only the specific peaks of ZnO, confirming the higher purity of the film. ZnO from seed layer presented wurtzite hexagonal structure P63mc as well as structure parameters a = b = 3.242 nm and c = 5.176 nm. The intensity of the diffraction peaks corresponding to (002) and (110) plans displayed low broad peaks in the case of all the analyzed seed layer samples. The XRD analysis showed wurtzite hexagonal structure P63mc and structure parameters a = b = 3.242 nm and c = 5.176 nm when also considering the nanowires. The diffraction pattern highlighted peaks associated to (100), (002), (101) and (102) plans and the correspondence of ZnO. The (002) plan displayed a higher intensity peak in comparison to the corresponding plans (100), (101) and (102), indicating that the ZnO nanowires are predominantly c-axis orientated. Other peaks were not observed, leading to the fact that no other structures besides ZnO were formed. It was confirmed that high purity ZnO is obtained.
A different number of depositions (spray pyrolysis and spin coating) were achieved in order to determine the optimal thickness and morphology of the ZnO seed layer. The optimal seed layer was obtained by three application stages of spray pyrolysis at a temperature of 100°C, three stages of spin coating followed by treatment at 300°C for a period of 30 minutes.
The microscopy micrographs shown within Figure 3 were recorded by using a field scanning electron microscope or by employing the annular in-lens detector for a second set of electron images with magnification of 100.000 X and an accelerating voltage of 2000 V. The surface morphology and structure of the nanoparticles were examined by employing a scanning electron microscope (FESEM, Carl Zeiss Auriga) at an accelerating voltage of 2.00 kV. The imaging was performed at a high magnification of 100 kx while the optical transmission and reflection spectra was recorded in the wavelength range of 400–800 nm by using a double beam UV–Vis–NIR spectrophotometer (UV–VIS Spectrophotometer 570 Jasco). The morphology of the ZnO seed layer surface influences the morphology of the ZnO nanowire. These layers operate as seed crystals in order to ensure the epitaxial growth of ZnO nanowires. In the case of thicker films, ZnO clusters are observed (grains with dimensions larger than 100 nm) consisting of agglomerations that influence the nanowires growth by a reduced order, scattered across the surface and random orientated (Figure 3a and b). The morphology and growth of the zinc oxide nanowires are influenced by the thickness and geometry of the seed layer (uniform grain, 30–55 nm) (as seen from Figure 3c and d). In this case, due to the seed layer uniformity and lack of agglomerations, the nanowires growth was orientated, with homogenous dimensions as well as displayed on the entire substrate surface. In this case, there was obtained a perfectly balanced seed layer and also a homogenous nanowire growth with lengths of ~200 nm and 50 nm diameter. Besides the high density of the ZnO nanowire arrays, other nanostructures are not observed.
The resulting seed layer presented suitable growth proprieties by the hydrothermal method of uniform and vertical ZnO nanowires. The variation of the optical transmission is shown within Figure 4, with wavelength found in the range of λ = 400–800 nm for glass, ZnO seed layer and ZnO nanowires. The ZnO seed layer has presented a good transparency of approximately 80%, similar to the glass value due to the reduced thickness (50 nm) and surface uniformity. The samples of ZnO nanowires present a good transparency in the visible range (400–800 nm), with a lower average value of 76% (approximately 5% lower than in the case of glass). This decrease is due to the fact that the transmitted radiation by light diffusion increases the occurrence of the light scattering phenomenon of the ZnO nanowires.
Following the spectrophotometric analysis, the variation of the optical reflection with wavelength in the range of 400–800 nm is presented in Figure 5. The graph confirms that the reflection is reduced in comparison to the values obtained for simple glass. The ZnO seed layer presents an intermediate value between glass and ZnO nanowires, with an average of 11%. The average value of ZnO nanowires sample for the visible optical reflection is equal to 9%, with 5% lower than the simple glass. By summarizing these optical characteristics, it is concluded that the ZnO nanowire films can be considered as a solution to the antireflective coatings in the solar cells field due to the optical proprieties and low-price manufacturing.
