Open access peer-reviewed chapter - ONLINE FIRST

Religious Disorientation in the Digital Transformation: An Islamic Review

Written By

Mustaqim Pabbajah

Submitted: 12 January 2024 Reviewed: 13 January 2024 Published: 17 May 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.1004235

Advances in Digital Transformation IntechOpen
Advances in Digital Transformation Personal Virtual Information Kiosks Enabled W... Edited by Eduard Babulak

From the Edited Volume

Advances in Digital Transformation - Personal Virtual Information Kiosks Enabled With Holographic Multimedia & Simultaneous Translation [Working Title]

Prof. Eduard Babulak

Chapter metrics overview

29 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Digital transformation has caused religious disorientation since religious literacy nowadays is accessible openly. This article seeks the shifting orientation of religious understanding due to the intensity of digital transformation using Islam as a measuring tool. This research relies on the qualitative descriptive method using the netnography approach. The results indicate that the religious orientation shifting in society is caused by three main factors: the open accessibility of online religious literacy, the strong urge of people to explore religion, and the widespread distribution of religion-based platforms. Consequently, religious understanding, which should be the focus of religious teachings, has shifted to a more general religious spirit. Thus, the ongoing digital transformation not only provides information but also generates religious knowledge that has the potential to influence one’s religious understanding. Therefore, this study advocates the need to strengthen religious literacy by utilizing technology wisely to align religiosity with essential religious teaching and understanding.

Keywords

  • religious disorientation
  • digital transformation
  • religious spirit
  • religious understanding
  • Islamic review

1. Introduction

The presence of technology through several religion-based digital devices is the cause of people’s religious understanding disorientation. The advancement of information technology is characterized by the increasingly intense penetration of new media in various sectors of life such as economy, politics, culture, and religion. This phenomenon further confirms changes in communication patterns from face-to-face to new media communication and from conventional media models to digitalized models [1]. Indonesian Internet Service Providers Association (APJII) in the 2019-quarter II/2020 period reveals that the number of internet users in Indonesia reached 196.7 million. There was a significant increase of 23.5 million people, or 8.9%, compared to the data in 2018 [2]. The internet users play an essential role in realizing digital transformation [3]. Under these conditions, with its rapid developments, digitalization is inevitable, including in shaping various orientations of religious understanding.

The digital transformation study concerning religion has gained attention from researchers and academics. Several scholars have explored the significance of digital transformation in today’s world. The existing studies indicate three key trends. Firstly, religion is practically understood through various digital tools [4, 5, 6]. Secondly, digitizing people’s lives leads to shifts in religious patterns [6, 7, 8]. Third, digitalization is used as a medium for learning and religious education [9, 10, 11, 12], even digital media as an important competitive tool in the world of education [13]. Despite these trends, not many studies have explored how intensive digital transformation has resulted in the transformation of religion and the religious understanding of communities.

This paper responds to existing studies by focusing on disorientation from religious understanding to religious spirit in the digital space. Thus, this current research proposes three primary objectives to discover: (1) how the orientation of religious understanding in the digital space takes place, (2) how the spirit of religion is realized in the digital space, and (3) how the digitization of religion has implications for shifting religious understanding to religious spirit in the digital space. Those three questions are the main topics discussed sequentially in the discourse of this writing.

The underlying assumption in this paper is that the intensity of religious digitization is an avoidable, where people can quickly obtain religious literacy through various sources in the digital space. The speed of information and religious literacy from physical to virtual space has shaped religious understanding and ideology. In addition, the rise of faith or religion-based platforms offering various religious features is critical in shifting people’s religious understanding. Although it affects religious fervor, it has not entirely coincided with an accurate understanding of religion. Therefore, thorough oversight of the digitalization of religion is necessary to guarantee the responsible use of digital media.

