Open access

Dairy Probiotic Foods and Coronary Heart Disease: A Review on Mechanism of Action

Written By

Fariborz Akbarzadeh and Aziz Homayouni

Submitted: 06 May 2012 Published: 03 October 2012

DOI: 10.5772/50432

From the Edited Volume

Probiotics

Edited by Everlon Cid Rigobelo

Chapter metrics overview

3,608 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is one of the major causes of death in adults in the developed and developing countries which is referred to the condition in which the main coronary arteries supplying the heart are no longer able to supply sufficient blood and oxygen to the heart muscle (myocardium). The main cause of the reduced flow is an accumulation of plaques, mainly in the intima of arteries, a disease known as atherosclerosis (Akbarzadeh and Toufan, 2008). A number of risk factors known to affect an individual to CHD have been categorized such as hyperlipidaemia (high levels of lipids in the blood), hypertension (high blood pressure), obesity, cigarette smoking and lack of exercise. Probiotics as a live microbial food supplement beneficially affects the host by improving its intestinal microbial balance and is generally consumed as fermented milk products containing lactic acid bacteria such as bifidobacteria and/or lactobacilli. The supposed health benefits of probiotics include improved resistance to gastrointestinal infections, reduction in total cholesterol and TAG levels and stimulation of the immune system. A number of mechanisms have been proposed to explain their putative lipid-lowering capacity and these include a ‘milk factor’, which has been thought to inhibit HMG-CoA reductase and the assimilation of cholesterol by certain bacteria. The mechanism of action of probiotics on cholesterol reduction include physiological actions of the end products of fermentation SCFAs, cholesterol assimilation, deconjugation of bile acids and cholesterol binding to bacterial cell walls. It has been well documented that microbial bile acid metabolism is a peculiar probiotic effect involved in the therapeutic role of some bacteria. The deconjugation reaction is catalyzed by conjugated bile acid hydrolase enzyme, which is produced exclusively by bacteria. The mechanism of cholesterol binding to bacterial cell walls has also been suggested as a possible explanation for hypocholesterolaemic effects of probiotics. Probiotics have received attention for their beneficial effects on the gut microflora and links to their systemic effects on the lowering of lipids known to be risk factors for CHD, notably cholesterol and TAG. The incorporation of probiotics into dairy products such as fermented milk products controlled nutrition studies need to be carried out to determine the beneficial effects of prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics before substantial health claims can be made (Ranjbar et al., 2007a).

Advertisement

2. Probiotics

Probiotics are distinct as live microorganisms which, when administered in sufficient amounts present a health benefit on the host (FAO/WHO, 2002; Homayouni, 2008a; Homayouni, 2009). In recent years probiotic bacteria have increasingly been incorporated into dairy foods as dietary adjuncts. Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium are the most common species of probiotic bacteria that were used in the production of fermented and non-fermented dairy products. Consumption of probiotic bacteria via dairy food products is an ideal way to re-establish the intestinal microflora balance (Homayouni, 2008a).

Probiotics have been shown to be effective against a number of disorders. Some mostly documented effects are relieving diarrhea, improving lactose intolerance and its immunomodulatory, anticarcinogenic, antidiabetic, hypocholesterolemic and hypotensive properties (Shah, 2007; Mai, and Draganov, 2009; Lye, et al., 2009). Probiotic bacteria, by competing with enteric pathogens for available nutrients and binding sites, reducing the pH of the gut, producing a variety of chemicals which inactivate viruses, enhancing specific and non-specific immune responses and increasing mucin production, can reduce incidence, severity and duration of diarrhea (Homayouni, et al., 2007; Allen, et al., 2010; Ejtahed, and Homayouni Rad, 2010). Alleviation of lactose intolerance symptoms by probiotic bacteria is attributed to their intracellular β-galactosidase content (Mustapha, et al., 1997). Studies have revealed that probiotic bacteria can induce many immunological changes and affect both Th1 and Th2 cytokine production and that these effects are strongly strain-specific (Lebeer, et al., 2010). Some major routes through which probiotic bacteria have been assumed to prevent cancer are: binding to mutagenic compounds thus decreasing their absorption, suppression of the growth of bacteria which convert procarcinogens to carcinogens, decreasing the activity of enzymes predictive of neoplasm including β-glucuronidase, nitroreductase and choloylglycine hydrolase as well as enhancing immune responses (Roos, and Katan, 2000). Inflammation plays a major role in both initiation and progression of diabetes (Duncan, et al., 2003; Pickup, and Frcpath, 2004). By reducing inflammatory responses, probiotics have been shown to correct insulin sensitivity and reduce development of diabetes mellitus. This anti-inflammatory effect has been proposed to be rooted in immunomodulatory properties of probiotic bacteria (Lye, et al., 2009). By reducing cholesterol absorption in the gut, incorporation of cholesterol into cell membranes, enzymatically deconjugation of bile salts and conversion of cholesterol to coprostanol, probiotics can reduce blood cholesterol (Lye, et al., 2009; Ooi, and Liong, 2010). Release of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory peptides from the parent protein through proteolytic action explains how probiotics can exert antihypertensive effects (Lye, et al., 2009).