1.4. Prototyping and testing the modular photovoltaic conversion system
Modular photovoltaic conversion system, designed for energy harvesting applications has been achieved, using four photovoltaic cells, Figure 6. A commercial polycrystalline silicone solar cell manufactured by Conrad Electronic SE was selected and covered by a nanostructured ZnO disposed on glass in order to be tested. The technical data related to the considered polycrystalline solar panel (123 cm2) consist of 1.35 W output power, 9 V nominal voltage, 10.5 V open circuit voltage and 150 mA short-circuit current. The determination of the solar cells functional parameters (efficiency, short circuit current, open circuit voltage and output power) has led to the conclusion that all the values are superior in the case of the solar cells with ZnO nanowires on glass showing that the performance of the solar cell depends on the irradiance and antireflective coating.
The photovoltaic module was tested for standard test conditions (1000 W/m2, 25°C, AM 1.5) as well as for reduced solar irradiance by using the Pasan Meyer Burger HighLight 3 solar simulator shown in Figure 7. There were used four masks for the solar irradiance attenuation (100 W/m2, 200 W/m2, 400 W/m2 and 700 W/m2) in order to achieve the comparison between the generated powers along with varying the operation conditions. The used simulator is able to adjust the irradiance value between 100 W/m2 and 1000 W/m2, with both the light uniformity and light stability below 1%. Accordingly, five characteristics resulted for each of the tested modules for these various operating conditions, Figures 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12.
The results confirm the advantages of using the ZnO nanowires in solar cells applications for antireflection coatings.
2. Piezoelectric structures based on new modified PZT zirconate titanate designed for energy harvesting applications
We propose a piezoelectric ceramic material what can it be integrated into piezoelectric structures for energy harvesting applications. The piezoceramic element has the shape of a disk with diameter of 12 mm while the width is 0.3 mm. On each of the ceramic disk’s sides, silver electrodes were attached. Perovskite ceramics based on lead zirconate titanate (PZT) modified with niobium (Nb) were used to obtain these active elements. A high temperature solid state reactions technique has been used to prepare the piezoelectric ceramic, [25, 26], described by the general formula Pb(Zr0.53Ti0.47)0.99Nb0.01O3. Based on their piezoelectric characteristics, modified PZT zirconate titanate ceramics have efficient applications in energy harvesting devices. The X-ray diffraction patterns of Pb(Zr0.53Ti0.47)0.99Nb0.01O3 ceramic are shown in Figure 13. The XRD results indicate the rovskite type tetragonal phase free from a pyrochlore phase. The SEM pattern of the same composition sample is shown in Figure 14 and it shows that the microstructure of our sample is very dense.
A simple structure is analyzed in , by numerical simulation for the demonstration of its capacity to generate electric voltage under mechanical stress.
Another piezoelectric transducer, consisting of a thin plate of piezoceramic material with dimensions (34 mm × 14 mm × 1 mm), is illustrated in Figure 15. A layer of conductive material is deposited on one side of the plate (see the lower picture in Figure 15) and four equal rectangular conductive areas are deposited on the other side (see the upper picture in Figure 15), . If the plate is subjected to pressure and mechanical deformation, due to exposure to wind or being placed in a fluid flow, the piezoelectric material will be polarized and a non-uniform electrical potential distribution could be identified on the faces of the plate. Conductive surfaces behave like surface electrodes attached to the plate; they integrate the electric potential on the plate’s surface and connect to an electric circuit, transferring the potential value of each plate to an output connector, Figure 16. The one face which is uniformly coated can be used for reference terminal (ground), while each of the four rectangular patches can be connected to an individual electrode (1, 2, 3, 4), Figure 16. If the deformation of the ceramic plate is not uniform (the case of a flexible material), the electrodes might take different potential values and the piezoceramic plate becomes an electrical generator with four different output voltages: U10, U20, U30, U40, Figure 16. If the plate is rigid and the deformations are identical, the four terminals provide equal output voltages, .