Advertisement

2. Methods

Religious practices in the digital space are the object of this investigation since the shift in societal understanding of religion is occurring due to the ongoing intensity of religious digitalization. This research adopts a qualitative descriptive approach, using data from observational and documentary studies. The study elucidates the reality of societal and religious practices based on online media observations. The method involves scrutinizing social phenomena the community practices in the digital space, specifically focusing on religion [1]. It is based on the method introduced by Kozinets in which data collection through the internet with a netnography approach [14]. The existing data are analyzed descriptively utilizing the concept of digitalization and religious understanding and then displayed narratively.

Advertisement

3. Literature review

3.1 Religious disorientation

Religious orientation is when an individual or a group consciously intends to align themselves with a religious value system. However, an individual’s or group’s use of religion is often disoriented, indicating an individual’s mismatch in understanding religious values. Religion and value systems play an essential role in civilization, and these value differences can lead to social conflict [15]. Religious disorientation can also affect mental health as religious orientation provides a moral compass in social life and spirituality [16]. Therefore, religious disorientation reflects a weakening of faith in the context of spiritual struggles, including doubts about religion.

Altinyelken [17] highlights how learners experience religious and belief disorientation, which can be influenced by various factors such as the attitudes of educators and peers, language proficiency, age, and a lack of critical thinking. Additionally, Cohen and McClymond [18] identify moral injury as a form of disorientation that occurs when individuals or groups violate moral and religious values, leading to emotional experiences for religious believers [19]. Various sources also mention that religious disorientation can be related to conflict, stress, and changes in social and religious life for individuals and groups. Triggering factors may include interactions, changes in understanding, injustices, gaps between assumptions and reality, and experiences of death and illness [20]. These findings suggest that religious disorientation can significantly impact individuals’ faith structures and lives.

3.2 Digital transformation

Digital transformation integrates technology into various aspects of human life, such as social, economy, education, and religion [21]. The goal is to connect the digital and physical worlds to create an interactive experience [22]. It represents a significant change in how society interacts and expands beyond the physical realm to the digital realm [23]. Furthermore, Feliciano-Cestero et al. [24] state that digital transformation is an evolutionary process that affects society’s structure, values, positions, and ecosystems. As a result, digital transformation profoundly impacts the relationships between individuals and groups in everyday life.

Digital transformation aims to provide convenience and high-quality services to the public, with mobile technology playing a crucial role in achieving it. Various forms of media, such as live broadcasts, news articles, videos, and infographics, are shared on digital platforms and social networks [25]. However, implementing digital transformation in organizations requires cultural changes and constant experimentation. In education, universities can leverage digital transformation to provide the best education and contribute to societal development. However, there is a challenge in optimizing both technical and social aspects to create sustainable added value and improve the quality of life [26]. Overall, digital transformation offers the potential for improving efficiency and user experience across various sectors. However, it requires careful consideration of technical and social factors to ensure long-term success [22].

3.3 Islam and technology

The Islamic perspective is a guiding principle for individuals, groups, and society to navigate life. It emphasizes the importance of religious values in shaping thoughts and actions [27]. By integrating material and spiritual aspects, this perspective offers a comprehensive understanding of social phenomena and the dynamics of life [28]. An Islamic perspective provides people with a foundation to make choices and evaluate different aspects of life, offering development opportunities that contribute to prosperity and peace [29]. However, there are limitations to the Islamic perspective to prevent social conflicts [30]. Some key elements, such as knowledge based on Islam and adherence to the core principles of Islam, need to be incorporated to address challenges brought about by changes, such as digital technology.

The use of digital technology in the Islamic sphere has led to a transformation of modern media and the unification of Muslims [31]. Online platforms and communication technology are crucial in disseminating information and promoting Islamic learning [32]. These platforms have eliminated space and time limitations, allowing Muslims to access knowledge about Islam from anywhere in the world. They have also introduced a new style of preaching that covers various aspects of Islam such as aqidah akhlah, fiqh, and Islamic history [33]. The Islamic perspective understands the contextual nature of technology and adapts to the changing times. The perspective allows it to transcend geographical boundaries and contribute to constructing a transnational identity for Muslims [34].