Advertisement

3. Dairy probiotic foods

Dairy probiotic foods are scientifically documented as having physiological benefits beyond those of basic nutritional values. Dairy products such as ice cream, cheese, yogurt, acidophilus-bifidus-milk, ayran, kefir, kumis, doogh containing probiotics and milk having omega-3, phytosterols, isoflavins, CLA, minerals, and vitamins have an outstanding position in the development of functional foods (Homayouni, et al., 2008b; Homayouni, et al., 2008c). Dairy beverages (both fermented and non-fermented) have long been considered as important vehicles for the delivery of probiotics. In fermentation process, lactic acid, acetic acid and citric acid are naturally produced which are commonly used organic acids to enhance organoleptic qualities as well as safety of many food products. Lactic acid bacteria are found to be more tolerant to acidity and organic acids than most of the pathogens and spoilage microorganisms (Homayouni, et al., 2008d).

Advertisement

4. Coronary heart disease (CHD)

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is one of the major causes of death in adults in the developed and developing countries which is referred to the condition in which the main coronary arteries supplying the heart are no longer able to supply sufficient blood and oxygen to the heart muscle (myocardium). The main cause of the reduced flow is an accumulation of plaques, mainly in the intima of arteries, a disease known as atherosclerosis (Akbarzadeh etal., 2003; Ranjbar et al., 2007b; Akbarzadeh etal., 2010; Ghaffari etal., 2010).

Advertisement

5. Main risk factors of coronary heart disease

CHD has assumed almost epidemic proportions in wealthy societies, whereas rheumatic heart disease is common in developing countries (Akbarzadeh etal., 2003; Akbarzadeh etal., 2008). Known risk factors of CHD can be classified into those that cannot be modified (being male increasing age, genetic traits including lipid metabolism abnormalities, body build, ethnic origin), those that can be changed (cigarette smoking, hyperlipidaemia, low levels of high density lipoprotein, obesity, hypertension, low physical activity, increased thrombosis, stress, alcohol consumption), those associated with disease states (diabetes and glucose intolerance) and those related to geographic distribution (climate and season, cold weather, soft drinking water) (Lovegrove and Jackson, 2003; Akbarzadeh etal., 2009a). It has been demonstrated that there is a strong and consistent relationship between total plasma cholesterol and CHD risk (Martin et al., 1986). Accumulation of LDL in the plasma leads to a deposition of cholesterol in the arterial wall, a process that involves oxidative modification of the LDL particles. The oxidized LDL is taken up by macrophages, which finally become foam cells and forms the basis of the early atherosclerotic plaque. It has been estimated that every 1% increase in LDL cholesterol level leads to a 2-3% increase in CHD risk (Gensini et al., 1998; Akbarzadeh etal., 2009b). HDL cholesterol levels are higher in women than in men. Factors that may lead to reduced HDL cholesterol levels include smoking, low physical activity and diabetes mellitus; whereas those that increase levels include moderate alcohol consumption (Assmann et al., 1998; Akbarzadeh etal., 2009c).

Advertisement

6. Probiotics and CHD: Mechanism of action

Diet is considered to control the risk of CHD through its effects on certain risk factors including blood lipids, blood pressure and probably also through thrombogenic mechanisms. New evidences suggest a protective role for dietary antioxidants such as vitamins E and C and carotenes, possibly through a mechanism that prevents the oxidation of LDL cholesterol particles (Lovegrove and Jackson, 2003). The diet is one of the adjustable risk factors associated with CHD risk which is recommends to reduce total fat (especially saturated fat), increasing Non-starch polysaccharides (NSP) intake and consumption of fruit and vegetables is advice that is expected to be associated with overall benefits on health.

As a result of low consumer compliance of low-fat diets, attempts have been made to identify other dietary components that can reduce blood cholesterol levels. These have included investigations into the possible hypocholesterolaemic properties of milk products, especially in a fermented form. 18% fall in plasma cholesterol after feeding 4-5 liters of fermented milk per day for three weeks (Mann, and Spoerry, 1974).