A multiphysics numerical simulation further illustrates such piezoelectric transducer operation. The numerical model was built and analyzed with Comsol Multiphysics , a technical software package based on the finite element method, which allows the coupling of different software modules specialized in modeling physical problems of different nature. An image of the solution of this analysis is presented in Figures 17 and 18.
Often, due to the complexity of the mathematical model, the analytical solutions of the differential equations system are difficult to obtained. Thus, it is necessary to use the numerical simulations method still from the design phase.
Interfacing of the low energy source built with piezoelectric linear transducers system is achieved through four bridges, as shown in Figure 19.
3. Miniature planar transformer with circular spiral winding and hybrid core—ferrite and magnetic nanofluid designed for new energy harvesting systems
One of the novelties of the future harvesting devices is regarding the use of a magnetic liquid core micro-transformer for the DC-DC converter of the harvesting device. From the operating point of view, by replacing the solid core with a hybrid core—ferrite and magnetic nanofluid, we estimate to result in a better heat dissipation and a reduction the thermal stresses in the micro-transformer leading to a longer life cycle of the device, maintaining or even improving the electric characteristics. Also, the dielectric properties of the micro-transformer will be improved.
3.1. Making a planar microtransformer with circular spiral windings with hybrid core—ferrite and colloidal magnetic nanofluid: V1 by using LIGA technology (Litographie, Galvanoformung, Abformung) and precision micromachining
Energy harvesting is a relatively new research area, seen as a viable and affordable solution for powering small autonomous devices, such as wireless sensor networks. Energy harvesting devices use small scale parts with low power losses. The main components are the electrical transformers that convert the voltage/current parameters from the primary from the energy harvesting stage, to the secondary to energy storage and distribution level stage. Miniature construction of the transformers, whose implementation can benefit from the LIGA manufacturing technology (Litographie, Galvanoformung, Abformung or in English Lithography, Electroplating and Molding), are required for compact, small but energy-efficient solutions. The following steps are performed to manufacture a planar microtransformer with circular spiral windings and with hybrid core—ferrite and colloidal magnetic nanofluid—V1:
Manufacture of the planar micro-coils:
the ceramic substrate preparation, 1, as well as surface preparation, (Figure 20a) and depositing conductive uniform submicrometer layer, 3;
spin deposition (coat) of a uniform layer, 2, SU8 photoresist, (Figure 20a). The thickness of this layer will be slightly above the height of turns to be deposited;
pre-exposure bake (soft bake) at 95°C;
exposure to UV radiation by direct writing lithography using DWL66 equipment;
post-expose bake at 65°C and 95°C, with controlled ramp;
relax and develop structures using 1-methoxy-2-propyl acetate (mr-DEV600), (Figure 20b);
dry, hard bake;
high purity copper galvanic deposition, 4, with controlled thickness (Figure 20c);
SU8 photoresist exposed remove using free radical reaction with STP2020/R3T equipment (Figure 20d);
controlled corrosion (remove) submicrometer layer to separate planar microcoils (Figure 20e);
integrity coils checking.
Manufacture of another parts:
aligning the plates with micro-coils (two) by means of the separation and seal element, 5, (Figure 20g);
undismantled adhesion assembly (bonding);
introducing a magnetic nanofluid, 6, (Figure 20g), in the cavity and sealing the nozzle access;
mounting plate ferrite isolated from coils and making of electrical connections.