Advertisement

4. Results and discussion

4.1 Disorientation of religious understanding in the digital sphere

The dynamics of religious life can influence values and perspectives on religion. Religious understanding is associated with interpreting religious teachings, actions, and speech within a context [35]. Individuals and groups undergo a learning process to understand and embody these values in social life [36]. However, there is a possibility for a paradigm shift, where old perspectives are replaced with new ones, leading to a transformation in religious understanding [37]. This shift may reshape the perception of religion from solely a doctrine of values to a cultural document shared and embraced within a civilization [38]. This change in understanding can also have consequences, such as individuals inclining toward extreme actions. Ultimately, religious understanding is complex and subject to change, impacting individuals’ interpretation and engagement with religion [39].

In recent studies, it has been observed that there is a shift in the orientation of religious understanding among different groups. Santalia and Galib [40] state that university students who were once open and tolerant toward religion have now adopted a more radical and intolerant religious model. This shift in understanding has led to an escalation of violence in the name of religion. Furthermore, Ilhami [41] also notices a change in the orientation of religious understanding during religious celebrations, where holidays of one religion are now being embraced and celebrated by followers of other religions. Ref. [42] explains how the understanding of hadith in Islam has experienced a paradigm shift, with different approaches used to interpret daily religious messages. Tambunan and Simon [43] highlight the impact of the digital era as religious figures adopt sociological roles using piety to deceive the wider community. As a result of these shifting understandings, religion is no longer seen as something sacred and can easily be undermined [44]. In summary, there is a noticeable shift in the orientation of religious understanding in various contexts, which has implications for tolerance, violence, and the perception of religion itself.

4.2 Religiosity spirit

Ongoing digitalization has changed the way of religion in society. It can be observed from several social media showing a tendency for the religious spirit of the community in the public sphere to increase significantly. Meanwhile, religious understanding is neglected in the life of the nation and state. Currently, in some circles, the spirit of nationalism has begun to weaken because it is triggered by religious fervor [45]. In this case, religious spirituality includes inner strength that gives purpose to physical life. Terminologically, religious spirituality is subjective and varied in interpreting the relationships that exist in life [46].

Religiosity spirit discusses the concept of religious spirituality and its meaning in human life [47]. According to Selvam, religious spirituality can be positive or negative, depending on its significance and role in individuals’ lives. It is closely connected to the inner realm of humans and goes beyond specific beliefs and practices. Instead, it is seen as an activity that explores existential questions and seeks identity, including notions of sacredness and the development of religious rituals [48, 49, 50]. Thus, religious spirituality involves a relationship between human spirituality and the experience and meaning of life. In summary, religious spirituality is a complex and dynamic aspect of human existence that encompasses the search for meaning and identity concerning existential matters and religious practices.

Religious spirituality in a multidimensional context has given individuals the freedom to construct and reproduce religious understanding. It also gives meaning to identity and psychology based on diverse religious and spiritual sources [51]. Wuthnow [52] distinguishes the concept of spirituality into two aspects: dwelling and seeking spirituality. Dwelling spirituality relates to tangible elements of religion such as worship, rituals, clear boundaries, and symbols of religious identity. In comparison, seeking spirituality involves an open search for the possibility of encountering diversity such as new teachings, new experiences, and new ritual practices. Religious spirituality in social life is interconnected and builds strength and power over individuals with representations of their lives. Thus, multidimensional experiences generally affect people’s religious spirituality [53]. If the practice of religion only results from the product of media, then the religion becomes less sacred. This kind of religious practice usually leads to the desacralization of religion [54].

4.3 Digital transformation and the disorientation of religious understanding

The rapid development of technology has led to a renewed interest in online religious literacy. As technology increasingly dominates our lives, social media platforms allow events in the public sphere, including discussions on religion, symbols, and language [55]. Online religion can be divided into two categories, one that allows individuals to freely express themselves and engage with others and one that solely provides religious information without fostering interaction [56]. Helland also draws attention to the desacralization of online religion, where the act of reading or speaking statements and clicking a mouse are seen as performative actions equivalent to authentic religious rituals. While some view religiosity in online spaces as an extension of their religious interactions, others believe that proper religious practice requires dedication in the physical world. Overall, the impact of technology on religious engagement is complex, with both positive and negative implications [56].

