Open access

Use of Microwaves in Coal Research and in Materials Synthesis

Written By

Mohindar Seehra and Vivek Singh

Submitted: 04 April 2011 Published: 27 July 2011

DOI: 10.5772/22536

From the Edited Volume

Microwave Heating

Edited by Usha Chandra

Chapter metrics overview

4,948 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

In this chapter, the use of microwave heating in addressing some problems in coal research and in the synthesis of inorganic materials are reviewed. The review covers the underlying theory of microwave heating and how it has been used in specific cases. This review is divided into three sections: Section 2 dealing with the fundamental theory behind microwave heating and section 3 and 4 dealing with its use in coal research and in the synthesis of materials respectively. References to selected papers are also given. However this list of references is not exhaustive and readers are asked to consult these references for earlier studies in specific areas.

Advertisement

2. Fundamentals of microwave heating

When a time varying electric field E = Eoexp(iωt) is applied to a liquid or solid, polarization develops which in general can come from three sources viz. dipolar, ionic and electronic (Kittel, 1996). The dipolar contribution is present in polar materials viz. materials with permanent dipoles such as water as these dipoles re-orient in the direction of the applied field E. The relaxation time τ associated with this reorientation is in picoseconds (ps) and therefore this phenomena is observable when frequency f = (ω/2π) is in the microwave range (f = 0.1 GHz to 100 GHz). The ionic contribution to the polarization results from the various normal modes of vibration of the atoms relative to each other. These frequencies in the IR range are from 300 GHz to 100 THz. Finally, the electronic contribution resulting from the relative displacements of the nucleus with positive charge and electron shell of the atoms occurs in the ultraviolet (UV) region of the frequencies. Thus microwave heating as shown below is most significant in materials having permanent dipoles such as water.

A number of experimental studies (Kaatze, 1989; Merabat & Bose, 1988) have shown that dielectric relaxation in water is adequately described by the Debye relation (Debye, 1929)

ε ( ω )   = ε ( )   +   [ ε ( 0 )   ε ( ) ] / ( + i ω τ ) E1

where ε(0) and ε(∞) are the dielectric constant in the limit ω→0 and ω→∞ respectively. For water, ε(∞) includes the polarization effects at the infrared and optical-uv frequencies. Separating the in phase and the out of phase components of ε = ε′- iε″ in Eq.(1) leads to

ε =   ε ( )   + [ ε ( 0 )   ε ( ) ] / ( + ω 2 τ 2 ) E2

and

ε " =   ω τ [ ε ( 0 )   ε ( ) ] / ( + ω 2 τ 2 ) E3

Eliminating ε(∞) through substitutions in Eq. (2) and (3) leads to the following relation between ε′and ε″:

ε , = ε ( 0 )   ε " · ω · τ E4

Once experimental data for ε′ and ε″ are available for different ω, a plot of ε′ vs. ε″•ω allows one to determine the relaxation time τ. Such an analysis for water in the frequency range of 1 GHz to 60 GHz and in the temperature range of 0˚C and 60˚C have shown (Kaatze, 1989) that at T = 25˚C, τ = 8.27 ps, ε(0) = 78.36 and ε(∞) = 5.2 and that with increase of temperature, ε(0), ε(∞) and τ decrease rapidly so that at 60˚C, ε(0) = 66.7, ε(∞) = 4.2 and τ = 4.0 ps.

Microwave heating involves absorption of electrical power by water from the microwaves. The power absorbed P can be shown to be given by (Agmon, 1996)

=  2 π | E 0 | 2 ε o f · ε " ,     w / m 3 E5

where ε0 = 8.854 × 10-12 A s/V m, Eo is the amplitude of the electric field and ω = 2πf. The important point to note is that P is proportional to f•ε″so that P depends upon the frequency f of the microwaves and ε″of the medium (water). From Eq. (3) it can be easily shown that ε″ peaks at ωτ = 1.

In order to provide visualization of the frequency variation of the quantities ε′, ε″ and f•ε″, the latter representing the power absorbed P, we have used the data for water given in a tabular form (Kaatze, 1989). The simulated plots of the frequency dependence of ε′, ε″ and f•ε″ for the data valid at 25˚C are shown as lines in Fig. 1 where the circles are experimental values (Kaatze, 1989). The data up to 60 GHz fit quite well with the Debye relaxation with a single τ. Later studies have suggested that two relaxation times are necessary to explain the data at frequencies higher than 100 GHz (Barthel et al., 1990; Agmon, 1996).

An interesting feature of Fig. 1 is the frequency dependence of f•ε’’ representing power absorbed. This plot, usually not avaliable in literature, shows that power absorbed saturates only near 100 GHz. At f = 2.45 GHz, the conventional frequency used in microwave ovens, domestic and industrial, the absorbed power is only about 1.6% of the power absorbed at 100 GHz. However, the wavelengths of microwaves λ = 0.3 cm at 100 GHz compared to λ = 12.2 cm at 2.45 GHz, thus reducing the size of the microwave ovens to impractical size of only about 0.3 cm at the higher frequency. At 17 GHz where ε″ has the maximum value of 36, λ = 1.76 cm and power absorbed is nearly 50% of the maximum value at 100 GHz.

As water heats up, τ, ε(0) and ε(∞) decrease (Kaatze, 1989) affecting the peak positions for ε″and f•ε″. In Fig. 2 simulated frequency dependence of ε′, ε″ and f•ε″ is compared at two temperatures viz. 25˚C and 60˚C using the magnitudes of ε(0), ε(∞) and τ (Kaatze, 1989). The important point to note is that the power absorbed at a fixed frequency below about 30 GHz decreases as the temperature of water increases.