3.2. Making a miniature planar microtransformer with circular spiral windings obtained by machining, starting from a textolit board double plated with copper and with hybrid core—ferrite and colloidal magnetic nanofluid
3.2.1. Making a miniature planar microtransformers with circular spiral windings with hybrid core—ferrite and colloidal magnetic nanofluid: V2
A key component of the devices used for energy harvesting from the environment is the electric transformer. In this case, we proposed a miniature planar transformer with circular spiral windings with hybrid core—ferrite and colloidal magnetic nanofluid, . The proposed model has two circular spiral-wound, made from copper: 20 turns in primary and 40 turns in secondary. Windings, Figures 21 and 22, can be “grown” using LIGA technology on a ceramic substrate (Al2O3) as has been shown previously or can be obtained by machining, starting from a textolit board double plated with copper. Housing and central column are made of 3F3 ferrite. The cavity formed in the housing is filled with superparamagnetic colloidal nanofluid, NMF-UTR40-500G, Figure 21, having saturation magnetization of 500 Gs, . The applications presented in [28, 29], uses a dilution of magnetic nanofluid acting also as a cooling agent, type NMF-UTR40-50G that having saturation magnetization of 50 Gs.
We purpose now that the magnetic nanofluid be used both as a coolant and as part of the hybrid magnetic core, by using of the magnetic nanofluid type NMF-UTR40-500G.
18.104.22.168. The mathematical model
The magnetic field inside the planar microtransformers with circular spiral windings with hybrid core—ferrite and colloidal magnetic nanofluid—V2 for steady state conditions is described by the (10), (11), (12) and (13) equations as follows: inside the coils (J ≠ 0), the ferrite part of the magnetic core (J = 0), and within the ceramic holders (J = 0).
inside the magnetic nanofluid (MNF) core.
where A [T·m] is the magnetic vector potential, J [A/m2] is the electric current density, μ0 = 4π×10−7 H/m is the magnetic permeability of the free space, μr is the relative magnetic permeability, and M [A/m] is the magnetization of the MNF, approximated here through,
The magnetic field, produced by the electric currents, generates magnetic body forces within the MNF, which are responsible for the flow of the fluid part of the core described, in steady state conditions, through.
momentum conservation (Navier–Stokes)
mass conservation law
where, u [m/s2] is the velocity, p [N/m2] is the pressure, ρ [kg/m3] is the mass density, η [N⋅s/m2] is the dynamic viscosity, and
22.214.171.124. The practical achievements
In Figure 23, the 3F3 ferrite parts of magnetic circuit can be seen and in Figure 24 the ferrite magnetic circuit and microtransformer housing. Parts of the housing, the ferrite magnetic circuit and the four planar coils which form the primary and the secondary circuit of the microtransformer it can be seen in Figure 25. Finally, two assembled planar microtransformers are represented in Figure 26.
126.96.36.199. Analysis of 3F3 ferrite as part of magnetic circuit
Analysis of 3F3 ferrite done by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) coupled with energy dispersive micro-probe X-ray under the following conditions:
Acquisitions have been made with the help of the secondary electron detector in the sample chamber, type “Everhart – Thornley”, coupled with “INCA Energy 250” energy dispersive microprobe produced by Oxford Instruments;
Two categories of spectra were achieved, namely: punctual, with the elemental distribution of the electron beam spot on the surface of the sample and another as micro-area, integrated where the composition of the elements of the microarray was determined quantitatively;
Spectral analysis is multipoint type because the spectra were superimposed to see the intensity and variation of the elements in the selected points/areas;
All the spectra were normalized to 100%. The unit was expressed in the concentration of the elements of interest was the percentage by mass (weight percent%).
After analysis, the following features were noted:
The presence of oxygen in percent more than 20% indicates that the sample contains oxides with various chemical combinations. The compositional distribution of the highlighted elements is relatively uniform, variations being probably due to the surface geometry of the sample (roughness of hundreds of nm) or to a non-uniform distribution of the carbon matrix (Figure 29);
SEM micrographs have revealed a relatively uniform surface in terms of morphology, but which has a roughness due to the technological methods of obtaining the samples (of the intrinsic material) or the mechanical processing methods used to obtain the investigated piece;
It is also observed the presence of some impurities on the surface of investigated samples such as Al, Si and Ca elements, Table 2 and Figure 30 for Spectrum 1, but in very small percentages and they are not likely to jeopardize their functional role.