The advent of digital space has significantly impacted society, including its role in shaping various religious perspectives. It is particularly evident in countries, such as Indonesia, with its diverse population and rich religious and cultural traditions. The widespread use of digital media, especially during the pandemic, has intensified the dissemination of religious knowledge and understanding [57]. The internet, in particular, has become a dominant force in influencing community behavior and religious practices. As a result, there has been an acceleration in the sharing and socialization of religious beliefs, leading to greater mobility within communities [58]. The accessibility and availability of digital platforms have made it easier for individuals to engage in religious discussions and explore different religious views. This transformation in the religious landscape highlights the changing dynamics and cultural shifts brought about by digital technology.

Religious orientation in the digital space, highlighting three key aspects. First, the ease of learning religion online provides instant understanding without direct guidance from religious authorities. Second, there is a shift toward pragmatism and materialism in religious understanding rather than being grounded in strong religious principles. This shift aligns with Ishomuddin’s [59] perspective on the changing religious landscape. Third, religion is often displayed physically online but fails to incorporate essential religious values. Instead, religion in the digital space tends to be understood textually, which can have counterproductive consequences for religious communities. The textual understanding of religion through social media platforms can lead to extreme and intolerant attitudes, contradicting the teachings of religion itself [60]. It highlights the potential negative implications of a text-based comprehension of religion in the digital era.

Advertisement

5. Conclusion

This paper emphasizes the importance of religious literacy in the digital age. It highlights three key points regarding the impact of digital transformation on religious understanding. Firstly, the current disorientation in religious beliefs is closely linked to the widespread availability of online religious information. The accessibility to religious content has contributed to confusion and lack of clarity. Secondly, the rapid digital transformation has resulted in a shift away from a deep understanding of religion toward a superficial understanding that is easily accessible. Lastly, digitizing religion has led to a change in the orientation of religious understanding, focusing on the practical aspects of religion rather than a comprehensive understanding. In essence, the digital space has altered religious orientation, causing a shift toward a pragmatic display of religious spirit without the need for in-depth religious learning.

Furthermore, this study explores the reality of people’s religious practices in the digital space and compares it to previous studies on the accessibility of religious literacy through digitalization. It also maps the emergence of community problems related to religious understanding in the digital era. The study uses a netnography approach to observe religion in the digital space but acknowledges the limitation of relying solely on observations rather than empirical data from the community. Consequently, further research is needed to examine the phenomenon of religion in the digital era thoroughly. The dynamic changes in people’s religious lives due to advancements in technology, particularly in searching for religious knowledge, call for a comprehensive understanding of the complexities and challenges of digitalization. The hope is that with proper knowledge and wisdom, the negative impacts of technology on religious understanding can be minimized.