The mechanisms of action of probiotics on cholesterol reduction are physiological actions of the end products of fermentation SCFAs, cholesterol assimilation, deconjugation of bile acids and cholesterol binding to bacterial cell walls. The SCFAs that are produced by the bacterial anaerobic breakdown of carbohydrate are acetic, propionic and butyric. It has been well documented that microbial bile acid metabolism is a irregular probiotic effect involved in the therapeutic role of some bacteria. The deconjugation reaction is catalyzed by conjugated bile acid hydrolase enzyme, which is produced exclusively by bacteria. Deconjugation ability is widely found in many intestinal bacteria including genera Enterococcus, Peptostreptococcus, Bifidobacterium, Fusobacterium, Clostridium, Bacteroides and Lactobacillus (Hylemond, 1985). This reaction releases the amino acid moiety and the deconjugated bile acid, thereby reducing cholesterol reabsorption, by increasing faecal excretion of the deconjugated bile acids. Many in vitro studies have investigated the ability of various bacteria to deconjugate a variety of different bile acids. Grill et al. (1995) reported Bifidobacterium longum as the most efficient bacterium when tested against six different bile salts. Another study reported that Lactobacillus species had varying abilities to deconjugate glycocholate and taurocholate (Gilliland et al., 1985). Studies performed on in vitro responses are useful but in vivo studies in animals and humans are required to determine the full contribution of bile acid deconjugation to cholesterol reduction. Intervention studies on animals and ileostomy patients have shown that oral administration of certain bacterial species led to an increased excretion of free and secondary bile salts (De Smet, et al., 1998; Marteau, et al., 1995).

There is also some in vitro evidence to support the hypothesis that certain bacteria can assimilate (take up) cholesterol. It was reported that L. acidophilus and B. bifidum had the ability to assimilate cholesterol in in vitro studies, but only in the presence of bile and under anaerobic conditions (Gilliland, et al., 1985; Rasic, et al., 1992). However, despite these reports there is uncertainty whether the bacteria are assimilating cholesterol or whether the cholesterol is co-precipitating with the bile salts. Studies have been performed to address this question. Klaver and Meer (1993) concluded that the removal of cholesterol from the growth medium in which L. acidophilus and a Bifidobacterium sp. were growing was not due to assimilation, but due to bacterial bile salt deconjugase activity. The same question was addressed by Tahri et al., (1995) with conflicting results, and they concluded that part of the removed cholesterol was found in the cell extracts and that cholesterol assimilation and bile acid deconjugase activity could occur simultaneously.

The mechanism of cholesterol binding to bacterial cell walls has also been suggested as a possible explanation for hypocholesterolaemic effects of probiotics. Hosona and Tono-oka (1995) reported Lactococcus lactis subsp. biovar had the highest binding capacity for cholesterol of bacteria tested in the study. It was speculated that the binding differences were due to chemical and structural properties of the cell walls, and that even killed cells may have the ability to bind cholesterol in the intestine. The mechanism of action of probiotics on cholesterol reduction could be one or all of the above mechanisms with the ability of different bacterial species to have varying effects on cholesterol lowering. However, more research is required to elucidate fully the effect and mechanism of probiotics and their possible hypocholesterolaemic action.

It has been demonstrated that microbial bile acid metabolism is a main effect in the therapeutic role of probiotic bacteria. The deconjugation reaction is catalysed by conjugated bile acid hydrolase enzyme, which is produced by Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus. This reaction releases the amino acid and deconjugated bile acid, which is reducing cholesterol reabsorption, by increasing faecal elimination of the deconjugated bile acids.

Advertisement

7. Conclusions and future trends

Risk factors known to affect an individual to CHD have been categorized such as hyperlipidaemia, hypertension, obesity, cigarette smoking and lack of exercise. Probiotics may prevent coronary heart disease by cholesterol reduction and microbial bile acid metabolism. The mechanism of action of probiotics on cholesterol reduction include physiological actions of the end products of fermentation SCFAs, cholesterol assimilation, deconjugation of bile acids and cholesterol binding to bacterial cell walls. It has been demonstrated that microbial bile acid metabolism is a peculiar probiotic effect involved in the therapeutic role of some bacteria. Deconjugation reaction is catalyzed by conjugated bile acid hydrolase enzyme, which is produced exclusively by bacteria. The mechanism of cholesterol binding to bacterial cell walls has also been suggested as a possible explanation for hypocholesterolaemic effects of probiotics. Probiotics have beneficial effects on the gut microflora and links to their systemic effects on the lowering of lipids known to be risk factors for CHD, notably cholesterol and TAG. In recent years, several probiotic foods were produced industrially. These foods have received attention for their beneficial effects on the gut microflora and links to their systemic effects on the lowering of lipids known to be risk factors for CHD. For progress to be made, the consumers need to be educated about the various health benefits and how they will be able to use these products in their own diet without adverse consequences. Also to make these foods attractive to the consumer, the products need to be priced in such a way that they are accessible to the general public.