The frequency derivative of power absorbed by water given by ∂(f•ε″)/∂f, is plotted in Fig. 3. The maximum slope occurs at 11 GHz for 25˚C and the position of this maximum changes to 23 GHz at 60˚C. Analytically, using relation (3), it can be shown that ∂(f•ε″)/∂f is maximum at f = 1/πτ12.

Figure 1.

The simulated plots of the frequency dependence of ε′, ε″ and f•ε″ for water using the data (circles) at 25˚C from Kaatze (1989).

Figure 2.

Simulated frequency dependence of ε′, ε″ and f•ε″ is compared for water at two temperatures viz. 25˚C and 60˚C using the magnitudes of ε(0), ε(∞) and τ

Figure 3.

Derivatives of power absorbed from Fig. 2 vs. frequency and wavelength at 25˚C and 60˚C.

Advertisement

3. Microwave heating in coal research

3.1. Microwave properties of coals

In the recent paper, (Marland et al., 2001) have reported the measurements of ε′and ε″ at 60˚C for over a dozen coals and for the ash components normally found in most coals. In these studies, data were reported at f = 0.615 GHz, 1.413 GHz and 2.216 GHz for the coals and the minerals pyrite, quartz, dolomite, kaolin, mica and calcite. Although there is some variations in the magnitudes of ε′ and ε″ from coal to coal, the range of values were between 1.6 to 3.5 for ε′ and 0.07 to 0.31 for ε″at f = 2.216 GHz. The frequency dependence among the three frequencies was found to be relatively weak. Among the minerals the highest magnitude was found to be for pyrite with ε′= 7.07 and ε″= 1.06 at 2.216 GHz and at 60˚C. For the other minerals, ε′ ~ 2 to 3 and ε″ ~ 0.05-0.06. Moisture levels in these coals varied from a low of 1% to a high of 13%. From Fig. 1 ε″ ≃ 10 for water at 2.45 GHz. Since power P absorbed is proportional to f•ε″ (Eq. 1), the highest power absorbed will be by moisture, followed by pyrite. Thus the largest effect of microwave heating of coal is the removal of moisture and heating of pyrite FeS2.

Pyrite FeS2 when heated above 250˚C is known to convert to pyrrhotites Fe1-x S (x = 0 - 0.125) whose mangetization at room temperature is ferrimagnetic like, with the magnitude depending on the x value (Jagadeesh & Seehra, 1981). Whereas FeS2 is only paramagnetic with feeble magnetization (Burgardt & Seehra, 1977) pyrrhotites Fe1-x S are strongly magnetic (Jagadeesh & Seehra, 1981). Therefore conversion of pyrites to pyrrhotites after microwave heating make them amenable to separation by magnetic methods. Thus microwave heating of coals at an appropriate frequency followed by magnetic separation of the impurities can lead to both dewatering and desulphurization, since a major source of sulphur in coals is pyrites. A combination of these techniques is likely being used in the recently developed and marketed technology by CoalTek (http://www.coaltek.com/).

3.2. Measuring moisture content by microwaves

Another area in which microwaves have been used in coal research is the on-line measurements of moisture in coals employing the frequencies of 2.45 GHz (Cutmore et al., 2000) and 1 GHz (Ponte et al., 1996). In these techniques, microwave horns are used to transmit and receive microwaves through the coal sample. The use of the lower microwave frequencies and hence corresponding larger wavelengths of λ = 12.2 cm (30 cm) for 2.45 GHz (1 GHz) allows the use of larger samples encountered at coal power plants. As microwaves pass through a coal sample, large ε′ of water produces a frequency and phase shift of the microwaves and ε″ results in the attenuation of the microwave signal. Both phase shift and attenuation are measured by microwave network analyzer. However, experiments show that phase shift provides a better linear correlation with the moisture content (Ponte et al., 1996; Cutmore et al., 2000). Since attenuation is due to absorption of microwaves primarily by moisture present, this technique can also result in sufficient dewatering of the coals. This topic of dewatering or drying of coals by using microwave is discussed next.

3.3. Microwave dewatering of coals

Dewatering or drying of coals is an important consideration in coal industry since removal of moisture reduces the transportation costs and improves the BTU value of the coals. The use of microwaves for dewatering of coals has been discussed in a number of earlier studies (Lindroth, 1985; Chatterji & Mishra, 1991; Perkin, 1980; Standish el al., 1988; Marland el al., 2000; Lester & Kingman, 2004) and in a more recent study from author′s laboratory (Seehra et al., 2007). In microwave dewatering of coals, the basic mechanism for power absorption by water discussed in Section 2 is operative.

Figure 4.

Block diagram of the bench-scale microwave dewatering unit (reproduced from the paper by Seehra et al., Fuel 2007).

In our studies of microwave dewatering (Seehra et al., 2007), the focus was on dewatering fine coal slurries containing nearly 50% moisture. A domestic microwave oven operating at 2.45 GHz was modified, Fig. 4 and Fig. 5, so that a conveyer belt could be used to continously feed wet coal into the oven and dried coal collected at the other end. The whole apparatus was shielded with a microwave shield. This bench scale unit was designed to simulate a practical situation at a coal plant. The website of CoalTek shows such a conveyer belt approach and perhaps the only way to achieve large scale continous operation.

Figure 5.

Left) Picture of the bench-scale microwave dewatering units with microwave shield in place. (Right) Close-up of the unit without the microwave shield showing the conveyor belt for feeding wet coal into the microwave oven (reproduced from the paper by Seehra et al., Fuel 2007).

In our experiment using a 0.8 kW domestic oven, the amount of moisture removed depended strongly on the belt speed; The slower belt speed removed more moisture but consumed more energy. This data on the relation between belt speed, electrical energy consumed and more moisture lost is shown in Fig. 6 (Seehra et al., 2007). Belt speed of

Figure 6.