References

  1. 1. Pabbajah M, Jubba H, Widyanti R, Pabbajah T, Iribaram S. Internet of Religion: Islam and New Media Construction of Religious Movements in Indonesia. EAI; 2020. DOI: 10.4108/eai.1-10-2019.2291750
  2. 2. Katadata. Jumlah Pengguna Internet di Indonesia Capai 196,7 Juta. Katadata.co.id; 2020
  3. 3. Ramli AM. Dirjen PPI: Survei Penetrasi Pengguna Internet di Indonesia. kominfo.go.id; 2020
  4. 4. Beznjuk D, Tsybulskaya N. Religious Practices Online: Belarus Experience. Logos Prax. 2019;18(2):39-47. DOI: 10.15688/lp.jvolsu.2019.2.4
  5. 5. Shebalina EO, Shebalin DD. Digitalization in activities of non-state actors: Example of the church. In: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Springer; 2021
  6. 6. Fedorova M. Religious identity in the modern digital world. Социодинамика. 2020;(6):66-79. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7144.2020.6.33085
  7. 7. Isetti G, Innerhofer E, Pechlaner H, De Rachewiltz M. Religion in the Age of Digitalization: From New Media to Spiritual Machines. 2020
  8. 8. Chernichkin D. Transformation of religious communication under the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Logos Prax. 2021;20(2):56-64. DOI: 10.15688/lp.jvolsu.2021.2.7
  9. 9. Pabbajah M, Jubba H, Abdullah I, Pabbajah MTH. From the scriptural to the virtual: Indonesian engineering students responses to the digitalization of Islamic education. Teaching Theology and Religion. 2021;24(2):122-130. DOI: 10.1111/teth.12581
  10. 10. Viktoruk E, Mineev V, Artemyeva S. Digitization of education: A socio-pedagogical experiment from the perspective of social philosophy. Science Research and Development Socio-Humanitarian Research and Technology. 2020. DOI: 10.12737/2587-912x-2020-15-19
  11. 11. Jamil S. From digital divide to digital inclusion: Challenges for wide-ranging digitalization in Pakistan. Telecommunications Policy. 2021;45(8):102206. DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102206
  12. 12. Shityakova NP, Verkhovykh IV, Zabrodina IV. The attitude of teachers to the opportunities and risks of spiritual and moral education in the context of digitalization. Perspekt. Nauk. i Obraz. 2020;48(6):446-458. DOI: 10.32744/PSE.2020.6.34
  13. 13. Rozanova NM. Competitive education in the third millenium: Quo vadis? World Economo and International Relations. 2020;64(11):23-30. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-11-23-30
  14. 14. Bowler GM. Netnography: A method specifically designed to study cultures and communities online. The Qualitative Report. 2010;15(5):1270-1275. DOI: 10.46743/2160-3715/2010.1341
  15. 15. Musek J. Values related to the religious adherence. Psihol. teme. 2017;26(2):451-480. DOI: 10.31820/pt.26.2.10
  16. 16. Jurjewicz H. How spirituality leads to resilience a case study of immigrants. European Journal of Science and Theology. 2016;12(4):17-25
  17. 17. Altinyelken HK. Critical thinking and non-formal Islamic education: Perspectives from young Muslims in the Netherlands. Contemporary Islam. 2021;15(3):267-285. DOI: 10.1007/s11562-021-00470-6
  18. 18. Cohen AI, McClymond K. Moral Injury and the Humanities. New York: Routledge; 2023
  19. 19. Preece C, Rodner V, Rojas-Gaviria P. Landing in affective atmospheres. Marketing Theory. 2022;22(3):359-380. DOI: 10.1177/14705931221076561
  20. 20. Kalfoss MH, Nygaard MR, Kleiven T, Nilsen M. Sources of weakened spiritual faith among Norwegian adults. Journal of Study Spiritual. 2020;10(2):140-154. DOI: 10.1080/20440243.2020.1812887
  21. 21. Dang-Pham D, Hoang AP, Vo DT, Kautz K. Digital Kaizen: An approach to digital transformation. Australasian Journal of Information Systems. 2022;26(1):1-28. DOI: 10.3127/AJIS.V26I0.3851
  22. 22. Govers M, van Amelsvoort P. A theoretical essay on socio-technical systems design thinking in the era of digital transformation. Grup. Interaktion. Organ. Zeitschrift für Angew. Organ. 2023;54(1):27-40. DOI: 10.1007/s11612-023-00675-8