References

  1. 1. AkbarzadehF.ToufanM.2008Atrioventricular Delays, Cardiac Output and Diastolic function in patient with implanted dual chamber pacing and sensing pacemakers, Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 112024072412
  2. 2. AkbarzadehF.HejaziM. E.KoshavarH.PezeshkianM.2003Prevalence of cardiovascular diseases and cardiac risk factors in north western Tabriz, Medical Journal of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, 1115
  3. 3. AkbarzadehF.KazemiB.PourafkariL.2009aSupraventricular Arrhythmia Induction by an implantable cardioverter defibrillator in a patient with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, Journal compilation, 15
  4. 4. AkbarzadehF.Kazemi-arbatB.GolmohammadiA.PourafkariL.2009bBiatrial Pacing vs. Intravenous amiodarone in prevention of atrial fibrilation after coronory artery bypass surgery, Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 121913251329
  5. 5. AkbarzadehF.PourafkariL.MohammadHashemi.JaziS.HesamiL.HabibiH.2010Prevalence and severity of cad among hypertensive and normotensive patients undergoing elestive coronary angiographi in Tabrize madani heart center, ARYA Atherosclerosis Journal, 515
  6. 6. AkbarzadehF.Ranjbarkouchaksaraei. F.BagheriZ.GhezelM.2009cEffect of Preoperative information and reassurance in decreasing anxiety of patients who are candidate for coronary artery bypass graft surgery, J. Cudirwsc. Thoruc. Rs. 2528
  7. 7. AkbarzadehF.ToufanM.AfsarpourN.2008AV Interval and cardiac output in patient with implanted DDD pacemaker, Research Journal of Biological Sciences, 31213811386
  8. 8. AllenS. J.MartinezE. G.GregorioG. V.DansL. F.2010Probiotics for treating acute infectious diarrhoea. Chocrane Collaboration.
  9. 9. AssmannG.CullenP.SchulteH.1998The Münster Heart Study (PROCAM): Results of follow-up at 8 years, Eur. Heart J. 19211
  10. 10. De SmetI.De BoeverP.VerstraeteW.1998Cholesterol lowering in pigs through enhanced bacterial bile salt hydrolase activity, BJN, 79185194
  11. 11. DuncanB. B.SchmidtM. I.PankowJ. S.BallantyneC. M.2003Low-Grade Systemic Inflammation and the Development of Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes; 5217991805
  12. 12. EjtahedH. S.HomayouniRad. A.2010Effects of Probiotics on the Prevention and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Disorders. Microbial biotechnological journal of Islamic Azad University, 245360Persian].
  13. 13. GensiniG. F.ComeglioM.ColellaA.1998Classical risk factors and emerging elements in the risk profile for coronary artery disease, Eur. Heart J. 195261
  14. 14. GhaffariS.AkbarzadehF.PourafkariL.2010Aneurysmal coronary arteriovenous fistula closing with covered stent deployment: A case report and review of literature, Cardiology Journal, 1714
  15. 15. GillilandS. E.NelsonC. R.MaxwellC.1985Assimilation of cholesterol by Lactobacillus acidophilus, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 492377381
  16. 16. GrillJ. P.Manginot-durrC.SchneiderF.BallongueJ.1995Bifidobacteria and probiotic effects: action of Bifidobacterium species on conjugated bile salts, Curr. Microbiol. 312327
  17. 17. HomayouniA.2008aTherapeutical effects of functional probiotic, prebiotic and symbiotic foods. (1st ed.). Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. Tabriz. Iran.
  18. 18. HomayouniA.2009Letter to the editor. Food Chemistry, 11410731073
  19. 19. HomayouniA.AziziA.EhsaniM. R.RazaviS. H.YarmandM. S.2008bEffect of microencapsulation and resistant starch on the probiotic survival and sensory properties of synbiotic ice cream. Food Chemistry, 1115055
  20. 20. HomayouniA.EhsaniM. R.AziziA.YarmandM. S.RazaviS. H.2007Effect of lecithin and calcium chloride solution on the microencapsulation process yield of calcium alginate beads. Iranian Polymer Journal, 169597606
  21. 21. HomayouniA.EhsaniM. R.AziziA.RazaviS. H.YarmandM. S.2008cSpectrophotometrically evaluation of probiotic growth in liquid media. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 20324142420
