The Laboratory Accreditation Program from the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) is one of the most widely used CMS-approved accreditation program. The other two accreditation programs are the Laboratory Accreditation Program from the CAP (College of American Pathologists) (http://www.cap.org) and COLA, formerly known as the Commission on Office Laboratory Accreditation (http://www.cola.org). Testing requirements of each organization are at least equivalent to those of CLIA '88, they execute to some extent different testing standards and rationales in reaching the goal of quality laboratory testing. Since 1995, clinical laboratories surveyed using JCAHO standards have been deemed to be certifiable under CLIA '88 requirements. The purpose of CLIA '88 is to ensure that all laboratory testing, wherever performed, is done accurately and according to good scientific practices and to provide assurance to the public that access to safe, accurate laboratory testing is available . Joint Commission inspect their members using performance standards that meet or exceed those of CLIA.
The current JCAHO laboratory standards include resource provision and management and mandate that the laboratory leaders plan for and provide adequate resources to meet the mission and goals of the laboratory (Joint Commission of Accreditation of Health Care Organizations, 2009 Accreditation Process Guide for Laboratories: http://www.jcrinc.com/). The areas of resource provision and management include appropriately trained staff; space, utilities, and safety and environmental controls; appropriate equipment and supplies; and adequate systems to handle required information. The planning process by lab leaders needs to address the ability to provide these and other resources, as required. There should also be adequate education to appropriate staff about the quality management system plan and implementation. This communication delineates an execution of resource management (RSM) program and some quality assurance tools that have been developed and tailored in our laboratory to comply with the requirements for laboratory accreditation by Joint Commission International (JCI) .
The objectives of this work were achieved in accordance with the mission of the hospital, the objectives of our laboratory, any applicable laws or regulations and all relevant accreditation standards. The related policies and procedures were developed to provide guidance for workers when implementing the process. The policies were generated based on standard requirements for resource provision and management by JCI . The implementation of this resource management (RSM) program is undertaken in five major sub-fields. Table 1 outlines the descriptions and intents of those pertinent standards classified in each sub-field.
3.1. RSM.1 – RSM.1.1
The qualifications and responsibilities of laboratory personnel should include the requirements of CLIA relating to competency assessments in the clinical laboratory [4-6]. The laboratory director and managers and/or other leaders have the appropriate training and experience to perform all responsibilities.
Table 2 and 3 summarize the requirements for laboratory director and technical supervisor, respectively. Those qualifications are described in CLIA’88 under Subpart M – Personnel for Nonwaived Testing §493.1351-§493.1495. A complete description of the requirement is located at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/clia or http://www.phppo.cdc/clia.
3.2. RSM.2 – RSM. 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4
Every individual employed in the laboratory need to be oriented to required duties before being allowed to perform them unsupervised. The orientation program is provided for each employee, regardless of job duties. Employee orientation and competency assessment activities are accomplished through a number of training and measurement of performance once a year . Another reason for performing competency assessment with laboratory personnel is that it is also a requirement of the College of American Pathologist (CAP) for accreditation. CAP General Inspection Checklist indicate that the manual that describes training activities and evaluations must be specific for each job description. Those activities requiring judgment of interpretive skills must be included. The records must make it possible for the inspector to be able to determine what skills were assessed and how those skills were measured. Retraining and reassessment of employee competency must occur when problems are identified with employee performance. The training and assessment program must be documented and specific for each job description .
The CAP and the JCAHO have guidelines that include several items dealing with initial training and competency assessment of laboratory personnel as a requirement for laboratory certification/accreditation.
Trainings include department policies, job-related tasks, patient safety and Employees Occupational Safety and Health Program (EOSHP). During the first year that an individual is performing such patient testing, competency must be assessed every six months [9-16].
Figure 1 shows a checklist developed in our laboratory to assess the competency of a medical laboratory technician who performs point of care (POC) urinanalysis. Records of documented personnel information including certification or licensure, summary of training and experience, references from previous employers, job description, initial orientation and any retraining, continuing education and achievement, competence evaluations, applicable health records such as immunization status, monitoring for exposure to hazardous chemicals and radiation and untoward incident or accident reports are also maintained for each staff member.