  23. 23. Laskar MH. Examining the emergence of digital society and the digital divide in India: A comparative evaluation between urban and rural areas. Frontiers in Sociology. 2023;8(1):1-10. DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1145221
  24. 24. Feliciano-Cestero MM, Ameen N, Kotabe M, Paul J, Signoret M. Is digital transformation threatened? A systematic literature review of the factors influencing firms’ digital transformation and internationalization. Journal of Business Research. 2023;157(1):113546. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113546
  25. 25. Albadri HA. The convergence of traditional media to the digital communicative environment – The reality and gap. Information Science Letter. 2023;12(4):1827-1839. DOI: 10.18576/isl/120408
  26. 26. Alenezi M, Akour M. Digital transformation blueprint in higher education: A case study of PSU. Sustainability. 2023;15(10):8204. DOI: 10.3390/su15108204
  27. 27. Aldulaimi SH. Fundamental Islamic perspective of work ethics. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research. 2016;7(1):59-76. DOI: 10.1108/JIABR-02-2014-0006
  28. 28. Hambali N, Paudzi HM, Sallam ANSM. Islamic perspective on the concepts of interaction among multicultural society. J. Akidah Pemikir. Islam. 2021;23(2):249-274. DOI: 10.22452/afkar.vol23no2.7
  29. 29. Sami FA-Z, Abdul Rahim A. Ethics & values in construction industry from islamic perspective. Planning Malaysia Journal. 2017;15(1):319-326. DOI: 10.21837/pmjournal.v15.i6.248
  30. 30. Zaim H, Demir A, Budur T. Ethical leadership, effectiveness and team performance: An Islamic perspective. Middle East Journal of Management. 2021;8(1):42. DOI: 10.1504/MEJM.2021.111991
  31. 31. Pontzen B. ‘Caring for the people’: ZuriaFM – An Islamic radio station in Asante, Ghana, Islam. Africa. 2018;9(2):209-231. DOI: 10.1163/21540993-00902007
  32. 32. Syarif. Building plurality and unity for various religions in the digital era: Establishing islamic values for Indonesian students. Journal of Social Studies and Educational Research. 2020;11(2):111-119
  33. 33. Mokhtar A, Bahari CA. Social media and Islamic ethics: An insight to instagram use by Muslim university students in Malaysia. Intellect. Discourse. 2021;29(1):175-206
  34. 34. Arrahman F, Lhaksmana KM, Murdiansyah DT. Topic Classification of Islamic Consultation Question and Answer Using Supervised Learning. ieeexplore; 2021. DOI: 10.1109/ICADEIS52521.2021.9701944
  35. 35. Lubis K et al. Lingkungan minoritas islam di desa labuhan kecamatan. Journal of Somasi. 2022;3(1):62-75. DOI: 10.53695/js.v3i1.669
  36. 36. Wulandari N. Pengaruh Konformitas dan Pemahaman Agama Terhadap Perilaku Seksual Pada Siswa MAN 2 Samarinda. Psikoborneo J. Ilm. Psikol. 2014;2(1):1-6. DOI: 10.30872/psikoborneo.v2i1.3566
  37. 37. Ulya I, Abid N. Pemikiran Thomas Kuhn dan Relevansinya Terhadap Keilmuan Islam. Keagamaan: Fikr. J. Ilmu Aqidah dan Stud; 2015
  38. 38. Rosyid A. Pergeseran paradigma agama dan sains di tengah pandemik covid dalam kaca mata thomas kuhn. ASKETIK. 2020;4(2):234-254. DOI: 10.30762/ask.v4i2.2415
  39. 39. Irama Y, Zamzami M. Telaah Atas Formula Pengarusutamaan Moderasi Beragama Kementerian Agama Tahun 2019-2020, KACA (Karunia Cahaya Allah). Journal of Dialogis Ilmu Ushuluddin. 2021;11(1):65-89. DOI: 10.36781/kaca.v11i1.3244
  40. 40. Santalia I, Galib SA. Prodi studi agama-agama sebagai pelopor inklusifitas beragama: refleksi pengalaman prodi studi agama-agama uin alauddin makassar. Reli. J. Stud. AGAMA-AGAMA. 2019;15(1):1. DOI: 10.14421/rejusta.2019.1501-01
  41. 41. Ilhami H. Agama dan komunitas virtual: Studi pergeseran orientasi keagamaan di era digital. Mukad. J. Stud. Islam. 2022;7(1):26-39
  42. 42. Muhtador M. Dinamika Memahami Hadis Nabi: Tinjauan Historis dan Metodologis. Riwayah J. Stud. Hadis. 2019;3(2):185. DOI: 10.21043/riwayah.v3i2.3704