Power consumed and belt speed (cm/min) vs. % moisture lost. The region of the least slope (13 cm/min) yields the optimum speed (reproduced from the paper by Seehra et al., Fuel 2007).

around 13 cm/min was found to be most energy efficient (~ 83%) for removal of water, the remaining power perhaps lost to surroundings and small heating of the minerals in coal and coal itself. In the experiments of Lindroth using higher power magnetrons (9.7 kW) operating at 2.45 GHz, the reported efficiency varied from 52% to 97% for drying of fine coals. A cost estimate of $ 3/ton to remove 10% moisture from coal was made based only on the amount of electrical power consumed (Seehra et al., 2007).

Dewatering efficiencies of microwave heating vis-à-vis thermal heating for the coal slurry samples are compared in Fig. 7 (Seehra et al, 2007). In this comparison, 20 gms of coal slurry sample was heated in a thermal oven set at 110˚C followed by taking the sample out after every 30 s for quick weighing and reinserting the sample in the oven in less than 5 s. Similar experiments were done using a domestic microwave oven. The results of weight loss vs. time in Fig. 7 show that complete dewatering of the coal slurry takes about 5 min with microwave heating compared to about an hour with thermal heating. Thus this experiment shows an order of magnitude reduction in time in microwave heating vis-à-vis thermal heating.

Figure 7.

Comparison of the efficiencies of thermal heating vis-a`-vis microwave heating using 20 g sample in each case (reproduced from the paper by Seehra et al., Fuel, 2007).

Advertisement

4. Use of microwaves in material synthesis

In section 2, the mechanism of microwave heating was described in terms of dielectric constants ε′and ε″ with specific examples given for microwave heating of water. Same argument can be used for all polar materials with known ε′and ε″. As an example, Barthel et al. (1990) have discussed the microwave heating using lower alcohols (methanol, ethanol, 1-propanol and 2-propanol).

In the chemical synthesis of a variety of materials, use of a conventional heating which has been a norm for a long time, is being replaced by microwave heating. In conventional heating, energy is first delivered to the surface of a material, followed by heat transfer to the material through conduction, convection and radiation. This results in non-uniform heating producing poor crystallinity and often wider distribution of particle sizes. By contrast, in microwave heating, energy is transferred throughout the material via molecular interaction thus producing uniform heating without thermal gradients and stress. This often results in materials with finer microstructures and particles with narrow size distribution. The reader is referred to several recent papers (Barison et al., 2010; Wu et al., 2008; Prasad et al. 2002; Utchariyajit et al. 2010; Chang et al. 2009; Gopinath et al. 2002; Vincente et al 2010) where examples of these advantages are described in detail. Thus, compared to conventional thermal heating, microwave heating has the advantages of speed, energy efficiency, finer microstructures and more uniform particle size distribution in the synthesis of materials in line with the data shown in Fig. 7.

Microwave heating in combination with hydrothermal processing has shown positive effects on crystallinity of samples. Samples prepared by conventional hydrothermal treatment showed poor crystallinity in an amorphous phase, and they required higher temperatures and longer times than that of microwave hydrothermal treatment (Kim et al. 2001). Crystalline samples have been obtained without increase in particle size (Addamo et al. 2008). Other observations have shown the particles to have higher crystallinity indicating larger particle size (Vincente et al. 2009), and it avoids the post treatment such as annealing required after sol-gel synthesis (Hu et al. 2007). The treatment time under microwave heating has shown increase in the crystallite size due to Oswald mechanism of crystallite growth. Thus for applications which involve surface and phase characteristics, and the presence of porosity used in catalytic applications, microwave synthesis has been very successful (Wilson et al. 2006).

From a review done by Yanshou et al. in 2008, synthesis using microwave heating has been found to have the Si/Al ratio increased from 1.4 to 1.8 in zeolite membranes. It is clearly pointed out that the difference between microwave heating and conventional heating is due to different heating mechanisms (Li &Yang, 2008). Shape effects have also been noticed by Chen et al. 2009, where the concentration of solvents of diols have significantly affected the length of the Si-MFI crystals compared to the widths and thickness having a lesser effect. This effect could not be reproduced using a conventional synthesis method (Chen et al., 2009). In general, microwave hydrothermal treatment has proved to be more efficient than conventional hydrothermal treatment because of energy saving and time. For preparing microwave-assisted organic materials, readers are referred to the review by Lidström et al. (2001).

Experimentally, all materials placed inside a microwave oven during operation must be“microwave safe”, i.e.. they cannot be good electrical conductors, as is well known in the domestic use of microwave cooking. This is because the concentrated electric field associated with the microwaves directly flows through the good conductor resulting in electrical sparks and even fires. Ceramic and polymer containers which are good insulators and so “microwave safe”are now avaliable for use in material synthesis.

Historically, the earlier use of microwave heating in material synthesis involved the use of domestic microwave oven appropriately modified by each investigator. In recent years, microwave ovens specially designed for synthesis of materials are now avaliable in which temperatures and even pressures in an autoclave can be monitored in situ. The use of autoclaves inside the microwave ovens producing materials under hydrothermal conditions has greatly expanded the use of microwave heating. (e.g. see Chang et al. 2009& Kim et al. 2001). Suppliers of such commercial units can be easily located by the readers in each country through internet search.

In the rest of this chapter on the use of microwave heating in the synthesis of materials, we have organized the available examples of such cases in a tabular form. The following table lists the name of the materials synthesized, conditions used in the synthesis and the corresponding reference covering the period from 2010 to 1998 with the most recent listed first. From this list, it is evident that the use of microwave heating in material synthesis is now becoming ubiquitous and it is sure to expand even more in the future.