|Processing option: all elements analysed (normalised); all results in weight%|
|Spectrum||In stats.||C||O||Mn||Fe||Zn||Total %|
|Processing option: all elements analyzed (normalized); all results in weight%|
|Spectrum||In stats.||C||O||Al||Si||Ca||Mn||Fe||Zn||Total %|
188.8.131.52. Magnetic nanofluids used for planar microtransformers with circular spiral windings with hybrid core—ferrite and colloidal magnetic nanofluid
Magnetic nanofluids used as the core liquid in the micro-electric transformer obtained by co-precipitation method [27, 35], is a colloidal suspension of nanoparticles of magnetite (Fe3O4), covered with a layer of surfactant oleic acid and dispersed in transformer oil. The main steps in the synthesis procedure for obtaining magnetic nanofluids based on non-polar organic liquids are indicated in [28–30, 35]. To be used as a transformer fluid core, magnetic nanofluid requires good colloidal stability and features adapted to the operating conditions and materials it is in contact with. The magnetic feature is the most important for this application that requires a high saturation magnetization, Figure 31.
The maximum volume fraction was set around 23% and the recommended saturation magnetization values ranging between 500 Gs and 1000 Gs. The quality of magnetic nanofluids (NFM) is related to many details of the synthesis process and their stabilization/dispersion in the base fluid (in our case the UTR40 transformer oil). Among these we mention the coprecipitation temperature, Fe2+ molar ratio to Fe3+, agitation rate, chemisorption temperature, reaction time, and so on. An essential aspect is the complete coverage of NFM with stabilizer and the elimination of the primary non-adsorbed primary surfactant. Repeated flocculation/redispersing NFM’s remain coated with the optimal amount of surfactant [34, 35].
3.2.2. Making a miniature planar microtransformers with circular spiral windings with hybrid core—ferrite and colloidal magnetic nanofluid: V3
Planar microtransformers with circular spiral windings with hybrid core—ferrite and colloidal magnetic nanofluid is used in electronic circuits as a separator transformer in the DC/DC converter in harvesting energy applications. The use of a specific colloidal magnetic nanofluid with high saturation magnetization between 500 Gs and 1000 Gs, as a liquid core as part of the magnetic circuit eliminates all air gaps and also the magnetic field of dispersion. Achieving an improved magnetic coupling is obtained by constructive form of planar coils. Use of symmetrically overlayed ferrite cores, Figure 32, in conjunction with the magnetic nanofluid to the magnetic circuit assembly, determines the extension of the frequency range up to 1000 Mhz, Figure 38. This planar microtransformer, Figures 32 and 36, is made up of a planar coils assembly, a magnetic circuit assembly and a housing assembly. Regarding the planar coils, these respect the same manufacturing technology (Figure 33 and 34).
The planar coils assembly
The planar coils assembly consists of four planar coils, Figures 32 and 34a and Figure 34c, respectively two identical planar coils, 1a and two identical planar coils 1b, each disposed on a glass-textolite plate of 1 mm thickness and diameter in the range 35–45 mm, covered on both sides with a copper layer thickness 35 μm and made by milling with a gap between 0.2–0.5 mm, dimensioned according to the current flow through the planar coils. Each primary planar coil, 1a, is formed of two semi-windings connected in series, double-sided disposed on the same glass-textolite plate. The two semi-windings each have 20 turns made by milling on the glass-textolite plate. Then the two semi-windings are inserted between them resulting in a primary coil 1a. Each secundary planar coil, Figures 34a and 34c, 1b, is formed of two semi-windings connected in series, double-sided disposed on the same glass-textolite plate. Also, the two semi-windings each have 20 turns made by milling on the glass-textolite plate. Then the two semi-windings are inserted between them resulting in a secundary coil 1b. All coils are isolated from each other by three insulation, 2, of 0.1 mm thick made of “hostaphan” (polyethylene terephthalate), Figure 12. The planar coils assembly are fixed relative to the two upper 4a and lower 4b magnetic cores by means of two spacers 3a and 3b made of glass-textolite, Figure 32.