3.3. RSM.3 – RSM.3.1, 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.1.3, 3.1.4, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.4.1, 3.4.2, 3.4.3
The laboratory facilities are designed and organized to provide adequate space and allow personnel to perform required work with optimal accuracy, precision, efficiency, timeliness and safety. Specimen collection facilities are designated to respect patient's privacy, security, comfort, and disabilities. In addition, provision is made for optimal specimen collection and/or processing conditions.
Sufficient and appropriate storage space is provided for specimens, reagents, control materials, equipment, laboratory supplies, manuals, slides, histology blocks, and files. Manufacturer or other authoritative storage requirements are met, such as for temperature, ventilation and humidity. Storage areas are kept clean and well maintained. A policy covering security issues concerning patients, visitors, other customers, personnel, and property is established. Equipment (software and hardware), reference materials, consumables, reagents, and analytical systems are safeguarded from adjustments or tampering which would invalidate test results.
Laboratory areas for which space and design should be addressed include areas where clerical functions are performed. Because this function is often critical to reporting the correct result on a patient or maintaining specimen identity, consideration should be given to providing areas where interruptions are uncommon and individuals can give full concentration to the transcriptions or data entry being completed.
One of the fundamental processes is to develop an Employees Occupational Safety and Health Program (EOSHP) to address all types of hazardous materials and wastes in the laboratory . Our EOSHP project was introduced as a reference case and published in the source book entitled “Understanding Health Care Facility Safety” by Joint Commission . The EOSHP puts a system in place that employees have both the right and the need to know about the
hazards they are exposed to while working and the identities of the chemicals that pose the hazard. It is essential to communicate the hazard information and protective measures required to use these chemicals safely to exposed or potentially exposed employees who may use the chemicals. The implementation of EOSHP incorporates the establishment of a Chemical Hygiene Plan, description of a Hazard Communication Quality Standard (HCQS), development an Employee’s Guide to Handle the Hazardous Chemicals to assist the laboratory staff in complying with the EOSHP HCQS, identification of the staff who will be responsible for the initial set up of the EOSHP and the day-to-day activities necessary to comply with each aspect of the HCQS, construction an inventory of all hazardous chemicals used in the laboratory and a written list comprising the hazard descriptions of chemicals. In this respect, guidelines of NFPA (National Fire Protection Association, USA) provide comprehensive source to delineate hazard symbols and classifications . In accordance with the EOSHP HCQS, the Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for the specific hazardous products or chemicals should be supplied. In addition, a guide should be published to explain the terms and definitions in the MSDS. Appropriate signs and labels are prepared as hazard warnings to convey the hazardous effects of the materials. Labeling guidelines are published. Storage conditions and groups are identified for chemical substances. Special areas and cabinets are designated based on the hazard identifications. Safety equipments need to be acquired to ensure the protection of laboratory staff . Guidelines are determined in the event of a chemical spill, incident, or leak from a sealed container. Initial and refresher trainings are provided with all laboratory staff. A copy of the Employee’s Guide to Handle the Hazardous Chemicals is handed out as training source document. The primary policies for managing biological hazards should define the mechanisms for oversight for controlling exposures to biological materials in the workplace and include the bloodborne pathogens and exposure plan [21-25]. The related policies and procedures for handling biohazardous materials need to be developed to provide guidance for worker safety when handling or exposure to biological agents and included in the new employee orientation and annual update training programs (Fig. 2) [26,27]. The administration and supervision of patient exposures to and infection with biological agents is the primary responsibility of organization’s Infection Control Unit. Assessments of risk for the biological safety management activities are accomplished through a number of audits and data collections on a semi-annual basis. All occupational exposures to or injuries from biological materials are to be reported by employees to the EOSHP coordinator. Biological safety posters including the information, reporting and reduction of exposures to bloodborne pathogens and tuberculosis  are posted in all major areas of the laboratory facilities.