SYSTEM CONDITIONS REFERENCES
BaCe0.65Zr0.20Y0.15O3-δ P = 350, 500 W Barison S., Fabrizio M., Fasolin S., Montagner F. &Mortalò C., (2010). A microwave-assisted sol-gel Pechini method for the synthesis of BaCe0.65Zr0.20Y0.15O3−δpowders. Mater. Res. Bull., Vol. 45, pp. 1171-1176.
Zn4O(BDC3) t = 30 min, P = 1 kW Lu C., Liu J., Xiao K.& Harris A., (2010). Microwave enhanced synthesis of MOF-5 and its CO2 capture ability at moderate temperatures across multiple capture and release cycles. Chem. Eng. J., Vol. 156, pp. 465-470.
Capillary MFI-type Zeolite-Ceramic Membrane T = 70 - 180 ˚C, P = 250 or 400 W, t = 10 - 150 min Sebastian V., Mallada R., Coronasa J., Julbe A., Terpstra R.&Dirrix R., (2010). Microwave-assisted hydrothermal rapid synthesis of capillary MFI-type zeolite-ceramic membranes for pervaporation application.J. Membrane Sci., Vol. 355, pp. 28-35.
Gold Nanoparticles t = 30 sec, P = 800 W
t = 9 min, P = 1 kW
Vargas-Hernandez C., Mariscal M., Esparza R. &Yacaman M., (2010). A synthesis route of gold particles with using a reducing agent.Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol. 96, pp. 213115-(1-3).
Silicalite (Si-MFI) Crystals T = 180 ˚C, P = 400 W,t = 10 min Chen X., Yan W., Cao X. &Xu R., (2010). Quantitative correlation between morphology of silicalite-1 crystals and dielectric constants of solvents. Microporous andMesoporous Materials, Vol. 131, pp. 45-50.
Saponite
M x [Mg6Al x Si8-xO20(OH)4] (M = Na, Li, NH4)
T = 453 K,t = 6 hrs Vicente I., Salagre P., Cesteros Y., Medina F.&Sueiras J., (2010). Microwave-assisted synthesis of saponite. Appl. Clay Sci., Vol. 48, pp. 26-31.
K8Ln3Si12O32NO3·H2O
(Ln = Eu, Tb, Gd, Sm).
T = 363 K, t = 20 min Wang X., Li J., Wang G., Han Y., Su T., Li Y., Yu J.&Xu R., (2010). Synthesis, characterization and properties of microporous lanthanide silicates:K8Ln3Si12O32NO3·H2O (Ln = Eu, Tb, Gd, Sm). Solid State Sciences, Vol. 12, pp. 422-427.
Calcia Stabilized Zirconia Nanoparticles T = 200 ˚C, t = 90 min Rizzuti A., Corradi A., Leonelli C., Rosa R., Pielaszek R. &Lojkowski W., (2010). Microwave technique applied to the hydrothermal synthesis and sintering of calcia stabilized zirconia nanoparticles. J. of Nanopart. Res., Vol. 12, pp. 327-335.
Double-walled Carbon Nanotubes T = 200 ˚C, t = 20 min Dunens O. M., MacKenzie K. J. & Harris A. T., (2010). Large-Scale Synthesis of Double-Walled Carbon Nanotubes in Fluidized Beds.
Ind. Eng. Chem.Res., Vol. 49, No. 9, pp. 4031-4035).
One-Dimensional Nano- Structured Silver Titanates T = 200 ˚C, P = 300 W, t = 1 hrs Li Q., Kako T. & Ye J., (2010). Strong adsorption and effective photocatalytic activities of one-dimensional nanostructured silver titanates.Appl. Catalysis A: General, Vol. 375, pp. 85-91.
Mesoporous Zeotype SAPO-5
(Silicoaluminophosphate)
T = 180 - 200 ˚C, t = 0.5 - 2 hrs Utchariyajit K. &Wongkasemji S., (2010) Effect of synthesis parameters on mesoporous SAPO-5 with AFI-type formation via microwave radiation using alumatrane and silatrane precursors. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, Vol. 135, pp. 116-123.
Ru/La0.75Sr0.25Cr0.5Mn0.5O3-δ P = 750 W, t = 1 min Barison S., Fabrizio M., Mortalò C., Antonucci P., Modafferi V.&Gerbasi R., (2010). Novel Ru/La0.75Sr0.25Cr0.5Mn0.5O3-δ catalysts for propane reforming in IT-SOFCs. SolidState Ionics, Vol. 181, pp. 285-291.
Tungsten Oxide Nanorods T = 180 ˚C, t = 20 min Li Y., Su X., Jian J. & Wang J., (2010). Ethanol sensing properties of tungsten oxide nanorods prepared by microwave hydrothermal method. Ceramics International, Vol. 36, pp. 1917-1920.
Saponites with Mg2+ T = 180 ˚C, P = 600 W, t = 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 or 16 hrs Trujillano R., Rico E., Vicente M., Herrero M. & Rives V., (2010). Microwave radiation and mechanical grinding as new ways for preparation of saponite-like materials. Appl. Clay Sci., Vol. 48, pp. 32-38.
Titanate Nanotubes T = 403 K, P = 70, 400 or 700 W, t = 3 hrs Chen Y., Lo S. &Kuo J., (2010). Pb(II) adsorption capacity and behavior of titanate nanotubes made by microwave hydrothermal method.Colloids and Surfaces A:Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, Vol. 361, pp. 126-131.