The magnetic circuit assembly
The magnetic circuit assembly consists of: two magnetic cores, top 4a and bottom 4b, 3F3 of the „pot” type, identical from ferrite, symmetrically overlapping according to Figures 32 and 34b; a liquid core consisting of a magnetic nanofluid, 5, Figure 32 in which are immersed the planar coil assembly and the two magnetic cores 4a and 4b Figure 34 C, placed in the casing assembly. The role of a liquid core made of a magnetic nanofluid as part of the magnetic circuit, eliminates all air gaps and also the magnetic field of dispersion. The most important magnetic feature for this usage is high saturation magnetization, between 500 Gs and 1000 Gs, Figure 31. Volume fraction (the ratio between the volume of magnetite nanoparticles and the volume of the entire magnetic nanofluid) corresponding to this saturation magnetization is in the range of 22–24%.
The casing assembly
The casing assembly, Figure 35, in which are immersed in magnetic nanofluid both the planar coils assembly and the magnetic circuit assembly. Figure 36 shows a planar microtransformer with circular spiral windings with hybrid core—ferrite and colloidal magnetic nanofluid, practical achievements. The casing assembly, Figures 32 and 33 consists of the box 6 and the lid 7, both made by duralumin, the gasket 8 and the central screw 9, which is fixing the magnetic circuit and the planar coils with the box 6. The lid 7 contains the plate with terminals 10, the system of the magnetic nanofluid supply 11 (made by a supply nozzle 12, by a nozzle lid 13 and a nozzle gasket 14), fixing screws 15 and four location screws 16.
As I have shown, by using a specific magnetic nanofluid with high saturation magnetization, ranging between 500 Gs and 1000 Gs, as a liquid core of a magnetic circuit, the air gaps and the dispersive magnetic field lines are removed. Thus, magnetic nanofluid is used both as a coolant and as part of the hybrid magnetic core. Also, an improved magnetic coupling by up to 10% is noticed, together with an increase of the overall efficiency by up to 5%. As we will see below, experimental measurements in dinamic mode proves extension of the frequency range up to 1000 MHz, by symmetrical superposition of the ferrite magnetic cores in conjunction with the specific magnetic nanofluid.
184.108.40.206. Experimental measurements on the planar microtransformer with circular spiral windings with hybrid core—ferrite and colloidal magnetic nanofluid
Experimental measurements performed in static mode
Static mode measurements have been made with the bridge “Precision LCR Agilent E 4980A” for the microtransformer without magnetic nanofluid as well as for the microtransformer with hybrid core—ferrite and colloidal magnetic nanofluid with 500 Gs saturation magnetization, for a frequency variation in the range of 100–300 kHz (Figure 36).
Number of turns of the primary coil are N1 = 80 turns and number of turns of the secondary coil are N2 = 80 turns, (separator transformer). The bridge “Precision LCR Agilent E 4980A” it is used with option LEVEL = 2 V.
in the presence of magnetic nanofluid, the quality factor for the primary planar coil as well as the quality factor for the secondary planar coil increases significantly;
there is a better frequency behavior in the presence of magnetic nanofluid.