A Laboratory Waste Management program should be established to safely control hazardous chemical and biological waste from receipt or generation through use or final disposal in the laboratory. Orientation training must include hazardous waste management (Fig. 3). Chemical waste is characterized as non-hazardous or hazardous in accordance with the rules and regulations specified by OSHA (The federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration, USA) [29,30]. With this regard, a substance, which exhibits one of the four hazardous characteristics (corrosivity, ignitability, reactivity, toxicity), is delineated as Hazardous Chemical Waste. Chemical waste that does not exhibit any of the hazardous characteristics as defined above is considered non-hazardous chemical waste. Any waste that is potentially biohazardous, infectious, or pathological is described as Biological Waste. A Waste Characterization Checklist needs to be developed to determine whether the waste is hazardous or non-hazardous (Fig. 4).
Policies and procedures for managing and handling radioactive materials and waste should be well defined. The ALARA program  and associated work practices are put in practice to reduce risks to workers by keeping doses well below the limits. All procedures and practices for radiation safety must comply with law and regulations by the Atomic Energy Authorities.
3.4. RSM.4 - RSM.4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 4.6, 4.7, 4.8, 4.9
The guidelines should be generated to perform initial validation for new instruments and analytical systems to verify that the method(s) will produce accurate and reliable results [32-34]. Laboratory instruments and analytical systems are tested upon installation, and prior to use to assure their capability of meeting performance expectations. For new analytical methods, the laboratory verifies, at a minimum, accuracy, precision and the reportable range, as well as confirming that the reference range applies to its patient population. If the laboratory has modified the test or if the method is very complex with many steps, the laboratory also verifies analytical sensitivity and analytical specificity.
The laboratory leaders provide for a program to regularly monitor and demonstrate proper calibration and function of instruments, reagents, and analytical systems. The program also includes preventive assessments through periodic inspection, testing and maintenance for the temperature of water baths, and/or heat blocks, paraffin baths, refrigerators and other temperature dependent equipment, mechanical timers, pipettors and dilutors, volumetric glassware, thermometer and microscopes.
Calibration, calibration verification, function checks, and preventive maintenance are performed on instruments and analytical systems, as needed, and at least according to manufacturers' recommendations. Criteria for calibration verification include at changes of reagent lots; when indicated by quality control data; after major maintenance or service; as recommended by the manufacturer and at least every six months . All required verification checks are documented, along with remedial action when instruments or test methods did not meet performance expectations. A maintenance log for the instruments and analytical systems is kept up to date. Maintenance and inspection ensure that equipment is safe. Equipment is used only by personnel who are competent and authorized to do so.
The historical records are maintained for each instrument. A historical record should include identity of the equipment; manufacturer's name, type identification, and unique identifier such as a serial number; manufacturer's contact person and telephone number, if appropriate; date received and placed into service; current location, where appropriate; condition when received (e.g., new, used, reconditioned); manufacturer's instructions or recommendations, if available, or reference to their location; equipment performance records that confirm the equipment's suitability for use; maintenance carried out to date and what maintenance is planned for the future; damage, malfunction, modification, or repair to the equipment; remedial actions carried out because of unacceptable performance tests.
Detailed records identifying daily, weekly, or monthly performance tests and function checks must be retained for at least two years. Records of major repairs, parts replacement, and semiannual or annual calibration checks and preventive maintenance must be retained for the life of the instrument.
Procedures should be determined to check periodically the validity and quality of reagents and water quality used in laboratory testing. Labeling protocols are defined for all reagents, controls, kits, and solutions. Processes are defined for validating and maintaining computer software and information.
3.5. RSM.5 - RSM.5.1, 5.2, 5.3
Policies and procedures should be developed to provide a safe physical environment where hazards are controlled and personnel activities are managed to reduce the risk of injuries . The details of environmental conditions and supporting safety utilities are represented in Table 4. The laboratory's safety processes should include adequate fire detection and prevention policies. Adequate safety devices such as emergency eyewash, safety cans, puncture-resistant containers for discarding all waste sharps , fire extinguishers and blankets are made available and training should be provided to all laboratory staff. Figure 5 presents a laboratory safety self-audit checklist.
Resource management for accreditation process at the medical laboratories applies to many aspects of quality management including personnel, basic facilities, equipment, security and safety. Preparation is key to the success of a resource management program. A comprehensive program that includes management commitment, effective training, regular audits of critical functions to identify potential problems, implementation of corrective action and establishment of priorities for improvement benefits the laboratory in many ways.