Mg, Al-Layered Double Hydroxides T = 125 ˚C, t = 10 - 180 min Benito P., Herrero M., Labajos F. & Rives V., (2010). Effect of post-synthesis microwave hydrothermal treatment on the properties of layered double hydroxides and related materials. Appl. Clay Sci., Vol. 48, pp. 218-227.
Y2O3 and Yb-Y2O3 T = 140, 170 ˚C, P = 150 - 300 W, t = 5 - 22 min, 2 hrs Serantoni M., Mercadelli E., Costa A., Blosi M., Esposito L.&Sanson A., (2010). Microwave-assisted polyol synthesis of sub-micrometer Y2O3 and Yb-Y2O3 particles for laser source application. Ceramics International, Vol. 36, pp. 103-106.
Co-Zn-Al catalysts T = 125 ˚C, t = 10 - 300 min Benito P., Herrero M., Labajos F. M., Rives V., Royo C., Latorre N. &Monzon A., (2009). Production of carbon nanotubes from methane: Use of Co-Zn-Al catalystsprepared by microwave-assisted synthesis. Chemical Engineering Journal, Vol. 149, pp. 455-462.
Hectorite
M x [Lix Mg6-xSi8O20(OH)4]
(M = Na, Li, NH4)
T = 393 K, t = 16 hrs Vicente I., Salagre P., Cesteros Y., Guirado F., Medina F.&Sueiras J., (2009). Fast microwave synthesis of hectorite. Appl. Clay Sci., Vol. 43, pp. 103-107.
Titania Nanowires T = 210 ˚C, P = 350 W, t = 5 hrs Chang M., Lin C., Deka J., Chang F. & Chung C., (2009). Nanomechanical characterization of microwave hydrothermally synthesized titania nanowires. J. Phys. D:Appl. Phys., Vol. 42, pp. 145105.
Graphitic Carbon Particle Chains T = 160 - 220 ˚C, t = 40 min Harris A., Deshpande S. &Kefeng X., (2009). Synthesis of graphitic carbon particle chains at low temperatures undermicrowave irradiation. Materials Lett.,Vol. 63, pp. 1390-1392.
Silicalite (Si-MFI) T = 80 ˚C, P = 250 W, t = 90 min
T = 180 ˚C, P = 400 W, t = 60 min
Chen X., Yan W., Cao X., Yu J. &Xu R., (2009). Fabrication of silicalite-1 crystals with tunable aspect ratios by microwave assisted solvothermal synthesis. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, Vol. 119, pp. 217-222.
ZnWO4 Nanoparticles T = 160 ˚C, t = 1, 3 hrs Bi J., Wu L., Li Z., Ding Z., Wang X. & Fu X., (2009). A facile microwave solvothermal process to synthesize ZnWO4 nanoparticles. J. Alloys and Compd., Vol. 480, pp. 684-688.
Multiferroic BiFeO3 t = 30 min, P = 800 W Prado-Gonjal J., Villafuerte-Castrejón M., Fuentes L. &Morán E., (2009). Microwave-hydrothermal synthesis of the multiferroic BiFeO3. Mater. Res. Bull., Vol. 44,pp. 1734-1737.
NaYF4:Yb3+,Tm3+ T = 180 ˚C, t = 4 hrs Chen X., Wang W., Chen X., Bi J., Wu L., Li Z.&Fu X., (2009). Microwave hydrothermal synthesis and upconversion properties of NaYF4:Yb3+,Tm3+ with microtube morphology. Mater. Lett.,Vol. 63, pp. 1023-1026.
Carboxylate-Intercalated Layered Double Hydroxides T = 85, 100, 125 ˚C, t = 10, 30, 180 min Benito P., Labajos F., Mafra L., Rocha J. &Rives V., (2009). Carboxylate-intercalated layered double hydroxides aged under microwave-hydrothermal treatment. J. Solid State Chem., Vol. 182, pp. 18-26.
Rapid Synthesis of Titania Nanowires T = 210 ˚C, P = 350 W, t = 2 hrs Chung C., Chung T. & Yang T., (2008). Rapid Synthesis of Titania Nanowires by Microwave-Assisted Hydrothermal Treatments. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., Vol. 47, No. 7, pp. 2301-2307.
TiO2 Photocatalysts T = 393, 423 K, t = 15, 30, 60 min Addamo M., Bellardita M., Carriazo C., Paola A., Milioto S., Palmisano L. & Rives V., (2008). Inorganic gels as precursors of TiO2photocatalysts prepared by low temperature microwave or thermal treatment. Appl. Catalysis B: Environmental, Vol. 84,pp. 742-748.
Titanate Nanowires T = 210 ˚C, P = 350 W, t = 5 hrs Chang M., Chung C., Deka J., Lin C. & Chung T., (2008). Mechanical properties of microwave hydrothermally synthesized titanate nanowires. Nanotechnology, Vol. 19, pp. 025710.
MesoporousAlPO4-5 (AFI) Zeotype T = 180 - 200 ˚C, t = 0.5 - 2 hrs Utchariyajit K. &Wongkasemjit S., (2008). Structural aspects of mesoporous AlPO4-5 (AFI) zeotype using microwave radiation and alumatrane precursor. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, Vol. 114, pp. 175-184.
Zn,Al-CO3 Layered Double Hydroxides T = 100, 125 ˚C, t = 30, 60, 180, 300 min Benito P., Guinea I., Labajos F., Rocha J. & Rives V., (2008). Microwave-hydrothermally aged Zn,Alhydrotalcite-like compounds: Influence of the composition and the irradiation conditions. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, Vol. 110, pp. 292-302.