Experimental measurements performed on dynamic mode
|Measured parameters for primary coil in the case if not magnetic nanofluid|
|Frequency||100 kHz||150 kHz||200 kHz||250 kHz||300 kHz|
|Measured parameters for secondary coil in the case if not magnetic nanofluid|
|Measured parameters for primary coil in the case with presence of magnetic nanofluid|
|Frequency||100 kHz||150 kHz||200 kHz||250 kHz||300 kHz|
|Measured parameters for secondary coil in the case with presence of magnetic nanofluid|
In order to perform experimental measurements in dynamic mode, the transformer is connected in an electronic circuit diagram as shown in Figure 37. The Arbitrary Waveform Generator FLUKE PM 5138A was set to provide an excitation signal with a rectangular waveform, with features: the amplitude 10 V peak-to-peak, duty cycle k = 50% and frequency in the range of f = 100 to 1000 kHz. In Blue, at the bottom, Figure 18, the waveform capture of the arbitrary function generator is highlighted. Also, the output (secondary winding) waveforms capture in yellow, at the top is highlighted, Figure 38. Both waveforms captures are achieved with a digital oscilloscope Tektronix TDS 2014B.
The waveforms capture results for the frequency in the range of f = 100 to 1000 kHz can be concluded as shown in Figure 38a–h. These shows a good behavior of the planar microtransformer with circular spiral windings with hybrid core—ferrite and colloidal magnetic nanofluid. Thereby, it results in the possibility of using this type of transformer in DC/DC converters, for applications such as energy harvesting.
As shown in Figures 39 and 40, the planar microtransformer with circular spiral windings with hybrid core—ferrite and colloidal magnetic nanofluid –V2 and V3 is used in applications of energy harvesting. Figure 41, the electronic circuit diagram of DC/DC converter, designed for energy harvesting applications is shown.
3.2.3. Numerical simulation of the planar transformer with circular spiral windings with hybrid core-Ferrite and colloidal magnetic nanofluid-V4
220.127.116.11. CAD design
Variant V4 of the planar transformer corresponds to the DC/DC converters of high active power, that exceeding 100 watts. Choosing a particular type of magnetic nanofluid for a given application is an essential stage in design and can be facilitated by numerical modeling that uses quantitative estimates of material properties (magnetoreological, thermal, magnetic, electrical, etc.) for the validation of numerical models used in designing and evaluating the behavior of the planar transformer. The evaluation of the magnetic flux inside the planar transformer with circular spiral windings with hybrid core—ferrite and colloidal magnetic nanofluid is done for two propose magnetic nanofluid, NMF-UTR40-50G and NMF-UTR40-500G, whose magnetization at saturation is of 50 Gs and 500 Gs respectively. Mathematical models and numerical simulation are defined, under stationary hypothesis, by the finite element (FEM) technique [38, 39]. The computational domain was constructed by CAD methods, based on the design dimensions of the transformer, Figure 42.
Also, the details of the primary and secondary windings profiles are shows in Figures 43 and 44. To reduce the complexity of the model and the computational efforts, some elements (e.g. between layers, supports, etc.) have been excluded from the computational domain.
The problem is solved by the Galerkin finite element (FEM) technique. A discretization network consisting of 850,000, tetrahedral, quadratic Lagrange elements was generated automatically to model the field, Figure 45.
18.104.22.168. Mathematical model
The magnetic field source, the electrical currents in the windings, must be known. Therefore, an electrokinetic field analysis is defined by the partial differential equation (PDE). Firstly, the magnetic field source as well as the electrical currents in the windings must be known. Therefore, an electrokinetic field analysis is defined by the partial differential equation, (14), (15), (16) and (17),
where σ [S/m] is the electrical conductivity, [W/m3] is an external current source and d [m] is the thickness of the shell. The operator represents the tangential derivative along the shell . The stationary magnetic field is computed by solving [38–40],
for the copper windings and free space
for the magnetic fluid
where A [T·m] is the magnetic vector potential, [A/m2] is the external electric current density of the shell ( ≠ 0 inside the planar coils), μ0 = 4π × 10−7 [H/m] is the magnetic permeability of free space, and μr is the relative permeability. For the 3CP90 ferrite core μr = 1720 and for the copper windings and the free space μr = 1. Also, M [A/m] is the magnetization in the magnetic nanofluid, approximated by the analytic formula ,
here H [A/m] is the magnetic field strength, and α, β are empiric constants selected to fit the experimental magnetization characteristic of the magnetic nanofluid (α = 3050 A/m and β = 1.5×10−5m/A for the NMF-UTR40-50G, respectively, α = 4.85 × 104A/m and β = 2.5 × 10−5m/A for NMF-UTR40-500G).