  43. 43. Tambunan E, Simon S. Virtualisasi tuhan: Menyelak Ownership Tokoh Agama. Charistheo J. Teol. dan Pendidik. Agama Kristen. Mar. 2022;1 (2):168-192. DOI: 10.54592/jct.v1i2.29
  44. 44. Setiansah M. Smartphonisasi agama: Transformasi perilaku beragama perempuan urban di era digital. Journal of Komun. 2015;10(1):1-10. DOI: 10.20885/komunikasi.vol10.iss1.art1
  45. 45. Amin N. Menyemai nasionalisme dari spirit agama: Upaya meredam radikalisme beragama. Journal of Theology. 2017;23(1):109-123. DOI: 10.21580/teo.2012.23.1.1762
  46. 46. Van Niekerk B. Religion and spirituality: What are the fundamental differences? HTS Teol. Stud./Theol. Stud. 2018;74(3):1-11. DOI: 10.4102/hts.v74i3.4933
  47. 47. Selvam SG. Towards religious-spirituality: A multidimensional matrix of religion and spirituality. Journal of the Study of Religions and Ideologies. 2013;12(36):129-152
  48. 48. Watts G. The religion of the heart: ‘Spirituality’ in late modernity. American Journal of Cultural Sociology. 2022;10(1):1-33. DOI: 10.1057/s41290-020-00106-x
  49. 49. Captari LE, Riggs SA, Stephen K. Attachment processes following traumatic loss: A mediation model examining identity distress, shattered assumptions, prolonged grief, and posttraumatic growth. Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy. 2021;13(1):94-103. DOI: 10.1037/tra0000555
  50. 50. Panzini RG, Mosqueiro BP, Zimpel RR, Bandeira DR, Rocha NS, Fleck MP. Quality-of-life and spirituality. International Review of Psychiatry. 2017;29(3):263-282. DOI: 10.1080/09540261.2017.1285553
  51. 51. Mahoney A, Shafranske EP. Envisioning an integrative paradigm for the psychology of religion and spirituality. In: APA Handbook of Psychology, Religion, and Spirituality (Vol 1): Context, Theory, and Research. American Psychological Association; 2012
  52. 52. Wuthnow R. New directions in the study of religion and economic life. In: The Handbook of Economic Sociology. Second ed. New Jersey, United States: Princeton University Press; 2010. pp. 603-626
  53. 53. Brandt PY. Religious and spiritual aspects in the construction of identity modelized as a constellation. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science. 2019;53(1):138-157. DOI: 10.1007/s12124-018-9436-8
  54. 54. Abraham IB, Stewart F. Desacralizing salvation in straight edge christianity and holistic spirituality. International Journal for the Study of New Religions. 2019;5(1):77-102. DOI: 10.1558/ijsnr.v5i1.77
  55. 55. Bunt GR. Religion and the Internet. In: The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Religion. Oxford Academic; 2009
  56. 56. Helland C. Online religion as lived religion: Methodological issues in the study of religious participation on the Internet. Online – Heidelberg Journal of Religious Internet. 2005;1(1):1-16. DOI: 10.11588/rel.2005.1.380
  57. 57. Pabbajah M, Abdullah I, Jubba H. Contested socioreligious reality: An-Nadzir, a non-mainstream Islamic movement in Indonesia. Intsernational Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Society. 2019;9(2):71-78. DOI: 10.18848/2154-8633/cgp/v09i02/71-78
  58. 58. Jubba H, Baharuddin T, Pabbajah M, Qodir Z. Dominasi Internet di Ruang Publik: Studi Terhadap Penyebaran Wacana Gerakan Bela Islam 212 di Indonesia. Al-Izzah J. Hasil-Hasil Penelit. 2020;15(1):10-13. DOI: 10.31332/ai.v0i0.1631
  59. 59. Ishomuddin I. The change of religious understanding from ideal-rationality to pragmatic-materialistic. el Harakah Jurnal Budaya Islam. 2017. DOI: 10.18860/el.v19i2.4186
  60. 60. Asif M, Ishtiaq A, Ahmad H, Aljuaid H, Shah J. Sentiment analysis of extremism in social media from textual information. Telematics and Informatics. 2020;48(1):101345. DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2020.101345

Written By

Mustaqim Pabbajah

Submitted: 12 January 2024 Reviewed: 13 January 2024 Published: 17 May 2024