Ni-Al, Zn-Al Hydrotalcite T = 100, 125, 150, 175 ˚C, t = 5 - 300 min Benito P., Herrero M., Barriga C., Labajos F. & Rives V., (2008). Microwave-Assisted Homogeneous Precipitation of Hydrotalcites by Urea Hydrolysis. Inorg. Chem., Vol. 47, No. 12, pp. 5453-5463.
Synthesis, Passivation and Stabilization of Nano (particles, rods & wires) P = 650 W (60%), t = 10 sec to mins Abdelsayed V., Panda A. B., Glaspell G. P. & El-Shall M. S., (2008). Synthesis, Passivation and Stabilization of Nanoparticles, Nanorods and Nanowires by Microwave Irradiation. ACS Symposium Series, Vol. 996, pp. 225-247.
LaPO4:RE (RE=Ce,Tb,Eu) and In2O3:Sn (ITO) T = 300 ˚C, t = 0 - 30 sec Buhler G., Stay M. &Feldmann C., (2007). Ionic liquid based approach to nanoscale functional materials. Green Chemistry, Vol. 9, pp. 924-926.
ZnIn2S4 Submicrospheres T = 200 ˚C, t = 10 min Hu X., Yu J., Gong J. &Quan Li., (2007). Rapid Mass Production of Hierarchically Porous ZnIn2S4Submicrospheres via a Microwave-SolvothermalProcess.;Cryst. GrowthDes.,Vol. 7, No. 12, pp. 2444-2448.
Co2+ in Layered Double Hydroxides T = 100, 125 ˚C, t = 10, 30, 60, 180 min Herrero M., Benito P., Labajos F. &Rives V., (2007).Stabilization of Co2+ in layered double hydroxides (LDHs) by microwave-assisted ageing. J. Solid State Chem., Vol. 180, pp. 873-884.
MFI Zeolite Membranes T = 80, 120 ˚C, P = 250, 400 W, t = 60, 90 min Motuzas J., Heng S., Lau P., Yeung K.,Beresnevicius Z. &Julbe A., (2007). Ultra-rapid production of MFI membranes by coupling microwave-assisted synthesis with either ozone or calcination treatment. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, Vol. 99, pp. 197-205.
Titanate Nanotubes T = 110, 130, 150, 175 ˚C, P = 70, 200, 400, 700 W,t = 1.5, 3, 6, 12 hrs Ou H., Lo S. &Liou Y., (2007).Microwave-induced titanate nanotubes and the corresponding behavior after thermal treatment. Nanotechnology, Vol. 18, pp. 175702.
α-Fe2O3 Nanoarchitectures T = 120 - 220 ˚C, t = 10 min Hu X., Yu J. &Gong J., (2007). Fast Production of Self-Assembled Hierarchical α-Fe2O3Nanoarchitectures. J. Phys. Chem. C, Vol.111 , No. 30, pp. 11180-11185.
Nanosized Cobalt Oxides T = 100 ˚C, t = 10, 30, 60, 180, 300 min Herrero M., Benito P., Labajos F. & Rives V., (2007). Nanosize cobalt oxide-containing catalysts obtained through microwave-assisted methods. Catalysis Today, Vol. 128, pp. 129-137.
Nanorods and Nanoplates of Rare Earth Oxides P = 650 W (70%) Panda A. B., Glaspell G. & El-Shall M. S., (2007). Microwave Synthesis and Optical Properties of Uniform Nanorods and Nanoplates of Rare Earth Oxides. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B Letters. Vol. 111, pp. 1861-1864.
AlPO4-18 Films T = 150 - 200 ˚C, P = 1 kW Vilaseca M., Yagüe C., Coronas J. &Santamaria J., (2006).Development of QCM sensors modified by AlPO4-18 films. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, Vol. 117, pp. 143-150.
Modification of TiO2 T = 145 ˚C, P = 1.2 kW, t = 5 -360 min Wilson G., Matijasevich A., Mitchell D., Schulz J. &Will G., (2006). Modification of TiO2 for Enhanced Surface Properties: Finite Ostwald Ripening by a Microwave Hydrothermal Process. Langmuir, Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 2016-2027.
Nano-sized Hydroxyapatite
(Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2)
T = 85 - 300 ˚C, P = 250 - 650 W, t = 4 min Han J., Song H., Saito F. &Lee B., (2006). Synthesis of high purity nano-sized hydroxyapatite powder by microwave hydrothermal method. Mater. Chem. Phys., Vol. 99, No. 2-3, pp. 235-239.
Ba-exchanged zeolite A T = 150, 200, 230 ˚C, P = 1kW, t = 40, 60, 120 min Ferone C., Esposito S. &Pansini M., (2006). Microwave assisted hydrothermal conversion of Ba-exchanged zeolite A into metastable paracelsian. Microporous andMesoporous Materials, Vol. 96, pp. 9-13.
Nanocrystalline Anatase TiO2 P = 950 W, t = 2 - 6 min Murugan A., Samuel V. &Ravi V., (2006).Synthesis of nanocrystallineanatase TiO2 by microwave hydrothermal method. Materials Lett.,Vol. 60, pp. 479-480.