  22. 22. HomayouniA.EhsaniM. R.AziziA.RazaviS. H.YarmandM. S.2008dGrowth and survival of some probiotic strains in simulated ice cream conditions. Journal of Applied Sciences, 82379382
  23. 23. HosonoA.Tono-OkaT.1995Binding of cholesterol with lactic acid bacterial cells, Milchwissenschaft, 5020556560
  24. 24. HylemondP. B.1985Metabolism of bile acids in intestinal microflora. In H. Danielson and J. Sjovall (eds), 331343Sterols and Bile Acids, New York, Elsevier Science.
  25. 25. KlaverF. A.and Van Der Meer, R. (1993The assumed assimilation of cholesterol by lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium bifidum is due to their bile salt-deconjugating activity, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59411201124
  26. 26. LebeerS.VanderleydenJ.KeersmaeckerS. C. J.2010Host interactions of probiotic bacterial surface molecules: comparison with commensals and pathogens. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 8171184
  27. 27. LovegroveJ.JacksonK.2003Coronary heart disease in: Functional dairy products, (Eds: Tiina Mattila-Sandholm and Maria Saarela). Woodhead Publishing Ltd and CRC Press LLC. England, 5493
  28. 28. LyeH. S.KuanC. Y.EweJ. A.FungW. Y.LiongM. T.2009The improvement of hypertension by probiotics: effects on chelesterol, diabetes, renin and phytoesterogens. International Journal of Dairy Sciences, 1037553775
  29. 29. MaiV.DraganovP. V.2009Recent advances and remaining gaps in our knowledge of associations between gut microbiota and human health. World J Gastroenterol, 1518185
  30. 30. MannG. V.SpoerryA.1974Studies of a surfactant and cholesteremia in the Maasai, Am J Clin Nutr 27464469
  31. 31. MarteauP.GerhardtM. F.MyaraA.BouvierE.TrivinF.RambaudJ. C.1995Metabolism of bile salts by alimentary bacteria during transit in human small intestine, Microbiol. Ecol. in Health and Disease, 8151157
  32. 32. MartinM. J.BrowenerW. S.WentworthJ.HulleyS. B.KulerL. H.1986Serum cholesterol, blood pressure and mortality: implications from a cohort of 361662 men, Lancet, 2933936
  33. 33. MustaphaA.JiangT.SavaianoD. A.1997Improvement of lactose digestion by humans following ingestion of unfermented acidophilus milk: influence of bile sensitivity, lactose transport and acid tolerance of lactobacilus acidophilus. Journal of Dairy Sciences, 8015371545
  34. 34. OoiL. G.LiongM. T.2010Cholesterol-lowering effects of probiotics and prebiotics: a review of in vivo and in vitro findings. International Journal of molecular Sciences, 1124992522
  35. 35. PickupJ. C.FrcpathD.2004Inflammation and Activated Innate Immunity in the Pathogenesis of Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care, 27813823
  36. 36. RanjbarF.AkbarzadeF.HashemiM.2007aQuality of life of patients with impianted cardiac pacemakers in north west of Iran, ARYA Atherosclerosis Journal, 24197203
  37. 37. RanjbarF.AkbarzadehF.KazemiB.SafaeiyanA.2007bRelaxation therapy in the background of standard antihypertensive drug treatment is effective in management of moderate to severe essential hypertension, Relaxation therapy in management of hypertension, 32120124
  38. 38. RasicJ. L.VujicicI. F.SkrinjarM.VulicM.1992Assimilation of cholesterol by some cultures of lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria, Biotech. Lett. 1413944
  39. 39. RoosN. M.KatanM. B.2000Effects of probiotic bacteria on diarrhea, lipid metabolism and carcinogenesis: a review of papers published between 1988 and 1998. American journal of clinical nutrition, 71405411
  40. 40. ShahN. P.2007Functional cultures and health benefits. International dairy journal, 1712621277
  41. 41. TahriK.CroccianiJ.BallongueJ.SchneiderF.1995Effects of three strains of bifidobacteria on cholesterol, Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 21149151

Written By

Fariborz Akbarzadeh and Aziz Homayouni

Submitted: 06 May 2012 Published: 03 October 2012