22.214.171.124. Numerical simulation results
An iterative flexible generalized minimum residual solver (FGREMS) was used to solve the mathematical model (5), (6), (7) and (8). Figures 46 and 47 present the electric field in the windings by voltage boundary color map, boundary conditions were chosen for nominal working conditions of the transformer are considered.
The current shell density resulting from the electric field problem is used to solve the magnetic field problem in the transformer. Figure 48 shows the magnetic field in the transformer submerged in the magnetic nanofluid NMF-UTR40-50G through field lines for different powering alternatives: (a) both windings are “ON”, the currents are in opposite directions – differential magnetic fluxes, (b) primary winding is “ON” and secondary winding is “OFF” and (c) primary winding is “OFF” and secondary winding is “ON”.
The magnetic field simulation result indicates that the fascicular magnetic field lines close mainly through the ferrite core, which offers a lower reluctance path than the magnetic nanofluid. In Figure 49 the flux inside the solid ferrite core is presented by color map of normalized magnetic induction, B, as well as the lines of magnetic field density.
The magnetic field problem was solved also for the NMF-UTR40-500G magnetic nanofluid which has higher saturation limit, Figure 50 shows the magnetic flux density (tubes) for different powering schemes.
The result indicates insignificant differences between the two types of magnetic nonfluids in terms of the magnetic flux distribution inside the fluid part of the magnetic core. However, because of the higher saturation limit, the NMF-UTR40-500G it is expected to perform better in higher power applications. For different models, the numerical investigations was performed under steady state conditions, to estimate the lumped parameters of the transformer and to evaluate the thermal behavior .
Figure 51 shows the planar coil corresponding to primary and secondary coils, practical achievements, for V4 variant of planar transformer. Also, Figure 52 shows the practical achievement of the planar transformer with planar windings with hybrid core—ferrite and colloidal magnetic nanofluid—V4 variant.
The authors express special thanks to Dr. Jean Bogdan Dumitru, researcher at University Politehnica of Bucharest, Romania, for valuable results concerning the numerical simulations and also to Dr. Elena Chitanu, researcher at National Institute for Electrical Engineering ICPE-CA, Bucharest, Romania, for valuable results concerning the development of technologies to obtain ZnO nanostructured materials. The research was performed with the support of UEFISCDI, PNCDI II Programme – Joint Applied Research Projects, Romania, Contract 63/2014, “Environment energy harvesting hybrid system by photovoltaic and piezoelectric conversion, DC/DC transformation with MEMS integration and adaptive storage”.
|Lp1||inductance of the primary coil, corresponding to an equivalent Lp1 – Rp1 pattern disposed in parallel;|
|Lp2||inductance of the secondary coil, corresponding to an equivalent Lp2 – Rp2 pattern disposed in parallel;|
|D1||tangent of the loss angle for the primary coil;|
|D2||tangent of the loss angle for the secondary coil;|
|Q1||Quality factor for the primary coil;|
|Q2||Quality factor for the secondary coil;|
|G1||conductivity (1/Rp1) of the primary coil, corresponding to an equivalent Lp1 – Rp1 pattern disposed in parallel;|
|G2||conductivity (1/Rp2) of the secondary coil, corresponding to an equivalent Lp2 – Rp2 pattern disposed in parallel;|
|Rp1||the resistance of the primary coil, corresponding to an equivalent Lp1 – Rp1 pattern disposed in parallel;|
|Rp2||the resistance of the secondary coil, corresponding to an equivalent Lp2 – Rp2 pattern disposed in parallel;|
|Rdc1||the resistance of the primary coil measured in DC;|
|Rdc2||the resistance of the secondary coil measured in DC.|