Semiconductor Rods and Wires P = 650 W (60%), t = 30 sec to 3 mins Panda A. B., Glaspell G. & El-Shall M. S., (2006). Microwave Synthesis of Highly Aligned Ultra Narrow Semiconductor Rods and Wires. J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 128, No. 9, pp. 2790-2791.
TiO2 Nanocrystals P = 650 W (33%), t = 30 mins Glaspell G., Panda A. B. & El-Shall M. S., (2006). Reversible paramagnetism to ferromagnetism in transition metal-doped TiO2 nanocrystals prepared by microwave irradiation. Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 100, pp. 124307-12412.
Silicalite-1 Seeds T = 70 - 180 ˚C, P = 250, 400 W,t = 10 - 150 min Motuzas J., Julbe A., Noble R. D., Guizard C., Beresnevicius Z. J. &Cot D., (2005).Rapid synthesis of silicalite-1 seeds by microwave assisted hydrothermal treatment. Microporous and MesoporousMaterials,Vol. 80, pp. 73-83.
Coaxial Ag/C Nanocables T = 200 ˚C,t = 20 min Yu J., Hu X., Lib Q. &Zhang L., (2005).Microwave-assisted synthesis and in-situ self-assembly of coaxial Ag/C nanocables. Chem. Commun., pp. 2704-2706.
M-Doped ZnO
(M = co, Cr, Fe, Mn, Ni)
P = 650 W (33%),t = 10 min Glaspell G., Dutta P. & Manivannan A., (2005). A Room-Temperature Synthesis of M-Doped ZnO (M = Co, Cr, Fe, Mn & Ni), Journal of Cluster Science, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 523-536.
Au and Pd Nanoparticle Catalysts P = 650 W (33%), t = 10 mins Glaspell G., Fuoco L. & El-Shall M. S., (2005). Microwave Synthesis of Supported Au and Pd Nanoparticle Catalysts for CO Oxidation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B Letters, Vol. 109, pp. 17350-17355.
AlPO4-5 T = 180 ˚C, P = 500 W, t = 17 min Lin C., Dipre J. &Yates M., (2004).Novel Aluminum Phosphate-5 Crystal Morphologies Synthesized by Microwave Heating of a Water-in-Oil Microemulsion. Langmuir, Vol. 20,No. 4, pp. 1039-1042.
Crystallization of Zeolite A P = 180, 360, 900, 1260 W, t = 10, 30, 40, 50 min
P = 360, 900 W, t = 5,10, 20,30, 50 min
P = 360 W, t = 15, 30, 40 min
Bonaccorsi L. &Proverbio E., (2003).Microwave assisted crystallization of zeolite A from dense gels. J. Cryst. Growth, Vol. 247, No. 3-4, pp. 555-562.
Sodalite/αAl2O3 Membranes T = 160 - 200˚C, P = 250 W,t = 15 - 180 min Julbe A., Motuzas J., Cazevielle F., Volle G. &Guizard C., (2003). Synthesis of sodalite/αAl2O3 composite membranes by microwave heating. Separation andPurification Technology, Vol. 32, pp. 139-149.
BaTiO3 Film T = 100 ˚C, t = 5, 10, 15, 30, 60 min Lee J., Kumagai N., Watanabe T. &Yoshimura M., (2002). Direct fabrication of oxide films by a microwave-hydrothermal method at low temperature. Solid State Ionics, Vol. 151, pp. 41-45.
Titanium Silicates T = 175 ˚C, P = 800 W Prasad M., Kamalakar G., Kulkarni S., Raghavan K., Rao K., Prasad P. &Madhavendra S., (2002). An improved process for the synthesis of titanium-rich titanium silicates (TS-1) under microwave irradiation. Catalysis Commun.,Vol. 3, pp. 399-404.
Hydrodechlorination of Chlorobenzene on Pd/Nb2O5 Catalysts T = 200 ˚C, P = 650 W, t = 5 min Gopinath R., Rao K., Prasad P., Madhavendra S., Narayanan S. &Vivekanandan G., (2002).Hydrodechlorination of chlorobenzene on Nb2O5-supported Pd catalysts: Influence of microwave irradiation during preparation on the stability of the catalysts. J. of Mol. Catalysis A: Chemical, Vol. 181, pp. 215-220.
Co-, Co-Zn and Ni-Zn Ferrite Powders T = 120, 150, 180, 200 ˚C, t = 30 min Kim C. K., Lee J. H., Katoh S., Murakami R. &Yoshimura M., (2001). Synthesis of Co-, Co-Zn and Ni-Zn ferrite powders by the microwave hydrothermal method. Mater. Res. Bull., pp. 2241-2250.
Uniform Pure and Dye-Loaded AlPO4-5 Crystals T = 145 - 170 ˚C, P = 1 kW, t = 5 - 60 min Ganschow M., Schulz-Ekloff G., Wark M., Wendschuh-Josties M. &Wohrle D., (2001). Microwave-assisted preparation of uniform pure and dye-loaded AlPO4-5 crystals with different morphologies for use as microlaser systems. J.Mater. Chem., Vol. 11, pp. 1823-1827.
Synthesis of AlPO4-5 T = 180 - 190 ˚C, P = 900 W, t = 8 min Braun I., Schulz-Ekloff G. &Lautenschläger W., (1998).Synthesis of AlPO4-5 in a microwave-heated, continuous-flow, high-pressure tube reactor. Microporous andMesoporous Materials, Vol. 23, pp. 79-81.

Table 1.

Summary of selected materials prepared using microwave heating with conditions and apporiate references listed.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the U.S. Department of Energy for financial support of this work provided through the Center for Advanced Separation Technologies.

References

  1. 1. Addamo M. Bellardita M. Carriazo C. Paola A. Milioto S. Palmisano L. Rives V. 2008 Inorganic gels as precursors of TiO2 photocatalysts prepared by low temperature microwave or thermal treatment. Appl. Catalysis B: Environmental, 84 742 748 .
  2. 2. Agmon N. 1996 Tetrahedral Displacement: The Molecular Mechanism behind the Debye relaxation in Water. J. Phys. Chem., 100 1072 1080 .
  3. 3. Barison S. Fabrizio M. Fasolin S. Montagner F. Mortalò C. 2010 A microwave-assisted sol-gel Pechini method for the synthesis of BaCe0.65Zr0.20Y0.15O3−δ powders. Mater. Res. Bull., 45 1171 1176 .
  4. 4. Barthel J. Bachhaber K. Buchner R. Hetzenauer H. 1990 Dielectric Spectra of some common solvents in the Microwave Region: Water and Lower Alcohols. Chem. Phys. Lett., 165 369 373 .
  5. 5. Burgardt P. Seehra M. S. 1977 Magnetic susceptibility of iron pyrite (FeS2) between 4.2 and 620 K. Solid State Commun., 22 2 153 156 .
  6. 6. Chang M. Lin C. Deka J. Chang F. Chung C. 2009 Nanomechanical characterization of microwave hydrothermally synthesized titania nanowires. J. Phys. D:Appl. Phys., 42 145105
  7. 7. Chatterjee I. Misra M. 1991 Electromagnetic and thermal modeling of microwave drying of fine coal. Miner Metall Process, 8 110 114 .
  8. 8. Chen X. Yan W. Cao X. Yu J. Xu R. 2009 Fabrication of silicate-1 crystals with tunable aspect ratios by microwave-assisted solvothermal synthesis. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 119 217 222 .
  9. 9. Cutmore N. G. Evans T. G. Mc Ewan A. J. Roger C. A. Stoddard S. L. 2000 Low Frequency Microwave Technique for On-Line Measurement of Moisture. Mineral Engineering, 13 1615 1622 .
  10. 10. Debye P. 1929 Polar Molecules, The Chemical Catalog Company, NY.
  11. 11. Gopinath R. Rao K. Prasad P. Madhavendra S. Narayanan S. . Vivekanandan G. 2002 Hydro dechlorination of chlorobenzene on Nb2O5-supported Pd catalysts: Influence of microwave irradiation during preparation on the stability of the catalysts. J. of Mol. Catalysis A: Chemical, 181 215 220 .
  12. 12. Hu X. Yu J. Gong J. 2007 Fast Production of Self-Assembled Hierarchical α-Fe2O3 Nanoarchitectures. J. Phys. Chem. C, 111 30 11180 11185 .
  13. 13. Jagadeesh M. S. Seehra M. S. 1981 Thermomagnetic studies of conversion of pyrite and marcasite in different atmospheres (vacuum, H2, He and CO). J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 14 2153 2167 .
  14. 14. Kaatze U. 1989 Complex permittivity of water as a function of frequency and temperature. J. Chem. Eng. Data, 34 371 374 .
  15. 15. Kim C. K. Lee J. H. Katoh S. Murakami R. . Yoshimura M. 2001 Synthesis of Co-, Co-Zn and Ni-Zn ferrite powders by the microwave hydrothermal method. Mater. Res. Bull., 2241 2250 .
  16. 16. Kittel C. 1996 Introduction to Solid State Physics, (Seventh Edition), John Wiley & Sons, Inc.), NY.
  17. 17. Lester E. Kingman S. 2004 The effect of microwave preheating on five different coals. Fuel, 83 1941 1947 .
  18. 18. Li Y. Yang . W. 2008 Microwave synthesis of zeolite membranes: A review. Journal of Membrane Science, 316 3 17 .
  19. 19. Lidström P. Tierney J. Wathey B. Westman J. 2001 Microwave assisted organic synthesis- a review. Tetrahedron, 57 9225 9283 .
  20. 20. Lindroth D. P. 1985 Microwave drying of fine coal. US Bureau of Mines Report # 9005, US Department of Interior.
  21. 21. Marland S. Han B. Merchant A. Rowson N. 2000 The effect of microwave radiation on coal grindability. Fuel, 79 1283 1288 .
  22. 22. Marland S. Merchant A. Rowson N. 2001 Dielectric properties of coal. Fuel, 80 1839 1849 .
  23. 23. Merabet M. Bose T. K. 1988 Dielectric Measurements of Water in the Radio and Microwave Frequencies by Time Domain Reflectometry. J. Phys. Chem., 92 6149 6150 .
  24. 24. Perkin R. M. 1980 The heat and mass transfer characteristics of boiling point drying using radio frequency and microwave electromagnetic fields. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 23 687 695 .
  25. 25. Ponte D. G. Prieto I. F. Vair P. F. Luengo J. C. G. 1996 Determination of moisture content in power station coal using microwaves. Fuel, 75 2 133 138 .
  26. 26. Prasad M. Kamalakar G. Kulkarni S. Raghavan K. Rao K. Prasad P. . Madhavendra S. 2002 An improved process for the synthesis of titanium-rich titanium silicates (TS-1) under microwave irradiation. Catalysis Commun.,3 399 404 .
  27. 27. Seehra M. S. Kalra A. Manivannan A. 2007 Dewatering of fine coal slurries by selective heating with microwaves. Fuel, 86 829 834 .
  28. 28. Standish N. Worner H. Kaul H. 1988 Microwave drying of brown coal agglomerates. J. Microwave Power EM Energy, 23 171 175 .
  29. 29. Utchariyajit K. . Wongkasemji S. 2010 Effect of synthesis parameters on mesoporous SAPO-5 with AFI-type formation via microwave radiation using alumatrane and silatrane precursors. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 135 116 123 .
  30. 30. Vicente I. Salagre P. Cesteros Y. Guirado F. Medina F. Sueiras J. 2009 Fast microwave synthesis of hectorite. Appl. Clay Sci., 43 103 107 .
  31. 31. Vicente I. Salagre P. Cesteros Y. Medina F. Sueiras J. 2010 Microwave-assisted synthesis of saponite. Appl. Clay Sci., 48 26 31 .
  32. 32. Wilson G. Matijasevich A. Mitchell D. Schulz J. . Will G. 2006 Modification of TiO2 for Enhanced Surface Properties: Finite Ostwald Ripening by a Microwave Hydrothermal Process. Langmuir, 22 5 2016 2027 .
  33. 33. Wu L. Bi J. Li Z. Wang X. . Fu X. 2008 Rapid preparation of Bi2WO6 photocatalyst with nanosheet morphology via microwave-assisted solvothermal synthesis. Catalysis Today, 131 1-4 , 15 20 .
  34. 34. Yanshou L. Weishen Y. 2008 Microwave synthesis of zeolite membranes: A review. Journal of Membrane Science, 316 3 17 .

Written By

Mohindar Seehra and Vivek Singh

Submitted: 04 April 2011 Published: 27 July 2011